
Consumers win cases, but justice delayed
Increasingly, they're being forced to file Execution Applications (EAs), a step that was meant to be rare but has now become routine just to get the commission's orders enforced.
Even then, the wait continues. Consumers complain of bureaucratic delays, indifferent companies, and a system with few teeth to ensure compliance. As a result, many end up spending more time and money trying to enforce the verdict than they did pursuing the case.
Shreyansh K, a resident of LB Nagar who filed an EA many years ago, said, "I filed my complaint in 2014, and in 2019, the commission awarded me Rs 2 lakh. But even after filing multiple EAs, I haven't received a single rupee till now."
You Can Also Check:
Hyderabad AQI
|
Weather in Hyderabad
|
Bank Holidays in Hyderabad
|
Public Holidays in Hyderabad
A senior official from one of the city's consumer commissions admitted that EA filings have surged in recent years.
"Getting a favourable judgment is tough. Getting it implemented is even tougher.
Each of the four commissions in Hyderabad has over 250 to 300 pending execution applications," the official said.
Many advocates attribute the crisis to poor enforcement mechanisms. "Consumer commissions can pass binding orders, but can't ensure compliance. Many firms delay payments or appeal to higher forums just to stall execution," said TV Rajeshwar Rao, president of the Hyderabad District Consumer Fora Advocates Association.
"Without the help of enforcement agencies like the police, warrants and compensation orders are often ignored. And when the opposite party disappears, there's little that can be done," he added.
As the backlog grows, consumer trust in the system is beginning to erode. What was supposed to be a quick and effective dispute redressal forum is increasingly seen as another stop in a long, uncertain legal journey.
What's an Execution Application?
When the party at fault does not comply with a consumer commission's order within 30-45 days, the complainant can file an Execution Application under Section 27A of Consumer Protection Act.
It seeks enforcement through legal means. The EA remains pending until proof of compliance is submitted by the opposite party.
A LONG WAIT FOR SOME…
Bank ignores order in FD case
Mohammed Zareena, a resident of Madhapur, approached the district consumer commission-III after her bank deducted money from a five-year fixed deposit to settle her husband's credit card dues. Last year, the commission ruled in her favour and ordered the bank to refund Rs 1.7 lakh and pay Rs 50,000 as compensation.
The bank ignored the ruling. Zareena filed an EA, but it's still pending, with no recovery in sight.
Dealer leaves buyer in limbo
Mandala Laxminarayana, a resident of Secunderabad, bought a second-hand car for Rs 5.7 lakh in 2020, only to find later that it had an unpaid loan of Rs 4.1 lakh and the ownership wasn't transferred. The district consumer redressal commission-II ruled in his favour, ordering a refund with interest and Rs 1 lakh compensation.
He filed an EA in 2021, but over three years later, the matter is still unresolved. He's left with a car he can't sell or use legally.
Buyer waits 5 yrs for compliance
In 2019, Vardharaju R, a resident of Saidabad, received the wrong sofa, a smaller blue version instead of the white XL he ordered. The district consumer redressal commission-II ruled in his favour and ordered the seller to replace it and pay Rs 50,000 in compensation. When the firm didn't comply, he filed an EA in 2020. Five years on, the sofa hasn't been replaced and the compensation hasn't arrived.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Thane MACT Awards ₹87 Lakh Compensation in 2015 Road Accident Death
Thane: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Thane, awarded a compensation of Rs 87.13 lakh to the family of a 55-year-old school teacher who succumbed to injuries sustained in a road accident in 2015. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The tribunal, presided over by Member R.V. Mohite, held the driver of a tempo solely responsible for the mishap. The accident occurred on July 31, 2015, near Sunita Apartment in Ulhasnagar-3, when the teacher was riding his motorcycle. According to case records, a tempo driver suddenly opened the vehicle door, causing the motorcyclist to crash into it. The victim suffered a severe head injury and remained in a coma for nearly a year before passing away on July 31, 2016. The tribunal relied on various pieces of evidence, including the FIR, spot panchanama, medical records, and crucial CCTV footage, which was presented in court by the investigating officer. Although the registration numbers and identity were not clearly visible in the footage, the tribunal accepted corroborative statements, including that of the tempo owner, who confirmed the vehicle and driver involved. The tribunal rejected objections raised by the insurer, which challenged the admissibility of the CCTV footage and raised concerns about an alleged policy breach. Member of MACT, Mohite, ruled that strict evidentiary rules under BNS do not apply to claims under the Motor Vehicles Act, and there was no evidence of footage tampering. The court also dismissed the claim of a licensing issue, confirming there was no breach of the insurance policy. The deceased was a permanent teacher at a Ulhasnagar municipal school, earning Rs 63,594 per month. The court considered his income, age, and number of dependents to compute compensation. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The awarded amount includes loss of future income, future prospects, medical expenses, along with amounts for consortium, estate, funeral expenses, and love and affection. The tribunal directed the tempo owner and insurer to jointly and severally pay the total amount with 9% annual interest from the date of petition filing until full payment. The compensation will be distributed among the widow and two adult children of the deceased, with part of the amount to be invested in fixed deposits in nationalised banks.


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
KSLU to get dedicated administrative building after 15 yrs
Hubballi: After more than 15 years since its establishment, Karnataka State Law University (KSLU) in Hubballi is set to have its own dedicated administrative building. The construction of the G+3 structure is under way on 2.4 acres, at an estimated cost of Rs 39.5 crore. The building is expected to be completed by May 2026. KSLU, established in Jan 2009, currently operates from a former PWD guest house that was repurposed into an administrative office. Spread over a 55-acre campus, the university offers undergraduate and postgraduate courses in constitutional law, intellectual property rights, business and trade law, criminal law, and international law. While around 1,200 students study on the campus, the university has a total student strength of approximately 45,000 across the state. The total built-up area of the four-storey structure will be 94,761 sq. ft. The ground floor will be 24,440 sq. ft, first floor 20,321 sq. ft, second floor 22,255 sq. ft, and third floor 20,321 sq. ft. KSLU vice-chancellor Prof C Basavaraju told TOI that the new building is being constructed on 2.4 acres in front of the existing building. "The project faced land allocation issues earlier. The work was awarded to a Bengaluru-based company in Jan. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why is everyone rushing to get their hands on this new air cooler? News of the Discovery Undo We expect the work to be completed within the stipulated 11-month timeframe.," he informed. RM Kulkarni, KSLU assistant executive engineer (AEE), explained that the ground floor will house a canteen, bank, post office, storeroom, physical director's office, laboratory and toilets. The first floor will include the vice- chancellor's office, related administrative offices, DPAR section, legal cell, clinic, and a 60-seat auditorium. The second floor will accommodate the finance section, ICT section, syndicate zone and cabins, student welfare and development section, academic zone and toilets. The third floor will feature the engineering section, SC/ST records cell, planning and management office, NSS office, administrative section, and toilets.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
CM: Submit revised estimated cost for Barapullah elevated road project
New Delhi: Chief minister Rekha Gupta has asked the public works department to submit the revised estimated cost for the Barapullah elevated road project to get it approved by lieutenant governor VK Saxena. The department has already spent nearly Rs 1,239 crore on the project against the sanctioned amount of Rs 1,260 crore, while a portion of the road measuring 690 metres is yet to be built. The overall cost of the 3.5-km road, connecting Sarai Kale Khan in the west of the Yamuna with Mayur Vihar in the east, is expected to exceed the sanctioned amount. The additional chief secretary of the finance department observed at the meeting of the expenditure and finance committee last week that approval was being sought only for the arbitration award of Rs 175 crore, due to the delay in completing the project. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi While deferring the proposal seeking Rs 175 crore, the committee, chaired by the chief minister, directed that PWD prepare a comprehensive proposal for the cabinet by taking into account all the pending liabilities, including the arbitration awards, for seeking the approval of the LG for the revised estimated cost, which, sources said, reached Rs 1,330 crore. It added that PWD should issue instructions to the executing agency to expedite and complete the project within the stipulated time frame. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like See Results for Car Selling Sites Search Now Undo Phase III of the Barapullah elevated road was approved by the then LG on Dec 12, 2014, and an amount of Rs 1,260.6 crore was sanctioned for it. Though the elevated road was to be completed by Oct 17, 2017, the project was delayed because govt failed to acquire a portion of land owned by private individuals. The case went into arbitration, leading to an award of Rs 120 crore in favour of the contractor. The amount eventually increased to Rs 175 crore, with interest and goods and services tax added to it. To enforce the award, the contractor filed a petition in Delhi High Court . Following the court's directions, PWD paid an amount of Rs 170 crore to the contractor. Gupta has asked the department to seek legal opinion on whether the arbitration order can be challenged now. The committee also deliberated that an inquiry was needed to ascertain the loss to the govt exchequer due to payment of arbitration awards without seeking the opinion of the law department and fixing responsibility for the erring officials. The chief minister last week ordered an inquiry by the anti-corruption branch for approval and acceptance of arbitration awards by authorities "not competent to accept" and delay in execution of the project.