logo
Trump administration abruptly pulls $24M in grants for Denver migrant shelters — what it may mean for the city

Trump administration abruptly pulls $24M in grants for Denver migrant shelters — what it may mean for the city

Yahoo16-05-2025

The Mile High City has joined a growing list of U.S. metros put on notice by the Trump administration: No more federal money for shelters that support migrants.
Denver leaders recently heard from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) that the agency is rescinding $24 million in grants earmarked to support shelters and services for migrants arriving in the city.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
The abrupt termination of funding was revealed during a routine presentation to the City Council in April, disrupting the plans of city officials who were relying on these funds to offset the costs of an influx of migrants.
"The city does not have the capacity, if all of that federal funding were to go away, to backfill it. And so, that is another risk that we are carefully monitoring and very concerned about," Budget Director Justin Sykes told the council, according to ABC affiliate Denver 7.
Cities applied for FEMA grants for migrant support because they faced significant costs in providing emergency shelter, food, medical care and transportation to migrants released from federal short-term holding facilities.
The Shelter and Services Program (SSP), administered by FEMA, was created to help non-federal entities offset some of these emergency costs, especially as large numbers of migrants began arriving and many could not immediately support themselves. Without this federal reimbursement, cities would have to bear these expenses alone, straining local budgets and resources.
In Denver's case, roughly $8 million of the $32 million promised had already been dispersed, according to Denver 7. It's unclear whether FEMA will seek repayment of the initial grant.
According to The Denver Post, Sykes told council members that the upcoming 2026 city budget doesn't account for federal grant money that has been canceled or may be canceled. But the city won't feel the hit for a while, as it wasn't expecting the federal reimbursement for several years, city spokesperson Jon Ewing told The Post.
In a letter to the city, FEMA administrator Cameron Hamilton said Denver's program was at odds with Trump's view that federal money shouldn't support programs tied to encouraging or facilitating illegal immigration.
'Grant programs that support, or have the potential to support, illegal immigration through funding illegal activities or support for illegal aliens that is not consistent with DHS's enforcement focus do not effectuate the agency's current priorities,' the letter read.
Read more: You're probably already overpaying for this 1 'must-have' expense — and thanks to Trump's tariffs, your monthly bill could soar even higher. Here's how 2 minutes can protect your wallet right now
Denver is the latest city caught in the crossfire of Trump's campaign against sanctuary cities that limit their cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. The administration has repeatedly threatened and, in several cases, already pulled significant funding from major cities across the country.
New York City recently faced a similar blow, losing $188 million previously allocated to its migrant support programs, according to CBS News. The administration's stark message is clear: Cities that openly defy strict immigration policies should expect to hear from FEMA.
Earlier this year, President Trump signed sweeping executive orders aimed explicitly at clamping down on sanctuary policies.
These orders include financial penalties, aggressive enforcement of deportation protocols and substantial funding cuts for non-compliant cities. Trump's strategy, critics say, puts city budgets nationwide in peril, risking vital public services that extend well beyond immigration support.
Federal courts have already blocked some attempts to withhold funds from 16 cities, including Minneapolis, Portland and San Francisco, citing constitutional limits on the executive branch's authority to impose new grant conditions without congressional approval.
That means the actual impact on city budgets remains uncertain and will likely be determined through ongoing legal battles.
Denver's total budget for 2025 is about $4.4 billion, down 2.5% from the year prior. But since the city wasn't expecting to receive the full federal allotment for several years anyway, FEMA's move doesn't exactly spell a budget crisis — yet.
However, if Denver pushes forward with its migrant support, the money will need to come from somewhere — so it's conceivable other parts of the city budget could suffer.
The sudden funding withdrawal could become more than politics. As city officials consider whether to mitigate the loss of the FEMA money, residents may wonder how deep the hole is — and how much they may end up paying for a battle fought at the federal level.
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.
The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.

Los Angeles Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.

The Trump administration announced Saturday that National Guard troops were being sent to Los Angeles — an action Gov. Gavin Newsom said he opposed. President Trump is activating the Guard by using powers that have been invoked only rarely. Trump said in a memo to the Defense and Homeland Security departments that he was calling the National Guard into federal service under a provision called Title 10 to 'temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions.' Title 10 provides for activating National Guard troops for federal service. Such Title 10 orders can be used for deploying National Guard members in the United States or abroad. Erwin Chemerinsky, one of the nation's leading constitutional law scholars, said 'for the federal government to take over the California National Guard, without the request of the governor, to put down protests is truly chilling.' 'It is using the military domestically to stop dissent,' said Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law. 'It certainly sends a message as to how this administration is going to respond to protests. It is very frightening to see this done.' Tom Homan, the Trump administration's 'border czar,' announced the plan to send the National Guard in an interview on Fox News on Saturday as protesters continued confronting immigration agents during raids. 'This is about enforcing the law,' Homan said. 'We're not going to apologize for doing it. We're stepping up.' 'We're already ahead of the game. We were already mobilizing,' he added. 'We're gonna bring the National Guard in tonight. We're gonna continue doing our job. We're gonna push back on these people.' Newsom criticized the federal action, saying that local law enforcement was already mobilized and that sending in troops was a move that was 'purposefully inflammatory' and would 'only escalate tensions.' The governor called the president and they spoke for about 40 minutes, according to the governor's office. Critics have raised concerns that Trump also might try to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 to activate troops as part of his campaign to deport large numbers of undocumented immigrants. The president has the authority under the Insurrection Act to federalize the National Guard units of states to suppress 'any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy' that 'so hinders the execution of the laws' that any portion of the state's inhabitants are deprived of a constitutional right and state authorities are unable or unwilling to protect that right. The American Civil Liberties Union has warned that Trump's use of the military domestically would be misguided and dangerous. According to the ACLU, Title 10 activation of National Guard troops has historically been rare and Congress has prohibited troops deployed under the law from providing 'direct assistance' to civilian law enforcement — under both a separate provision of Title 10 as well as the Posse Comitatus Act. The Insurrection Act, however, is viewed as an exception to the prohibitions under the Posse Comitatus Act. In 1958, President Eisenhower invoked the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to Arkansas to enforce the Supreme Court's decision ending racial segregation in schools, and to defend Black students against a violent mob. Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, wrote in a recent article that if Trump were to invoke the Insurrection Act 'to activate federalized troops for mass deportation — whether at the border or somewhere else in the country — it would be unprecedented, unnecessary, and wrong.' Chemerinsky said invoking the Insurrection Act and nationalizing a state's National Guard has been reserved for extreme circumstances where there are no other alternatives to maintain the peace. Chemerinsky said he feared that in this case the Trump administration was seeking 'to send a message to protesters of the willingness of the federal government to use federal troops to quell protests.' In 1992, California Gov. Pete Wilson requested that President George H.W. Bush use the National Guard to quell the unrest in Los Angeles after police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. That was under a different provision of federal law that allows the president to use military force in the United States. That provision applies if a state governor or legislature requests it. California politics editor Phil Willon contributed to this report.

Trump attends UFC championship fight in NJ, taking a break from politics, Musk feud

time30 minutes ago

Trump attends UFC championship fight in NJ, taking a break from politics, Musk feud

NEWARK, N.J. -- President Donald Trump walked out to a thunderous standing ovation just ahead of the start of the UFC pay-per-view card at the Prudential Center on Saturday night, putting his public feud with tech billionaire Elon Musk on hold to instead watch the fierce battles inside the cage. Trump was accompanied by UFC President Dana White and the pair headed to their cageside seats to Kid Rock's 'American Bad Ass.' Trump and White did the same for UFC's card last November at Madison Square Garden, only then they were joined by Musk. Trump shook hands with fans and supporters — a heavyweight lineup that included retired boxing champion Mike Tyson — on his way to the cage. Trump was joined by his daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, along with son Eric Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Trump shook hands with the UFC broadcast team that included Joe Rogan. Rogan hosted Trump on his podcast for hours in the final stages of the campaign last year. UFC fans went wild for Trump and held mobile devices in their outstretched arms to snap pictures of him. Trump arrived in time for the start of a card set to include two championship fights. Julianna Peña and Merab Dvalishvili were scheduled to each defend their 135-pound championships. UFC fighter Kevin Holland won the first fight with Trump in the building, scaled the cage and briefly chatted with the President before his post-fight interview.

LA immigration protests live updates: Trump deploys 2,000 National Guard members

time35 minutes ago

LA immigration protests live updates: Trump deploys 2,000 National Guard members

California Gov. Gavin Newsom called the move "purposefully inflammatory." 1:20 The Trump administration is deploying the California National Guard in response to protests in Los Angeles that begin Friday evening over immigration enforcement operations that have resulted in some clashes between demonstrators and authorities, the White House said in a statement. President Donald Trump signed a memorandum "deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness" in California as demonstrations opposing Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations continue in the state, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement Saturday evening. Earlier Saturday, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the federal government was moving to "take over the California National Guard," calling the move "purposefully inflammatory" and saying it will "only escalate tensions." 6 minutes ago Hegseth says National Guard being mobilized immediately, active-duty Marines on 'high alert' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the Defense Department is "mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles." Hegseth said if violence continues, "active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert." The memo that President Donald Trump signed Saturday night directing the National Guard to California said that the current protests "constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." Trump utilized his authority under "10 U.S.C. 12406 to temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel," according to the memo. The presidential memorandum also said that the 2,000 service members could be deployed for 60 days or "at the discretion" of the defense secretary. The memo adds that the secretary of defense "may employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store