Minnesota lawmakers extend tax breaks for Big Tech data centers
Minnesota Technology Center houses multiple data centers, including a Cologix and a Vaultas data center, in this facility next to U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis Friday, May 23, 2025. (Photo by Nicole Neri/Minnesota Reformer)
The Legislature passed a bipartisan bill Monday that extends tax breaks for some of the country's most profitable technology companies on their data centers up to the year 2077, in a win for both Big Tech and the trade unions that build the data warehouses.
The once boutique tax subsidy has exploded in cost in recent years, as tech companies chased the benefit to meet ever increasing demand for computing power. In fiscal year 2015, the state estimated a sales tax break for data center purchases of computers, servers and other equipment costs the state about $6 million. That number is projected to explode to $114 million in fiscal year 2025 — a 1,800% increase — according to state tax expenditure reports.
Minnesota currently has 42 data centers, with the majority spread across the metro. Nationwide, tech companies are rapidly building data centers — warehouses with computer servers used to power the internet and, increasingly, AI — to store and process data.
As Gov. Tim Walz and his fellow Democrats in the divided Legislature confronted a worsening fiscal outlook, however, they looked to the data center tax breaks. They settled on revoking the sales tax exemption on electricity bills, which are massive because of data center energy requirements.
Curbing this tax break alone will bring in an estimated $140 million over the next four years.
But lawmakers also gave Big Tech a win, extending the expiration of the state's sales tax break for data centers on purchases of computers, servers, software and cooling and energy equipment.
Minnesota law currently allows data centers this sales tax exemption on technology equipment for 20 years, up to the year 2042. The bill passed Monday will extend the tax break to 35 years with a sunset date of 2042. This means that a data center that makes its first purchase in 2042 could continue claiming the exemption until 2077.
Sen. Ann Rest, DFL-New Hope, has been negotiating for the data center sales tax break throughout the session. Rest, the Senate's chief author of the data center bill, said the Legislature can use the tax breaks as leverage to ensure proper regulation of the nascent industry.
'This is the beginning of how we can bring a new industrial age that is one that we are going to control,' Rest said Monday.
The bill also includes a new annual fee on large-scale data centers between $2 million and $5 million to go to the Department of Commerce's weatherization account, which grants energy upgrades to low-income Minnesotans. The bill also requires public utilities to offer a clean energy tariff for data center companies, i.e, the company can pay an additional fee to the utility for the utility to fund the development of clean energy technology that the data center could one day consume.
Rep. Athena Hollins, DFL-St. Paul, voted against the bill.
'I am anti-tax breaks for billionaires. When we are saying that we are trying to incentivize people to come to our state to build these facilities, we are saying that the tax burden is going to lie on our constituents,' Hollins said Monday.
The sales tax exemption on technology equipment — even with the elimination of the sales tax break on electricity — is expected to cost Minnesota $133 million in fiscal year 2027 and jump to $219 million in fiscal year 2029 as the number of data centers increases and they purchase more equipment, according to the Department of Revenue.
The data center tax breaks are a huge win for building trade unions, which warned lawmakers that Minnesota will lose jobs if it can't compete with neighboring states to entice tech giants to build their data centers here.
Amazon recently announced it was suspending construction of a data center in Becker, citing regulatory uncertainty. Meanwhile, the company announced a $20 billion data center project in Pennsylvania, where Gov. Josh Shapiro — a potential Walz rival for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination — stood with construction workers to make the announcement.
The Minnesota data centers package included a provision requiring that companies must pay workers a prevailing wage to build the data centers, which ensures much of the construction will be done by unionized companies.
The House passed the bill 85-43 and the Senate 40-26.
Walz is expected to sign the data centers package.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bluesky backlash misses the point
Bluesky is missing an opportunity to explain to people that its network is more than just its own Bluesky social app. In recent weeks, a number of headlines and posts have surfaced questioning whether Bluesky's growth is declining, if the network has become too much of a left-leaning echo chamber, or if its users lack a sense of humor, among other charges. Investor Mark Cuban, who even financially backed Skylight, a video app built on Bluesky's underlying protocol, AT Proto, complained this week that replies on Bluesky have become too hateful. 'Engagement went from great convos on many topics, to agree with me or you are a nazi fascist,' he wrote in a post on Bluesky. That, he said, is 'forcing' people to return to X. This embedded content is not available in your region. Naturally, X owner Elon Musk and CEO Linda Yaccarino have capitalized on this unrest, with the former posting that Bluesky is a 'bunch of super judgy hall monitors' and the latter proclaiming that X is the 'true' global town square. The debate around this topic is not surprising. Without a more direct push to showcase the wider network of apps built on the open protocol that Bluesky's team spearheaded, it was only a matter of time before the Bluesky brand became pigeon-holed as the liberal and leftist alternative to X. That characterization of Bluesky, however, is not a complete picture of what the company has been building — but it could become a stumbling block toward its further growth if not corrected. It's true that many of Bluesky's initial users are those who abandoned X because they were unhappy with its new ownership under Musk and its accompanying right-wing shift. After the November elections in the U.S., Bluesky's adoption soared as X users fled the platform headed by Trump's biggest individual backer. At the time, Bluesky was adding millions of users in rapid succession, climbing from north of 9 million users in September to nearly 15 million by mid-November and then 20 million just days later. That growth continued in the months that followed, as top Democrats like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton joined the app. Today, Bluesky has more than 36.5 million registered users, its public data indicates. It follows, then, that users' conversations around news and politics on Bluesky would help to define the network's tone as they became the dominant voices. Of course, that can spell trouble for any social network, as partisan apps on both the left, like Telepath, and right, like Parler, have failed to successfully challenge X. What's missing in this current narrative is the fact that Bluesky's social app is only meant to be one example of what's possible within the wider AT Proto ecosystem. If you don't like the tone of the topics trending on Bluesky, you can switch to other apps, change your default feeds, or even build your own social platform using the technology. Already, people are using the protocol that powers Bluesky to build social experiences for specific groups — like Blacksky is doing for the Black online community or like Gander Social is doing for social media users in Canada. There are also feed builders like Graze and those in Surf that let you create custom feeds where you can focus on specific content you care about — like video games or baseball — and exclude others, like politics. Built into Bluesky (and other third-party clients) are tools that let you pick your default feed and add others that interest you from a range of topics. If you want to follow a feed devoted to your favorite TV show or animal, for instance, you can. In other words, Bluesky is meant to be what you make it, and its content can be consumed in whatever format you prefer best. In addition to Bluesky itself, the wider network of apps built on the AT Protocol includes photo- and video-sharing apps, livestreaming tools, communication apps, blogging apps, music apps, movie and TV recommendation apps, and more. Other tools also let you combine feeds from Bluesky with other social networks. Openvibe, for instance, can mix together feeds from social networks like Threads, Bluesky, Mastodon, and Nostr. Apps like Surf and Tapestry offer ways to track posts on open social platforms as well as those published with other open protocols like RSS. This lets the apps pull in content from blogs, news sites, YouTube, and podcasts. The team at Bluesky may not be the ones directly building these other social experiences and tools, but highlighting and promoting the existence of this wider, connected social network benefits Bluesky's brand. It shows that not only is Bluesky more than just a Twitter/X alternative, it's just one app in a wider social ecosystem built on open technology — and that's bigger than just building another X. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Republicans vote to claw back $9.4 billion in funding for foreign aid, NPR and PBS
The Republican-led House voted 214-212 on Thursday to pass a proposal from President Donald Trump to cancel $9.4 billion in previously approved federal funding. The 'rescissions' package would claw back $8.3 billion for foreign aid and $1.1 billion for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides funding to NPR and PBS. It is part of an effort by the White House to codify cuts proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency, which was helmed by tech billionaire Elon Musk. Four House Republicans — Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Mike Turner of Ohio — voted with 208 Democrats to reject the measure. Some GOP members flipped their votes from 'no' to 'yes' toward the end after realizing it wouldn't pass otherwise. Four Democrats and two Republicans missed the vote. Three Democratic-held seats are vacant because of lawmaker deaths. Trump pushed Republicans to back the bill just ahead of the House vote, posting on social media, 'The Rescissions Bill is a NO BRAINER, and every single Republican in Congress should vote, 'YES.' MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' After the vote, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., called the package a start to restoring 'fiscal discipline' in Washington. 'Today's passage of this initial rescissions package marks a critical step towards a more responsible and transparent government, that puts the interests of the American taxpayers first,' Johnson told reporters. 'It's just one of the ways that Republicans are codifying DOGE findings and putting taxpayer dollars to better use. 'There will be more of this in the days to come,' he added. The package now heads to the Senate, where it isn't subject to the 60-vote threshold, meaning Republicans can pass it along party lines. Some Republicans, like Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, have voiced concerns about cuts to PEPFAR — the Bush-era program to combat HIV/AIDS that has been credited with saving millions of lives in Africa. And Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, has said she opposes cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, noting that parts of her state rely on it to meet important needs. 'Not only would a large portion of Alaska communities lose their local programming, but warning systems for natural disasters, power outages, boil water advisories, and other alerts would be severely hampered,' Murkowski said. 'What may seem like a frivolous expense to some has proven to be an invaluable resource that saves lives in Alaska.' Overall, the $9.4 billion in savings is a drop in the bucket compared to the $2.4 trillion in new deficits that Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act would create, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Republicans are pushing to pass the larger bill through the Senate by July 4. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., slammed the rescission package as 'reckless' and said it would 'undermine America's national security, hurt our ability to protect the American people.' 'Republicans want to rip billions of dollars away from America's efforts to keep her people safe and secure to satisfy some extreme ideological crusade related to a deeply unpopular effort formerly led by Elon Musk to devastate the American way of life,' Jeffries said before the vote. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Donald Trump approval rating: Poll finds new low for Trump
President Donald Trump's approval rating has dropped to a new low point, according to a new poll. A Quinnipiac University poll published on June 11 found that 38% of respondents approve of the job the 47th president is doing, while 54% disapprove of his work. This is the first time during Trump's second term that a Quinnipiac University poll has found the president's approval rating under 40%, according to RealClearPolitics' poll average. The poll also found more respondents disapproving of Trump's handling of immigration (43% approve, 54% disapprove) deportations (40% approve, 56% disapprove), the economy (40% approve, 56% disapprove) trade (38% approve, 57% disapprove) universities (37% approve, 54% disapprove) the conflict between Israel and Hamas (35% approve, 52% disapprove) and the war between Russia and Ukraine (34% approve, 57% disapprove). The survey's findings caught the attention of CNN's Harry Enten on X. 'This is definitely one of Trump's worst polls,' Enten wrote. 'Just horrible across the board.' Enten also noted the poll found opposition to the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' a piece of legislation containing Trump's immigration and tax policy. Only 27% of respondents support the bill, which includes the extension of the 2017 Trump tax cuts, $50 billion to renew construction of Trump's border wall and a committment of $150 billion in defense spending to be used for shipbuilding and a missile defense system Trump calls 'The Golden Dome.' A majority of respondents, 53%, don't support the One Big Beautiful Bill, according to the poll. In addition to respondents disapproving of Trump's job as president and the tax and immigration legislation, they also disapprove of the job that Democrats in Congress are doing. Just 21% of respondents approve of the job being done by Democrats in D.C., while 70% say they don't. Among respondents who identify as Democrats, 41% expressed approval of Democrats in Congress, while 53% expressed disapproval. In comparison, 32% of respondents said they approve of the job being done by Republicans in Congress compared to 61% who don't. Among Republican respondents, only 13% disapprove of the actions of Republicans in Congress compared to the 79% who expressed approval. The poll was conducted between June 5 to June 9 with a sample size of 1,265 self-identified registered voters. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.8%.' Here's who polling says is winning the fight between Trump and Newsom Trump proposes 'automatic' year in jail for action protected under 1st Amendment Boston Councilor Fernandes Anderson resigns after pleading guilty to fraud charges Mass. AG Campbell joins court fight over Trump's military deployment in California Here's how many Capitol Hill Republicans will attend Trump's military parade Read the original article on MassLive.
