logo
A second act for empty office space?  How skyscrapers in downtown L.A. could ease the housing crisis

A second act for empty office space? How skyscrapers in downtown L.A. could ease the housing crisis

The transformation of a sleek, granite-clad office tower on the edge of the 110 Freeway into deluxe apartments is about to begin, and developer Garrett Lee thinks the nearly 40-year-old building can be competitive with downtown L.A.'s much newer upmarket housing.
A mock-up of an apartment assembled in the L.A. Care tower on 7th Street reveals high ceilings, tall windows and sweeping views of the city that speak to the appeal of urban living.
It could also be a harbinger of what's to become of other fancy office towers.
With downtown's office rental market mired in high vacancies and falling values, stakeholders are clamoring for more city support to convert high-rises to housing that would help address the city's persistent housing shortage.
Among the suggested targets for conversion are elite Financial District towers that commanded top rents before offices were shut down by COVID-19 pandemic stay-at-home orders, leaving many buildings more than one-third vacant.
Failure to make at least some of them into housing could be financially catastrophic for taxpayers, according to a new study commissioned by the Central City Assn. of Los Angeles, a downtown business advocacy group that says the city should consider giving developers financial incentives to convert their buildings.
Office values have fallen dramatically in recent sales, and many owners are seeking public reappraisals of their buildings in hope of reducing their property taxes. When assessed values of buildings are reduced, so are the taxes collected by the county and shared with the city, school districts and other public entities.
'Declining assessed values are likely to translate into significant losses in General Fund revenue' for the city, according to the report by BAE Urban Economics, a Berkeley real estate consulting firm.
Efforts to create a second act for underused office towers that were the height of corporate prestige a generation ago are part of a larger drama playing out in a financial center that has lost much of its shine in the years since the pandemic started.
Restaurants and shops have struggled with the departure of many workers while homelessness and a sense that sidewalks aren't safe have risen and helped lead to the departure of some office tenants.
Downtown L.A. has 54 office buildings that are at immediate risk of devaluation and could result in nearly $70 billion in lost value over the next 10 years, the report said, creating a potential loss of $353 million in property tax revenues.
Buildings potentially would have more value as apartments or condominiums and could make a dent in expected tax losses. Converting just 10 big office buildings to housing would boost their combined assessed property value over a decade by $12 billion, adding $46 million in tax revenue and creating more than 3,800 residential units, the report said.
Meanwhile, demand for housing in downtown L.A. has held steady even as the need for offices has waned. Occupancy in apartments has remained about 90% for more than a year, slightly higher than the level before the pandemic. And unlike most neighborhoods in Los Angeles County, downtown has seen a monumental housing construction boom in recent years.
In the last decade, 22% of the new housing in the city has been built downtown, where city planning policies encourage dense development, according to the DTLA Alliance business improvement district.
To be sure, downtown will retain its identity as a white-collar business center even as its housing component grows. At 56.5 million square feet, downtown is one of the largest office markets in the country and is an important economic engine for the city, said Nella McOsker, president of the Central City Assn.
Business leaders in the association will continue to support efforts to refill office buildings with workers, she said, even as they encourage the conversion of some buildings to housing.
'We're not giving up on folks coming into the office in large numbers,' McOsker said, 'but we need to always evolve.'
The BAE Urban Economics report does not identify the 10 buildings used to calculate the financial effects of converting them to housing, but previous discussions of prime candidates have included some of the most prominent towers on the city skyline that were built in the latter part of the 20th century.
Among them are 777 Tower and Union Bank Plaza, both on Figueroa Street, and Gas Company Tower at the foot of Bunker Hill near Pershing Square.
The list of conversion candidates is confidential because publicizing them might 'put a scarlet letter around their neck' when most are 'actually very good office buildings,' said John Adams, a managing principal at Gensler. The architecture firm selected potential candidates for conversion, which have recently faced financial straits and low occupancy.
The Gas Company Tower was sold to Los Angeles County last year for about $200 million, a steep drop from its $632-million valuation in 2020. The 777 Tower traded a year ago for $120 million, a 70% drop from its 2013 sale price, according to real estate data provider CoStar.
Union Bank Plaza, a 40-story tower completed in 1967, is an attractive candidate in part because it has a retail complex at the base that would be a good amenity for residents as well as office tenants, Adams said.
The 55-story 777 Tower, completed in 1991, was designed by architect César Pelli, who designed some of the world's tallest buildings including the Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Part of its appeal is that it has separate banks of elevators for different tiers of floors, Adams said, which could make it easier to convert some floors to housing while others remain offices. With renovations, residents could have a separate lobby entrance from office workers.
Many early 20th century office buildings downtown have already been converted to apartments and hotels, but housing advocates are now eyeing the newer generation of towers that dominated the office market in the last three decades.
Among them are ripe candidates to become residences, mostly built from the 1970s to 1990s, Adams said.
Their 'slick glass-and-marble aesthetic' is visually appealing, he said, and they were built in a way that the outer skins can be modified to include balconies and operable windows.
'These towers are hackable,' Adams said.
The city is close to adopting a new building code that will make it easier for developers to get approvals to convert offices built after 1975. A previous code for conversions that focused on buildings erected before that year, when construction standards were less stringent, led to a boom in office, apartment, condo and hotel conversions starting in the early 2000s.
Newer buildings such as the L.A. Care tower are 'night and day' more attractive to convert to housing than the midcentury buildings Lee's company, Jamison Properties, has converted in the past, he said.
Downtown's Class A buildings have more modern systems such as elevators and electrical service, and may require fewer upgrades to meet seismic standards than older structures. The city recently determined that Jamison Properties did not need to perform a structural retrofit of the L.A. Care tower at 1055 W. 7th St., Lee said.
Los Angeles County officials, meanwhile, have declared that Gas Company Tower is seismically safe, but are reviewing bids to perform more than $230 million worth of proactive upgrades 'to ensure that the building performs optimally in the decades ahead,' a representative said.
The highest hurdle for private landlords considering turning an office building into apartments or condos is typically financial; it often costs more to acquire and convert a building than can be justified by expected rents.
City leaders should consider offering financial incentives such as those found in other cities to bridge the gap to profitability, the report said, citing programs in other central business districts.
New York, Washington and Boston have property tax abatement programs, for example. San Francisco offers transfer tax exemptions, and Chicago uses tax-increment financing to encourage some redevelopments. In Canada, Calgary offers direct grants.
The Central City Assn. wants the city to consider financial incentives for conversions, even though it is experiencing budget shortfalls, McOsker said. As of May, the city faced a nearly $1-billion budget shortfall.
McOsker suggested that the city form a team to focus on conversions and perhaps do it at a scale 'well outside of downtown Los Angeles.'
Helping turn unused offices into housing is important to city officials, said Rachel Freeman, deputy mayor of business and economic development.
'We have a deep need for more housing at all levels of affordability,' she said. 'Adaptive reuse has the potential to be a tool to help achieve our goals towards housing production and also the revitalization of our core urban centers.'
Zoning and building codes should be 'more supportive' of the process, she said, adding that the mayor's office also is open to the idea of financial incentives for builders.
For the vibrancy of downtown and other core business centers also facing falling office values, Freeman said, 'there is a cost to doing nothing.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FACT FOCUS: No, taxpayers will not receive new stimulus checks this summer
FACT FOCUS: No, taxpayers will not receive new stimulus checks this summer

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

FACT FOCUS: No, taxpayers will not receive new stimulus checks this summer

Don't splurge just yet. Rumors spread online Friday that the U.S. government will soon be issuing stimulus checks to taxpayers in certain income brackets. But Congress has not passed legislation to authorize such payments, and, according to the IRS, no new stimulus checks will be distributed in the coming weeks. Here's a closer look at the facts. CLAIM: The Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department have approved $1,390 stimulus checks that will be distributed to low- and middle-income taxpayers by the end of the summer. THE FACTS: This is false. Taxpayers will not receive new stimulus checks of any amount this summer, an IRS official said. Stimulus checks, also known as economic impact payments, are authorized by Congress through legislation and distributed by the Treasury Department. Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri last month introduced a bill that would send tax rebates to qualified taxpayers using revenue from tariffs instituted by President Donald Trump. Hawley's bill has not passed the Senate or the House. The IRS announced early this year that it would distribute about $2.4 billion to taxpayers who failed to claim on their 2021 tax returns a Recovery Rebate Credit — a refundable credit for individuals who did not receive one or more COVID-19 stimulus checks. The maximum amount was $1,400 per individual. Those who hadn't already filed their 2021 tax return would have needed to file it by April 15 to claim the credit. The IRS official said there is no new credit that taxpayers can claim. Past stimulus checks have been authorized through legislation passed by Congress. For example, payments during the coronavirus pandemic were made by possible by three bills: the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act; the COVID-related Tax Relief Act; and the American Rescue Plan Act. In 2008, stimulus checks were authorized in response to the Great Recession through the Economic Stimulus Act. The Treasury Department, which includes the Internal Revenue Service, distributed stimulus payments during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Great Recession. The Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service, formed in 2012, played a role as well during the former crisis. Hawley in July introduced the American Worker Rebate Act, which would share tariff revenue with qualified Americans through tax rebates. The proposed rebates would amount to at minimum $600 per individual, with additional payments for qualifying children. Rebates could increase if tariff revenue is higher than expected. Taxpayers with an adjusted annual gross income above a certain amount — $75,000 for those filing individually — would receive a reduced rebate. Hawley said Americans 'deserve a tax rebate.' 'Like President Trump proposed, my legislation would allow hard-working Americans to benefit from the wealth that Trump's tariffs are returning to this country,' Hawley said in a press release. Neither the Senate nor the House had passed the American Worker Rebate Act as of Friday. It was read twice by the Senate on July 28, the day it was introduced, and referred to the Committee on Finance. ___

Best high-yield savings interest rates today, August 15, 2025 (Earn up to 4.3% APY)
Best high-yield savings interest rates today, August 15, 2025 (Earn up to 4.3% APY)

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Best high-yield savings interest rates today, August 15, 2025 (Earn up to 4.3% APY)

The Federal Reserve reduced its target interest rate three times in 2024. As a result, high-yield savings account rates have been falling. That said, some of the best accounts still pay above 4% APY. In order to get the highest interest rate possible on your savings, it's important to do your research and find competitive offers. Not sure where to start? Here's a closer look at savings interest rates today and where you can find the best ones. Where are the best savings interest rates today? The average interest rate on a traditional savings account is only 0.42%, according to the FDIC. However, the best savings rates can be found on high-yield accounts, which often pay much more. As of August 15, 2025, the highest savings account rate available from our partners is 4.3% APY. This rate is offered by EverBank and requires a $0 minimum opening deposit. Here is a look at some of the best savings rates available today from our verified partners: This embedded content is not available in your region. Historical savings account rates Over the last decade, savings account interest rates have fluctuated quite a bit. From 2010 to about 2015, rates were rock-bottom, hovering at around 0.06% to 0.10%. This was largely due to the 2008 financial crisis​ and the Federal Reserve's decision to lower its target rate to near zero in order to spur economic growth. From 2015 to 2018, interest rates began to increase gradually. However, they remained low by historical standards. Then the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 led to another sharp decrease in rates as the Fed once again cut rates to stimulate the economy. This brought average savings interest rates down to new lows, around 0.05% to 0.06% by mid-2021​. Since then, savings account rates have recovered considerably, largely driven by the Fed's interest rate hikes in response to skyrocketing inflation. However, the Fed finally lowered the federal funds rate in September, November, and December 2024, and as a result, deposit rates are beginning to fall as well. Whether or not rates will continue to fall after its September meeting is yet to be determined. The following is a look at how savings interest rates have changed over the past decade: Is a high-yield savings account right for you? Despite the fact that interest rates have risen substantially since 2021, the average savings account rate is still fairly low, especially compared to market investments. If you're saving for a long-term goal such as a child's education or retirement, a savings account probably won't generate the returns needed to reach your goal. On the other hand, if you're saving for an emergency fund, home down payment, vacation, or other short-term goal, a high-yield savings account is ideal — especially if you want to access the funds as needed. Other types of deposit accounts, including money markets and CDs, may offer similar or even better rates, but restrict how often you can make withdrawals. The key is to shop around and find an account that provides a competitive rate with low or no fees. This embedded content is not available in your region.

Ong Ye Kung rebuts complaints about treatment of stallholders at Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre
Ong Ye Kung rebuts complaints about treatment of stallholders at Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ong Ye Kung rebuts complaints about treatment of stallholders at Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre

SINGAPORE – Stallholders at Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre are not charged for storing supplies in baskets or penalised for not providing free meals, said Health Minister Ong Ye Kung. Mr Ong, who oversees the ward where the food centre is located, was responding in an Aug 11 Facebook post to concerns raised by veteran food critic K.F. Seetoh about the treatment of hawkers there. In a Facebook post on Aug 4, Mr Seetoh had claimed that the food centre's hawkers were forced to pay $70 each month to use blue supply baskets at the back of each stall. The founder of local food guide Makansutra, in another post on Aug 8, said the stallholders were contractually obliged to offer 60 free meals at their own expense. 'What a ridiculous smash and grab management policy,' he said in the post, which included a screenshot of what appears to be a contract with the hawker centre's management. Mr Seetoh also claimed that hawkers were forced to offer budget meals of up to $3.50 for everyone, not just 'the poor'. In March 2023, the budget meal initiative was launched by the Ministry of National Development and the Housing Board to provide Singaporeans with meals typically priced $3.50 and below. Mr Ong, who also leads the Sembawang GRC MPs, said he had investigated the matters raised after finding out about the food critic's online posts. He said the claim that hawkers must provide 60 free meals 'does not present the full picture'. Mr Ong said stallholders had initially agreed to provide 30 meals each month for low-income residents when the hawker centre first opened, before the figure was adjusted to 100 meals over the three-year duration of their lease. Mr Ong, who is also Coordinating Minister for Social Policies, added: 'There are no penalties if they do not or are unable to provide the meals. 'This simple, well-intentioned initiative was meant to encourage our hawkers to 'pay it forward'.' Mr Ong, who said he visits the hawker centre frequently, noted that the initiative has yet to commence. He added: 'I appreciate K.F. Seetoh's concern for our hawkers and share his passion for keeping our hawker culture alive and thriving. 'However, let's do so without putting down anyone, whether they are patrons, hawkers, the hawker centre operator, or government agencies.' On Aug 11, Mr Seetoh thanked the minister and suggested that they meet so that he could get 'the full picture'. The 44-stall Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre opened in December 2022 after a three-year delay due to the Covid-19 pandemic. At the time of its launch, about 10 per cent of the stalls were run by Sembawang residents. It was the first such facility to open in the constituency after about three decades. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction Discover how to enjoy other premium articles here

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store