Cancer probe at KC-area elementary school expands to former students, staff
After six teachers at one Liberty elementary school were diagnosed with breast cancer in the past five years, advocates desperate for answers are making a plea for more information.
They want to know if former students or past teachers at Warren Hills Elementary have been diagnosed with cancer or other illnesses since leaving the school, which has a 120 foot cell phone tower located 130 feet from the building. The goal, advocates say, is to understand the scope of what they may be dealing with and ultimately see what, if anything, is making people sick.
'It's important to know if former students, staff or teachers at Warren Hill Elementary have cancer or other illnesses related to the wireless radiation because often there is a long latency in cancer awareness or cancer diagnosis,' said Ellie Marks, founder of the California Brain Tumor Association, who has been working alongside Liberty parents and has spoken to the school board and superintendent about the dangers of cell towers.
'There's a long latency period between the time of exposure and the actual diagnosis,' Marks said. 'Students, staff or teachers could have been in the school and diagnosed 10 or even 20 or 30 years later with cancer.'
The search for information is the latest development at Warren Hills Elementary, where teachers have been concerned for years about a potential health risk at the Liberty school. The cell tower's close proximity has caused the most consternation, not just by local residents, but also by national experts. Questions have also centered around other potential environmental concerns, from water to soil and air quality.
On top of the six breast cancer diagnoses since 2020, plus another one in 2013, there have been at least three other cases of various cancers in staff at the school, according to anecdotal information provided to Clay County health officials.
After several reports in The Star about the diagnoses, parent Tiffany Schrader, a nurse, has heard from many who are worried whether the school is safe for children and those who work there, some of whom have offered their help with awareness efforts.
'We just need to find out what's causing it, if anything is,' Schrader said. 'Just do the research to try to help figure out what is going on. That's all we're asking to do. That's all the teachers have asked since day one.'
The push for answers and scrutiny at Warren Hills has gained traction in recent days. U.S. Rep. Sam Graves, a congressman who represents northern Missouri, including Liberty, asked the Department of Health and Human Services for help investigating the cancer cases.
And he alluded to students being diagnosed as well.
In a letter earlier this month to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, Graves asked for the leader's assistance in 'uncovering the root causes in the concerning number of cancer diagnoses amongst staff and students at Warren Hills Elementary School.'
A spokesperson for Graves said in an email to The Star last week that HHS received the request and asked for more information.
Several people — from health and school officials to parents and teachers — have heard anecdotes about former students getting cancer after leaving Warren Hills, but say there's nothing concrete at this point.
In early February, staff at Warren Hills sent an unsigned letter to Superintendent Jeremy Tucker asking for more information and a meeting. Staff said they had 'not felt heard, supported, or have seen the need of urgency to protect our Warren Hills family.'
And they told Tucker that they knew of numerous diagnoses of a variety of cancers in people at the school.
'We have not only had breast cancer diagnoses, but throat, cervical, brain, ovarian, and brain tumors,' staff said in a letter The Star received in a Sunshine Law request. 'Not all staff, but students as well. Six cases in the last two and a half years. One leading to the loss of our friend and teacher.'
Dallas Ackerman, a spokesperson with Liberty Public Schools, said the district doesn't have access to 'detailed data regarding students diagnosed with cancer.'
'But (district officials) do believe there have been a few over the course of the past two decades,' Ackerman said in an email. 'It's important to bear in mind that Warren Hills has an approximate annual student enrollment between 600-700 students, meaning that several thousand students would have attended the school over this period of time.'
Now, advocates hoping to learn more about the situation at Warren Hills, and whether something at the school is making individuals sick, want people to reach out. Marks and Schrader are asking for former students and teachers or staff who have been diagnosed with cancer or other illnesses since leaving the school to email cabraintumor@gmail.com.
'We're trying to get a bigger picture of those that have moved on, or those that used to go to school here,' said Schrader. 'Do they have complications now that they're older and they didn't realize that maybe they were predisposed to something at a young age?'
Teachers began asking questions in the fall of 2022, leading the district to ask the Clay County Public Health Center to initiate a study, which ultimately determined that breast cancer diagnoses at the school were in line with county and state figures.
In the fall, a beloved teacher died of cancer and soon after, another teacher was diagnosed with breast cancer. That brought the number of breast cancer diagnoses at Warren Hills to six since 2020 and seven since 2013.
It was a breaking point for many. Since then, the cry for additional testing and a review of the cancer cluster has only gotten louder.
That review is now happening.
On June 25, the Missouri Cancer Inquiry Committee will meet to formally review data provided to the members from Clay County health officials to determine if there is a cancer cluster at the Liberty school. The goal is to determine next steps.
Lisa Cox, a spokesperson for the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, said the purpose of the June meeting is to 'recommend initiating or not initiating a cancer inquiry (investigation).'
'DHSS staff will share their analysis of cancer incidence data and review of the environmental studies that the school district has already completed at Warren Hills,' Cox said.
After meeting with school district officials as well as health leaders from the state on multiple occasions, the Clay County Public Health Center (CCPHC) requested the review earlier this month.
'To date, the school has received information on a total of 7 breast cancer cases, 1 cervical, 1 brain and 1 throat cancer among their staff,' wrote Ashley Wegner, deputy director of the CCPHC, in her letter to the cancer inquiry committee. 'There are also potentially concerns about student populations as of 2025.'
Wegner also wrote to Warren Hills parents, staff and teachers about the requested inquiry. She told them that Clay County health officials will be 'partnering closely with the school district to follow through on procedures if the Missouri Cancer Inquiry Committee approves and initiates the inquiry process.'
'It's important to note that the CI (Cluster Inquiry) process focuses on determining if the number of cancer cases in a defined location meet a statistically abnormal level to support the need for further investigation,' Wegner wrote. 'If a true cluster is identified, CI staff will assist in the implementation of epidemiological studies, notify agencies responsible for remediation of existing environmental hazards and educate the community regarding the risk and response of state government and other concerned agencies regarding cancer locally.'
Wegner told The Star that the public health center provided information to the state that the school had received regarding the diagnoses of teachers and staff. She explained in the letter that 'one of the environmental concerns raised by school staff has been related to the on-site cell tower.'
And she told the committee that the school district 'investigated' the tower in 2022-2023 and has conducted 'multiple environmental and facility assessments' to explore other possible risk factors.
'We've also included that there have been parents that have come back and reported, 'Hey, my kiddo went here and they've developed other types of cancer that are not related to breast cancer,'' Wegner said. 'And so we have submitted all that to the state.
'We haven't been able to put a number to that because there is an entirely separate side of student health that is completely outside of the same arena that employee health would operate in. So we wanted to open it up and see what sort of questions might come about from that.'
At this time, though, Cox said the state is not looking at former students.
Wegner said it was her understanding that on June 25, the committee will 'either make a determination to open an inquiry or not or they will say, 'We're going to table this because we want more information.''
After The Star reported earlier this month that six parents at Warren Hills who were worried about health risks had been denied transfers for next year, additional people reached out to Schrader and others with growing concerns. One is a mom whose son went to Warren Hills for several years and was often sick at the school.
Schrader has communicated with the mom. She said her son 'had all kinds of health concerns' while at Warren Hills, from being sick often, to having trouble focusing and experiencing headaches.
When the family was gone on an extended trip, and away from the school, the boy didn't have any of those symptoms, the mom said.
'But then as soon as he went back to the school, it started again,' Schrader said. 'Within a week to two weeks, he was back at the nurse's office and he was sick again and they couldn't figure out why.'
After moving on from Warren Hills after 5th grade, the student has been good.
'He has none of the same symptoms or none of the same problems he had,' Schrader said. 'It's literally ever since he's left the school or like moved on to middle school, since starting sixth grade, that he has not had any of the same problems that he had before.'
After 17 years of studying cell towers, Marks said there are illnesses associated with wireless radiation with symptoms including headaches, vertigo, heart palpitations and drowsiness.
Theodora Scarato, director of the Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences, a non-profit scientific organization, has studied the dangers of cell towers and radiation for more than a decade.
'When you actually look at the published research, safety is not assured,' Scarato said. 'And to me, it just makes sense to have safeguards, especially when you have literally hundreds of scientists calling for more protection. Schools should be safe learning environments.'
School districts and city officials in pockets of the nation, in states like California, Maryland, Oregon and Virginia, have banned towers near schools or placed other restrictions. Some countries, she said, have also banned cell towers near schools and have other protections in place. Information on that, as well as other details on towers, can be found on the Environmental Health Sciences website.
'Whereas, in the United States, school children lack any special federal protections or safeguards,' she said. 'And we have limits that haven't been properly reviewed since 1996.'
Specific Absorption Rate limits set by the Federal Communications Commission nearly 30 years ago are outdated and need to be revised, experts say. These limits from 1996 account for 30-minute exposures.
But children and teachers can be at schools for 35 hours a week, if not more, Marks said. Which is why she's urged the school board and superintendent to do something about the tower outside Warren Hills.
'I feel that the cell tower is endangering people in the school,' Marks said. 'However, there could be other contributing factors, and we need to get to the bottom of it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
23-07-2025
- Forbes
InnovationRx: Sarepta Blinks In Showdown With FDA
In this week's edition of InnovationRx, we look at Sarepta's showdown with the FDA, Moderna's use of quantum computers, a new top drug regulator at the FDA, ARCH Venture's latest biotech company, and more. To get it in your inbox, subscribe here . Sarepta Therapeutics CEO Douglas Ingram Bloomberg Finance U sually when the FDA asks a drugmaker to halt distribution of a treatment, the company complies. Last week, in a remarkable showdown, Sarepta Therapeutics refused to stop distribution of Elevidys, its therapy for the muscle-wasting disease Duchenne muscular dystrophy as the FDA had requested. Then, in a remarkable reversal, on Monday Sarepta blinked and said that it would indeed pause all shipments of Elevidys by Tuesday evening. The latest twist in the saga followed a decision by Children's Hospital Los Angeles to halt use of the drug while it was facing regulatory uncertainty. Elevidys is a gene therapy for Duchenne, a particularly severe form of muscular dystrophy, which typically kills patients before they turn 30. The one-time intravenous infusion was first approved in 2023 in an unusual decision that was made unilaterally by Peter Marks, a top FDA official, despite misgivings of his staff. Last Friday evening, the FDA had requested that Cambridge, Mass.-based Sarepta voluntarily stop all shipments of the drug, citing the deaths of three patients who had taken Elevidys or a similar drug (that's in early-stage clinical trials) from liver failure. Later that evening, Sarepta responded that it would continue to ship Elevidys for patients who do not use wheelchairs (who are generally younger and healthier), citing its own analysis that there were no new safety problems in these patients. It had already voluntarily halted sales to patients who use wheelchairs. The face-off between Sarepta and the FDA comes at a time when investment in gene therapy has slowed, and as Sarepta itself has laid off hundreds of employees. Sarepta's stock is down nearly 40% since last Thursday's close. It's unclear how long the 'pause' might last. The company is working on an enhanced immune-suppressing protocol that could reduce liver toxicity, but a senior FDA official told Stat yesterday that the drug faces an 'arduous and treacherous path' back to the market. Whatever ultimately happens, the ongoing saga highlights the questions about what risks are acceptable for patients with diseases that are fatal at a young age and how the potential for treatment should be balanced against the possibility of death from the therapy itself. Moderna M essenger RNA (or mRNA) is a hugely promising technology for future vaccines and therapies, as was demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic. One of its major advantages is that it provides instructions for the body itself to manufacture the medicine it needs, rather than delivering it. But developing new treatments is challenging, Wade Davis, vice president of computational science at Moderna (best known for developing those COVID vaccines), told Forbes . That's in part because of the fragile nature of mRNA–its primary function is serving as a temporary set of instructions for cellular machinery, so it doesn't stick around long. But for the purposes of medicine, it needs to be optimized so that it's both durable enough to provide an efficacious dose, but still transient enough to minimize potential side effects. The potential combinations are mind boggling. For example, there are 10^623 different ways to combine nucleotides in mRNA to encode for the same protein as the company's COVID vaccine, Davis said. To put that in perspective, 'there's only 10^80 particles in the universe,' he said. 'The numbers just go crazy.' Conventional computers, even supercomputers using the best AI algorithms, struggle with this sort of problem, he said. For one, because mRNA is so fragile, there aren't a lot of known structures that an AI program could be trained on. And when it comes to optimization of structures, the numbers are so large that it's difficult to scale, forcing chemists to rely on rules of thumb and oversimplifying the data to try and find solutions. Moderna has found one solution: quantum computing. It recently partnered with IBM to use its quantum hardware to optimize mRNA structures. Quantum computers are uniquely suited to solving large scale optimization problems like this, because they can search and compute potential solutions in parallel. By contrast conventional computers have to calculate everything in sequence, which goes ever slower the bigger the problem gets. Using IBM's quantum computers, Moderna was able to predict a 60-nucleotide sequence of mRNA. The previous record was only eight. While that's still a long way from the sequence lengths, comprising thousands of nucleotides, that biotech companies will need, it shows a potential new way to find new mRNA therapies. More importantly, it could lead to breakthroughs that might have never been discovered with conventional approaches. With quantum algorithms, Davis said, 'you get into the space of possibilities in a different way than some of the classical approaches.' BIOTECH AND PHARMA CAR-T cell therapy has been a life-saving treatment for patients with cancers like leukemia or lymphoma, with many going into remission. But the therapy so far has been less successful on solid tumors, which comprise most cancers. Dispatch Bio aims to change that: The three year-old company emerged from stealth today with $216 million in funding led by Midas Lister Bob Nelsen's ARCH Venture Partners and the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy. One reason it's challenging to treat solid cancers with CAR-T therapy is that it's more difficult for the cells to identify their targets, Dispatch Bio CEO Sabah Oney told Forbes . To get around this, Dispatch has developed a viral vector that targets cancer cells and then 'tags' them with a protein that the T-cells can use to attack the cancer. The virus uses the cancer cells' own replication system to make copies of itself, making it difficult for the cancer to develop a resistance to it. Because this mechanism is different in healthy cells, the risk is lower that the therapy would attack them. So far, the Philadelphia-based company has tested its therapy in both human cells in the lab and in animals, Oney said. It plans to start clinical trials in 2026, but is still working out what indication it will go after first. 'Ultimately, we have plans to be able to scale this approach so we can get to millions and millions of patients because that's the broad potential of this platform,' he said. 'We can do lung cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer with the same drug.' Plus : AstraZeneca plans to invest $50 billion in U.S. drug development and manufacturing by 2030 as pharma companies look for ways to deal with Trump's tariffs. DIGITAL HEALTH AND AI Mental healthcare startup Slingshot AI launched an AI-powered chatbot to provide support for those dealing with mental health issues. It simultaneously raised $53 million in venture funding led by Forerunner Ventures and Radical Ventures, bringing total funding to $93 million, at an undisclosed valuation. The chatbot, called Ash, has been beta tested with more than 50,000 patients. Plus : Aidoc, which has developed FDA-cleared algorithms for use by radiologists, raised $150 million led by General Catalyst and Square Peg at an undisclosed valuation. PUBLIC HEALTH AND HOSPITALS The FDA has named George Tidmarsh, a pediatric oncologist and pharma company veteran, as its top drug regulator, director of its Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. He will replace Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay, who has been serving in the role in an acting capacity after the departure of former director Patrizia Cavazzoni in January. Tidmarsh has led teams that have developed seven FDA-approved drugs and has served as CEO of several pharmaceutical companies in addition to being an adjunct professor at the Stanford School of Medicine. He takes over as the FDA has faced substantial upheaval under HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. WHAT WE'RE READING How a push for increased organ donation led to people enduring rushed or premature attempts to remove their organs. Wellness startup Truemed, cofounded by RFK Jr. aide Calley Means, helps people buy Peloton bikes and $9,000 saunas with tax-free funds set aside for healthcare. Bankrupt hospital system Steward Health sued its former CEO claiming he conducted insider transactions that drained its assets and led to its collapse. AI companies, including OpenAI, Grok and others have stopped warning users that their chatbots aren't doctors. Life sciences investment firm Omega Funds has raised $647 million for its eighth fund. Researchers figured out a way to deliver a vaccine using dental floss, which has so far been successfully tested on mice. Former Citigroup chair Sandy Weill gave $100 million to harness AI for a West Coast cancer hub. MORE FROM FORBES Forbes Vibe Coding Turned This Swedish AI Unicorn Into The Fastest Growing Software Startup Ever By Iain Martin Forbes Why JPMorgan Is Hitting Fintechs With Stunning New Fees For Data Access By Jeff Kauflin Forbes Go Back To The Office, But Bring Your Own Snacks. Blame Congress. By Kelly Phillips Erb
Yahoo
16-07-2025
- Yahoo
After Missouri repealed paid sick leave law, it could go back on the ballot
Reality Check is a Star series holding those with power to account and shining a light on their decisions. Have a suggestion for a future story? Email our journalists at RealityCheck@ Have the latest Reality Checks delivered to your inbox with our free newsletter. When Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe last week signed a bill repealing paid sick leave protections, his signature overhauled a voter-approved law that enjoyed widespread support in November. But the Republican governor's decision may not be the final say on the matter. Supporters of paid sick leave have laid the groundwork for a potential campaign that would put another measure on voters' 2026 ballots. 'This measure would restore the paid sick leave that legislators just took from Missouri voters,' said Richard Von Glahn, who filed a new measure on behalf of Missouri Jobs with Justice, one of the groups that successfully campaigned for the previous initiative, called Proposition A. The decision by Kehoe and Republican lawmakers to strike down portions of Proposition A was met with fierce backlash from paid sick leave supporters. Workers who began receiving paid sick leave earlier this year are now poised to lose those benefits on Aug. 28, when the law signed by Kehoe takes effect. The move also illustrated a continuation of Republican attempts to undermine voter-approved policies seen as more progressive, such as legal abortion, which lawmakers are seeking to overturn through a new ballot measure in 2026. Unlike Proposition A, which changed state law, the initiative filed by Von Glahn would amend the state constitution. Some supporters feel that constitutional protections might be the only way to prevent lawmakers from overturning measures passed by voters. 'It's about the only response that's left to proponents of these particular proposals,' said Peverill Squire, a professor of political science at the University of Missouri-Columbia. 'When you leave it as a statute, then it invites the legislature to make changes.' Von Glahn cautioned that the paid sick leave initiative was still in its early stages and supporters could eventually decide on a different path. After settling on a measure, campaigners must also clear an expensive and time-consuming signature process to get initiatives on statewide ballots. But if supporters decide to collect signatures to put his measure on a ballot in 2026, it would serve as a major response to the legislature's overhaul of Proposition A. 'The initiative is basically about restoring rights to Missourians that the legislature has, you know, in the previous decade taken from them,' Von Glahn said. The language of Von Glahn's initiative is similar to Proposition A. It would require most employers with 15 or more employees to offer an hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked. The measure would also enshrine the state's $15 minimum wage in the constitution and guarantee future increases based on inflation. In addition, the initiative would also allow cities and counties with populations of more than 10,000 people to enact their own minimum wage and sick leave requirements. A spokesperson for Kehoe did not immediately respond to a request for comment. GOP opposition likely While nearly 58% of voters approved Proposition A, the measure faced intense pushback from Republican lawmakers and business advocacy groups who argued it would hurt local businesses. They also argued that the new law did not repeal all of Proposition A, including a section that raised the state's minimum wage to $15 an hour. If Von Glahn's initiative reaches the ballot, it's certain to run into similar opposition. Some of the resistance will come from the Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry, which last month submitted a letter to Republican Secretary of State Denny Hoskins opposing the proposed initiative. Kara Corches, the chamber's president and CEO, said in a statement to The Star that the measure would have 'dire effects on Missouri's economy.' 'The ability for businesses to decide the policies that best fit their unique needs is the bedrock on which our free enterprise system is built,' Corches said. 'This proposal is a clear break from our system of free enterprise.' Senate President Pro Tem Cindy O'Laughlin, a Shelbina Republican, sent The Star a lengthy statement that also lambasted the proposed initiative as a 'job killer.' O'Laughlin specifically criticized the paid sick leave requirement, claiming it 'basically allows anyone to claim illness even if they are not ill.' 'It is an effort to destroy the capitalist society that has made America a place of endless opportunity for anyone willing to work and be responsible for their own future,' O'Laughlin said. Direct democracy attacks The prospect of another paid sick leave initiative could also bolster Republican attempts to curtail direct democracy in Missouri by raising the threshold for initiative petitions to pass. Abortion rights, Proposition A, Medicaid expansion and marijuana legalization were all placed on statewide ballots through initiative petitions, a more-than-a-century-old process that allows voters to bypass lawmakers and approve policy measures. Missouri is one of more than 20 states where voters have this ability. Missouri Republicans, who control every statewide office and both chambers of the legislature, have targeted this mechanism for direct democracy in recent years. They argue that amending the state constitution has become too easy, while some insist that the U.S. is a republic, not a democracy. Historically, however, most initiative petitions fail to qualify for the ballot before they're even put to voters. Missourians also shot down nearly 60% of the initiatives on the ballot between 1910 and 2022, according to previous reporting. But Missouri Republicans have made raising the threshold for amending the state constitution a top priority during recent legislative sessions. At least one Republican senator told The Star he'd like to pursue changes to the process during the upcoming legislative session. 'This whole initiative petition thing is a mess,' said Sen. Mike Cierpiot, a Lee's Summit Republican, who later added, 'my primary focus this year is trying to do something to fix this initiative petition thing.' But Cierpiot said his plan would not focus on changing the approval threshold. Instead, he said he wants to amend the process so that the summaries on voters' ballots are more concise and that the state properly enforces a rule that ballot measures only deal with one subject. While Republican lawmakers argue against the initiative petition process by saying the state constitution has been amended too easily, supporters like Von Glahn point to the recent decision to overhaul Proposition A. He had hoped that a constitutional change wouldn't be necessary, he said. 'But for the legislature to attack provisions that were so overwhelmingly passed by voters, for the legislature to repeal provisions on the minimum wage that have been in place for nearly two decades,' Von Glahn said, 'well, it certainly seems like greater protections for Missouri families might be needed.'
Yahoo
12-07-2025
- Yahoo
I'm Retired and Regret Moving Out of New York — Here's Why
Many retirees dream of leaving New York in search of cheaper living, warmer weather and a slower pace. For some, the move delivers exactly that. But for others, the reality doesn't match the fantasy. Mark S., 68, is one such retiree. Consider This: Find Out: Three years ago, he and his wife packed up their lives in New York and headed to North Carolina, lured by the promise of lower taxes and a bigger house. Now, Mark wishes he'd thought twice. Mark's story, inspired by a comment shared on Reddit, reveals the unexpected downsides of leaving the Empire State behind, and offers a cautionary tale for anyone considering a similar move. Mark and his wife were enticed by the numbers. 'We left New York for North Carolina, thinking we'd get more house for our money and lower taxes,' he recalled. 'At first, it felt like a smart financial move, but honestly, I regret it now.' While their new home was bigger and their property taxes lower, Mark soon realized that savings alone couldn't replace the life they'd built in New York. The couple found themselves missing more than just the city skyline. Learn More: One of Mark's biggest regrets is leaving behind his social circle. 'I miss my friends, the energy of the city and even the seasons,' he admits. The vibrant community, spontaneous meetups, and the simple pleasure of running into familiar faces on the street were things he'd taken for granted. Building new friendships in a new state proved harder than expected. 'We thought we'd visit New York often, but it's expensive and tiring,' Mark said. 'I didn't realize how much I'd miss being able to walk everywhere, the food and just feeling connected.' Healthcare was another area where expectations didn't match reality. 'Healthcare was supposed to be cheaper, but finding good doctors has been harder than expected,' Mark explained. In New York, he and his wife had longstanding relationships with trusted physicians and access to world-class hospitals. In their new town, navigating the local healthcare system felt overwhelming and, at times, disappointing. Mark also underestimated how much he'd miss the city's walkability and culture. The ability to stroll to a favorite deli, catch a show or simply enjoy the buzz of the city was irreplaceable. Even the weather, which he thought he'd enjoy, came with its own drawbacks. 'We thought we'd love the warmer climate, but I miss the changing seasons. There's something about a crisp fall day in New York you just can't get anywhere else,' Mark said. Mark's experience has left him with some hard-earned advice for others considering a move out of New York: 'If I could do it over, I'd have stayed put or at least rented for a while before making such a big move,' he said. 'The grass isn't always greener.' Visit your new city in every season before committing. Consider what you'll miss about your current home; community, culture, healthcare, and even the weather. Weigh the emotional and social costs, not just the financial ones. For Mark, the decision to leave New York was more complicated than he ever imagined. While the financial benefits were real, the loss of connection, culture and comfort made the move bittersweet. 'The grass isn't always greener,' he reflects. 'Sometimes, what you're looking for is right where you started.' More From GOBankingRates 7 Luxury SUVs That Will Become Affordable in 2025 This article originally appeared on I'm Retired and Regret Moving Out of New York — Here's Why
