
Scotland's religious groups divided on assisted dying bill
In a secular Scotland, one can't assume that one's religion, whether Catholic, Protestant, or other; will necessarily influence the votes of individual members.
Yet, a survey of 53 MSPs carried out by Holyrood Magazine in 2023 found that 55% held religious faith and 65% believed they should have more freedom to vote with their conscience.
Several high-profile politicians are members of religious groups; including Humza Yousaf, who is Muslim, Kate Forbes, who attends the Free Church, and John Swinney, who is a member of the Church of Scotland.
Indeed, Scotland's religious communities have expressed a range of opinions on the legislation, orignally proposed by Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur, with many groups not coming to a settled position.
Here's what some of them had to say ahead of the historic vote.
One of Scotland's largest denominations, the Church of Scotland currently has 245,000 members and maintains around 1,100 churches.
A spokesperson said: 'Our position on Assisted Dying is being reviewed as there is a diversity of opinion in the Church (as in wider society) and a report will be coming to the General Assembly on 19 May.'
The report states: 'We acknowledge that [our position] moves the church away from a binary 'for' or 'against' approach. Some may argue that this ambiguity makes advocacy difficult, and that it may diminish the Church's public witness.
"While these are valid concerns, we would respond that this approach more accurately reflects where we are currently as a Church on this matter.'
The Church of Scotland General Assembly will discuss the issue later this month (Image: Getty) More than 676,000 people identify as Roman Catholic in Scotland.
A spokesperson for the Catholic Bishops' Conference of Scotland said: 'The Catholic Church remains steadfast in its consistent opposition to assisted suicide and invites MSPs to commit to improving palliative care, protecting the vulnerable and upholding the dignity of life by voting against Liam McArthur's Bill."
A letter sent to parishioners across Scotland during mass last Sunday reads: 'The Bishops of Scotland are calling the Catholic community to a Day of Prayer to pray for our parliamentarians to cast their vote to care and not to kill; and to pray for Catholics across Scotland to reach out to their MSPs and MPs to urge them to work to improve palliative care and reject assisted suicide.'
There are around 120,000 Muslims in Scotland. A spokesperson for the Scottish Association of Mosques pointed The Herald to a statement released in May 2023.
The statement reads: 'We grieve with those who grieve and identify with those who suffer. We acknowledge the sincerely-held motivation of those seeking change, but do not believe thai is the correct approach to the alleviation of suffering.
The ways in which similar laws in other countries are being applied, and the effect that its introduction would have on some of the most vulnerable in our society, including the disabled and the elderly, would be extremely detrimental.'
Former First Minister Humza Yousaf has often spoken about his deep Muslim faithThe Scottish Episcopal Church has 23,500 members.
A spokesperson said members of the church held a range of views on the issue.
They noted that two of the church's committees made a joint response to the Scottish Government's 'Call for Views', adding: 'While the response reflects views and discussions on the matter of assisted dying within the Church, it does not represent the settled views of the Church as a whole.
'The submission raises concerns about specific aspects of the legislation were it to be introduced, and explores fundamental questions about 'dying well'.
'It offers partial opposition to the legislation, but does not firmly support or oppose the principle of assisted dying.'
The spokesperson said the issue would be discussed at the church's General Synod in June.
The Baptist Union of Scotland has 9,946 members across 156 churches. It opposes any change to the law.
General Director Martin Hodson noted: "We share a deep compassion for people who experience terrible pain and fear in their dying months. However, there is widespread concern among our churches about the Assisted Dying Bill because it clearly crosses a line between viewing human life as a sacred gift and treating it as a possession we have the right to extinguish.
'Once this line is crossed there are deep misgivings about how the legislation will be used and be extended, posing increasing risks to vulnerable people who will feel pressure or duty to end their lives. I believe it would be wiser to make a greater investment in hospices and palliative care at this time.'
Deputy FM Kate Forbes is a member of the Free Church (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) The Free Church of Scotland, who has 8,000 members across Scotland, also opposes the legislation.
Rev Stephen Allison told The Herald: 'The Free Church of Scotland cannot support assisted suicide because true compassion is shown not by ending life but by offering the highest standard of palliative care and support to those who suffer.
'Every life matters—especially in its most fragile moments. Society should not answer suffering with death, but with love, dignity, and hope.'
Allison added: 'Politicians need only look to countries where assisted suicide and euthanasia are legal to see how the practice changes society for the worse. Teaching a culture that some people's lives aren't worth living devalues human life.
'We want to see a Scotland that champions the immense value of every life, created in God's image, which understands that every suicide is an incalculable loss.'
Read more from Josh Pizzuto-Pomaco:
'A fantastic connection': Renfrew Bridge hailed by community at opening
'There's precious few left': Holocaust survivors race against time to preserve memory
ScotRail booze ban called into question by union and alcohol charities
Universal Studio projections light up Edinburgh Castle
The Jewish Council of Scotland represents the 5,847 Jews living in Scotland.
In a recent consultation, the Council told the Scottish Government that their members have a wide variety of views.
The submission reads: 'Orthodox Judaism is unequivocally opposed to assisted dying, and sets great store by the dedicated care given to patients in their final illness by members of the medical and nursing professions.
'Reform Judaism is divided about assisted dying; it has no unequivocal position on assisted dying, and respects the differing views.
'However, there are a growing number of Reform Rabbis who believe that there are limits to the efficacy of palliative care, and who strongly assert that assisted dying should be permitted, providing that safeguards are in place to protect the vulnerable.
'Liberal Judaism has formulated a policy in support of legalising assisted dying, which states that, as people 'have had control over their life, they should also have control over their death in order to minimise the suffering of those dying in pain or indignity'.'
Scotland's Jewish population is divided on the issue. (Image: Newsquest) There are around 1,000 Quakers in Scotland. Michael Hutchinson, clerk of the General Meeting for Scotland, said: 'In 2019 Quakers considered assisted dying in careful detail but did not reach a united position.
'Quakers embrace diversity in what we believe individually but hold the space for opposing views; we can have conversations, answer questions of ourselves and of God, work through our contradictions and support each other in difficulty.
'We uphold everyone concerned in this matter, knowing they are following the promptings of love and truth in their hearts.'
Scotland is an increasingly secular nation, as the number of empty pews and boarded-up churches attests.
Yeah the religious underpinnings of our society remains.
MSPs of all faiths and none will be asked to make one of the most serious decisions of their political lives this week.
They will hold the power to decide matters of life and death, literally.
Let's hope they choose wisely.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
5 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Ruth Jones MP on need to ban fur imports and sales
We have a real history of leading the way on animal welfare. Two years ago, Wales became the first part of the UK to ban the use of snare and glue traps. Scotland then followed, and last year Labour committed to do the same in England. Twenty-five years ago, we did the same with the Fur Farming (Prohibition) Act, raising the bar and setting an example for our neighbours to follow. Countries like Austria (2005), France (2021) and even Norway (2025) have all implemented 'fur bans' of their own, showing we were ahead of the curve. I am proud of our record on animal welfare. But before we absolve ourselves of being complicit in the fur trade, there is another step we can and must take: banning imports and sales. Two decades ago, we were right to ban fur farming on moral grounds – but still it is legal to import fur from beautiful, intelligent animals like foxes, mink and chinchilla. I have seen footage from a fur farm in Finland showing foxes with raw wounds, deformed feet and infected eyes. Then there were the obese, 'monster foxes' which were the result of selective breeding to increase their yield. Make no mistake – our ancestors may have used fur to survive the winter, but there is nothing natural about the fur industry today. Five years after covid, experts are warning us the next pandemic might come from one of these farms, where conditions are appalling for animals but perfect for viruses to mutate and make the leap to humans. This issue is urgent as the risk of a zoonotic outbreak looms large. I have been pushing for this change with my own piece of legislation, called the Fur (Import and Sale) Bill. If passed, it would ban the import of real fur products into Britain. Last week I carried a petition to Downing Street for the Fur Free Britain campaign with more than a million signatures and support from singer Will Young and TOWIE star Pete Wicks. Carrying the signatures to the famous black door, we were greeted by Chief Mouser, Larry, who showed great interest in our box. Afterwards an X account belonging to 'Larry the Cat' shared our photos, asking his nearly 900,000 followers to 'leave the fur wearing to the professionals'. I know Argus readers will agree that if an animal product like fur is too cruel to make in Britain, it's also too cruel to import from overseas. It is cruel and unnecessary, and high time we put the fur trade out of fashion. Ruth Jones is MP for Newport West and Islwyn.


The Herald Scotland
6 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
MP calls for ‘chronic under-supply' of Gypsy and Traveller sites to be addressed
The MP for City of Durham tabled an amendment to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill which proposes that Gypsy and Traveller sites are included in spatial development strategies. Speaking in the Commons, she said: 'Today I rise to speak to amendment 134, in my name, that works towards addressing a long-standing and deeply entrenched failure in our planning system, the chronic under-supply of Gypsy and Traveller sites across England. 'And my amendment seeks to increase fairness into the system to enable, rather than hinder, the provision of adequate, culturally appropriate accommodation for Gypsy and Traveller communities. 'For too long, the accommodation needs of Gypsies and Travellers have been overlooked by the planning system.' She added: 'The Government has committed to delivering 1.5 million new homes by 2029, if that ambition is to be truly inclusive, it must include everyone, and that means by making space, literally and politically, for communities who have been moved on, fenced off and forgotten.' Ms Foy said just 30 sites have been created over the past 30 years, adding: 'Decisions on Gypsy and Traveller sites have frequently been underpinned by prejudice, whether overt or institutional. 'Too often, proposed developments are blocked or delayed by local opposition that's not met with political will or leadership. 'Site delivery also suffers from a lack of inclusion at the strategic planning level, where Gypsy and Traveller site provision can be absent from local plans and excluded from land allocations. And this absence isn't an accident, it's a result of years of structural marginalisation that this Bill must now correct.' Ms Foy said the UK is 'seeing a troubling trend' with the number of socially rented pitches declining. She argued that leaving out Gypsy and Traveller sites from future strategies would be 'repeating mistakes of the past'.


Glasgow Times
7 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Fears of damage to nature from Labour planning reforms overblown, minister says
Housing minister Matthew Pennycook hit out at criticism that the plans would allow developers to get away with damaging habitats if they contributed to a nature restoration fund, dubbed 'cash to trash'. Mr Pennycook dismissed concerns several times, including calling them 'misrepresentation', 'patently false', and saying some critics had 'flagrant misconceptions' of what the Bill would do. Campaigning groups, including the National Trust, RSPB, Wildlife Trusts and Marine Conservation Society have warned they believe the reforms will significantly weaken environmental law. They said it could allow developers to effectively disregard environmental rules, and increase the risk of sewage in rivers, flooding and the loss of woods and parks. It came as Labour faced a potential rebellion in the voting lobbies on Monday over the fears. One Labour MP encouraged the Government to 'rescue something positive from the wreckage of this legislation' as he tabled an amendment. However, Mr Pennycook said the current 'status quo' between the environment and development was not working. In turn, he said, proposed changes would lead to a 'win-win' for both. He said: 'The nature restoration fund will do exactly as its name suggests. It will restore, not harm nature. It is a smart planning reform designed to unlock and accelerate housing and infrastructure delivery while improving the state of nature across the country.' He later told MPs: 'I feel obliged to tackle a number of the most flagrant misconceptions head on. 'First, some have claimed that driven by a belief that development must come at the expense of the environment, the Government is creating a licence for developers to pay to pollute. A cash-to-trash model, as some have dubbed it. In reality, the nature and restoration fund will do the precise opposite. 'I have been consistently clear that building new homes and critical infrastructure should not, and need not, come at the expense of the environment. It is plainly nonsense to suggest the nature restoration fund would allow developers to simply pay Government and then wantonly harm nature.' Mr Pennycook said the money would be given to Natural England, which would develop plans on how to better preserve nature. In response to a question from shadow housing minister Paul Holmes about the capacity of Natural England to take on the responsibilities, Mr Pennycook said: 'We've been perfectly clear that this new approach is not a means of making unacceptable development acceptable.' He continued: 'Another claim put forward has been that the Bill strips protections from our protected sites and species, allowing for untrammelled development across the country. Again, I'm afraid this amounts to nothing less than wanton misrepresentation.' Green Party MP Ellie Chowns (North Herefordshire) said the Office for Environmental Protection warned the Bill reduces environmental safeguards. 'This Bill constitutes a regression on environmental protection,' she said. Mr Pennycook said: 'The Government's view that the Bill is not regressive. Environmental delivery plans (EDPs) will secure improved environmental outcomes that go further than simply offsetting harm as required under current legislation.' Suggestions that the Bill would allow for the destruction of irreplaceable habitats or create irretrievable harm to them were 'patently false', he told MPs. The Conservatives accused the Government of 'greenwashing', over its plans. Mr Holmes said: 'While developers may cheer the ability to pay into a nature restoration fund instead of taking direct responsibility for mitigations, we should ask, is this really restoration, or is it greenwashing?' Mr Pennycook said the new laws were needed to 'speed up and streamline' Labour's housing target of 1.5 million homes, clean energy goals and aim to approve at least 150 'major economic infrastructure projects'. Labour MP Chris Hinchliff described the nature restoration fund as a 'kernel of a good idea', but added: 'The weight of evidence against how it has been drafted is overwhelming.' The North East Hertfordshire MP said his amendment 69 will give 'ministers the opportunity to rescue something positive from the wreckage of this legislation, ensuring environmental delivery plans serve their purpose without allowing developers to pay cash to destroy nature'. He added: 'It would ensure conservation takes place before damage, so endangered species aren't pushed close to extinction before replacement habitats are established, and it outlines that conservation must result in improvements to the specific feature harmed, protecting irreplaceable habitats like chalk streams.'