logo
Tucker Carlson's two word response to Trump's Iran-Israel ceasefire announcement

Tucker Carlson's two word response to Trump's Iran-Israel ceasefire announcement

Independent5 hours ago

Tucker Carlson, one of the most outspoken critics of the U.S. entering Israel's war with Iran, breathed a sigh of relief after a ceasefire was announced following 12 days of fighting, posting simply: 'Thank God.'
President Donald Trump announced a 'complete and total' end to hostilities on Monday evening after Tehran had launched missile attacks on an American military base in Qatar in revenge for the U.S. bombing three of its nuclear sites. However, just hours after the announcement, reports emerged that Iran had broken the agreement.
The question of whether the U.S. should support Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 's Operation Rising Lion offensive caused a bitter divide within Trump's MAGA coalition, with the likes of Carlson, Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Steve Bannon, and former congressman Matt Gaetz finding themselves at odds with Republican hawks.
In one particularly memorable spat, Carlson sparred with Texas Senator Ted Cruz last week, deriding the politician over his ignorance of the country he supported invading in a viral interview.
Another vicious exchange saw conservative radio host Mark Levin label Greene 'a shameless nitwit' over the weekend.
Levin appeared especially frustrated by Monday's developments, commenting on his show: 'I hate this word ceasefire. The president hated it a few days ago too.
'What's needed now is this, in my humble opinion. Iran should be forced to sign a surrender document. Unconditional surrender. They lost their nukes, they've lost their air force, they have no ground-to-air protection. China didn't step in, Russia didn't step in, not a single Arab country stepped in.
'The Supreme Nazi is hiding in a bunker much like Adolf Hitler did. Adolf Hitler wasn't thrown a lifeline… What does an agreement look like? Does that mean the Supreme Nazi survives? Does that mean the regime survives? I guess so.'
Other conservatives reacting yesterday included veteran pundit Bill O'Reilly on NewsNation, who speculated that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's regime may soon be overthrown by its own people after 'one of the biggest military humiliations… in world history.'
Trump's White House adviser Stephen Miller appeared on Sean Hannity 's primetime show on Fox News to praise his boss's 'historic' achievement and 'bold, courageous action', as did South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham and Alabama Senator Katie Britt, the latter suggesting that Trump would win the Nobel Peace Prize for his actions, an accolade he has long dreamed of being awarded.
'President Trump is going to win the Nobel Peace Prize, no doubt!' she told Hannity.
'You look at what he's done with the Congo and Rwanda. You look where he is with Pakistan and India and what he has done there. And then you look at this – what everyone talked about but no one thought was possible.
'He has brought peace to a region that needed stability. He has shown what 'America First' policy actually is.'
The same hope was shared by ex-Fox star Glenn Beck, who, like Carlson, expressed his relief that the conflict had seemingly been brought to an abrupt close.
'Give the man the Nobel Peace Prize,' he said in a social media video filmed, oddly, as his niece chauffeured him along a busy highway.
'He deserved it before for what he did in the Middle East in the first round; he definitely deserves it this time… Thank you, God, for the end of this madness.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chaos engulfs Iran. What can Britain and Europe do?
Chaos engulfs Iran. What can Britain and Europe do?

New Statesman​

time29 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

Chaos engulfs Iran. What can Britain and Europe do?

Whether it is a democracy or a dictatorship, a state that loses a long war usually faces a dangerous reckoning. For four decades the ideological foundations of the Islamic Republic of Iran were anchored on recurring confrontations with the United States and Israel. This struggle was not only a geopolitical fault line, it also provided a foundational narrative for the domestic legitimacy of Iran's ruling elite. As the prospect of Iran losing that conflict becomes real in the wake of relentless Israeli and American airstrikes, the Iranian state now teeters on the edge of destabilisation that may prove profoundly dangerous for the wider world. In the wake of the Hamas attack on Israeli communities along Gaza's borders on 7 October 2023 and the attacks on Israel by Hezbollah and other Iran-backed militias in the months that followed, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seized every opportunity to weaken Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's theocratic regime in Tehran. The airpower campaign Israel initiated on 13 June to destroy Iran's nuclear weapons programme cannot topple the Khamenei regime overnight, but economic collapse and public frustration after a military defeat would undermine the foundations of the Islamic Republic. Despite long standing demands for regime change in Iran among American neo-conservatives and Israeli hawks, the US and Israeli governments have not produced a credible plan for what comes next after Iran's social order falls apart. Dreams of victory among Israeli and US policymakers were bolstered by signs of Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps overstretch abroad, even as the Khamenei regime's economic mismanagement led to cycles of revolt among a frustrated populace at home. The Israeli military's brutal evisceration of Hamas in Gaza, its decisive victory over Hezbollah in Lebanon and the fall of the Assad regime to Syrian rebel forces in the autumn of 2024 marked the humiliating collapse of a network of alliances that the IRGC had propped up for decades. But for all these setbacks, there is no sign of an opposition movement strong enough to restore stability if the Khamenei regime does fall apart. Though the pressure Israeli and US airstrikes have exerted on the IRGC has led many commentators to draw comparisons with America's invasion of Iraq in 2003, such analogies are not useful for understanding the distinct geopolitical context of 2025 that will shape Iran's trajectory. The legacy of Colin Powell's so-called Pottery Barn Rule of 'you break it, you own it' underscoring US responsibility for any post war outcome no longer holds. Unlike Iraq twenty years ago, there is no American land army waiting in the wings to occupy and govern Iran. Instead, in his quest to shatter the Iranian state Netanyahu in particular seems intent on using Israel's military advantage to pursue chaos as a strategic goal. If the Khamenei regime is toppled with no viable plan for what comes next, then Syria's recent civil war may prove a more salient precedent. Though central power would eventually reassert itself in a society as urbanised as Iran, a collapse of state structures is less likely to empower reformist elites than military warlords and regional strongmen. If power flows to the peripheries, a society fractured into fiefdoms would face recurring cycles of civil conflict that could generate refugee flows and economic disruption whose impact would be felt far beyond Iran's borders. In such a worst case scenario the consequences for the Middle East and Europe would be disastrous. Yet the US and Israel show no indication of planning for a postwar regional order. The Netanyahu government's backing of the exiled Pahlavi dynasty whose corruption and incompetence brought about the Iranian Revolution and the rise of the Islamic Republic in 1979 borders on delusion. What is unfolding instead is a strategy of desiccating the Iranian state, letting it collapse, and then disengaging to leave others to clean up the mess. The EU and the UK will try to keep their distance from such a wild gamble while offering economic incentives to Tehran in the hopes of reviving diplomacy. Yet Europeans have no contingency plans to deal with a collapse of the Islamic Republic. With no answer to the question of how to engage with a fragmenting society in an environment in which Israel and the US pursue chaos as a strategy, the EU and the UK would struggle to prevent such a disaster from exacerbating Europe's other geopolitical and economic challenges. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Israel and America's war with Iran is not just a strategic throw of the dice. It is a fundamental shift in how power operates in a multipolar world. Though a transition toward new models of collective security remains theoretically possible, as the foundations of US global hegemony wither under Donald Trump the current trajectory favours entropy over order. The danger is not merely in acts of war, it is also in the chaos they leave behind. For the EU and UK the escalating crisis in the Middle East means more than diplomatic frustration and higher energy prices. It could shape Europe's strategic environment for decades to come. The Iranian state might not survive its long war, but nor will the illusion that chaos can be contained. [See also: Ayatollah Khamenei faces a nuclear nightmare] Related

Co-op to stop sourcing carrots from Israel to ‘support peace and co-operation'
Co-op to stop sourcing carrots from Israel to ‘support peace and co-operation'

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Co-op to stop sourcing carrots from Israel to ‘support peace and co-operation'

Co-op is to stop sourcing carrots from Israel, among other products from 'countries of concern', to 'support peace and co-operation', it has announced. The supermarket chain said it will stop sourcing relationships with countries where there are 'internationally recognised community-wide human rights abuses and violations of international law'. The policy says that, wherever possible, the grocer will not use ingredients in Co-op branded products or sell whole products from 17 countries of concern. Products and ingredients on the prohibited list include Russian vodka, mangoes from Mali and carrots from Israel. They will be removed from Co-op shelves and products on a phased basis, starting this month. The supermarket said the policy had been approved by the Co-op Group Board and coincided with the start of Co-op Fortnight in the UK. It followed a year of 'detailed analysis' and was based on three criteria: agreement across respected assessments of behaviour which would constitute community-wide human rights abuses or violations of international law; that the actions Co-op could take would make a difference to those affected; and that the grocer's actions would not negatively affect its integrity as a commercially successful business aligned with co-operative values and principles. Over recent years, Co-op members had made clear through surveys, engagement and motions that conflict was one of their biggest concerns and that 'their Co-op should do all it can to advocate and build peace', it said. Debbie White, chairwoman of the Co-op Group Board, said: 'This policy – which has been developed over the past year as a part of our Hate Divides Communities, Co-operation Builds Them campaign – is a clear demonstration of our co-operative values in action, where the voices of our members have been listened to and then acted upon. 'We are committed, where we can, to removing products and ingredients from our shelves which are sourced from those countries where the international consensus demonstrates there is not alignment with what happens in those countries and our co-operative values and principles. 'As a business, we have a long-standing legacy of doing the right thing, supporting Fairtrade and championing ethical sourcing, and this policy is a natural progression of this.'

Sky News issues major apology as Donald Trump unleashes swear-filled rant on air
Sky News issues major apology as Donald Trump unleashes swear-filled rant on air

Daily Mirror

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Sky News issues major apology as Donald Trump unleashes swear-filled rant on air

President Donald Trump left Sky News gobsmacked when he unleashed a heated rant about the ongoing Israel and Iran conflict in the Middle East Sky News have been forced to apologise over Donald Trump's expletive outburst live on air. The US President was speaking to reporters outside The White House before heading to a NATO summit after Israel and Iran had both violated their recent ceasefire decision. Quizzed on reports that Israel and Iran violated their recent ceasefire agreement, Trump responded: "I'm not sure they did it intentionally. They couldn't reign people back. I don't like the fact that Israel went out this morning, and I'm going to see if I can stop it. As soon as I get away from you, I'm going to see if I can stop it." ‌ Speaking to the news crews, President Trump said: "Israel violated it too. Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and dropped a load of bombs. ‌ "The likes of which I'd never seen before, the biggest load we had seen. I'm not happy with Israel, you know when I say 'ok you have 12 hours,' you don't go out in the first hour and drop everything you have on them. I'm not happy with them, I'm not happy with Iran either. "But I'm really unhappy if Israel are going out this morning because of one rocket, that didn't land, that was shot. Perhaps by mistake, that didn't land. We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard, that they don't know what the f**k they're doing – do you understand that?" Seconds after the former reality star's outburst, a Sky News anchor could be heard saying: "We'll just apologise for that language from the US President, Donald Trump, who was speaking to reporters for that NATO summit and departing on Air Force One." Iranian officials have stated they will "decisively respond" after accusing Israel of breaching the ceasefire. The Supreme National Security Council have said the armed forces are ready. The two nations had only recently signed a ceasefire agreement, proposed by Trump, but Israel claimed that Iran violated it by carrying out missile strikes after it was put in place. ‌ Iranian military chiefs have denied this, but have faced new orders from the Israeli defence minister, Israel Katz. Iran has accused Israel of having carried out strikes on the country after the ceasefire came into effect. It claims Israel struck Iran in three stages up until 9am local time, according to Iran's Khatam al-Anbiya central military headquarters, the country's state TV said. Both sides accepted the agreement, but it is now unclear if it will hold. "Tehran will tremble," Israeli Finance Minister Betzalel Smotrich warned on X, raising the spectre that the war might continue. Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz said Iran's "violation of the ceasefire" will not go unpunished, adding that he had ordered the Israel Defence Forces to "respond forcefully". He said they will be deploying " intense strikes against regime targets in the heart of Tehran". Following Trump's extraordinary comments, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he wants the ceasefire between Israel and Iran to continue. "The sooner we get back to that, the better," he said. "And that's the message that I'm discussing with other leaders today. We need to get back to that ceasefire, which is consistent with what I've been saying about de-escalation for quite some time now."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store