Northern Ireland's health service facing projected £600m budget shortfall
Northern Ireland's health service is expected to face a £600 million budget shortfall.
Stormont Health Minister Mike Nesbitt described financial plans being finalised which will be 'unprecedented in their scale and ambition' and involve 'extremely difficult and painful savings measures'.
In a written statement to the Assembly on Wednesday afternoon, Mr Nesbitt said the projected £600 million is the 'scale of the gap between existing funding and what's needed to maintain services'.
He told MLAs he will play his part and 'do everything I can to achieve a breakeven budget', but also urged the Executive and the Assembly to support him.
'My permanent secretary is finalising financial plans that will be unprecedented in their scale and ambition,' he said.
'They will involve an extremely difficult and indeed painful series of savings measures for HSC trusts.
'I can assure the Assembly that I will drive forward savings to reduce the projected shortfall.'
'To repeat, I will play my part and do everything I can to achieve a breakeven budget.
'But I will need Executive and Assembly support.'
Mr Nesbitt also confirmed he is ordering the paying of £200 million recommended pay increases despite not having the budget to cover it.
It includes 3.6% for nurses and staff under Agenda for Change, 4% for doctors, and 4% plus £750 for resident doctors – formerly known as junior doctors.
That requires a ministerial directive to be made to the department's permanent secretary to proceed despite not having the necessary budget.
It will go to the Finance Minister, John O'Dowd, and potentially be passed to the Executive for approval.
Mr Nesbitt told MLAs the move involves the risk of an overspend for the department, but that not paying the pay increases also involves risks.
'There is an undeniable risk that the department could be on a path towards a potential overspend,' he said.
'I have also concluded that there are also substantial risks in not proceeding with the pay increases – the biggest risk is failing to deliver on my promise to deliver 'better outcomes'.
'I do not want health service staff to be demoralised by inaction and another year of uncertainty on pay. They deserve better than that. This is about treating with respect the people who keep us healthy, fix us when we are broken and keep us alive when death becomes a potential outcome.
'Falling behind pay levels across the water will also exacerbate challenges with recruitment and retention of health service staff.'
He added that pay parity with England for Agenda for Change staff is a 'well-established and hard-fought principle' that he intends to maintain.
'Failure to do so would undoubtedly lead to industrial action with all the disruption to patient care that will involve,' he said.
'Not to mention the negative impact on the focus to reduce waiting lists, or the overdue need to reform healthcare delivery.
'In short, the risk of a potential budget overspend must be balanced against the significant risk to service provision.'
Permanent Secretary Mike Farrar said finding the £200 million for the pay award is a challenge.
'I have got a statutory duty as the accounting officer to point out to the minister that we don't have that in the budget which is what I've done,' he said.
Mr Farrar said he is talking to colleagues from the Department of Finance, and expects the Executive to be involved.
'I'm hoping that if they can see how hard we're working to get our efficiencies, and that this plan that we're putting forward to reset the health and social care system is going to lead to a sustainable financial position, I'm hoping that they will somehow find the wherewithal to help me in the short term,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alliance leader says abuse ‘unacceptable' as colleague targeted
Alliance Party leader Naomi Long has described homophobic abuse that one of party colleagues was subjected to as 'despicable'. Earlier this week Stormont Agriculture Minister Andrew Muir said he had experienced 'vile homophobic comments' and spoke out about misogynistic remarks directed at some of his officials, as well as racism against workers in the agri-food sector recently on social media. It comes during heated opposition from the farming community to Mr Muir's proposed Nutrients Action Programme 2026-2029 which is currently out for consultation. Mr Muir has been urged to scrap the proposals which are aimed at improving water quality and the wider environment by reducing and preventing pollution caused or induced by nutrients from agricultural sources. Opponents say the proposals could devastate agriculture, reduce livestock numbers and undermine food security. Speaking to media in Belfast on Wednesday, Ms Long urged constructive engagement around policy. 'I think it's despicable that any politician in any role is subjected to the kind of abuse, threat, intimidation that we see commonplace now being directed at politicians, and what Andrew has been subjected to in particular is appalling and unacceptable,' she said. 'People have a right to disagree with Andrew's policy, they have a right to disagree with his direction of travel as minister, they do not have a right to harass, intimidate, threaten and abuse him, and there needs to be a clear line drawn between the two. 'A constructive engagement around policy, around practice, is entirely reasonable. Abuse is unacceptable.' Speaking in the Assembly on Tuesday, Mr Muir contended there is 'a lot of misinformation' around the proposals, adding that social media commentary has been 'disgraceful'. 'There's been misogynistic comments against officials in my department,' he said. 'There's been racist comments in relation to people that we are very, very fortunate to have working within our agri-food sector. 'And not for a very long time have I seen such vile homophobic comments about myself. 'I am a gay man, and I am proud to be a gay man, and it has no relevance whatsoever to the Nutrients Action Programme nor my ability to do this job.' Disappointment was expressed at the social media comments referred to across the chamber, including from Opposition leader Matthew O'Toole, Sinn Fein MLA Aoife Finnegan, UUP MLA Robbie Butler and DUP MLA Trevor Clarke, who said opposition to the programme 'should not be personalised against anyone'.
Politico
4 hours ago
- Politico
Clock ticks on progressives' tax push
Presented by MONEY MAKER — This year in the California Legislature, tax season falls in June. Progressive Democrats racing against a looming deadline to approve the state budget are pressing to hike taxes on large corporations to address California's $12 billion budget shortfall while minimizing cuts. But they haven't agreed on how to do it and are running out of time. Rank-and-file Democrats in the Assembly and Senate are floating an array of proposals, from targeting offshore tax havens to penalizing companies that employ large shares of Medi-Cal recipients, according to interviews with more than a dozen lawmakers. 'We know that if we're going to mitigate these budget cuts, that we really have to have a solution,' said Assemblymember Sade Elhawary, a first-term lawmaker from Los Angeles. Still, Senate Pro Tem Mike McGuire and Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas have given no public indication of support as they grind through budget negotiations, though some of the lawmakers said Senate leaders are further along in their deliberations. The lack of consensus — and a fast-approaching June 12 deadline for the Legislature to get a joint budget proposal into print — have imperiled attempts to raise revenue and limit cuts. Even if a two-house deal is struck, legislators would need buy-in from Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has swatted down Senate-backed tax hikes during his tenure, even if he did agree to suspend some corporate tax breaks last year. Nevertheless, progressives see a need, if not an opportunity, to pursue tax hikes on big businesses as the state faces projected shortfalls each year through 2029 and as Republicans in Congress mull major spending cuts to Medicaid and other programs. Related: 'Lawmakers consider new corporate taxes to stave off Medi-Cal cuts' (POLITICO Pro) Assembly Democrats met behind closed doors Tuesday and discussed raising taxes for 'water's-edge' filers — multinational companies that do business in California — according to one lawmaker who was at the meeting. They also talked about placing higher taxes on people's second and third homes. Senators in recent days have pushed to make corporations pay more, perhaps by penalizing businesses that have large numbers of employees with low enough incomes to qualify for Medi-Cal — a proposal that moderates stopped back in 2013. But tax issues didn't come up Tuesday during a Senate Democratic Caucus meeting, said an attendee. SEIU California has floated several proposals to Newsom and legislative leaders, and union members Saturday solicited signatures for a letter that outlined some of them, which Playbook obtained. Cuts to spending on in-home care, including to providers' overtime, in Newsom's May budget proposal have prompted the union to get involved. Members of the Latino Caucus — which is fighting the governor's proposal to cap Medi-Cal enrollment for undocumented immigrants and require those recipients to pay premiums — have pitched tax increases as a way to prevent those reductions. 'We're not accepting a two-tier system,' said Elhawary, a member of the Latino Caucus, who is pushing for increased taxes. 'I think that we probably have a majority in both houses that are really looking at it. It's just figuring out which are the best options.' The Medi-Cal issue, along with a heftier spending plan from the Senate, have created disagreement between the chambers, according to two of the people interviewed, who were granted anonymity to discuss private deliberations. If tax-hike talks peter out during this summer's budget negotiations, they could still come back in the fall. State Sen. Anna Caballero predicted the Legislature will likely have to come back then and adjust its budget if and when Congress passes its megabill. Tax increases will be necessary, state Sen. Sasha Renée Pérez argued — 'especially if we see the Trump big ugly bill pass.' — with help from Tyler Katzenberger and Lindsey Holden GOOD MORNING. Happy Wednesday. Thanks for waking up with Playbook. You can text us at 916-562-0685 — save it as 'CA Playbook' in your contacts. Or drop us a line at dgardiner@ and bjones@ or on X — @DustinGardiner and @jonesblakej. WHERE'S GAVIN? Nothing official announced. ON THE AIRWAVES BILINGUAL GOP — The NRCC is defending President Donald Trump's budget megabill by going on the offensive with a Spanish-language ad blitz in the Central Valley. The digital ads accuse Democratic House members of supporting the 'largest tax increase in generations' by opposing the GOP's efforts to extend 2017 tax cuts. Among those targeted are battleground Reps. Adam Gray and Josh Harder — as well as Reps. Jim Costa and Raul Ruiz, whose districts lean bluer but have shifted closer to Trump in recent cycles. Christian Martinez, the NRCC's national Hispanic press secretary, said those Democrats' votes against the bill 'betrayed our Latino communities.' Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers have hammered the GOP over the bill's provisions that would slash spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other safety-net programs. CONVENTION EXTRAS REFUND THE POLICE? — One item that flew under the radar at the California Democratic Party's convention last weekend: the party's complete about-face on the 'defund the police' movement. Party delegates approved, on a simple consent vote, a resolution that calls for 'full staffing' in police departments. The measure passed with little fanfare, on the final day of the convention after many delegates had already boarded flights home from Anaheim. But it illustrated just how much the pendulum has swung in terms of how Democrats view issues of police accountability. Just five years ago, delegates to the party's 2020 convention approved a resolution — amid a national debate about race following George Floyd's murder — that stated the 'California Democratic Party supports police defunding.' It called for redirecting money to programs to combat the unjustified use of lethal force against people of color. The latest resolution was sponsored by San Francisco County Democratic Party leaders and was part of a larger package of proposals to shift Democrats away from so-called identity and performative politics. Marjan Philhour, a San Francisco party official who wrote the resolution, said its approval suggests party insiders are ready for new messaging on law-and-order issues. She said the 'defund the police' movement alienated many Chinese and AAPI voters who had traditionally leaned Democratic. 'The extreme left is facing a reckoning,' said Philhour, who's vying for a seat on San Francisco's Police Commission. 'Public safety is really core to the functioning of cities.' STATE CAPITOL CHEERS — Assemblymember Matt Haney's bill to give cities the option of allowing bars to serve alcohol until 4 a.m. on weekends in dedicated zones cleared the Assembly on Tuesday and is headed for the Senate. The passage was no small feat. More sweeping proposals to allow some bars to stay open until the same hour have failed year after year in the state Legislature, including a 2022 proposal that fell far short of the votes it needed in the lower house. CLIMATE AND ENERGY SOLAR WARS PT. III — The saga of California's ever-evolving rooftop solar subsidies is set to take a turn today when the California Supreme Court hears arguments for and against the California Public Utilities Commission's role. At the same time, lawmakers are set to take their own bite out of the debate with consideration of a bill that goes even further than the CPUC in slashing subsidies. Read more about the fights in last night's California Climate. Top Talkers BRIBERY PROBE GROWS — Federal prosecutors told San Leandro Councilmember Bryan Azevedo that he is the target of an investigation into potential crimes including bribery and lying to federal agents, the San Francisco Chronicle reports. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California sent a letter to Azevedo on May 12, telling him to contact prosecutors if he was 'interested in resolving this matter short of an indictment.' HIGH STAKES — Sales at California's cannabis stores have hit a five-year low following an 11 percent drop in transactions, SF Gate reports. Experts have warned that the industry is in trouble, plagued by high regulatory fees, taxes and competition from the unlicensed market. AROUND THE STATE — The Fresno Police Department has 66 open positions despite having the largest force in the city's history. (The Fresno Bee) — A 70-year-old man in El Sereno is protesting his eviction by camping out in a tree house in his backyard — five years after he illegally seized the vacant state-owned home. (Los Angeles Times) — San Luis Obispo County's first battery plant, the Caballero Energy Storage project, is up and running. The facility can power 100,000 homes for up to four hours. (The San Luis Obispo Tribune) PLAYBOOKERS PEOPLE MOVES — Charlie Arreola is the new director of external affairs and partnerships at the state Office of Exposition Park Management. He previously served as the Southern California organizing director for Harris for President in 2024. — David Bournazian has joined the firm Norton Rose Fulbright's product liability and consumer disputes practice as a partner in the Los Angeles office. He joins NRF from K&L Gates. — Anthony Martinez is now manager of marketing and communications at the California ISO. He previously served as senior communications adviser and digital director at DOE throughout all four years of the Biden Administration. BIRTHDAYS — Christian Arana at the Latino Community Foundation … Meta's Ryan Daniels … Andre de Haes at Backed VC BELATED B-DAY WISHES — (was Tuesday): Jacqueline Hartsough in the office of Rep. John Garamendi … (was Monday): Emeryville Councilmember Courtney Welch (cocktail: tequila, neat with lime) WANT A SHOUT-OUT FEATURED? — Send us a birthday, career move or another special occasion to include in POLITICO's California Playbook. You can now submit a shout-out using this Google form.
Medscape
5 hours ago
- Medscape
Aid-in-Dying Vote Sparks Historic Medical Debate
A wide-ranging majority of deputies in the National Assembly approved a bill authorising assisted suicide and euthanasia. The phrase may be overused, but it is no exaggeration to call it a historic day for the Assembly — on par with the legalisation of abortion or same-sex marriage. After 2 weeks of review and nearly 100 hours of debate, the lower house of Parliament passed the assisted dying bill by 305 votes in favour and 199 against. Right- and far-right Members of Parliament (MPs) largely opposed it, while those from the centre and left voted in favour. However, as all political groups gave their members the freedom to vote on this extremely complex issue, some MPs did not hesitate to vote against their party's line. Nineteen MPs from the National Rally, including Sébastien Chenu and Jean-Philippe Tanguy, and seven members of The Republicans voted in favour of legalising assisted dying. Conversely, opposition to the bill came from the left: Sophia Chikirou, an MP from La France Insoumise, voted against the assisted dying bill; a Green MP; a Communist MP; and four Socialist MPs voted against it. The bill authorises assisted dying through either assisted suicide or euthanasia in cases where the patient is physically unable to end their life, though these terms are not explicitly used in the text. Palliative Care To access assistance in dying, a person must meet the following conditions: Being at least 18 years old. Be of French nationality or reside in a stable and regular manner in France. Suffering from a serious and incurable condition, whatever the cause, which is life-threatening, in an advanced phase, characterised by the entry into an irreversible process marked by the worsening of the state of health of the sick person, which affects their quality of life, or in a terminal phase. Present constant physical or psychological suffering linked to this condition, which is either resistant to treatment or unbearable, depending on when they have chosen not to receive or to stop receiving treatment. Psychological suffering alone cannot, in any case, allow one to benefit from assistance in dying. Be able to express one's will in a free and informed manner. The last two conditions have given rise to and will continue to give rise to significant terminological debates. Immediately prior to the vote on assisted dying, MPs unanimously adopted a separate bill focused on palliative care. This legislation outlines a 10-year strategy to enhance the provision of palliative care across France. Key measures include the establishment of 'support and palliative care homes aimed at improving access to pain relief and end-of-life support for patients.' 'The vote by the National Assembly on the texts on the development of palliative care and assisted dying is an important step,' said French President Emmanuel Macron on social media platform X. 'Regarding sensitivities, doubts, and hopes, the path of fraternity that I wished for is gradually opening up. With dignity and humanity,' Macron said. The Association for the Right to Die with Dignity expressed satisfaction that France has embarked on the path to freedom. 'I am thinking of all the patients and their loved ones. There are days you know you will never forget. I will never forget this day,' said Olivier Falorni, the general rapporteur of the bill and long-time advocate for legalising assisted suicide. Despite this progress, the government remains divided. Health Minister Catherine Vautrin championed the bill, whereas Junior Health Minister Yannick Neuder, a cardiologist, expressed reservations. Speaking to France Info, Neuder stated he was 'not certain he would have voted for the bill if he had been a member of parliament.' 'Active assisted dying must not become a fallback for inadequate palliative care or limited access to treatment,' he said. 'I have confidence in the parliamentary process to resolve all questions,' said Prime Minister François Bayrou, despite being known for his scepticism towards legalised assisted suicide. The two bills will now proceed to the Senate, where the right-wing majority is expected to propose significant amendments to the assisted dying legislation, potentially limiting its scope or entirely rejecting it. A joint committee and negotiations may be necessary to reconcile the differences between the two houses. President Macron has indicated that in the case of a parliamentary deadlock, he may resort to a referendum to resolve the issue.
