ABN AMRO Bank NV (ABMRF) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Profit and Lending Growth ...
Net Profit: EUR619 million.
Return on Equity: Approximately 10%.
Mortgage Portfolio Growth: Increased by EUR1.7 billion.
Corporate Loans Growth: Increased by EUR900 million.
Fee Growth: Up by 8% compared to Q1 2024.
Underlying Costs: Decreased by 5% compared to Q4.
CET1 Ratio: 14.7%.
Net Interest Income Guidance: Expected between EUR6.2 billion and EUR6.4 billion for the year.
Fee and Commission Income Growth: Increased by 1% compared to the last quarter.
Underlying Costs Guidance: Expected to be between EUR5.3 billion and EUR5.4 billion for 2025.
Impairments: EUR5 million booked in Q1.
Cost of Risk Expectation: Below 15 to 20 basis points for 2025.
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with ABMRF.
Release Date: May 14, 2025
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
ABN AMRO Bank NV (ABMRF) reported a solid net profit of EUR619 million for Q1 2025, with a return on equity of around 10%.
The bank's mortgage portfolio increased by EUR1.7 billion, and corporate loans grew by EUR900 million, indicating strong lending growth.
Fee growth continued, with an 8% increase compared to Q1 2024, supported by contributions from all client units.
The bank successfully transitioned to Basel IV, reporting a strong CET1 ratio of 14.7%.
ABN AMRO Bank NV (ABMRF) was awarded the overall best European private bank, reflecting its commitment to excellence and innovation in wealth management.
Net interest income decreased in Q1, largely due to normalization of treasury results and lower deposit margins.
Consumer loans decreased due to repayments, less demand, and the phasing out of legacy products.
The bank's net interest margin was under pressure, particularly in the mortgage segment, due to lower margins.
There is uncertainty regarding corporate loan growth, with potential delays in investment decisions by clients.
The bank faces challenges in maintaining cost discipline, with a focus on controlling insolent expenditures and external hiring.
Q: Can you share your initial thoughts on growth opportunities and cost reductions for ABN AMRO, and any updates on capital levels and share buybacks? A: Marguerite Berard, CEO: We have a strong brand, client franchise, and committed teams. Our focus will be on achieving profitable growth, cost discipline, and capital management. We are conducting a strategic review and will share more at our Capital Market Day in November. Ferdinand Vaandrager, CFO: We submitted a proposal to the ECB for model simplification, which will bring stability to our capital position. We expect further improvements over time and will reassess our capital trajectory and share buyback potential in Q2.
Q: Have you applied for ECB approval for a share buyback, and what is the potential impact of the SME factor on capital? A: Ferdinand Vaandrager, CFO: We will start discussions in Q2 and provide an update in August. The SME factor could have a EUR2 billion to EUR3 billion impact, and we are optimizing our capital position, as seen with our recent SRT with the European Investment Bank.
Q: How are you managing the increase in full-time employees (FTEs) in the corporate center, and will the Capital Markets Day address capital distribution plans? A: Marguerite Berard, CEO: We are managing our cost base to keep it flat compared to last year and internalizing specific skills when necessary. Ferdinand Vaandrager, CFO: We have reached an inflection point in FTE growth and are focusing on operational efficiency. We aim to be predictable and reliable, sticking to our commitments regarding capital distribution timelines.
Q: How do you plan to address the deposit franchise and corporate lending given high risk weighting and low ROE? A: Marguerite Berard, CEO: Total deposits have increased, with seasonal effects impacting client deposits. We have a stable deposit franchise. Ferdinand Vaandrager, CFO: We can run the corporate bank profitably, and capital management is a priority. The RWA density may appear high, but it excludes off-balance sheet exposures.
Q: What is your mandate from the Board, and how do you view mortgage growth and clearing income? A: Marguerite Berard, CEO: My mandate is to lead the bank into its next strategic phase, covering all aspects, including cost management. Ferdinand Vaandrager, CFO: Mortgage growth continues, with lower margins but higher ROE. Clearing income remains strong, contributing significantly to fee and net interest income.
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
9 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Can't Derail Climate Agenda, Senior ECB Official Says
Europe's determination to include climate risk in financial regulations won't be thrown off track by the Trump administration's interventions, according to a senior European Central Bank official. 'We always go back to our mandate,' Irene Heemskerk, head of the ECB's Climate Change Centre, said in an interview. 'We see climate and environmental risk — regardless of any political wind that goes around — as relevant for banks to manage.'
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
How has wealth inequality changed across Europe since the 2008 crisis?
The richest 10% in the eurozone held 57.3% of total net household wealth in the final quarter of 2024. This is 2.8 percentage points higher than in the same period of 2009, when their share was 54.5%, according to the European Central Bank (ECB). Wealth inequality has increased in some parts of Europe while declining in others in the period from 2008 to 2023, according to UBS's Global Wealth Report 2024. The report notes that wealth inequality has generally risen in most of Eastern Europe, while the data for Western Europe is 'extremely mixed'. So, which European countries have seen the greatest increases or decreases in inequality since the 2008 financial crisis? And which countries in Europe have the highest disparities between rich and poor? UBS's report covers 12 European countries and uses the Gini coefficient as the primary measure of inequality. A higher Gini coefficient indicates greater wealth inequality, with 0 representing perfect equality. Net worth — or 'wealth' — is defined as the total value of a household's financial and real assets (primarily housing), minus its debts. In 2023, the Wealth Inequality Gini Index ranged from 46 in Belgium to 75 in Sweden, among the 12 European countries covered. Sweden recorded the highest level of wealth inequality by far, followed by Germany (68), Switzerland (67), and Austria (65). Belgium stood out with the lowest Gini score of 46, indicating the highest level of equal wealth distribution in the list. It was a clear outlier, as the closest countries — Italy and Spain — both had significantly higher scores of 57. France and the UK — two of Europe's major economies — both fall below the 12-country average Gini index of 62.1, with scores of 59 and 61 respectively. Among the Nordic countries, Denmark (62) and Finland (64) were around the average, as was the Netherlands (64). Looking at the change in the Gini Index between 2008 and 2023, Finland recorded the highest increase, rising by 21%, from 53 to 64. Spain followed closely, with a 20% increase, from 47 to 57. Italy also saw a notable rise of around 15%, going from 50 to 57, while Denmark's index increased by 11%, from 56 to 62. According to the UBS report, wealth inequality also increased in the UK by roughly 8% and in France by 5% between 2008 and 2023. Sweden, which had the highest Gini Index among the countries examined, saw only a slight rise of 1% during this period. Wealth inequality declined in five out of the 12 countries examined. Belgium saw the largest drop, with an 11% decrease in its Gini Index—from 51 to 46. Germany, Austria, and Switzerland each recorded a roughly 5% decline, while the Netherlands saw a 4% reduction over the same period. Veli-Matti Törmälehto, a senior researcher at Statistics Finland, noted that surveys carried out by his own organisation also indicate a rise in wealth inequality. 'In general, the increase in wealth inequality in Finland can be attributed to a shift from real assets towards financial assets in households' average portfolio,' Törmälehto told Euronews Business. 'The role of housing wealth has been important, with weak and even declining housing prices and uneven regional patterns, as well as declining homeownership rate.' He also noted that financial wealth has continued to grow, which contributes to rising inequality, as these assets are heavily concentrated among the wealthiest households. According to Statistics Finland, the share of total wealth held by the wealthiest 10% of households increased from 43.9% in 2009 to 51.8% in 2023. Related Billionaire wealth surges as Oxfam predicts five trillionaires in decade Where are Europe's top tax havens - and how are they luring in the rich? Arthur Apostel, a researcher at Ghent University, pointed out that an ECB study shows a slight decline in Belgium's wealth inequality — from 0.71 in 2010 to 0.69 in 2023 —representing a 2.8% decrease. This differs from what the UBS report claims. Apostel argued that there is insufficient evidence to confidently conclude that wealth inequality in Belgium has meaningfully decreased in recent years. According to the Distributional Wealth Accounts (DWA), the share of net wealth held by the top 5% in Belgium declined from 49.3% in 2010 to 44.8% in 2023. Both Apostel and Törmälehto recommend caution when using UBS figures, especially for cross-country comparisons, as the report relies on estimates drawn from a mix of micro- and macro-level data. Gini Index scores may not clearly show how unequally wealth is distributed, partly because they're not very sensitive to the extremes. But wealth shares held by top percentiles provide a more detailed picture. While this breakdown is not included in the 2024 UBS report, it is available in the 2023 edition, which presents data from 2022. In 2022, the richest 10% of households in Sweden held 74.4% of total wealth, while in Belgium they held just 43.5%. These two countries had the highest and lowest wealth inequality Gini Index scores, respectively, among the 12 countries included in 2023. The top 10% of households held 63% of total wealth in Germany and 62.5% in Switzerland— placing both countries just behind Sweden in both the Gini Index and the share of wealth held by the top 10%. While the rankings of some countries shift slightly when looking at the top 5% or top 1% of wealth holders, the overall trends in wealth distribution remain consistent. The report emphasised that changes in inequality alone don't necessarily indicate whether people are better or worse off in different countries. It suggests that absolute wealth levels also need to be taken into consideration 'in order to paint a comprehensive picture of a society's wealth profile'. In other words, it's also important to look at how much wealth people have, as well as how it is divided.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
How has wealth inequality changed across Europe since the 2008 crisis?
The richest 10% in the eurozone held 57.3% of total net household wealth in the final quarter of 2024. This is 2.8 percentage points higher than in the same period of 2009, when their share was 54.5%, according to the European Central Bank (ECB). Wealth inequality has increased in some parts of Europe while declining in others in the period from 2008 to 2023, according to UBS's Global Wealth Report 2024. The report notes that wealth inequality has generally risen in most of Eastern Europe, while the data for Western Europe is 'extremely mixed'. So, which European countries have seen the greatest increases or decreases in inequality since the 2008 financial crisis? And which countries in Europe have the highest disparities between rich and poor? UBS's report covers 12 European countries and uses the Gini coefficient as the primary measure of inequality. A higher Gini coefficient indicates greater wealth inequality, with 0 representing perfect equality. Net worth — or 'wealth' — is defined as the total value of a household's financial and real assets (primarily housing), minus its debts. In 2023, the Wealth Inequality Gini Index ranged from 46 in Belgium to 75 in Sweden, among the 12 European countries covered. Sweden recorded the highest level of wealth inequality by far, followed by Germany (68), Switzerland (67), and Austria (65). Belgium stood out with the lowest Gini score of 46, indicating the highest level of equal wealth distribution in the list. It was a clear outlier, as the closest countries — Italy and Spain — both had significantly higher scores of 57. France and the UK — two of Europe's major economies — both fall below the 12-country average Gini index of 62.1, with scores of 59 and 61 respectively. Among the Nordic countries, Denmark (62) and Finland (64) were around the average, as was the Netherlands (64). Looking at the change in the Gini Index between 2008 and 2023, Finland recorded the highest increase, rising by 21%, from 53 to 64. Spain followed closely, with a 20% increase, from 47 to 57. Italy also saw a notable rise of around 15%, going from 50 to 57, while Denmark's index increased by 11%, from 56 to 62. According to the UBS report, wealth inequality also increased in the UK by roughly 8% and in France by 5% between 2008 and 2023. Sweden, which had the highest Gini Index among the countries examined, saw only a slight rise of 1% during this period. Wealth inequality declined in five out of the 12 countries examined. Belgium saw the largest drop, with an 11% decrease in its Gini Index—from 51 to 46. Germany, Austria, and Switzerland each recorded a roughly 5% decline, while the Netherlands saw a 4% reduction over the same period. Veli-Matti Törmälehto, a senior researcher at Statistics Finland, noted that surveys carried out by his own organisation also indicate a rise in wealth inequality. 'In general, the increase in wealth inequality in Finland can be attributed to a shift from real assets towards financial assets in households' average portfolio,' Törmälehto told Euronews Business. 'The role of housing wealth has been important, with weak and even declining housing prices and uneven regional patterns, as well as declining homeownership rate.' He also noted that financial wealth has continued to grow, which contributes to rising inequality, as these assets are heavily concentrated among the wealthiest households. According to Statistics Finland, the share of total wealth held by the wealthiest 10% of households increased from 43.9% in 2009 to 51.8% in 2023. Related Billionaire wealth surges as Oxfam predicts five trillionaires in decade Where are Europe's top tax havens - and how are they luring in the rich? Arthur Apostel, a researcher at Ghent University, pointed out that an ECB study shows a slight decline in Belgium's wealth inequality — from 0.71 in 2010 to 0.69 in 2023 —representing a 2.8% decrease. This differs from what the UBS report claims. Apostel argued that there is insufficient evidence to confidently conclude that wealth inequality in Belgium has meaningfully decreased in recent years. According to the Distributional Wealth Accounts (DWA), the share of net wealth held by the top 5% in Belgium declined from 49.3% in 2010 to 44.8% in 2023. Both Apostel and Törmälehto recommend caution when using UBS figures, especially for cross-country comparisons, as the report relies on estimates drawn from a mix of micro- and macro-level data. Gini Index scores may not clearly show how unequally wealth is distributed, partly because they're not very sensitive to the extremes. But wealth shares held by top percentiles provide a more detailed picture. While this breakdown is not included in the 2024 UBS report, it is available in the 2023 edition, which presents data from 2022. In 2022, the richest 10% of households in Sweden held 74.4% of total wealth, while in Belgium they held just 43.5%. These two countries had the highest and lowest wealth inequality Gini Index scores, respectively, among the 12 countries included in 2023. The top 10% of households held 63% of total wealth in Germany and 62.5% in Switzerland— placing both countries just behind Sweden in both the Gini Index and the share of wealth held by the top 10%. While the rankings of some countries shift slightly when looking at the top 5% or top 1% of wealth holders, the overall trends in wealth distribution remain consistent. The report emphasised that changes in inequality alone don't necessarily indicate whether people are better or worse off in different countries. It suggests that absolute wealth levels also need to be taken into consideration 'in order to paint a comprehensive picture of a society's wealth profile'. In other words, it's also important to look at how much wealth people have, as well as how it is divided.
