Illinois jury nears deliberation in killing of Palestinian-American boy
The Brief
Testimony has concluded in the murder trial of Joseph Czuba, who is accused of killing 6-year-old Wadee Al Fayoumi and injuring his mother.
Prosecutors say the attack was racially motivated, citing Czuba's statements about fearing Muslims.
Closing arguments could take place as early as Friday, with jury deliberations possibly beginning before the weekend.
PLAINFIELD, Ill. - Testimony has wrapped up in the Will County trial of 73-year-old Joseph Czuba, who is charged with the fatal stabbing of 6-year-old Wadee Al Fayoumi and the critical wounding of the boy's mother, Hannan Shaheen.
What we know
Prosecutors say Czuba attacked the boy and his mother in October 2023, just days after the Hamas attack on Israel, because they are Palestinian-Americans.
The two were tenants living in Czuba's Plainfield home.
In a video played in court Thursday, Czuba is seen in a police car speaking—unprompted—about the attack. He claimed he feared for his life.
"I was afraid for my wife. I was afraid they were going to do Jihad on me," Czuba said.
Czuba continued speaking to a Will County deputy sheriff, saying, "I was just trying to help her out because she couldn't afford a house… She didn't tell me she was a Muslim… She was a trained fighter. Let me tell you she was a problem. They are like infested rats."
The mother and son had been living at the home for more than two years without incident.
Czuba's wife testified that he became withdrawn and angry after watching news coverage of the Hamas attack.
In the video played in court, Czuba said, "I can't believe all these protests of people supporting the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization). It's so evil. It's like Nazis."
Meanwhile, forensic experts testified that blood and DNA from Czuba and the victims were found on the knife allegedly used in the attack.
Czuba waived his right to testify in his own defense. His attorneys called three sheriff's deputies to the stand in an effort to clarify some of the evidence.
What's next
Closing arguments in the case could take place as soon as Friday. If that happens, the jury may begin deliberations before the weekend.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US criticises UK decision to sanction two Israeli ministers
The US has condemned the UK's decision to sanction two Israeli ministers over 'egregious abuses' of human rights in Gaza. Donald Trump's secretary of state Marco Rubio said that the travel ban and asset freeze imposed on Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich 'do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire' and called for the measures to be reversed. The UK is taking the action alongside Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway. Mr Rubio said that the US 'stands shoulder-to-shoulder' with Israel. UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said on Tuesday that the ministers had been 'inciting violence against Palestinian people for months and months and months, they have been encouraging egregious abuses of human rights'. In a post on X, Mr Rubio said that the 'United States condemns the sanctions imposed by the governments of United Kingdom, Canada, Norway, New Zealand, and Australia on two sitting members of the Israeli cabinet. These sanctions do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war.' The United States condemns the sanctions imposed by the governments of United Kingdom, Canada, Norway, New Zealand, and Australia on two sitting members of the Israeli cabinet. These sanctions do not advance U.S.-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and… — Secretary Marco Rubio (@SecRubio) June 10, 2025 He went on to say that America reminds 'our partners not to forget who the real enemy is'. 'The United States urges the reversal of the sanctions and stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Israel.' The sanctions against Israel's security and finance ministers were announced on Tuesday. Mr Smotrich and Mr Ben-Gvir both belong to right-wing parties which help to prop up Benjamin Netanyahu's fragile coalition government, and both have been criticised for their hardline stance on Gaza. Mr Smotrich has campaigned against allowing aid into Gaza, and also supported the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which are considered illegal under international law. Meanwhile, Mr Ben-Gvir has called for Gaza's people to be resettled from the territory. In a joint statement with the foreign ministers of the other nations who also imposed sanctions, Mr Lammy said that the two sanctioned ministers had incited 'serious abuses of Palestinian human rights' and described their actions as 'not acceptable'. The statement added: 'We will strive to achieve an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the immediate release of the remaining hostages by Hamas which can have no future role in the governance of Gaza, a surge in aid and a path to a two-state solution.' Downing Street said that the two men had been sanctioned in their 'personal capacities' and not 'their ministries and departments'. 'As the Israeli ambassador to the UK has said in recent interviews, their statements in their ministerial capacities do not even represent government policy,' a Number 10 spokesman said. The UK and other allies have upped pressure on Israel in recent weeks, amid aid shortages in Gaza and suggestions a large-scale offensive could be launched into the territory. It has been reported that only scarce amounts of aid is making it into the hands of people, and the slow flow of food and medicines has prompted warnings of famine and starvation.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Is Officially Spiting Pride Month
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that President Donald Trump has no intention to officially recognize Pride Month. 'There are no plans for a proclamation for the month of June,' Leavitt said at a White House press briefing Tuesday. 'But I can tell you this president is very proud to be a president for all Americans, regardless of race, religion or creed.' The reporter who asked the question, MAGA podcaster Alec Lace, suggested that the White House could name June 'Nuclear Family Month' rather than honoring LGBTQ Americans. President Bill Clinton first named June 'Gay and Lesbian Pride Month' in 1999 in a tribute to the Stonewall riots of June 1969, which helped launch the gay rights movement. Pride Month was expanded to include bisexual and transgender Americans under President Barack Obama. Trump declined to officially proclaim June Pride Month during his first presidency—although in 2019, he tweeted in support of Pride Month. 'As we celebrate LGBT Pride Month and recognize the outstanding contributions LGBT people have made to our great Nation, let us also stand in solidarity with the many LGBT people who live in dozens of countries worldwide that punish, imprison, or even execute individuals on the basis of their sexual orientation,' Trump said. 'My Administration has launched a global campaign to decriminalize homosexuality and invite all nations to join us in this effort!' However, since returning to office, Trump has made what he calls 'gender ideology' among his top priorities. Trump has eradicated DEI programs from the federal government, sought to prevent trans women from competing in women's sports and also to eliminate trans people from the military. Many corporations and brands are planning to scale back their celebrations of Pride Month in this new political climate, according to CNN. Nevertheless, many LGBTQ Americans are still boisterously celebrating June. Pride Month events in Washington, D.C.—including a parade and a street festival—are expected to draw hundreds of thousands of attendees, according to ABC News.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Un-American' or 'necessary'? Voters divided on Trump's LA protest crackdown
US President Donald Trump has sent thousands of National Guard troops and hundreds of US Marines to Los Angeles as protests take place against the administration's ramped-up immigration enforcement. While the president's allies cheer him on, both the governor of California and the mayor of Los Angeles say Trump is overstepping his authority and stoking tensions. Everyday Americans are no less divided over the issue. But do they feel it is the president or the protesters who have gone too far? Here's what six voters had to say about the news. This Indiana man worries about the precedent Trump is setting by sending the National Guard into Los Angeles. I've seen some different takes on the legality of it, but it feels to me like the federal government is being very, very heavy-handed on this, which is concerning to me since protest is a protected form of expression in this country. I'm concerned that this sets Americans against Americans, and specifically American military against American citizens. The Trump administration is going about [the ICE raids] in an interesting manner... While making unilateral raids like these, they're making a lot of mistakes and those mistakes are costing people their freedoms. [The Trump administration] is not admitting to their mistakes and they're not following due process. We have laws in this country for a reason. This Mexico-born Texas resident - a naturalised US citizen - supports the deployment of troops to put down "shameful" protests in California. It's a shame that people who have come to this country to set themselves up are doing this, the riots. I tend to think that many of the rioters are people with criminal histories. Violent protesters. People that want to be here to create a future and have a family in this generous country would not be doing that. Many are even waving Mexican flags. That's so shameful. I respect the president in so many ways. He is a guy who knows how to get things done. He's the law-and-order president. What was he supposed to do? Let them burn trash? Let them destroy Los Angeles?When I saw they called on the National Guard, I just started crying because he's weaponising everything he possibly can. There's no free speech, there's no dissent - it's Hitler's playbook all over again. It's heartbreaking, really. I just feel for the people he's targeting. It's wrong, it's so un-American. It's so against what this country was founded for. I'm just shocked. I probably shouldn't be, but I just can't believe it's happening. I can't believe the military and the National Guard are supporting this. How protests erupted after rumours of immigration raid Analysis: This is a political fight Trump is eager to have This Indiana man wants the violence to stop, but also worries about what deploying the military in response to protests means for the future. This goes far beyond just protest, in my view. This is an attack on our sovereignty and our civil society. We can debate immigration policy, but violence and chaos should not be tolerated. [But Trump is] the one who's going to push the envelope to the legal limit, and if he can get by with more, he will, I think. That's one of my concerns about this whole thing. I'm not 100% on board with it, but at the same time, I think something has to be done. It's not getting taken care of. My trepidation is about precedent...I feel like everything we do, when we set new precedents, it will become new norms and not the exception. This Nebraska woman says she's likely to get involved with protests happening in her town because she's upset with what she sees Trump doing in LA. When watching clips, I saw some mostly peaceful protests. It seems like Trump is just mad that they're happening, rather than trying to prevent them from being violent. More and more, he's become a president who uses his power to enforce his will [rather] than the will of the people. I wonder to what extent is he going to keep doing this. It's extremely valid that people are protesting ICE, because in all honesty there is very little proof of due process for people who have been taken by ICE and wrongfully detained. A 29-year veteran of the US Army who retired as a colonel, this Texan - from the overwhelmingly Latino Rio Grande City on the border - believes that it is the protests that have gone too far. When state and local governments fail to support federal law - in this case deportation orders - the military deployment is necessary to protect lives, property and the movement of commerce. The protesters are blocking major highways, disrupting commerce, destroying and burning police cars, and interfering with police orders to disperse in certain areas. Everyone has the right to protest, but you don't have the right to make me or others listen to you. Creating violence so I can have your attention comes with consequences. Everything we know about the demonstrations Trump's deportation drive is perfect storm in city of immigrants LA's chaotic weekend of protests in maps and pictures
