City Council requests to restore Sand Island's Native name
Over 641 acres in size and largely man-made, Sand Island features industrial zone businesses, a U.S. military base, a state-owned recreational park and the city's prime wastewater treatment facility, all within Honolulu Harbor.
But the site also has significant local history, and that's why the Honolulu City Council's International and Legal Affairs Committee voted unanimously last week to pass Resolution 63, which urges the Hawaii State Board on Geographic Names (HBGN ) to rename the site as Mauliola. The full Council is expected Wednesday to review Resolution 63 for approval.
The resolution, introduced by Council member Radiant Cordero, states, 'From the mid-1800s through the mid-1900s, this small tidal island grew in size with the dredging and infilling of Honolulu Harbor, altering an area that had once been a large complex of fishponds and reefs.'
The resolution says the name Mauliola harks back to the late 1800s and early 1900s, when the rapid urbanization of Honolulu and an increasingly busy harbor brought an influx of disease, which rapidly spread.
'Mauliola was utilized to quarantine ships, and the government built a crematorium on the island, which in part led to Mauliola becoming known as Quarantine Island, ' the resolution read.
Over time, Quarantine Island grew in size with more dredging and infilling of Honolulu Harbor in the 1940s. The island was utilized by the military as a coastal defense station and an internment camp during World War II, for Japanese Americans and other Axis nationals.
The resolution states, 'Quarantine Island later became known by its present name, Sand Island, which is listed as the island's official name on the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS ), a federal repository for identifying official place names. State governments are given the authority to provide 'administrative names' to places, which are then listed in the GNIS.'
The state Board on Geographic Names was established to designate the official place names and spellings of geographic features in the state of Hawaii, and to ensure uniformity in the use and spelling of geographic features, the resolution says.
'The HBGN uses cultural and historical significance as a criterion for considering a name change, with preference given to names in 'Olelo Hawaii, ' the resolution states.
Rhonda Burk, advocacy chair for the Oahu Hawaiian Canoe Racing Association, or OHCRA, during an April 30 committee meeting told the panel that her group had officially requested that Sand Island be renamed Mauliola.
She said that name 'embodies values of healing, renewal and interconnectedness that resonate deeply within our paddling community.'
'Renaming Sand Island to Mauliola aligns with efforts to restore traditional place names and highlights the historical and cultural significance of this location, which was historically used by Native Hawaiians and later became a site of a World War II detention camp, ' Burk added.
The canoe racing association was not alone in its Sand Island name-change request. In submitted written testimony to the Council, state Sen. Glenn Wakai (D, Kalihi, Mapunapuna, Airport ) expressed his support for Resolution 63 as well.
'Renaming the island to its original name of Mauliola is a thoughtful and appropriate action to reflect the historical and cultural significance of the area, ' Wakai said. 'While many know it today as Sand Island, the name Mauliola connects us to the deeper history of the island, particularly its role as a place of quarantine and the meaning behind the name itself, which refers to healing and renewal.'
'Recognizing original place names in 'Olelo Hawaii is one way we can promote awareness of and respect for Native Hawaiian culture, ' he added. 'It also helps preserve the unique identity of our communities and the stories tied to the land.'
At the meeting, Cordero said the resolution's effort was only 'a starting base.'
She also stressed that the requested name change will not affect address changes or renaming to actual streets and thoroughfares—including to well-traveled Sand Island Access Road, off North Nimitz Highway.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Committee postponed at short notice due to technical difficulties
A council committee has been cancelled at short notice due to technical difficulties. The Corporate and External Issues Scrutiny Committee was due to sit this evening, August 18, at 6pm. It had been due to discuss the work Bolton Council does in relation to the armed forces, including the topic of Constellation House in Kearsley, where veterans who live there were recently given eviction notices. However, the meeting has had to be cancelled due to technical difficulties which would prevent the live streaming of the meeting. It has been postponed to Thursday, September 4 at 6pm. Read more: Statements issued after armed forces veterans served eviction notices Read more: Town Hall chiefs to discuss veterans being issued eviction notices Cllr Anne Galloway, chair of the Corporate and External Issues Scrutiny Committee, said: "We have been suffering technical difficulties with the live streaming of the meeting, as we live stream all of the public council meetings. "As chair of the committee, I have decided to cancel the meeting, as we are discussing very important issues and we want to make sure it is open and transparent. "We want people to be able to watch a recording of the meeting, so it is not behind closed doors." A spokesperson for Bolton Council said: "Unfortunately, due to technical difficulties preventing the live streaming of the meeting of the Corporate and External Issues Scrutiny Committee scheduled to take place at 6pm today, August 18, the meeting has been postponed until 6pm on Thursday, September 4."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Greater Manchester's rumoured winners and losers in £69bn deal
Greater Manchester's rumoured winners and losers in the government's next financial deal have been named. Manchester council could be a big winner under the government's new rules for how local authority funding is calculated, a report seen by the Local Democracy Reporting Service says. However, the SIGOMA study says Wigan, Rochdale, and Trafford councils are all set to receive a smaller increase in 'core spending power' than the England average. READ MORE: 'We think we're allowed to park on the pavement' READ MORE: Children 'having meltdowns' after families turned away from summer breaks at Haven holiday park To see planning applications; traffic and road diversions and layout changes; and more, visit the Public Notices Portal HERE Core spending power measures the amount of cash town halls can spend on day-to-day services like road maintenance, adult social care, and bin collections through government grants, business rates, and council tax. The research suggests Manchester's core spending power will rise by 25.64pc, double the projected England average of 12.8pc. But Rochdale could see a lower-than-average increase of 10.62pc, Wigan is set to receive a 9.98pc rise, and Trafford is in line for 7.94pc. Report author SIGOMA is a pressure group comprising urban area councils in the north, midlands, and south coast. It calculated the figures based on information released by the government under its 'Fair Funding 2.0 proposals', which are set to shake-up how local authorities are funded The government says no final decisions have been made on the proposals and councils' cash settlements this year, with official funding packages usually confirmed in December. However, a Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said reform of the system is due: 'No final decisions have been made and these figures should be treated with caution. 'We will consult again through the provisional Local Government Finance Settlement later this year. 'We have already made over £69bn available this year to boost council finances, including over £3.5bn for Greater Manchester, and we will go further to reform the funding system to make it fit for the future.' Wigan, Trafford, and Rochdale councils told the LDRS they would 'make representations' to the government's 'fair funding 2.0' consultation, which closed last Friday (August 15). Trafford council leader Tom Ross said: 'We have made no secret about the significant ongoing financial challenges Trafford has faced after suffering cuts to our funding of almost £300m over the last 15 years. 'These historic funding cuts, rising cost pressures and an increase in the need for services especially among children's and adult social care, compounded by several years of council tax freezes, have meant it is becoming harder to deliver what our residents and businesses need while balancing the books. 'We will be providing a detailed response to the consultation and will continue to work closely with the government and our local MPs to secure a fair deal for Trafford and our residents.' A Wigan council spokesperson said: 'We welcome the review of funding for local authorities and will be making representations as part of the ongoing consultation process, which we hope will result in fair distribution of funds based on the needs of communities – ensuring local authorities can continue to deliver vital services and support to those who need us most. 'Wigan borough faces many ongoing challenges – including high levels of deprivation and health inequalities within our neighbourhoods – which, together with our partners, we are committed to addressing in line with our Progress with Unity missions.' And a Rochdale council spokesperson added: 'No final decisions around our settlement for the next financial year have been made and, as always, we will make any representations through the appropriate channels. We will be responding to the Fair Funding Consultation this week, and providing feedback on the proposed funding allocation methodology.' Manchester council and the Greater Manchester Combined Authority declined to comment. SIGOMA's calculations: Area Increase in core spending power Manchester 25.64% Bolton 19.25% Bury 18.88% Oldham 18.88% Salford 14.99% Stockport 13.48% Tameside 13.31% England average 12.80% Rochdale 10.62% Wigan 9.98% Trafford 7.94%
Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
‘Launching Liberty' Review: Shipyard Victory
Constructing a massive merchant fleet was one of the most remarkable American achievements during World War II. Most of those vessels were Liberty ships, 441 feet long, designed to ferry tanks, planes and military supplies across the oceans. Between 1941 and 1945, some 2,700 Liberty ships were built at U.S. shipyards. The goods they transported were critical to the Allies' victory. In 'Launching Liberty,' Doug Most tells the story of the Liberty ships and the people who built them. History buffs will find his book enjoyable. Academics, though, may note a lack of new insights into a subject scholars have investigated thoroughly since the 1940s. Mr. Most, a former editor at the Boston Globe, vividly describes a great accomplishment, but he leaves some of its less praiseworthy aspects aside. The book opens in 1940, one year into World War II. German submarines had torpedoed much of the British merchant navy, and the beleaguered British had sent a delegation to the U.S. in a desperate quest for ships. The U.S. Maritime Commission agreed that 60 such ships could be constructed in American yards. But there was a problem: The U.S. Navy had already commandeered the country's entire capacity for building oceangoing ships. Emory S. 'Jerry' Land, the retired rear admiral who headed the Maritime Commission, helped the British envoys arrange a coast-to-coast tour to identify locations where yards could be built and companies that could run them. After Dec. 21, when German forces sunk an unarmed American-crewed tanker off the coast of West Africa, the isolationist sentiment that previously stood in the way of the British venture dissipated. On Dec. 29, President Franklin Roosevelt proclaimed the U.S. to be 'the great arsenal of democracy' and pledged to build those 60 ships for the British. Five days later, he announced a separate program to build cargo ships for American use.
