
Gaza's Final Act: A Handful Of Dust, A Skyful Of Death
This two-month ceasefire may perhaps be the first sigh of relief in months for the two million civilians trapped in the narrow, battered Gaza Strip. They have been under relentless siege since October 2023, when Hamas operatives stormed across the Israeli border and killed more than 1,200 people.
A Collective Sigh of Relief
The ceasefire will be a reprieve for medics like Dr Taher Almadhoun, a young physician I first interviewed on Zoom back in 2021 during another punishing round of bombardment. Even then, he had just lost his two brothers but kept working, tending to the wounded with a composure that almost seemed borrowed from someone else - someone not living in a city under fire.
I tried reaching him months ago, partly out of concern, partly to reassure myself that he hadn't been added to Gaza's long list of casualties. For a long time, there was no answer. But silence in Gaza is never just silence. It is the hush of collapsed buildings, the severed phone lines, the dreadful uncertainty of whether someone is alive or gone.
When his reply finally came, it was a message steeped in both exhaustion and stubborn resolve. He told me he was now married to a dentist, that they had a baby barely a year old -- a child who has never known anything but displacement. The house they built together over years of borrowed money and hope had been crushed into a mound of concrete, indistinguishable from all the other ruins.
Since the war began, they have drifted from one temporary shelter to another: crowded classrooms, tents on bare earth, the broken shells of relatives' homes. By day, he and his wife return to the wards to care for the endless influx of the wounded. By night, they try to sleep under tarpaulins, listening to the growl of drones that never really leaves the sky.
Almadhoun had ambitions to study advanced medicine abroad, to build something stable out of the wreckage. Now, those dreams have been replaced by simpler wishes: to see the dawn, to keep his child alive one more day. In Gaza, waking up to your child's face has become a rare joy not that many have been robbed of.
Yet, Almadhoun's story is not unique. It reflects the quiet ordeal of thousands of medics and nurses whose working lives have become a theatre of impossible choices. Each hour demands decisions that would unmake most people: whom to comfort with the last vial of morphine, which child to prioritise when there are no supplies left.
Life And Death
For them, a ceasefire would mean more than a pause in fighting. It would mean a chance, however fleeting, to remember what it feels like simply to live without fear. To call what's happening in Gaza a humanitarian crisis is an understatement. To call it a catastrophe feels somehow woefully inadequate. What is happening is a long, withering disintegration of a people's collective spirit - the slow unravelling of human dignity.
This is a place where the living and the dead are neighbours. The poet TS Eliot wrote in The Waste Land, 'I will show you fear in a handful of dust.' But in Gaza, fear comes in a bag of flour, in the flicker of a drone overhead, in the empty shelves of a pharmacy
Since October 2023, some 65,000 souls have been lost - an arithmetic of horror that defies comprehension. But numbers alone cannot capture the personal hell of every mother, every child, every old man whose life has been reduced to a daily ritual of hunger, grief and dread.
Food Aid or Killing Fields?
Across Gaza, aid convoys arrive bearing food that is barely sufficient to keep people from starvation. Even this aid has become a source of terror: distribution sites have turned into killing fields. Witnesses recount how tanks, drones and machine guns have targeted civilians lining up for flour or lentils. According to local reports and the Hamas-run health authorities, at least 600 Palestinians have been killed and over 4,000 injured simply while waiting for rations.
Yet, no matter which side of politics one occupies, there is a truth that transcends the noise of blame: these people are exhausted, starving and broken. A journalist on the ground described Gaza as 'a dead city, a dying city'. This is no hyperbole. Two million inhabitants, half of them children, live without running water, without electricity, without medicine. The few remaining hospitals are overwhelmed beyond any reasonable capacity. Doctors and nurses work shifts so long they barely remain conscious, tending to patients whose bodies have been ravaged by wounds, infection, or chronic illness left untreated for months.
It is here, amid the overcrowded corridors and the makeshift morgues, that the words of WB Yeats in The Second Coming feel like a prophecy:
'Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned.'
There is a sense in Gaza that the ceremony of innocence was drowned long ago. When a widow named Umm Raed al-Nuaizi asked, 'Why are our children's lives seen as so cheap?', she voiced a question that has no satisfactory answer - only the echo of silence from a world that has become accustomed to atrocity. Her son was shot and left in intensive care while trying to collect flour. In any other place, the deliberate targeting of civilians would be an unthinkable scandal. Here, it has become an almost unremarkable event
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an entity supported by American and Israeli authorities, has been described by some UN officials as a 'death trap'. The UN has condemned the system as grotesquely inadequate, yet it remains the only conduit for food to a population at risk of famine. The paradox is chilling: the desperate act of collecting a sack of flour can end in a funeral.
Dead Men Walking
Beyond the headlines, there is a quieter agony. Patients with diabetes or heart disease now slip away in dimly lit rooms, unable to access the simplest treatments. For them, life has become what Eliot called 'the hollow men': a grey half-existence where the body remains, but the spirit has fled.
'We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!'
If Gaza is a wasteland, it is one constructed by human hands. It's a place where hope has withered in the sun, and where each dawn brings no promise of relief.
And yet the horror does not only belong to those who are dying. Those who survive must reckon with what survival even means. A child who grows up amid such relentless trauma carries invisible wounds that no treaty can heal. Even if the guns fall silent, what future can there be for a generation that has known nothing but siege, bombardment and bereavement?
A Cemetary Of The Living
When you walk through the debris of Gaza, the landscape resembles something out of Dante - rings of hell composed of collapsed buildings, scorched cars and shattered lives. Some aid workers describe the place as 'a cemetery of the living.'
There are also dozens of Israeli hostages held by Hamas, their condition unknown, their families living in paralysing uncertainty. In this tragedy, there are no simple villains or saints - only layers upon layers of pain and desperation. A mother in Rafah wonders each night if a drone's crosshairs are pointed at her roof. A father in Khan Younis calculates whether to risk fetching food or stay hidden in the ruins. A boy with pneumonia gasps for breath in a hospital with no oxygen tanks. Each day begins and ends with the same question: Will we survive until tomorrow?
When we were children learning about the Holocaust, we often asked ourselves how modern, democratic Europe -- so proud of its civilisation -- could stand by while millions of Jews were starved, humiliated and systematically erased. That chapter became not only a wound in history but a profound, unshakable shame that Europe still carries like a hidden scar.
And now, in our own lifetime, we are witnessing another terrible spectacle: a whole population being pushed beyond the brink - killed, maimed, starved and humiliated in plain view of the world. Gaza's people were already half broken from years of siege, air strikes and the slow suffocation of their daily lives. What is unfolding today feels less like a sudden catastrophe and more like the cruel final act of a long, deliberate process of subjugation.
The Death Of The Human Soul
History will judge these months not by the language of press releases or sound bytes but by the testimony of the dispossessed. Their suffering, like the 'blood-dimmed tide', has swept away any illusions that this is simply a conflict over territory or ideology. This is a catastrophe of the human soul.
It is impossible to read the accounts from Gaza without feeling that something essential is being lost. Not merely infrastructure or lives, but the moral compass that makes civilisation possible. When food becomes a pretext for slaughter, when medicine becomes a bargaining chip, when children become targets, we cross a line that should never have been crossed.
'Between the idea
And the reality
Between the motion
And the act
Falls the Shadow.'
That shadow now lies across Gaza, suffocating every possibility of normal life. Even if the siege were lifted tomorrow, the wounds of the spirit would remain. What jobs would there be in this dead city? What homes are left to return to? What peace can there be when so many ghosts will forever haunt the survivors?
A Flicker of Hope?
Yet amid this devastation, there is still a flicker of resilience, as fragile as a candle in the wind - the wasteland is breeding lilacs out of the dead land in an otherwise lifeless world. The people of Gaza have not relinquished their humanity, even as the world's attention drifts elsewhere. In the ruins, volunteers share water, strangers shelter the newly displaced, and doctors save lives despite knowing that each day may be their last.
This resilience is not victory, nor does it erase the horror. But it is a reminder that even in the most desolate wasteland, something sacred endures - the simple, unyielding conviction that life matters.
In the end, no matter what justification is offered, Gaza remains a place that should haunt the conscience of anyone who dares to look honestly. For all the rhetoric of policy and security, there is a deeper question that will linger long after the last shot is fired: what have we become, that we can watch such suffering and call it 'collateral'?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
The nuclear policeman
On July 2, Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian ordered his country to suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog. He explained this decision as 'a natural response to the unjustified, unconstructive, and destructive conduct' of the IAEA's Director General Rafael Grossi. Tehran believes Mr. Grossi cleared the ground for Israel's unprovoked strikes on its nuclear facilities by preparing a 'misleading' report on Iran's compliance with non-proliferation obligations. On the basis of this report, the IAEA's Board of Governors on June 12, one day before Israel's attack, adopted a resolution stating that Iran had 'failed to cooperate fully' with the Agency and accused it of 'repeatedly failing to provide the Agency with technically credible explanations' to its various queries. Israel and the U.S. used this resolution to push forward the narrative that Iran was on the verge of making a nuclear bomb and the only way to stop it was to destroy its nuclear installations through 'pre-emptive' military strikes. Subsequently, after Israel struck Iran's nuclear sites, Mr. Grossi made a clarification that seemed to walk back the impression created by the June 12 resolution. In an interview with CNN, he said, 'We did not have any proof of a systematic effort by Iran to make a nuclear weapon.' A spokesperson of Iran's Ministry of External Affairs shared the video clip of Mr. Grossi's interview on social media with the comment, 'This is too late, Mr. Grossi: you obscured this truth in your absolutely biased report…Do you know how many innocent Iranians have been killed/maimed as a result of this criminal war? You've made IAEA a partner to this unjust war of aggression.' It cannot be denied that Mr. Grossi and the IAEA have played a major role in shaping the discourse around Iran's nuclear programme. But is there merit in the Iranian claim that under Mr. Grossi, the IAEA has been acting in alignment with Western, and in particular, Israeli political interests? Mr. Grossi, 64, is a diplomat from the Argentine Foreign Service. In a career spanning 40 years, he carved a niche for himself in nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament, serving as president of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (2014-2016) before assuming office as Director General of the IAEA on December 3, 2019. He said in a 2020 interview, 'I feel like I prepared for this my whole life.' As the IAEA chief, Mr. Grossi made headlines in 2022 for his energetic efforts to secure Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, which was caught in the cross-fire of the Ukraine-Russia war. An accidental strike on it could unleash a nuclear disaster that would impact much of Europe. Mr. Grossi, at some risk to his own life, personally visited the nuclear plant near the frontline even as shells rained down not far away. With the consent of the Ukrainian leadership, he shut down all but one reactor, and as an additional safety measure, left behind a team of UN inspectors — an arrangement that continues to this day. But his efforts did not stop there. A month later, he went to St. Petersburg and met Russian President Vladimir Putin. His mission: to extract an assurance that Russian forces would not target the Zaporizhzhia plant. Mr. Grossi's trip had the intended effect, with the Russians steering clear of attacking the facility. IAEA's mandate Mr. Grossi's actions were fully in keeping with the mandate of the IAEA, which is to promote and safeguard peaceful nuclear programmes all over the world. Today, however, the IAEA is known more as an agency tasked with verifying that nuclear materials meant for civilian use are not diverted for weaponisation. In fact, IAEA inspectors cannot, and are not mandated to, search for weapons. They merely monitor nuclear facilities to ensure that the signatory country is fulfilling its obligations under the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement (CSA). Critically, IAEA inspections, by design, are incapable of generating verifiable evidence of the absence of a military nuclear programme. Nor can its reports — with their catalogue of 'failures' in compliance or cooperation — serve as a proxy for the existence of a weaponisation programme, in the absence of independent intel proving as much. Since IAEA inspections cannot possibly cover every square inch of a vast country, the problem of 'unknowns' at 'undeclared' locations are a given. While these might warrant further investigation, it is questionable whether they can be used to fuel speculation about a country's intentions at a time of escalating tensions. And yet, the ambiguous wording in the IAEA resolution and Mr. Grossi's public statements did precisely that, lending credence to the narrative of Iran building a nuclear bomb. Ironically, American intel leaked to the media, as well as a statement in March 2025 by the U.S. Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, confirmed that Iran was not building a bomb. Another major element of this narrative was that Iran had 400 kg of highly enriched uranium (HEU), which is not needed for civilian use. Mr. Grossi dwelled on this aspect often in his public pronouncements. Yet, it is not illegal under the NPT for a signatory country to hold uranium enriched to 60%. For Iran, however, it was prohibited, but only under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the 2015 agreement which limited its enrichment rights to 3.67% and capped its stockpiling of enriched uranium at 300kg. But the JCPOA became defunct — at least from the Iranian perspective — the moment the U.S. withdrew from it in 2018 and the sanctions relief guaranteed under it for Iran failed to materialise. But Mr. Grossi went along with the position of holding Iran to a JCPOA the West had already scuttled, while disregarding the IAEA's own resolutions that prohibit military attacks on civilian nuclear installations. Attacks prohibited The IAEA's General Conference resolution (407) adopted in November 1983 states that 'all armed attacks against nuclear installations devoted to peaceful purposes should be explicitly prohibited'. A draft resolution of September 26, 1985, submitted jointly by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden not only forbade Israel from targeting Iraq's civilian nuclear facilities, it further called 'upon Israel urgently to place all its nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards' – something difficult to envisage at a time when exemption for Israel from international law is getting increasingly normalised. Incidentally, both these resolutions were from a time when the IAEA was led by Mr. Grossi's illustrious predecessor, Hans Blix. Under the IAEA statutes and the UN charter, Iran is entitled to a peaceful nuclear programme. It is also entitled to protection of its nuclear installations from military attacks. And yet, Mr. Grossi never condemned the Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. On the contrary, his words and deeds amplified suspicions about Iran's intentions, which were used by Israel and the U.S. to justify their attack. Today, in the aftermath of a fragile and difficult ceasefire, Mr. Grossi is back to stoking fears about Iran's nuclear programme by claiming it could start enriching uranium again in a matter of months. Not surprisingly, Iran has refused to allow IAEA inspection of its bombed-out nuclear facilities, with the Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, stating, 'Grossi's insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent.' Had Mr. Grossi displayed a little of the same urgency for protecting Iran's civilian nuclear facilities that he did for Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, it may have gone some way toward protecting the IAEA's credibility among nuclear threshold states.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Israel to send delegation to Qatar for Gaza ceasefire talks: Report
Israel will send a delegation to Qatar on Sunday for talks on a possible ceasefire and hostage deal in Gaza, an Israeli official told Reuters. The move comes after the Palestinian group Hamas said it had responded to a US-backed proposal 'in a positive spirit.' The Israeli official, who asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the talks, said the delegation will travel to Qatar in an effort to push forward the negotiations. The discussions aim to finalise a 60-day truce in Gaza. Earlier this week, US President Donald Trump said that Israel had agreed to 'the necessary conditions to finalise' the deal. While Hamas has not confirmed the full details of its response, a Palestinian official linked to the group said there were still concerns. These include issues around humanitarian aid, access through the Rafah crossing into Egypt, and a clear timetable for Israeli troop withdrawal. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not yet commented on Trump's statement. He is expected to meet the US president in Washington on Monday. Although both sides appear engaged in the process, there are still major differences. Netanyahu has insisted that Hamas must be disarmed, a demand the group has so far rejected. According to Israeli sources, Hamas is still holding 20 living hostages. Israeli media reported on Friday that Israel had received Hamas' latest response and was reviewing it. The current phase of conflict began on 7 October 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing about 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli figures. Since then, Israel's military response in Gaza has led to over 57,000 deaths, according to Gaza's health ministry. The fighting has displaced nearly the entire population and worsened the humanitarian crisis. Israel denies allegations of genocide and war crimes.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Israel to send delegation to Qatar for renewed Gaza ceasefire and hostage talks
Israel has decided to send a delegation to Qatar for talks on a possible Gaza hostage and ceasefire deal, an Israeli official said, reviving hopes of a breakthrough in negotiations to end the almost 21month war. read more People take part in a protest demanding the end of the war and immediate release of hostages held by Hamas in the Gaza Strip, and against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government in Tel Aviv, Israel, Saturday, July 5, 2025. (AP Photo) Israel will send a delegation to Qatar on Sunday to revive stalled negotiations on a potential Gaza ceasefire and hostage deal, an Israeli official told Reuters, raising hopes for a possible breakthrough in the 21-month-long conflict. The move comes shortly after Hamas said it had responded in a 'positive spirit' to a US-backed ceasefire proposal, days after President Donald Trump announced that Israel had agreed 'to the necessary conditions to finalise' a 60-day truce. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not commented on Trump's announcement, an unnamed Israeli official confirmed the delegation's imminent travel to Doha, highlighting the sensitivity of the talks. Despite renewed momentum, major gaps remain. A senior Palestinian official from a group allied with Hamas cited unresolved concerns, including the delivery of humanitarian aid, access through the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt, and clarity on the timeline for Israeli troop withdrawals. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is due to meet Trump in Washington on Monday, has yet to comment on Trump's announcement, and in their public statements Hamas and Israel remain far apart. Netanyahu has repeatedly said Hamas must be disarmed, a position the militant group, which is thought to be holding 20 living hostages, has so far refused to discuss. Israeli media said on Friday that Israel had received and was reviewing Hamas' response to the ceasefire proposal. The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Gaza's health ministry says Israel's retaliatory military assault on the enclave has killed over 57,000 Palestinians. It has also caused a hunger crisis, displaced Gaza's entire population internally and prompted accusations of genocide and war crimes. Israel denies the accusations. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies