Ruth Jones MP on need to ban fur imports and sales
Twenty-five years ago, we did the same with the Fur Farming (Prohibition) Act, raising the bar and setting an example for our neighbours to follow. Countries like Austria (2005), France (2021) and even Norway (2025) have all implemented 'fur bans' of their own, showing we were ahead of the curve.
I am proud of our record on animal welfare. But before we absolve ourselves of being complicit in the fur trade, there is another step we can and must take: banning imports and sales.
Two decades ago, we were right to ban fur farming on moral grounds – but still it is legal to import fur from beautiful, intelligent animals like foxes, mink and chinchilla.
I have seen footage from a fur farm in Finland showing foxes with raw wounds, deformed feet and infected eyes. Then there were the obese, 'monster foxes' which were the result of selective breeding to increase their yield. Make no mistake – our ancestors may have used fur to survive the winter, but there is nothing natural about the fur industry today.
Five years after covid, experts are warning us the next pandemic might come from one of these farms, where conditions are appalling for animals but perfect for viruses to mutate and make the leap to humans. This issue is urgent as the risk of a zoonotic outbreak looms large.
I have been pushing for this change with my own piece of legislation, called the Fur (Import and Sale) Bill. If passed, it would ban the import of real fur products into Britain.
Last week I carried a petition to Downing Street for the Fur Free Britain campaign with more than a million signatures and support from singer Will Young and TOWIE star Pete Wicks.
Carrying the signatures to the famous black door, we were greeted by Chief Mouser, Larry, who showed great interest in our box. Afterwards an X account belonging to 'Larry the Cat' shared our photos, asking his nearly 900,000 followers to 'leave the fur wearing to the professionals'.
I know Argus readers will agree that if an animal product like fur is too cruel to make in Britain, it's also too cruel to import from overseas. It is cruel and unnecessary, and high time we put the fur trade out of fashion.
Ruth Jones is MP for Newport West and Islwyn.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
24 minutes ago
- Times
Labour attack ad highlights Nigel Farage's praise for Andrew Tate
Labour will accuse Nigel Farage of supporting the misogynist influencer Andrew Tate in a new attack advert and claim his promise to scrap online safety rules leaves young boys vulnerable to radicalisation. When it goes out on Sunday the advert will seek to exploit comments made by Farage in the Strike It Big podcast last year, when he praised Tate for defending 'male culture'. The podcast, hosted by three young male influencers, offers listeners the chance to 'connect with the 1 per cent'. Topics covered by the show include 'who controls the world and money' and 'how to escape the system'. Farage told the hosts: 'Tate was a very important voice for an emasculated … You three guys, you are all 25, you are all kind of being told you can't be blokes, you can't do laddish, fun, bloke things … that masculinity is something we should look down upon, something we should frown upon. It's like the men are becoming feminine and the women are becoming masculine and it's a bit difficult to tell these days who's what. 'And Tate fed into that by saying, 'Hang on, what's wrong with being a bloke? What's wrong in male culture? What's wrong in male humour?' He fed into those things. His was a campaign of raising awareness. His was a campaign of giving people, perhaps, a bit of confidence at school or whatever it was to speak up.' Featuring a photograph of the two men together, the Labour advert states: 'Nigel Farage says Andrew Tate is an 'important voice' for men. Andrew Tate said women should 'bear responsibility' for being sexually assaulted.' Tate is a self-proclaimed 'misogynist' and 'sexist' who has described women as 'intrinsically lazy' and said there was 'no such thing as an independent female'. He faces 21 charges in the UK, including rape, actual bodily harm, and human trafficking. In Romania, the influencer, who has more than ten million followers on X, faces similar charges of human trafficking, rape and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women. Tate denies all charges. The attack advert, which was developed in-house by Labour HQ and will appear on social media sites including X, Facebook and Instagram, will reignite the row between Farage and the technology secretary Peter Kyle, who accused the Reform UK leader of being on the side of sex offenders like Jimmy Savile. Kyle told Sky News last month that the new law was a 'huge step forward' for online safety, adding: 'Make no mistake, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today he would be perpetrating his crimes online — and Nigel Farage is saying he is on their side.' Farage demanded an apology from Kyle and called the minister's comments 'absolutely disgusting'. Kyle refused to back down, saying on social media: 'If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act, you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that.' Savile was a BBC TV personality who presented shows such as Top of the Pops and Jim'll Fix It but after his death it emerged he had been one of the UK's most prolific sexual predators, using his celebrity status to target children and young people. A senior Labour party source said: 'We'll be looking to continue taking the fight to Farage in this area. He's not thought through his approach when it comes to online safety and we'll continue to expose it.' The party was widely criticised in 2023 for releasing an advert about the then prime minister, Rishi Sunak, which claimed he did not believe adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison. It included the claim that '4,500 adults convicted of sexually assaulting children under 16 served no prison time'. But the figure related to a period 11 years before Sunak became prime minister and the adults received a community sentence or suspended sentence, rather than prison. The latest campaign comes after reports an 'attack team' has been created inside Downing Street with the specific remit of targeting Reform that is headed by Morgan McSweeney, Sir Keir Starmer's chief of staff. Reform has made significant inroads in winning over Gen Z women, who now represent a demographic the right-wing populist party has struggled to attract in the past. Its vote share among women aged 18 to 26 shot up in May — jumping from 12 per cent to 21 per cent after nationwide local elections, according to polling for the More in Common think tank. Labour accused Farage of 'failing to prevent online radicalisation into extreme misogyny' after the Internet Matters charity found that 19 per cent of boys aged nine to 16 — around 650,000 — had a positive impression of Tate and could be at risk of radicalisation. Farage pledged to scrap the Online Safety Act, which requires Big Tech to tackle algorithms that may expose children to harmful and illegal content, such as some produced by Tate and other members of the 'manosphere' like the Americans Adin Ross and Sneako. Under rules that came into effect on July 25 as part of the act, social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography and material that encourages suicide. Farage called the legislation 'dystopian', claiming it threatened freedom of speech and open debate. When asked how his party would protect children, Farage said he did not know. 'Can I stand here and say that we have a perfect answer for you right now? No,' he admitted. Last week Starmer warned that young men were getting sucked into a world of 'toxic masculinity' online. He said it was his duty as prime minister and 'as a dad' to call out the likes of Tate. Ellie Reeves MP, the Labour chair, said: 'Nigel Farage's promise to tear up protections against online radicalisation by extreme misogynistic influencers is a dangerous sign of where Reform want to take Britain. It shows nothing but neglect for the next generation and will only serve to increase violence against women and girls. 'Young men are increasingly vulnerable to being radicalised into extreme misogyny online, which leads to real-world violence against women and girls when phones are put down and laptops shut. Tech firms must be held to account for algorithms that lead boys and young men to harmful and potentially illegal content online. It's shameful that Farage doesn't agree.' Laila Cunningham, a Reform councillor, said: 'Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early, with no regard for women's safety. I am calling on [the safeguarding minister] Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety. She ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue.'
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
UK must bring in sick and injured children from Gaza 'without delay', MPs demand
A cross-party group of 96 MPs have urged the government to bring sick and injured children from Gaza to the UK for treatment "without delay". In a letter to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Health Secretary Wes Streeting, the MPs warn the health system in Gaza has been "decimated" and that conditions in the territory are "worsening by the minute". More than 50,000 children are estimated to have been killed or injured in Gaza since October 2023, according to Unicef. With "essential infrastructure destroyed" and a long-running blockade by Israel of food, water and medical supplies, they say the population now faces a "medical and humanitarian catastrophe of horrific proportion". Citing World Health Organisation estimates, the letter warns 14,800 Palestinians are "in urgent need of medical evacuation - including children at immediate risk of death from trauma injuries and severe pre-existing conditions, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease.". "Given this grave reality, we urge the government to launch the medical evacuation scheme without delay". The letter, co-ordinated by Labour MP and GP, Dr Simon Opher, welcomes the government "finally prioritising" the issue but calls on senior ministers to "recognise the real urgency around medical evacuations". The group make six key demands of ministers while a scheme is developed: Timeline: MPs ask ministers to confirm the planned timeline for a medical evacuation scheme for Palestinian children. "This should be done in close coordination with the WHO and civil society organisations, with all eligible evacuees and their accompanying family members expedited as a matter of urgency," they add. Medical needs first: " The prioritisation of medical evacuations from Gaza must be determined solely based on clinical necessity and individual case assessment, without regard to financial implications, political considerations or reputational interests," the letter says. Funding: "Large-scale evacuations cannot rely on private donations or diversion of aid from other conflict responses," MPs say. "We urge you to ensure adequate government funding for medical treatment, psychosocial support, housing and other essential costs." Family unification: The 96 MPs say it is "vital" that children are accompanied by parents, close family members or another appropriate caregiver. "There is clear medical evidence to suggest their presence can positively impact the recovery of sick or injured children," they add. Legal status of evacuees: Ministers are asked to clarify the legal status of evacuees upon their arrival in the UK and following completion of medical treatment, including any rights to remain and pathways to settlement."We would urge that children and their families are given the option of applying for asylum, humanitarian protection or the chance to resettle in the UK. Evacuees must not be returned to Gaza," the MPs say. Biometrics:"The requirement for biometrics as a prerequisite to issue visas remains a major barrier, given that the only authorised biometrics centre in Gaza closed in October 2023," the groups warns. "We urge you to waive biometric requirements for evacuees under this scheme and permit applications to be completed after departure from Gaza." ITV News has contacted the government for comment on the MPs demands. Ministers have already started working on plans to evacuate up to 300 seriously ill or injured children from Gaza for NHS treatment in the UK. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said in late June that the government was 'urgently accelerating' efforts to bring children over for treatment. Two weeks ago a government spokesperson said: 'We are taking forward plans to evacuate more children from Gaza who require urgent medical care, including bringing them to the UK for specialist treatment where that is the best option for their care. 'We are working at pace to do so as quickly as possible, with further details to be set out in due course.' Scottish First Minister John Swinney welcomed the move to fly up to 300 children from Gaza but criticised the Westminster government for not taking action sooner. 'We have been consistently clear that the suffering being inflicted on the people of Gaza is beyond any justification.'People in Gaza are being bombed and left to starve by Israel on a massive scale. I wrote to the Prime Minister on 9 July to request support from the UK government in meeting the call from Unicef to provide medical care for children from Gaza.'If the UK government is prepared to evacuate Palestinians for medical treatment it would be entirely only regret is the UK government has taken this long to act."
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'Scrap Tory two-child benefit limit to lift kids out poverty' Neil Kinnock says
In an interview with The Mirror, the former Labour leader Neil Kinnock said the Tories had left the country in a state that would 'make Charles Dickens furious' with 'intolerable' hardship Neil Kinnock has said the controversial two-child benefit limit should be scrapped to lift hundreds of thousands of kids out of poverty. In an interview with The Mirror, the former Labour leader blamed the Tories for undoing Gordon Brown's proud legacy of cutting child poverty. He said after 14 years the Conservatives left the country in a state that would "make Charles Dickens furious" with "intolerable" hardship. Getting rid of the two-child benefit limit - one of the most severe cuts to the welfare state by austerity Chancellor George Osborne - would be the "immediate and direct way of trying to correct the conditions the government inherited," he said. It comes after Mr Brown hit out at the return of 'poverty of 60 years ago'. READ MORE: KEVIN MAGUIRE: 'Labour must find engaging story for the UK - or face election wipeout' The policy, which restricts Universal Credit and Child Tax Credits to the first two children, has been blamed by charities for trapping kids in poverty. Labour MPs are calling on Keir Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves to axe the policy at the Budget in the autumn, or as part of an ongoing child poverty review. Asked whether the government should now scrap the two child benefit-limit, Lord Kinnock, who led Labour between 1983 and 1992, said: "I would want them to do it. They may not be able to do it all at once, but I really want them to move in that direction because the figures are that if that did occur it would mean that about 600,000 kids, fewer, are in poverty." He later added: "Yes, I would say that. It might have to be done in a phased fashion - simply because of the revenue implications - but heading strongly and evidently in that direction is the way to go." The former Labour leader said tackling child poverty - among other issues facing the country - could be paid for by a tax on the assets of the super-rich or a hike in levies on the top 1%. He told The Mirror: "I think people would see the justification of increasing taxes on assets and the very, very highly paid - I'm talking about the top 1% - in order to make the transfer directly to reduce child poverty. "I know it's the economics of Robin Hood, but I don't think there is anything terribly bad about that." Lord Kinnock has previously said a 2% levy on asset values over £10million - a "very big fortune" - could bring in around £11billion for the Treasury. He added: "The thing is we live in a fair country where the instincts are fair, so people approve of the idea of the broadest backs bearing the heaviest burden. "Of course the very rich do make a substantial contribution. It's not enough. And it hasn't kept pace with the increase in their asset wealth. Simple and straightforward as that." Earlier this year official figures showed a record 4.5million children living in poverty. Pressed on what this said about the state of the nation, Lord Kinnock said: "All you've got to do is reflect where we were under Gordon Brown's government when they cut child poverty gigantically by millions. "In 15 years, starting from a position where beneficial change was taking place, we've got to the place that would make Charles Dickens furious. It's been allowed to happen because the kids are voiceless and their parents feel powerless. I defy anybody to see a child in need and not want to help." Keir Starmer has previously vowed to slash the number of kids living in poverty. And Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, who is leading the child poverty task force alongside Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, has suggested ending the two-child benefit limit remains on the table. Asked what he would like to see from the taskforce, Lord Kinnock said: "Recognise the basic thing that poverty exists because people haven't got enough money. That's so obvious you almost feel foolish saying it. But unless and until it's recognised in operational policy then it's going to continue." Lord Kinnock made clear he wants to see a reform of the "unjust" tax system. He told The Mirror: "To do it in the name of equity, fairness. "People need to see a demonstration of the fact that things really are changing for the better. We live in a country now where lots of people are utterly fed up. When the encountered reality that whatever happens in the world, whatever happens in Britain, the same people come out on top, always, untouched." Ahead of the autumn Budget, Lord Kinnock also praised the "smart" and "gutsy" Chancellor Ms Reeves. He added: "She's got a very, very difficult task. Last July they [Labour] inherited a phenomenal mess, a gigantic mess, almost of a post-war scale and we haven't had a war. "What we have had is 14 years of continual and chronic underinvestment in crucial areas. Not just the health service and education system, but the care system... virtually eradicated. The support for young families, really smashed to pieces. "The [defence] forces, so underinvested, that we've got a smaller army than we had at the time of the Napoleonic wars. All of that is cumulative and just as in every other sphere in life, demolition is easy. Reconstruction is difficult. "They've got this huge task of reconstruction. It is fundamental. I would actually like them to treat it not only as a terrible challenge, which it is, but also an opportunity that the mess that the Tories left is so big, so wide, that it could be used as an invitation for radical change. "My gut tells me, my brain tells me, that our country needs that."
