The Joys and Woes of Charging Our 2025 Chevrolet Blazer EV RS RWD
Daily driving an EV and relying exclusively on public charging is getting easier with each passing year. Not only has the number of stations continued to increase, but widespread Supercharger access is becoming a reality as automakers begin to offer North American Charging System (NACS) compatibility with their vehicles.
The 2025 Chevrolet Blazer EV RS RWD offers convenient charging via Tesla's Supercharger network, but faces challenges like awkward charge port placement and power-off alerts during charging. It's mostly stress-free, with good range and a useful app, despite needing improvements in charging speed.
This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next
Such is the case with our yearlong review 2025 Chevrolet Blazer EV, which arrived with a NACS adapter when we took delivery five months ago. Our SUV's ability to use Superchargers came in handy as early as our first road trip, when we drove from Los Angeles to East Tucson and back. Now that we've spent more time commuting, shopping, and transporting friends in the Blazer EV, we're happy to report that solely utilizing public charging has been a happy affair. Until it wasn't. The Pros
One of the biggest advantages to driving the Blazer EV daily is that it can fast-charge with a Tesla Supercharger whenever we need to quickly juice up the battery. Hooked up to a Tesla V3 Supercharger, which dispenses a maximum of 250 kW, we come close to the Blazer EV's peak charge rate of 190 kW—that's better than vehicles like the Hyundai Ioniq 5, which plateaued at 126 kW using the latest 325-kW Tesla V4 Supercharger cabinet in our testing.
During our most recent Supercharging session at Tesla's Culver City, California, location, the Blazer EV capped out at 181 kW before dropping off. Perhaps more impressively, we averaged over 100 kW of charging power from the Supercharger between the start at 21 percent until the battery hit the 65 percent mark. To our surprise, the Blazer was still accepting 88 kW when the battery was at an 80 percent state of charge. In total, charging from 21 to 91 percent took 47 minutes, longer than getting gas but swifter than using a lower-output Level 3 charger. What's more, there wasn't a line when we arrived at the Supercharger station in the middle of the day. We'll have to do a complete charging test for an apples-to-apples comparison with the Hyundai Ioniq 5, but our initial impressions have been positive.
Level 3 fast charging isn't always the best way to put more electrons into our Blazer EV's battery, though. We've come to rely on Level 2 charging from the ChargePoint stations at MotorTrend 's office in El Segundo. When we pop into the building for a day of productivity, the Blazer EV sips electricity from a J-1772 plug. A typical eight-hour charge provides as much as 41.82 kW, which translates to 136 miles of range, just over 40 percent of its battery capacity. The charge would be even quicker with upgraded hardware; the Blazer EV is plumbed to accept up to 11.5 kW from a Level 2 charger, and our office Level 2s max out at just 6.1 kW.
Going to the office once or twice a week gives me more than enough range to keep the Blazer EV on the road. Our car's EPA-rated range of 334 miles and real-world road trip range of 275 miles gives us the flexibility to add only as much charge as needed to get around.
Beyond as-needed road trip charging at Level 3 stations and regularly scheduled stops at ChargePoint's Level 2 stalls, we've enjoyed using streetside charging whenever convenient. Flo, a charging network with curbside EV chargers, has continued to install units throughout the greater Los Angeles area. My gym, for example, has a Flo right around the corner. Whenever it's available, I hook up the Blazer EV and get some extra range while I work out. It's cheap, too, costing just $3.31 for my most recent session of an hour and 39 minutes. A short stint like that gets 11.6 kW of electricity and 33 miles of range, much more than I used getting to the gym.
All the while, the myChevrolet app has been a useful tool for keeping track of the Blazer EV while it charges. The interface gives a readout of the vehicle's current state of charge and range in addition to providing an estimate of when the charge will complete. You can see your vehicle's location on the map, too, in case you left your car charging on the street and can't remember how to get back to it.
We've finally had a chance to initiate charges on Tesla Supercharges with Chevy's app, as well. It essentially loads up a browser version of Tesla's own app within the myChevrolet interface, serving as convenient shortcut if you only want to use one app.
Although having Tesla Supercharger access is an overall convenience, especially since they tend to have fewer lines than Electrify America fast chargers, Tesla's existing V3 cabinets have their disadvantages.
These prior-generation Superchargers are the most common variant we've encountered with the Blazer EV throughout California and Arizona. Stations with V3s were designed exclusively with Tesla cars in mind, from the positioning of the cabinets, to the short length of the charging cables. Usually, they're placed side by side in banks of parking spots that run perpendicular to the curb so Teslas can back in to recharge.
Unless I can find an end spot or get lucky with Superchargers that have been placed with a parking space in between cabinets, the Blazer EV almost always takes up two spots due to the positioning of the charging port between the front wheel and the driver's door. Newer V3 Superchargers are occasionally positioned beside a parallel parking spot, which I always choose over a perpendicular space, but these have been rare in my experience.
Tesla owners must be used to seeing cars from other automakers parked haphazardly at Supercharger stations because no one has asked me to stop blocking a charging stall since the trip to Arizona four months ago. Still, the anxiety of being in that position is something I deal with every time I use one of Tesla's chargers.
From an objective perspective, the Blazer EV has a slower average charge rate than rivals like the Hyundai Ioniq 5. Our 2025 Chevrolet Blazer EV RS averaged 111 kW as it charged from 5 to 80 percent on a 350-kW Electrify America Level 3 charger. That pales in comparison to the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5, which maintains an incredible average of 186 kW from 5 to 80 percent. Using a Tesla Supercharger, the Ioniq 5 still sustains 125 kW from 5 to 80 percent. In subsequent iterations of the Blazer EV, average charging speed is one of the most crucial areas Chevrolet can improve.
Our final complaint is a bit more trivial. The Blazer EV threatens to power off unless you intervene when it's hooked up to a fast charger. During our most recent session at the Culver City Tesla Supercharger, the Blazer EV alerted us twice over 47 minutes that it would power off and disable the air conditioning unless we hit a button or the brake pedal to keep it running. I was using that time on the charger to get some work done on my laptop using the rather excellent Wi-Fi hot spot, so it was frustrating being interrupted when I wasn't planning to leave the car during the duration of the charge. Great to Charge With a Few Exceptions
The 2025 Chevrolet Blazer EV RS RWD has turned out to be one of the more stress-free EVs to charge in our long-term fleet, with Tesla's Supercharger network playing no small role in its ease of use. Our SUV's charging performance is serviceable, its driving range is excellent, and Chevy's supporting mobile app has proven to be very useful. Still, a few cumbersome design elements oversights—like the awkward charge port placement and the need to keep the car awake during longer sessions—remind us that EV refinement is still a moving target. Fortunately, the Blazer gets most of the fundamentals right. More on Our Long-Term 2025 Chevrolet Blazer EV RS RWD: 2025 Chevrolet Blazer EV Yearlong Review Arrival: Stress-Testing a MotorTrend SUV of the Year
The Tesla Supercharging Network Isn't Ready for Our 2025 Chevrolet Blazer EV
The Adrenaline Red Interior of the Chevy Blazer EV RS Gets Our Hearts Pumping
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Coinbase, Circle rally as stablecoin momentum heats up
Coinbase (COIN) and Circle (CRCL) shares rose sharply on Thursday as both the crypto exchange and the stablecoin issuer emerged as major winners of growing enthusiasm around digital tokens. Coinbase gained 5% to notch its first all-time high since November 2021. The stock has surged more than 40% since the Senate passed the GENIUS Act last week. The landmark legislation is aimed at establishing a regulatory framework for stablecoins, digital tokens backed by assets such as the US dollar and short-term treasuries. Bernstein analyst Gautam Chhugani this week dubbed Coinbase the "Amazon of crypto financial services." His team raised their price target on the stock to a Street high of $510 from $310, with an Outperform rating. On Thursday, shares traded near $375 each, more than 950% above their "crypto winter" lows in late 2022 following the collapse of FTX. Today, analysts point to Coinbase's buildout of a suite of crypto financial services beyond trading, including the stablecoin industry. Earlier this month, shopping platform Shopify (SHOP) partnered with Coinbase and payment processing company Stripe ( to launch digital wallet stablecoin payments, allowing merchants to accept the tokens globally. Read more about Coinbase and Circle's stock moves and today's market action. Meanwhile, shares of Circle, of which Coinbase owns a minority stake, have also soared. The stock is now up more than 575% from its IPO price of $31 per share as investors bet on the rapid global adoption of the company's flagship product, USDC stablecoins. "We view Circle as a top-tier crypto 'disruptor' with a sizeable future opportunity," Jeff Cantwell wrote last week. The firm sees "the stablecoin 'market cap' potentially reaching $2T over the longer-term, from roughly $260B today." Momentum around Circle has also been fueled by a wave of new stablecoin initiatives from major financial players. Read more: Can you buy crypto with a credit card? See the pros and cons. On Monday, fintech firm Fiserv (FI) announced plans to launch a digital asset platform, including a new stablecoin (FIUSD) by the end of this year using existing infrastructure from issuers Paxos and Circle. One analyst, however, warned of possible share price pressures later this year as competition in the stablecoin space intensifies. "We expect competition to accelerate after stablecoin legislation passes," Compass Point analyst Ed Engel wrote in a note Tuesday. "This influx of competition could reduce long-term market share expectations and pressure CRCL shares in 2025." Engel and his team initiated coverage of the stock with a Neutral rating and $205 price target. On Thursday, shares of Circle were trading near $210 a piece. Ines Ferre is a senior business reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X at @ines_ferre. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
5 Times Conventional Startup Advice Backfires
In this article we give famous real-world examples of successfully breaking conventional startup ... More advice. Sometimes, the widely shared mantras in the startup world passed down from investors, accelerators, or successful founders can turn into liabilities when applied too broadly or in the wrong context. This article examines five pieces of startup advice that are commonly repeated and shows how they can backfire when misunderstood or taken too far. 1. 'Move Fast And Break Things' Can Break The Wrong Things Originally coined by Facebook, this phrase became shorthand for prioritizing speed over perfection. And in many early-stage contexts, it makes sense - speed allows you to iterate, test assumptions, and beat slower-moving competitors. This principle is engraved in the startup DNA, especially in the early startup stages when you need to make mistakes fast so that you learn fast and find the right direction of iteration, hopefully leading you to product-market fit before your competitors. But when applied without discipline, 'move fast' can result in poor technical foundations, half-baked product decisions, and organizational debt that slows down future progress. In critical systems—healthtech, fintech, or any sector involving real-world risk—moving fast can be dangerous. Even in consumer SaaS, shipping without user research or QA can alienate early adopters. Many early-stage fintech companies learned this the hard way by skipping compliance considerations in their early days, only to face regulatory scrutiny later. Stripe's early team, on the other hand, built a developer-friendly API and took care of banking compliance from day one. The better version of this mantra is to move fast on learning, not just building. Speed should be tied to clarity of assumptions and feedback loops, not chaos. 2. 'Fail Fast' Can Lead To Premature Abandonment The 'fail fast' mantra is often meant to encourage experimentation and reduce sunk-cost bias. It works when you're testing small ideas inside a validated framework. But when applied to entire product directions or business models, it can lead founders to give up before reaching real insight. Markets with longer sales cycles (e.g., B2B, healthcare, climate tech) don't reveal signals quickly. In these cases, what looks like 'failure' might just be a slow ramp. Giving up too soon wastes the chance to learn something valuable. For example, Airbnb struggled for years with low traction, relying on unconventional growth hacks and continuous iteration. If they had 'failed fast,' they would have quit before figuring out how to build trust at scale in a peer-to-peer model. The better version of this saying is to iterate fast. Fail cheap. But don't exit too early if you're solving a real problem. 3. 'Hire 10x Engineers' Can Stall Your Hiring Entirely The idea that a small number of great engineers are more productive than large teams of average ones is grounded in truth. But turning that into a strict hiring philosophy where only mythical '10x' candidates are acceptable can paralyze early hiring or foster toxic team dynamics. Also, the definition of a '10x' hire varies by context. In a startup, a strong generalist who can write decent code, talk to customers, and help set up infrastructure may be far more valuable than a brilliant algorithm designer who's uninterested in messy real-world problems. For example, Shopify's early team included product-minded engineers who focused on practical needs, not just technical brilliance. Their execution ability across a messy retail stack helped them scale fast. In startups, you should usually hire for adaptability, alignment, and ownership. A cohesive, good-enough team often beats a scattered group of 'stars.' 4. 'Your Startup Should Be A Rocket Ship' Can Lead To Premature Scaling Ambition is necessary. But the 'rocket ship' metaphor encourages companies to hire fast, raise more than needed, and go for growth before their systems, product, or customer base are ready. According to CB Insights, 70% of startups fail due to premature scaling - spending ahead of traction, growing headcount without process, or chasing growth metrics without retention. For example, Quibi, the short-form video platform, raised nearly $2 billion before launch, hired aggressively, and launched at massive scale. But with an unclear product-market fit, the platform collapsed within six months. 5. 'Talk To Users' Can Produce Misleading Signals Every founder hears 'talk to your users' or 'get out of the building' from the moment they enter the startup world. And it's good advice if you know what you're listening for. But talking to the wrong users, asking biased questions, or interpreting polite encouragement as validation can lead to false confidence. Early users often want to be helpful and will say what you want to hear, especially if they're friends or peers. Many failed social apps have strong feedback from early testers, but fail to scale because the use case isn't sticky or the need isn't strong enough to build a habit. You shouldn't just talk to users, but observe behavior, measure engagement, and look for patterns that confirm actual need.
Bloomberg
23 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Target Follows Walmart in Testing Digital Locks on Store Shelves
Target Corp. is preparing to introduce new technology to lock and unlock store shelves from a smartphone in a bid to curb theft and improve the shopping experience. Once in place, staff could unlock in-store cases more quickly than having to manually open them with keys, Chief Stores Officer Adrienne Costanzo said during an internal meeting with staff on Thursday. The retailer may also offer the option to employees of its Shipt delivery service, who fulfill online orders, and users of its paid membership program.
