
Netanyahu says Israel's operation may lead to regime change in Iran. How likely is that?
Since Israel began its concerted attack on Iran on Friday, calls for regime change in Iran have grown louder – from hawks in the United States Congress to Israeli officials and some Iranian activists abroad.
They argue that the Islamic Republic is significantly weakened, and that now is the time to capitalize on domestic unrest and public discontent to bring about the overthrow of its ruling clerical establishment, with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei at its head.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Fox News on Sunday that Israel's operation 'could certainly' result in regime change, as the government in Iran is 'very weak.' He claimed that '80% of the people would throw these theological thugs out.'
'They shoot women because their hair is uncovered. They shoot students. They just suck the oxygen out from these brave and gifted people, the Iranian people,' Netanyahu said. 'The decision to act, to rise up this time, is the decision of the Iranian people.'
Freedom of speech is heavily restricted in Iran, and there have been no major public calls from within the country to overthrow the regime following Israel's attacks. But experts say Netanyahu may be misreading Iranian public sentiment – and that the strikes could backfire.
Israel's attacks are more likely to direct public anger toward Israel, as domestic issues are briefly put aside while Iranians run for shelter, experts say.
'Iranian activists, people who fought for freedom and justice all their lives, first of all know that their value has little to do with people like Netanyahu,' Arash Azizi, an Iran expert based in New York City and author of the book 'What Iranians Want,' told CNN. They recognize Netanyahu's right-wing government 'is not at all aligned with their values.'
Iran has in recent years seen nationwide protests against the regime, especially in 2022 and 2023, sparked by the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old woman arrested by Iran's morality police for allegedly not wearing her headscarf properly. Many activists have since been detained, and authorities have sought repress further protest, instilling fear with a rise in criminal prosecutions and executions. Disgruntlement is widespread.
But experts, and Iranians currently living under Israeli bombardment, said that most Iranians don't see Netanyahu or his government as having the solution to their domestic problems.
Many of those who spoke to CNN in recent days did not want to be named for safety reasons, and none expressed support for Netanyahu's calls for a revolt.
A local Iranian journalist told CNN that while some believe the conflict could be an opportunity for a potential push for regime change, they want to build their future themselves. Others believe that Israeli attacks are not the correct basis for political change, and that such a shift should take place through democratic procedures.
Another journalist, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told CNN that the perception at home is that the regime isn't weak, and that people are unlikely to protest while their cities are being bombed.
'The people of Iran have fought against the Islamic Republic for years, striving for democracy and freedom,' the journalist said from Tehran. 'But I believe that in the current situation, those who are terrified under missiles and explosions, trying to protect their children and loved ones, do not have the psychological or practical capacity to 'take to the streets.' The streets, which are constantly under attack, are now emptier than ever.'
'Moreover, from the public's perspective, the Islamic Republic has not yet become weak enough to collapse through protests. Any action against the regime during wartime will lead to brutal repression,' the journalist said, adding that 'now the regime has free rein to label anyone it wants as an Israeli spy.'
Others say during a time of national crisis, people are more likely to favor unity, no matter how dissatisfied they are. To them, foreign intervention is a red line.
'There is no support that they will give to Netanyahu's war on themselves and their society. If anything, they are organizing now to help each other defend their country,' Azizi said, referring to anti-regime Iranians. 'Any idea that this will lead to a popular uprising of some sort that will bring down the regime has very little basis in reality.'
Even in the diaspora, where many anti-regime Iranians live, there is anger at Israel's actions, with activists calling for unity in the face of Israel's assault.
Narges Mohammadi, one of Iran's most prominent human rights activists and 2023 Nobel Peace Prize winner, who has spent years in prison in Tehran on what supporters say are politically motivated charges, posted on X: 'Iranian Civil Society Says No to War!'
She and other Iranian activists, including fellow Nobel Peace Prize winner Shirin Ebadi and filmmakers Jafar Panahi and Mohammad Rasoulof, all of whom have been pursued by the regime for their activism, wrote a joint opinion piece in France's Le Monde newspaper Monday calling for an end to the war – but they also demanded that Iran stop enrichment of uranium and that the regime step down.
'This conflict not only destroys infrastructure and claims civilian lives but also constitutes a serious threat to the very foundations of human civilization,' they wrote.
In recent years, Israel has strengthened ties with Reza Pahlavi, the US-based son of Iran's deposed monarch. Pahlavi voiced support for Israel's actions, drawing praise from some in the Iranian diaspora and accusations of betrayal from others.
'Soon in Tehran,' Israeli Minister of Diaspora Affairs Amichai Chikli posted on X on Friday, along with a picture of himself shaking hands with a smiling Pahlavi. Pahlavi told BBC News on Sunday that Israel's conflict with Iran was an opportunity to bring down the Iranian regime.
'The ultimate solution is regime change,' he said. 'Now, we have an opportunity, because this regime is at its weakest point. There's (a) window in which we can operate and hopefully liberate our country.'
His US-backed father had warm ties with Israel before he was overthrown by the Islamic Revolution in 1979.
Israel has pounded Iran with strikes for four days, striking residential areas and the country's civilian infrastructure. At least 224 people have been killed in the country since hostilities began Friday, the health ministry said Sunday, according to state media.
Israel has said it is doing so to stop the Islamic Republic from acquiring a nuclear weapon and has targeted several of the country's nuclear sites, but civilians appear to have borne the brunt of the attacks.
Iran has retaliated by firing 370 ballistic missiles and hundreds of drones at Israel, the Israeli Prime Minister's Office said. By Monday morning, 24 people had been killed in Israel and 592 others had been wounded.
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said on Monday that 'the residents of Tehran will pay the price,' later clarifying that Israel didn't intend to harm civilians.
Israeli officials 'don't even pretend' to care about the safety of Iranian civilians, said Azizi, the Iran expert.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian called for unity, in a statement released through state media. 'The people of Iran must join hands and stand strong against the aggression that has been launched against us,' Pezeshkian said, adding that the Iranians were 'not the aggressors' and defending Iran's right to a peaceful nuclear program.
In its operation, Israel has taken out some of Iran's most senior military officials, including in the powerful Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Even if the leadership changes, it may not look like what Netanyahu hopes for, Iran experts said.
'Regime change is a possibility, just not the kind that Netanyahu has in mind,' Mohammad Ali Shabani, editor of the Amwaj news outlet, wrote on X. 'Among potential medium-term outcomes of Israel's war on Iran: military-led administration, possibly armed with nuclear weapons.'
Netanyahu's call for regime change by force has also alarmed other countries in the region.
Speaking to the Paris-based journal Le Grand Continent, Anwar Gargash, diplomatic adviser to the president of the United Arab Emirates, warned that 'when a country feels under attack, nationalism tends to intensify.'
Asked about Netanyahu's call for an uprising in Iran, Gargash said: 'The region cannot be reshaped through force and confrontation. We may be able to resolve some problems in the short term, but this will lead to others that are at least as serious.'.
Iranians who spoke to CNN said they don't see Israel's actions as helping their country.
'Netanyahu has attacked us, and now he expects us to overthrow Khamenei while we're standing in lines for bread and fuel, worried about our own survival? To topple Khamenei with Israeli missiles?' one of the Iranian journalists who spoke to CNN said.
'Of course, we're glad to see the leaders of this regime - whose hands are stained with the blood of our children - killed. But the death of ordinary people is painful.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
21 minutes ago
- CNBC
U.S. Treasury yields fall as investors weigh state of Israel-Iran tensions
U.S. Treasury yields fell on Tuesday after U.S. President Donald Trump departed early from the Group of Seven summit, signaling an escalation in Israel-Iran tensions. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury was over 2 basis points lower at 4.432% at 3.58 a.m. ET. The 2-year Treasury yield slipped 2 basis points to 3.95%. One basis point is equivalent to 0.01%. Bond yields and prices have an inverse relationship. Trump noted that his early exit from the summit was due to "much bigger" things than negotiating a ceasefire between Tel Aviv and Tehran, while calling on Iranians to "immediately evacuate Tehran." "Indeed, there have been no signs of de-escalation in the aerial war, with reports of explosions against in Tehran overnight, while Iran launched more missiles into Israel," Deutsche Bank wrote in a note published Tuesday. The Group of Seven summit concluded in Canada on Tuesday, with no joint communique expected at the end of the gathering. "There are still big questions as to whether Israel would be receptive to a ceasefire, given that it is seeking to destroy Iran's nuclear program," said Deutsche Bank's analysts. The conflict between Israel and Iran has yet to show any concrete signs of abating after Israel conducted military strikes on Iran last Friday. Both regional powers issued new evacuation orders as missiles continue to be launched at each other for a fourth straight day. Investors will also be keeping an eye out on May retail sales data coming out later in the day.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Plays Down Iran-Israel Ceasefire as He Leaves G-7 Early
(Bloomberg) -- US President Donald Trump left the Group of Seven leaders meeting in Canada early to deal with the Israel-Iran conflict, but played down the chances of a ceasefire. As Part of a $45 Billion Push, ICE Prepares for a Vast Expansion of Detention Space Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' As American Architects Gather in Boston, Retrofits Are All the Rage How E-Scooters Conquered (Most of) Europe On Tuesday morning, he returned to Washington and criticized French President Emmanuel Macron for saying the move was possibly a sign he was working on a truce. 'Wrong!,' Trump said in reference to Macron on Truth Social. 'He has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a Cease Fire. Much bigger than that. Stay Tuned!' Trump hasn't clearly spelled out his next steps as he returns to the US capital. Israel and Iran continue to strike on one another. While global markets have calmed since hostilities started on Friday with Israel bombing Iran, there are still widespread fears the war will spread to other countries in the oil- and gas-producing region. Despite Trump's latest comments, top US officials said the president remains hopeful a peace deal can be achieved between Israel and Iran. The diplomatic flurry followed another 24 hours of intense bombardments, with Iran firing ballistic missiles and Israel striking targets across the Islamic Republic, including the capital of Tehran. The USS Nimitz aircraft carrier strike group is now sailing to the Middle East ahead of schedule, marking the first significant move of American military assets to the region since Friday. 'Iran should have signed the 'deal' I told them to sign,' Trump wrote in an earlier social media post, referring to nuclear talks between Tehran and Washington that are now on hold. 'What a shame, and waste of human life. Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. I said it over and over again! Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' It wasn't clear if Trump knew of a fresh round of attacks Israel may have planned for the city, which has a population of more than 9 million. Israel earlier warned residents of one Tehran neighborhood to evacuate and social media videos showed traffic jams as people sought to leave. Soon after Trump's post, Iran's Fars news agency reported several explosions east of the city. The American president kept his options open. As well as urging Iran to accept a deal that restricts its nuclear activities in return for sanctions relief, he has maintained a vague stance on whether the US might intervene in the war offensively. For now, the US says its only helping Israel defend against Iran's missile and drone salvos. Steve Witkoff, Trump's top Middle East envoy, who headed five rounds of talks with the Islamic Republic on its atomic program until Israeli strikes last week, might meet Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi later this week, Axios reported on Tuesday, citing unnamed US officials. 'They want to make a deal, and as soon as I leave here, we're going to be doing something,' Trump told reporters in Canada on Monday, without providing details. Open Conflict Long-standing tensions between Iran and Israel erupted into open fighting last week, when Israel launched surprise attacks on Iranian military and nuclear sites and killed senior commanders and atomic scientists. Since then, its achieved air superiority over much of Iran, allowing it to bomb major cities and infrastructure frequently. For Iran's government, the showdown poses a strategic dilemma. It can't risk appearing weak, yet its retaliatory options are shrinking. And proxy forces it supports across the region have been largely degraded by Israeli wars against them since October 2023. More than 200 people have been killed in Iran by Israel's strikes, according to the last official tally from the Iranian government. In Israel, the government says 24 people have been killed and around 400 injured. Israel has signaled it wants to continue its campaign for now as it looks to set back or destroy Iran's nuclear program. While Iran insists it has no plans to build an atomic bomb, it is enriching uranium far beyond the levels need for civilian purposes, such as fueling nuclear power plants. 'They want to stop and continue producing the weapons of death, both the nuclear weapons that threaten our existence and the ballistic missiles,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Monday. 'But we are committed to destroying these two threats.' 'If that can be achieved in another way, please — but we gave it a chance,' he added. In a telephone call with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Monday, Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian said that his country will respond to Israel's ongoing strikes with proportional retaliation. 'We do not seek to escalate the conflict, but we will respond to any attack on Iranian soil in a manner that will make them regret it,' Pezeshkian said. Israel's airstrikes have managed to deliver a blow to Iran's nuclear program, with the United Nations' atomic watchdog reporting damage at various sites including Natanz, a key uranium-enrichment facility. But military experts say Israel needs US assistance to destroy Natanz and Fordow, another atomic site that's buried deep below ground. Alex Pfeiffer, a White House spokesperson, on Monday denied claims on social media that the US would join Israel in its military offensive against Iran. 'American forces are maintaining their defensive posture, and that has not changed,' he said in a post to X. Oil was steady in early trading on Tuesday, with Brent rising 0.4% to $73.54 a barrel as of 6:12 a.m. in London. It's up about 6% since the conflict started. Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software US Allies and Adversaries Are Dodging Trump's Tariff Threats ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

CNN
39 minutes ago
- CNN
Israel says Iran was racing toward a bomb. US says it was years away
When Israel launched its series of strikes against Iran last week, it also issued a number of dire warnings about the country's nuclear program, suggesting Iran was fast approaching a point of no return in its quest to obtain nuclear weapons and that the strikes were necessary to preempt that outcome. But US intelligence assessments had reached a different conclusion – not only was Iran not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon, it was also up to three years away from being able to produce and deliver one to a target of its choosing, according to four people familiar with the assessment. Now, after days of Israeli airstrikes, US intelligence officials believe that so far, Israel may have set back Iran's nuclear program by only a matter of months, according to one of those people, a US official. Even as Israel has done significant damage to Iran's facility at Natanz, which houses centrifuges necessary to enrich uranium, a second, heavily fortified enrichment site at Fordow has remained effectively untouched. Israel lacks the capability to damage Fordow without specific US weapons and aerial support, defense experts say. 'Israel can hover over those nuclear facilities, render them inoperable, but if you really want to dismantle them it's either a US military strike or a deal,' said Brett McGurk, a former top diplomat to the Middle East under the Trump and Biden administrations and a CNN analyst. That raises a key dilemma for the Trump administration, which is struggling to avoid becoming entangled in a costly, complex war in the Middle East. Although President Donald Trump has made clear that he does not want to involve the US in Israel's efforts to destroy Iran's nuclear infrastructure, the administration recognizes that the only way Israel can knock out Iran's nuclear program is with American military assistance, sources told CNN over the weekend – in particular, US bombs capable of damaging underground facilities and the B-2 bombers that carry them. It's a tightrope that has led to debate among the more isolationist members of the president's advisers and some of Trump's more hawkish Republican allies – as well as some hedging from the president. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told ABC News on Sunday morning. Trump, speaking from the G7 Summit in Canada on Monday, urged Israel and Iran to begin talks 'before it's too late.' US Central Command, responsible for American military operations in the Middle East, has conveyed a greater sense of urgency than the civilian intelligence community when it comes to Iran's pursuit of a nuclear weapon. In the lead-up to Israel's latest attack, Central Command had endorsed a more dire timeline, believing Iran could obtain a usable nuclear weapon more quickly if it were to sprint towards that goal, according to a source familiar with the discussions. In recent weeks, some US military leaders, including US Central Command chief Gen. Michael Kurilla, have requested more resources to defend and support Israel as it continues to trade fire with Iran – although not to help it launch offensive attacks. '{Kurilla} would want to be prepared for the most challenging contingency,' according to a source familiar with the matter, referring to his push for positioning US assets in the Middle East in support of Israel. The US is realigning forces in the region as the conflict escalates to ensure American forces are protected and help defend Israel if necessary. On Monday, a US official told CNN that the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group is moving to the Middle East 'without delay.' Some US naval assets capable of defending against ballistic missiles already in the Middle East are expected to move into the eastern Mediterranean 'in the coming days,' the official added. Two US Navy ships intercepted missiles in defense of Israel at least twice over the weekend, the official said. US military and intelligence officials have long said that the US and Israel often differ on how to interpret information on Iran's nuclear program, although they closely share it. Trump's Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, testified in March that the US intelligence community, 'continues to assess Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khameni has not authorized a nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was pressed Sunday during an interview with Fox News on why Israel's intelligence differed from Gabbard's congressional testimony. Asked if something changed between the end of March and this week and if the US intel was wrong, Netanyahu said: 'The intel we got and we shared with the United States was absolutely clear, was absolutely clear that they were working, in a secret plan to weaponize the uranium. They were marching very quickly.' Prev Next The International Atomic Energy Agency, a top international watchdog, said last week that Iran had amassed enough uranium enriched at levels just below weapons-grade to potentially make nine nuclear bombs, which it termed 'a matter of serious concern.' The challenge, for Iran, is producing not merely a crude nuclear weapon – which experts say Iran could potentially do within the space of months if it decided to – but also producing a working delivery system, which could take much longer. As US intelligence officials – and the IAEA – work to assess the damage Israel has caused to Iran's nuclear architecture, there is some concern that the blitz might cause Iran to do what US officials believe it hasn't up until now: pursue weaponization. But, said one source familiar with the latest intelligence, 'Iran is reeling. Not sure they have the capacity or expertise to do that anymore.' Israel has yet to seriously damage perhaps the most impenetrable fortress of Iran's nuclear program: Fordow, an enrichment facility buried deep beneath a mountain. 'It comes back to one question: Fordow, Fordow, Fordow,' McGurk told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Monday. 'That is something the United States can take out. That is something the Israelis will have a lot of difficulty doing. If this ends with Fordow intact, you could actually have a worse problem,' said McGurk. 'You could actually have Iran more inclined to go to a nuclear weapon and they have that infrastructure intact.' Trump and his administration have made the case that a diplomatic solution could still come to fruition. But Iran has told Qatar and Oman that it will not engage while it is under attack from Israel, a regional diplomat told CNN, and Israel has signaled no short-term end to the operation.