Latest news with #PLO


Memri
4 hours ago
- Politics
- Memri
Druze Revolts, Then And Now
Sultan Pasha Al-Atrash in exile in Saudi Arabia Exactly a century ago, what began as a dispute about local power in the Druze majority region of Southern Syria erupted into a long-lasting anti-imperialist revolt, one that would have a lasting regional impact. In July 2025, a different Druze revolt threatened to change the trajectory of political change in Syria and is already havening regional implications. The Druze, a relatively small and compact ethnic and religious minority found mostly in Syria, Lebanon, and Israel, are once again in the spotlight. On July 21, 1925, Druze feudal leader Sultan Al-Atrash announced a revolt against the French Mandate in the Levant. French rule in Syria, part of the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916 between Britain and France, had already been rocky from the start. French efforts at modernizing and controlling Syria had also been characterized by a considerable amount of meddling and heavy-handed micromanaging. The powerful Al-Atrash family (the Turshan, plural of Atrash) had sent representatives to iron out differences with the French only to have them jailed as hostages in order to secure good behavior from the Druze. The French did not quite know who they were dealing with. Sultan Al-Atrash had lost a father to the Ottomans, been drafted into the Turkish Army and later had fought the French in past battles.[1] This was a warrior chief from among a warrior people. Jealous of his personal power and feudal privileges, the Great Syrian Revolt Al-Atrash ignited was not a parochial one but framed in the potent language of Syrian Arab Nationalism, anti-imperialism and freedom. His revolutionary manifesto (drafted by Damascus intellectuals) even called for the "application of the principles of the French Revolution and the Rights of Man." The humble Arab masses, what Al-Atrash dubbed "the patchers of cloaks" were especially inspired by this cause.[2] Despite many small victories and undoubted bravery, Al-Atrash would eventually lose the war to the French but become a legendary figure, even in the West (he was portrayed heroically in the December 1925 issue of The Atlantic, in an article written by a Revisionist Zionist).[3] While he may have lost on the battlefield, Al-Atrash's cause won politically, giving a tremendous boost to both Syrian patriotism and Arab Nationalism, a feat that would later earn him the praise of Gamal Abdel Nasser and Hafiz Al-Assad. And yet in 1946, 20 years after that nationalist revolt, the Al-Atrash clan fought fiercely against the newly independent Arab government in Damascus (under Presidents Shukri Al-Quwatli and Adib Shishakli) to maintain Druze rights and autonomy. The Druze, like the Alawites, and like the Christians of neighboring Lebanon, seemed to have had two quarreling factions within their ranks: those seeking unity with the greater whole – either with the state and/or the Arab nation – and those leaning towards greater autonomy, federalism, or separation.[4] Clipping of PLO Chief Yasser Arafat with an ailing Sultan Al-Atrash The Turshan still exist but they are not the leading political figures of the Syrian Druze today. As with other polities and individuals in Syria over the past 15 years, the Druze have had to maneuver and scheme in their relations with the state, with each other, with the Assad regime, during the brutal Syrian Civil War, and now with the new Syrian government headed by Islamist President Ahmed Al-Sharaa. There were Syrian Druze who fought against Assad and there were Syrian Druze who collaborated with and indeed held high military rank in the Assad regime army. A (pro-Al-Hijri) Druze fighter desecrating the tomb of Wahid Al-Balous (July 2025) Syria's most prominent Druze figures today represent the two sides of that historic Druze duality and ambivalence. 30-year-old Laith Al-Balous represents the more Syrian Arab nationalist Druze tendency, looking towards today's Damascus government. The Al-Balous (through Laith's father, Wahid Al-Balous, who was assassinated by the Assad regime in 2015) raised their own militia which fought against Jihadists and against aggressive Bedouin (Sunni Arab) neighbors but which also mostly leaned against the Assad regime.[5] Druze fighter posing with dead Syrian government troops (July 2025) The traditional Druze religious leadership, especially in the person of Venezuela-born 60-year-old Hikmat Al-Hijri (many Druze have ties with South America, especially Venezuela), leaned much more decisively towards the Assad regime through the years. Al-Hijri broke with the Assad regime only at the very end, and much more clearly represents the autonomy-seeking tendency among the Druze.[6] And although Al-Hijri's powerbase was initially religious, he is now very much a political player, with his own militia base and international ties (to the Israeli Druze).[7] Critics also accuse Al-Hijri of having recruited former Assad regime officers among the Syrian Druze and to be deeply involved in the Syrian drug trade across the border into Jordan. Both Al-Balous and Al-Hijri are connected, in different ways, in the recent violence in Syria's Druze majority Suwayda Governorate. One of the challenges the new government in Damascus faces is how to incorporate breakaway provinces back into a centrally-ruled Syria. This is a major problem with the Kurdish ruled Syrian Northeast and with Druze Suwayda.[8] Earlier this month, the Damascus government saw what seemed a golden opportunity to reincorporate Suwayda into Syria. The 1925 war was triggered by a dead cat belonging to a French officer. The ostensible trigger for the 2025 war was the stealing of a Druze vegetable truck at a pro-government Bedouin-run checkpoint. Both local events were, of course, intimately connected to larger questions of power and authority in Syria, a century ago under French military, today, under Syria's new Islamist rulers. Anti "Al-Hijri Gangs" propaganda on Twitter (July 2025) With the vegetable truck incident, tensions between Bedouin and Druze (which are nothing new) then exploded into outright conflict, with kidnappings and murders on both sides. Al-Hijri's men – already regarded suspiciously by Damascus because of the international ties, the Assad officer connection and the smuggling question – were prominent in fighting (and killing) their Bedouin rivals. Damascus saw the sending of troops as a way to solve several problems – restore order, extend state power, curtail (or maybe eliminate) a troublesome local potentate, perhaps also build up a more amenable local figure in Laith Al-Balous.[9] Infamous image of Druze cleric having his mustache clipped by government soldier (July 2025) But disaster struck. The Damascus units initially sent in had two major problems. They seem to have been made up of raw recruits and they were contaminated by open religious animus. Videos of government soldiers mocking the Druze including several showing government fighters forcibly shaving the mustaches of Druze elders peppered social media. Islamists called for "no Druze mustaches (shawarib) or baggy pants (the traditional Druze sherwal)." And if insults were not bad enough, government troops and the pro-government Bedouin militias committed many human rights abuses against Druze civilians (not just against Al-Hijri's fighters) while Al-Hijri's forces seem to not just ambushed government troops but also slaughtered civilian prisoners and taken hostages. All of this, the rhetoric, the videos, calls for revenge, calls to slaughter the Druze (not just "the criminal Al-Hijri") fed into larger regional and international narratives.[10] Enemies of the Ahmed Al-Sharaa government in Damascus, including Iran and its allies, Assad regime types, and the Syrian Kurds, wasted no time in highlighting the abuses, and there was plenty of real material to work with. Pro-Syrian government forces stand on image of Druze flag and Sultan Al-Atrash With its own Druze population, a valued part of the state of Israel's history and armed forces, rhetoric (and real violence) against the Syrian Druze and deeply ambivalent about Islamist rule in Damascus, the IDF intervened directly on the side of the Druze (meaning on the side of Al-Hijri).[11] Israel has long considered Southern Syria an area of deep strategic concern. Israel not only hit local government units and militias confronting Druze forces but spectacularly bombing the Syrian Defense Ministry in Damascus on live television. With the help of American mediation, Damascus tried to forge a de-escalation agreement with the Druze which may or may not last. Government troops pulled back which led to even worse violence which then seems to be leading to government forces returning to the region.[12] There are simultaneously community-generated efforts at vendetta and at peacebuilding happening between Druze and non-Druze. Anti-Druze, pro-government propaganda on Twitter (July 2025) Much blood has been spilt and hearts hardened, especially among the Syrian Sunni majority against the Druze. There is deep rage and fury on both sides. While pro-government voices seek to place all the blame on the mercurial Druze warlord Al-Hijri, the fact remains that many Druze (and some Christians) were slaughtered, raped or kidnapped by pro-government forces (whether Bedouin or uniformed government units) with no regard to political affiliation.[13] Syrian Bedouin Tribes Meet to Demand Disarming of Al-Hijri's militia (January 2025) Both sides are being portrayed as either victims or villains and both are portrayed too often, falsely, as uniform fronts.[14] There has been so much rhetoric and so much twisting, for political or ideological reasons, of the facts or exaggeration that it is important to make some general statements about the situation: 1) Tension and violence between Syrian Bedouin and Druze are not new. In addition, elements of both groups have connections with and are competitors in the lucrative smuggling (drugs and guns) business. They are not just in conflict because of religion or ethnicity. 2) There has been heightened anti-Druze tension for months in Syria.[15] In April 2025, there were bloodcurdling threats against Druze as a result of a suspicious video of a Druze man insulting the Prophet Muhammad which led to Syrian Sunni Muslim calls for violence against the Druze community as a whole.[16] 3) The March 2025 slaughter of Alawites by government forces on the Syrian Coast and the seeming subsequent impunity of those forces has heightened tensions with all ethnic and religious communities in the country across the board. The Druze, like the Kurds, and unlike the Christians, are armed and everyone is more leery of domination by Damascus after the March events. 4) Hikmat Al-Hijri is indeed a scheming, volatile figure who seeks to gain ultimate power within his community and is involved in all sorts of suspicious enterprises. But the indiscriminate slaughter of Druze by Bedouin/government forces seems to have boosted his popularity among Druze while Al-Balous's influence is greatly diminished in comparison. 5) The Syrian government has real ties with Syrian Bedouin which it has used and is using as a tool to project power. In this conflict, the Bedouin are not completely free actors but rather enthusiastic sub-contractors, pursuing their own vendettas and crimes (such as rape and looting) while broadly serving the political interests of the Damascus government, in a sense serving as the "bad cop" to the Syrian government's relative "good cop."[17] 6) The Damascus government – whatever President Al-Sharaa's real feelings on the matter – is itself not a free actor in this conflict either. Al-Sharaa is exquisitely aware of Qatari, and especially Turkish interests, in everything involving Syria, including the South. In a way, what happened with the Druze can be seen as a dry-run for a similar campaign to be directed against the Kurdish-led SDF in the country's Northeast, an issue of tremendous interest to the Erdogan regime. But Al-Sharaa seems to also be hampered by his own cadres, blunt and chaotic instruments who seem to be cruder and less disciplined than he would prefer.[18] Pro-Al-Hijri Propaganda on social media comparing him to Sultan Al-Atrash (July 2025) A century after Sultan Al-Atrash's heroism, the situation in Syria seems dire indeed, balancing on the edge of a knife. Any celebration marking the Great Syrian Revolt of 1925 and the great Druze warrior would ring extremely hollow today. A shaky ceasefire seems to be holding in Suwayda but what comes next?[19] The war-wrecked country's already frayed social fabric is again, deeply and severely wounded. *Alberto M. Fernandez is Vice President of MEMRI.

The National
8 hours ago
- Politics
- The National
Those of us with long memories can see Benjamin Netanyahu's goal
There is, however, nothing wrong with my long-term memory. I recall that in the 20th century Beirut was the jewel of the Mediterranean long before the Riviera. Hollywood movie stars went there for its beautiful beaches, hotels, casinos and night life. READ MORE: Greens press SNP over secret Israeli ambassador meeting I also recall that in the late 20th century there was a situation when many native Palestinians fled Israel with Yasser Arafat and the PLO, and camped up in Lebanon under the protection of the Lebanese government. Israel was unhappy with this, pursued the Palestinian refugees with Biblical violence and reduced Beirut to rubble. The jewel of the Mediterranean was no more and Israel had no immediate economic rival in the Middle East. The state of Israel was created by the British after the end of World War Two from the remains of the Ottoman Empire. They had not forgiven the Turks for siding with the Germans during World War One. They wanted to create a new world order and for the British to have major influence in this new world order. They carved up the Arab states into separate ad hoc states, which was opposed by TE Lawrence who had built up a relationship with the Arab people. Small-minded bureaucrats with no significant battlefield experience took over. The British created Israel with the intention for it be a client state, but Britain had lost its influence in the world as many former colonies had gained independence and did not bow to 'mother England' any longer. This came to the fore during the fiasco that was the Suez Crisis. Great Britain was no longer the world power it thought it was. Israel was no longer a client state of GB but became a client state of the US and has been ever since. Everything Israel does is okayed by the US. READ MORE: Protesters gather outside court for Palestine activists hearing Yasser Arafat and the PLO were bombed out of Lebanon and returned to Palestine, Gaza and the West Bank. Israel had further plans. Under the Israeli government's control, Mossad infiltrated [[Gaza]] and encouraged young radicals to oppose Arafat and El Fatah, and to do this they paid them millions of dollars and supplied them with arms. That was the origin of Hamas. Hamas are an Israeli creation. Hamas won the elections in Gaza. Yasser Arafat and El Fatah were ejected to the West Bank. Israel has infiltrators in Gaza; nothing of significance happens in Gaza that Israel is not aware of. The Israeli government was made aware by its own observers and by Egypt that something was brewing in Gaza before October 7 2024. They deliberately chose to take no action. The result was what we all own know. Many female members of the IDF who had the responsibility of observing Gaza were slaughtered. This gave Netanyahu the excuse to launch a full-scale attack on Gaza in search of the hostages, it also gave the 'hilltop boys' occupying the West Bank an excuse to attack and assassinate Palestinian residents of the West Bank. This was never about the hostages. That could have been resolved within weeks. This is about a deliberate land grab by the Israeli government of Gaza and the expulsion of all Palestinians from Israel, including the West Bank. Not only that, since the regime change in Syria the IDF have occupied 'defensive positions' in Syria. They have also launched missiles into Syria in support of Druze against Bedouins. There are Druze inhabitants of Israel but it is very hard to believe that Israel would launch missiles against Syria except for selfish reasons. READ MORE: Angus Robertson's secret Israel meeting minutes revealed I have engaged in discussions via social media with American supporters of Israel who have accused me of being an anti-Semite who believes jihadist propaganda, but they have declared that Balfour promised them (although being American citizens, they identify definitely with Israel) the West Bank of the Jordan where the country called Jordan is. All this, put together, makes me think that what Netanyahu is all about is to create Eretz Israel and occupy all the land that the previous state of Israel occupied. Israel is a puppet state of the US. This leads me to believe that the US is fully supportive of this and why supine governments do not oppose what is quite plainly an international war crime. Peter Mclaughlin via email


Morocco World
2 days ago
- Politics
- Morocco World
CNDH: Morocco, Palestine Unite for Joint Human Rights Initiatives and Capacity Building
Rabat — The National Human Rights Council (CNDH) and the Human Rights and Civil Society Department of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) concluded a weeklong training program in Rabat today, culminating in the signing of a cooperation protocol between the two sides. The Palestinian delegation, which included human rights and political representatives from the PLO, has been on an official visit to Morocco to strengthen ties and exchange expertise in the field of human rights. The closing session was chaired by Amina Bouayach , president of the CNDH, and Ahmad Said Al-Tamimi, head of the PLO's Human Rights and Civil Society Department. During the ceremony, the two officials formalized their commitment to continued collaboration by signing an agreement to deepen cooperation and develop joint mechanisms for the protection and promotion of human rights. The protocol outlines a framework for practical programs designed to build capacities, share experiences and best practices, engage with the international human rights system, and enhance documentation, monitoring, advocacy, and reporting on violations. Speaking at the event, Bouayach described the protocol as more than just a formal document, calling it 'a sincere expression of a collective will to establish sustainable cooperation and a firm commitment to advancing human rights causes.' She also acknowledged the serious challenges facing Palestinian human rights institutions, including mounting restrictions on civic space and persistent targeting of human rights defenders. These circumstances, she said, reveal the need for stronger cooperation and joint advocacy to support justice and fairness. The agreement outlines several areas of collaboration, including capacity building, exchange of information and knowledge, dialogue, and monitoring of relevant UN processes and jurisprudence. This initiative marks the first training of its kind between the Moroccan council and the Palestinian delegation and highlights Morocco's ongoing engagement with regional human rights issues, with the Palestinian cause remaining central to its human rights agenda. Tags: CNDHhuman rightsPalestine


Maroc
3 days ago
- Politics
- Maroc
Upper House Speaker Receives PLO Delegation
Speaker of Morocco's House of Councillors, Mohammed Ould Errachid, received, on Thursday in Rabat, a high-level delegation from the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), led by Ahmad Al-Tamimi, member of the Organization's Executive Committee and head of its Department of Human Rights and Civil Society. On this occasion, Ould Errachid reiterated Morocco's constant position, under the enlightened leadership of His Majesty King Mohammed VI, Chairman of the al-Quds Committee, which considers the Palestinian issue a national cause, the Upper House said in a press release. He also underlined the unanimity of the Moroccan people in their continued support for and solidarity with the brotherly Palestinian people, in the defense of their legitimate rights and the strengthening of their resilience, particularly in the midst of the difficult circumstances in the Gaza Strip. Ould Errachid furthermore expressed the House of Councillors' willingness to elevate the level of cooperation ties with the Palestinian National Council, to bolster efficient parliamentary communication and promote the exchange of experiences and expertise in the different fields of mutual interest. For his part, Al-Tamimi, who was accompanied by the ambassador of the State of Palestine to Morocco, Jamal Choubki, commended the Kingdom's leading role, under the leadership of His Majesty King Mohammed VI, in supporting the Palestinian cause. He also highlighted the Kingdom's continuous interest in this cause, through the initiatives and projects of the Bayt Mal Al-Quds Asharif Agency, reflecting the depth of the historical and human ties between the two brotherly peoples. MAP: 18 July 2025


Telegraph
4 days ago
- Politics
- Telegraph
Telegraph style book: Pp
P Palestine: Not to be referred to as a country: it is not recognised as such by Britain or the US. Say Palestinian territories. The Palestinian Authority. The people are Palestinians. It is acceptable to describe protesters as being pro-Palestine Palestine Liberation Organisation: PLO in heads and subsequent mentions. Explain which faction if possible pan: Is usually hyphenated e.g. Pan-African. (But Pan Africanist Conference) panama: Is a hat made, not in Panama, but Ecuador. As with trilby, boater etc, 'panama hat' is tautological Panama: Cigar has a cap P paparazzi: Is the plural: paparazzo is the singular paralleled Parker Bowles, Brigadier Andrew; Parker Bowles Tom : No hyphen Parkinson's disease is the proper name but it is acceptable to call it Parkinson's Parliament: But parliamentary. Foreign parliaments are lc Parole Board part-time Party: In the names of specific political parties it takes the cap P. The Labour Party, the Conservative Party but 'all the parties were agreed' partygate past/last: 'last' often carries the sense of something happening recently 'last year' and also conveys a specific time period 'it has been in profit the last five years'; 'past' conveys a more general sense of time 'the past few years' and refers to the entirety of a period 'it was founded in 2020 and the past five years have all been profitable' payoff payout Pc: Style for a police constable. Strictly speaking, there are no WPcs now. They are women Pcs but WPc may be used in heads Patriot missiles PayPal PCBs: polychlorinated biphenyls Pearl Harbor peddler/pedlar/pedaller: Use drug peddler (or trafficker), reserving pedlar for the more traditional meaning and pedaller for someone riding a bicycle people: Not persons Pepsi-Cola per cent: two words perestroika Pernod: Upper case, it's a trademark Perspex: Trade name, needs cap P; never use generically Peterhouse, Cambridge: Never Peterhouse College Pfeiffer, Michelle Philips: The electrical firm takes one l Phillips: The auctioneers Phillipson, Bridget pidgin English: Not pigeon Pin number is tautological Pinocchio pit bull Pimm's pistol: Preferred to handgun. Say, if possible, whether it is a revolver or an automatic. The two are frequently confused, and are not interchangeable Play-Doh PlayStation Poets' Corner Pontin's: Note the apostrophe Portakabin: is a trade name. Use 'portable building' if you're not sure post, pre: Meaning after and before are prefixes, not whole words post mortem examination: Always in full. Never autopsy, which is American postnatal post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Potters Bar practice is a noun, practise is the verb premiere: The first performance of a work does not require an accent pre-booked, pre-planned: Avoid press: For newspapers, reporters is lower case presume: see assume prevaricate: Does not mean to haver or procrastinate; it means to depart from the straight and narrow or to act crookedly or deceitfully priests: They are not necessarily Roman Catholics Prime Minister's Questions Princes Street, Edinburgh: No apostrophe private member's bill Privy Counsellor: Not councillor programme: But computer program propellant: A propellant (noun) has a propellent (adjective) effect protagonist: The chief actor in a drama, and by extension the main person in any affair. It does not mean champion, advocate or defender, and it is not the opposite of antagonist. There can only ever be one protagonist. Proponent may be a useful substitute protest: Requires the preposition 'against': only American usage dispenses with this proved: the past participle of prove, preferred to proven. Proven is fine as an adjective or in Scottish law pub: This is perfectly acceptable for a public house Public Record Office