US must pressure Syria to protect minority rights: USCRIF
French, US officials to meet with Syrian FM in Paris: Source
Yazidi woman rebuilds life years after ISIS captivity
US passes Syria sanctions bill, ties relief to reforms
Rubio tells Sudani important to pay KRG salaries 'consistently'
A+ A-
WASHINGTON DC - The US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has recommended to Washington to condition its assistance to the interim authorities in Damascus on the protection of minorities, one of the commissioners of the organization said.
'We also recommended to the United States actually to include in their ongoing negotiation with the transitional authorities the issue of the minority communities," Mohamed Elsanousi told Rudaw on Wednesday.
He added that it is very "critical" to protect the minorities in Syria and it is the responsibility of Damascus to do so.
'So we also recommend to the United States government to tie the economic assistance and everything else that they're giving to the current transitional authority with the protection and the freedom of religion or belief for the minority communities,' the commissioner noted.
Damascus has come under fire for its response to the recent clashes between Druze militants and Sunni tribal fighters in Suwayda, which have killed at least 1,300 people. Damascus has been accused of siding with the Sunni tribes and carrying out mass killings in Suwayda.
In March, violence erupted in Syria's Alawite-majority coastal areas after armed groups, many loyal to ousted president Bashar al-Assad, launched attacks on forces allied with the government, prompting Damascus to respond with force.
At least 1,700 people, mainly Alawite civilians, were killed in the waves of violence, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which said that most of the casualties were caused by government or government-affiliated forces.
Elsanousi said they are concerned about the latest developments in Syria, highlighting the importance of the US 'pressuring' the transitional authorities and telling them that it is their responsibility to protect the minorities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
6 hours ago
- Shafaq News
PMF Law delay risks collapse next term, SLC Spokesperson
Shafaq News – Baghdad On Friday, the State of Law Coalition (SLC), led by former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, warned that the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) Authority Law risks being postponed to the next parliamentary term, citing a lack of political consensus and quorum-breaking absences by key blocs. The SLC holds 33 of 329 seats in Iraq's parliament and is part of the Coordination Framework (CF), a coalition of mainly Shiite political parties. The Coalition Spokesperson, Aqil al-Fatlawi, told Shafaq News that the real reason behind the law's failure to pass is the absence of Sunni and Kurdish lawmakers, calling on all 183 Shiite MPs in parliament to attend the next session in support of the PMF. Al-Fatlawi also pointed to 'US interference influencing some political blocs aligned with US institutions,' claiming that these pressures have started to directly affect the decisions and movements of MPs. Deferring the PMF Authority Law to the next legislative cycle would further complicate its prospects due to uncertainty around future political alliances, he cautioned, adding that around 30 Sunni MPs representing tribal forces would benefit from its provisions. 'We're awaiting developments after Arbaeen,' al-Fatlawi concluded. 'There may be a decisive session, but it will be the last chance to pass the law during the current term.' Earlier, the US State Department reaffirmed Washington's opposition to any legislation in Iraq that, in its view, 'moves the country toward becoming an Iranian proxy,' warning of possible sanctions targeting financial entities linked to armed groups. The PMF was established in mid-2014 following a fatwa by Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, calling for volunteers to defend Iraq after ISIS seized Mosul. Thousands of fighters from various armed factions—many of whom had existed prior to the edict—joined the force, which played a critical role in halting ISIS's advance across northern and western Iraq. In November 2016, Iraq's parliament passed a law formally recognizing the PMF as a component of the national security apparatus. However, the law lacked clear structural and administrative details, leading to repeated calls for its revision and proper legal regulation.
Rudaw Net
10 hours ago
- Rudaw Net
SDF says thwarted attack in Deir ez-Zor
Also in Syria Kurds, Druze, Alawites, Christians attend Rojava unity conference Ankara, Damascus discuss joint fight against 'terrorist organizations' UK repatriates child from northeast Syria Two ISIS militants captured in joint SDF, US-led Coalition operation A+ A- ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in northeast Syria said they 'successfully thwarted an attack' on their force in Deir ez-Zor province on Friday. 'Our forces successfully thwarted an attack on one of our positions in Al-Jazrat, Deir Ezzor's countryside. An armed group attempted to infiltrate via the Euphrates and fired an RPG. Our forces responded immediately - clashes broke out briefly before the attackers fled,' the SDF said in a statement, adding 'no casualties reported among our forces.' The SDF did not identify the group that carried out the attack. The US-backed force has been engaged in a series of clashes this month with both Damascus-aligned forces and the Islamic State (ISIS) in separate events. On Wednesday, two SDF members were killed in an ISIS attack in Deir ez-Zor province. On Monday, the SDF accused factions affiliated with Damascus of launching an attack on their positions in Syria's northern Aleppo province. A day earlier, the SDF and Damascus traded blame for an assault in the city of Manbij, also in the north of the country. The flare-up between the SDF and Damascus is straining an integration deal signed in March by Syria's interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa and SDF commander Mazloum Abdi. The agreement aims to fold the SDF into the Syrian state military structure, recognize the Kurds as an integral part of Syria, implement a nationwide ceasefire, and enable the return of displaced Syrians to their hometowns. Talks on implementing the agreement have stalled for several reasons, including the SDF insisting on integrating into the Syrian army as a unit while Damascus wants them to do so as individuals.
Memri
11 hours ago
- Memri
After The Israel-America-Iran War, What Can President Trump Do Now?
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Syrian President Abu Mohammad Al-Joulani, and Qatar Emir Tamim bin Hamad Aal Thani. After President Donald Trump's most daring and historically unique military operation that destroyed Iran's military nuclear facilities – a move for which Western civilization is morally indebted to him – he ended America's intervention in the war and purposefully saved Khamenei's life in order to have a new future for Iran. For a variety of reasons, some valid, most of them invalid, but regardless of whether it is the correct position or not, President Trump does not want regime change in Iran and that is his prerogative as president. So then the question is: What is going to happen in this region that will affect the United States? Iran will continue with the most effective weapon that it has mastered in the war: the missiles, including the long-range missiles that threaten Europe. The further development of these missiles will threaten America itself – developing ICBMs that reach America is something they tried to do already 12 years ago before Israel virtually killed the project temporarily with a major explosion for the sake of American security, as it should. They will develop their proxies – mainly the Houthis in Yemen to execute the maritime attacks that have destabilized oil prices, and the militias in Iraq. Israel has taken care of Hizbullah, Iran's proxy and a mortal enemy of America. They will strengthen the Shi'ite practice of exporting and imposing the Islamic revolution. The depth of the religious commitment is something that the Western world does not understand and that even Israel did not understand before October 7. Israel believed that developing the Gaza Strip was an answer and now President Trump believes that developing Iran is an answer. He will learn that they will stick by their religious ideology. There will be attempts to assassinate President Trump, which have to be dealt with by the secret service. The Iranians talk about it openly and have religious edicts[1] calling for his assassination. They want to assassinate him; they see him as the cause of all their troubles, and, while there have been such attempts before published by American law enforcement,[2] now there will be more attempts to assassinate him. The Iranians are working for a surprise attack like the one that befell them. This surprise attack will surely be against Israel but also against American forces in the region and, if they manage to be prepared for it, against America itself. This is what will follow for as long as this regime continues. President Trump has to consider that while he does not want to support regime change, this is what will come. The main reason for him not being willing to support regime change is because he does not want to involve American troops in any action in the Middle East – rather he wants to withdraw all American soldiers, which is of course a legitimate reason. The question is: Does regime change necessarily involve American troop deployments? The answer is: absolutely not. There is a way to deal with this regime with no involvement whatsoever of American forces. Iran is full of opposition to the Ayatollahs' regime. The majority of those opposition groups are ethnic groups that constitute 50 percent of the population and fight the repression of the Ayatollahs' regime, primarily the Balochs, Ahwazis, Azeris, and Kurds. They seek political, not military, nor even financial support from the free world. They have begged for it for years and deserve it. But for years, America has stayed away from them. We are not talking about support with money or weapons, but only for America to speak out in favor of repressed minorities. That is all – this will make it happen. If the regime is not changed, Shi'ite Iran on the one hand, and, Sunni Turkey, Syria, and Qatar on the other – who unlike Iran pretend to be allies of America but in fact, are absolute enemies – may bring the region into chaos. Turkish President Erdoğan hallucinates about establishing the Ottoman empire in public speeches, on television, and in his actual imposition of Turkish authority in northern Syria. This hallucination of a renewed Ottoman Empire 100 after years of its dismantling indicates, according to at least one Turkish journalist, some kind of mental deterioration. Turksih President Erdoğan stands with actors wearing military garb from various periods of Turkish history. Unfortunately, the American Ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack, rather than calming President Erdoğan down and practicing soft diplomatic engagement with minorities in Syria, was understood by Al-Jolani to have given the approval for violence against the Druze in Syria. This exactly happened in recent history during the first Iraq war when Saddam Hussein believed that the American ambassador April Glaspie told him in July 1990 that he could take Kuwait. The massacre in Swaida, prompted by Al-Jolani's forces and Bedouins, could bring about an even bigger massacre than has already occurred, which would inevitably involve the deployment of American troops to stop it. President Trump should be worried about these Islamic extremists pretending to be allies of America. They are not. It is a very dangerous path and aligning with them may bring him the opposite of his intention to be the peacemaker in the region. *Yigal Carmon is founder and president of MEMRI.
