logo
UFC landed a $7.7bn deal with Paramount. But is Dana White's Trump bond a liability?

UFC landed a $7.7bn deal with Paramount. But is Dana White's Trump bond a liability?

The Guardiana day ago
Forget for a moment the stereotype that MMA athletes and their fans are All-American bar fighters. The MMA community is far more diverse and far more cerebral than the casual onlooker realizes.
Has Dana White forgotten that?
The UFC president has long sought to expand the sport's appeal to as many demographics as possible. But in the past few years, he has bet big on a tight affiliation with Donald Trump, who has been perfectly content to revel in the adulation of one segment of the population while heaping scorn upon all others. White has campaigned for Trump, welcomed him to several UFC events and hasn't immediately smacked down the notion of holding a UFC card at the White House.
On the surface, that might seem logical. MMA culture is intertwined with bro culture, and bros are considered the antithesis of 'woke' liberalism.
But it's not that simple. Consider a startling fact: while Maga champions an 'America First' ideology, the UFC is a paragon of globalism. Of the 11 reigning UFC champions, only one is American – Kayla Harrison, thriving in an organization White once insisted would exclude women. Both Australia and Georgia (the country) boast twice as many champions as the UFC's home country. The only belt firmly held by US fighters is the unofficial 'BMF' (Baddest Motherfucker) belt. White invented this to reward charismatic fighters who put on great shows. While it's a clever way to encourage personality and panache, it also seems like a DEI program to ensure US fighters remain prominent in the UFC pantheon.
So the UFC roster is more global than ever. But UFC fighters have never fit neatly into categories.
This diversity was a hallmark of the reality show that broke the UFC into the mainstream, The Ultimate Fighter. The casts included cerebral chess players, devout Christians and someone who brought a compass to ensure that his bed would face north, and another who fled the show to reassure his girlfriend that rumors she saw online weren't true.
And the UFC evolved in ways that might be considered 'progressive.' Cain Velasquez didn't lose any noticeable fan support in 2010 when he sported a 'Brown Pride' tattoo across his chest and admitted that his father had immigrated illegally. (Velasquez has since been sentenced to prison for issues unrelated to immigration.) After opposing the idea of female fighters for many years, White threw open the octagon door to Ronda Rousey in a 2013 bout against Liz Carmouche, who was openly gay. White strongly supported Carmouche and even gave an impassioned plea to legalize gay marriage wherever it wasn't already recognized – a position he stated well before a series of landmark US supreme court decisions upheld that right. Four years later, UFC fighter Jessica Andrade proposed to her girlfriend in her postfight interview in the octagon. While the UFC sold Pride Month gear and gave proceeds to an LGBTQIA+ organization in Nevada, outspoken Trump supporter Colby Covington emerged as one of the sport's biggest villains.
Still, the UFC's primary demographic of young adult men proved to be a decisive force for Trump's return to the presidency. This group overlaps significantly with the audience for UFC commentator Joe Rogan's popular podcast, and Rogan – who felt ostracized by the left after touting scientifically unsound Covid treatments – endorsed Trump last year.
But that was November. Fast forward to this summer, and this demographic has veered sharply against Trump. Rogan himself has broken with the president over tariffs, deportations and the Epstein files. Last month, Rogan told podcast guest James Talarico, a Texas Democrat, that he should run for the White House. There's a case to be made that if the Kamala Harris campaign had managed to get her on Rogan's podcast last fall, we would have a different president today.
Such changes shouldn't be a surprise. Rogan himself is always on the lookout for new ideas – if anything, he's a little too receptive to some schools of thought and doesn't push back or check facts. While older Americans are prone to adopting a party and sticking with it come hell or high water, Gen Z is fiercely independent politically. They're also more diverse than previous generations, more likely to be non-white, LGBTQ+ or any other group that may feel aggrieved by Trump's actions since reclaiming the presidency. Younger generations are also much more receptive to socialism than prior ones – after all, young men made enough of a fuss over Bernie Sanders to warrant the term 'Bernie Bros.'
So Maga's place in 'bro culture' – and those who are MMA fans – is by no means secure. And one day, Donald Trump will be out of office. We've already seen that US conservatives are eager to abandon one trend for another. Today's Maga supporters had a decidedly different message when the Tea Party reigned supreme. Two decades after calling Democrats 'traitors' for opposing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, they excommunicated the entire Bush family.
Trump's popularity may well be on the slide too. His approval rating has tanked, and his mutable responses to the Jeffrey Epstein saga have fractured his base. The UFC may well be losing as many fans as its attracts by aligning itself with Trump.
The UFC, meanwhile, is still a strong brand but perhaps not the hot property it was a few years ago. Last week's Disney earnings report made a brief reference to 'lower Ultimate Fighting Championship pay-per-view fees due to lower average buys per event.' The fight game tends to be cyclical, driven by big personalities like Rousey, Jon Jones and Conor McGregor, all of whom have either left the sport or gone through a prolonged period of inactivity. It's tough to imagine current light heavyweight champion Magomed Ankalaev reaching the level of fame of Forrest Griffin, Rampage Jackson or Chuck Liddell. While we can't really quantify the impact of the Trump lovefest on the UFC's popularity, the organization clearly can't afford to alienate the 60% or so of the population that disapproves of Trump's presidency thus far.
Sign up to The Recap
The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action
after newsletter promotion
Perhaps this is one reason why the UFC has just opted for a new media deal that breaks from their pay-per-view model in order to get wider exposure. 'This shift in distribution strategy will unlock greater accessibility and discoverability for sports fans,' said the press release announcing the seven-year, $7.7bn deal. Some fight cards will be on network TV, and others will be free to subscribers of their streaming partner.
That streaming partner, though, is Paramount, which has also drawn the ire of many US viewers through a series of moves that appear to be a capitulation to the president's desire to control the media. First, Paramount settled a lawsuit over the editing of a Kamala Harris interview, a lawsuit deemed by many legal scholars as rather simple for Paramount to win, at the same time that the media conglomerate sought government approval for a merger. Second, after TV host Stephen Colbert criticized his parent company for settling the suit, Paramount announced that his show will end in 2026, ostensibly for financial reasons even though it is the highest-rated late-night show. (Fox News Channel claims its show Gutfeld! has higher ratings, but it airs earlier than the traditional late-night window that starts at 11.30pm Eastern time.)
Still, the decision to move away from the pay-per-view model can only be seen as a sign that the UFC feels the need to make its big tent a bit bigger as it faces the difficult challenge of keeping US fans interested in a sport in which American athletes are far from dominant. Typically, US sports broadcasters gravitate to events in which US athletes are faring well, which is why Olympic coverage focuses far more attention on swimming and snowboarding than, say, table tennis or biathlon.
White and Trump were always an odd match. Trump was involved with Affliction, a rival MMA organization of the late 2000s that White fought with the venom of the Trump administration's attacks on Harvard and the media. Trump has ridiculed veterans, dating back to when he said he didn't consider John McCain a war hero because he likes 'people who weren't captured' and continuing with Ice arrests of veterans in his second term and a recent awkward moment in which he turned attention to himself at a ceremony honoring Purple Heart recipients; White and the UFC are staunch supporters of the Wounded Warrior Project and other veterans' groups. White is an affable philanthropist; Trump used funds from his own foundation on a portrait of himself and his presidential campaign.
We probably won't see White publicly repudiate Trump, a move that wouldn't sit well with a sizable portion of UFC's audience. But over the years, White has shrewdly expanded the UFC fanbase, and he would dearly love for his sport to be the biggest in the world. White has already pronounced that his involvement with politics ends with Trump, telling The New Yorker last year that: 'I'm never fucking doing this again. I want nothing to do with this shit. It's gross. It's disgusting. I want nothing to do with politics.'
White has changed his mind about many things over the years. He brought in Kimbo Slice not long after denigrating his fighting skills. He brought women into the cage. But those moves were driven by popular uprisings, and White is almost always willing to give fans what they want. While much of the country watches in horror as Medicaid is slashed, Gaza's suffering gets worse by the week, the economy teeters on the brink, and the White House is in crisis mode trying to deflect from the Epstein case, the clamor to make White reassert his position at Trump's side will surely be muted.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump claims Schiff leaked classified information to damage him
Trump claims Schiff leaked classified information to damage him

Daily Mail​

time3 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump claims Schiff leaked classified information to damage him

Donald Trump ripped into one of his longtime Democratic opponents claiming he leaked classified information to damage him, and he wants the Department of Justice to investigate. 'Just out, irrefutable proof that Adam Shifty Schiff 'approved plan to leak classified information to damage Donald Trump,'' the president wrote on Truth Social Wednesday. He was reacting to reports about a whistleblower alleging that California Sen. Adam Schiff hatched a plan to leak classified intelligence to damage Trump shortly after he first took office in 2017. The whistleblower claims Schiff personally authorized a plan to selectively leak damaging information about Trump to the media during the FBI 's investigation into the president's possible ties to Russia . Later in the day, at an event at the Kennedy Center, the president slammed Schiff again. 'I told him ( Putin ), you know, they got this phony investigation going on. Russia, Russia, Russia. Totally phony, created by Adam Schiff,' the 79-year-old recounted. 'Shifty Schiff and Hillary Clinton and the whole group of them ... made it very dangerous for our country,' the president continued. 'I'm looking at Pam, because I hope something's going to be done about it,' he added. 'Now we've learned all the stuff that's come out over the last two months is incredible, through intelligence. And hopefully something's gonna happen with it.' A spokesperson for Schiff hit back at the allegations in a statement to the Daily Mail. 'Kash Patel's latest smear against Senator Schiff is absolutely and categorically false, and is just the latest in a series of defamatory attacks from the President and his allies meant to distract from their plummeting poll numbers and the Epstein files scandal,' they said. 'These baseless smears are based on allegations that were found to be not reliable, not credible, and unsubstantiated from a disgruntled former staffer who was fired by the House Intelligence Committee for cause in early 2017, including for harassment and potentially compromising activity on official travel for the Committee.' New testimony revealed in FBI documents shows that a career Democrat intelligence official believed Schiff's leaking to the press was 'illegal' and 'treasonous,' according to documents first reported by Just the News . 'When working in this capacity, [redacted staffer's name] was called to an all-staff meeting by SCHIFF,' the FBI report said. 'In this meeting, Schiff stated the group would leak classified information which was derogatory to President of the United States Donald J. Trump. Schiff stated the information would be used to indict President Trump.' The whistleblower gave the testimony at the FBI's St. Louis field office in 2023. However, according to the outlet, the whistleblower had told FBI officials in Washington as early as 2017 about Schiff's plot. The whistleblower reportedly said during the meeting, 'this would be illegal and, upon hearing his concerns, unnamed members of the meeting reassured that they would not be caught leaking classified information,' the report states. According to the testimony, Schiff believed he would be saved from prosecution due to the Constitution's speech and debate clause. The statute protects members of Congress from legal action for actions taken during their legislative work. It is unclear whether Attorney General Pam Bondi is working on charges related to Schiff's plan to leak classified material.

Trump administration ordered to restore some withheld grant funding to UCLA
Trump administration ordered to restore some withheld grant funding to UCLA

The Independent

time5 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump administration ordered to restore some withheld grant funding to UCLA

A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to restore millions of dollars in National Science Foundation grants it has withheld from the University of California, Los Angeles, saying they were made in violation of her earlier court ruling. U.S. District Judge Rita F. Lin ruled late Tuesday that the NSF must reinstate the research grants that were suspended for reasons she had already ruled 'arbitrary and capricious,' and gave the administration until Aug. 19 to show compliance or explain why it hasn't restored the money. It was not immediately clear how much funding could be returned to UCLA. The school's chancellor said last week that the Trump administration has pulled $584 million in federal grants from various federal agencies. The judge's ruling applies specifically to NSF grants. UCLA's money as been frozen as part of a wider pressure campaign targeting universities that Trump says are out of step with his political agenda. University of California researchers challenged the cuts as 'abrupt and unexplained' and won a preliminary injunction in June from Lin, who ruled that the NSF and other agencies could not terminate grant funding without specifically explaining why. But on July 30, the NSF sent out a new round of letters that Lin described as 'en masse, form letter funding cuts.' One said the awards 'no longer effectuate program goals or agency priorities." Another cited allegations of racism, antisemitism and policies around transgender athletes at UCLA. It did not elaborate. The administration argued in a Tuesday hearing that the UCLA funding cuts were 'suspensions' rather than 'terminations.' Lin dismissed this as semantics. 'NSF's indefinite suspensions differ from a termination in name only,' and the reasons the agency provided are based on 'the same type of deficient explanations as the original terminations,' she ruled. The university issued a brief statement praising the decision, saying that 'restoration of National Science Foundation funds is critical to research the University of California performs on behalf of California and the Nation.' UCLA also faces a Trump administration demand to pay $1 billion to settle antisemitism allegations. UCLA became the first public university to be targeted as the administration seeks to dominate academic institutions around the country. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

Christian Pulisic, his father and Tim Weah rail against ‘evil' US soccer critics
Christian Pulisic, his father and Tim Weah rail against ‘evil' US soccer critics

The Guardian

time6 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Christian Pulisic, his father and Tim Weah rail against ‘evil' US soccer critics

Tim Weah, Christian Pulisic, and Mark Pulisic (Christian's father) all delivered searing takes on ex-US men's national team players who criticized the team during their recent run of bad form, with Weah deeming the pundits to be 'evil.' The trio made the comments in the latest epsiode of the Pulsic docuseries on Paramount+, the final episodes of which were released this week. The new episodes cover the national team from the 2024 Copa América, in which the US underperformed by exiting at the group stage, up through the 2025 Nations League final, where the US lost against Panama and Canada en route to a disappointing fourth-place finish in a competition they had won in each of the previous three editions. Following that tournament, Pulisic kicked off a media firestorm when he announced that he would skip the 2025 Gold Cup, the team's last competitive tournament before next year's World Cup on home soil, due to fatigue after a second-straight 50-game season with Milan. Pulisic's decision elicited strong critiques from ex-US players like Clint Dempsey, Landon Donovan, Tim Howard, Charlie Davies, Jimmy Conrad, Herculez Gomez and others. 'In my opinion (they) disrespected me in a lot of ways, and completely forgot about what I've done for this national team for 10 years,' Pulisic said in the widely promoted docuseries covering nearly every aspect of his still-ongoing career, including extensive time spent on his breakthrough with the US national team. The series also includes many segments focused on Pulisic's personal life, and the role his family plays within his inner circle. His father, Mark, was a former professional soccer player, and he spoke up forcefully for his son. 'These [pundits] want clicks, social media, 'subscribe to my channels,' 'listen to my podcasts' or whatever. I think they should look in the mirror and look at their last performances for the national team before they start talking shit,' he said. 'It's jealousy. People want to be in his shoes, and they'll find any reason to bring him down. But Christian doesn't give a shit what anyone says.' Sign up to Soccer with Jonathan Wilson Jonathan Wilson brings expert analysis on the biggest stories from European soccer after newsletter promotion Christian also repeated a retort he used earlier this year, in an appearance on CBS Sports' Call it What You Want podcast, which had been heavily critical of his decision to withdraw from the Gold Cup 'I'd say the most annoying thing, and for me the biggest cop-out of all time, is when all pundits say 'they didn't want it,' 'they didn't have the heart,' 'back in our day we would fight and we would die on the field,' he said, insisting again that national team results affect him deeply. The most scathing retort, though, came from winger Tim Weah. 'I think those guys are chasing checks, and for me I just feel like they're really evil,' he said. 'They've been players, and they know what it's like when you're getting bashed. Those are the same guys that'll turn around and shake your hand and try to be friendly with you at the end of the day. Don't get me wrong, I respect all of them. They were players I looked up to. But quite frankly, the guys before us didn't win anything either … Christian himself has had a better career than every single one of the guys that speak negative on us.' Pulisic finished last season as one of Milan's best players in a season when the team won the Supercoppa Italia but lost in the Coppa Italia final, lost in the knockout round of the Uefa Champions League, and finished eighth in the Serie A table. The team will not play in European competition this year, with Pulisic missing time in preseason due to an ankle injury.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store