Elon Musk's 'baby mamma' Ashley St. Clair claims she's broke and 'getting evicted' as she brutally mocks Big Balls on new podcast
The 26-year-old, who is in the process of fighting the Tesla CEO for custody of their nearly one-year-old son Romulus, opened her show, entitled Bad Advice with Ashley St. Clair by claiming she is in desperate need of the money.
'Well after a year of unplanned career suicide, many questionable life choices and a gap in my LinkedIn profile that cannot be legally explained, I've decided to start a podcast,' St. Clair said.
'Not because anybody asked, but because statistically speaking, it was either join this or join a [multi-level marketing scheme]. So here we are.
'And unlike your Ben Shapiros or Megyn Kellys, I'm not starting this because I think my big-brain thoughts and my podcast mic are the greatest gift to humanity. I actually think I have the worst ideas, so consider everything out of my mouth a cautionary tale.'
'Also, I'm getting evicted and Polymarket offered me $10,000 to do an ad read,' she announced. 'So with that, the roof over my head has been brought to you by Polymarket.'
Musk had reportedly offered St. Clair $15million and $100,000 a month to keep quiet about her pregnancy, but she took him to court instead.
After doing so, Musk 'substantially' reduced the amount of money was paying to St. Clair, her lawyers have claimed.
During that period, a resolution seemed a long way off as St. Clair claimed that Musk 'no longer wishes to resolve issues of custody and support amicably.'
Romulus, Musk's 13th child, was born in September 2024 and St. Clair went public with her story on Valentine's Day.
'Five months ago, I welcomed a new baby into the world. Elon Musk is the father,' she wrote on social media.
'I have not previously disclosed this to protect our child's privacy and safety, but in recent days it has become clear that tabloid media intends to do so, regardless of the harm it will cause,' St. Clair continued.
'I intend to allow our child to grow in a normal and safe environment. For that reason, I ask that the media honor our child's privacy, and refrain from invasive reporting.'
St. Clair went on to claim that she and Musk got together in St. Barts in the Caribbean in January last year and had sex twice, leading to the conception of the child.
In her original petition for sole custody, St. Clair claimed the SpaceX founder had only met their child three times and that she is the only parent to make decisions on the child's behalf.
She claimed that Musk was not present for the birth of the boy and hasn't expressed any interest in having custody.
Musk has amplified remarks from fellow MAGA influencer Isabella Moody, who shared a series of messages between her and St. Clair in which St. Clair appears to discuss seducing the billionaire.
'Elon followed me. I need his rocket babies,' messages purportedly from St. Clair read.
Moody said the messages were 'evidence Ashley planned to baby trap Elon,' saying St. Clair sent her the texts in May 2023, when she first met Musk and 'started sleeping with him.'
A paternity test has since revealed there is a 99.99 percent chance Musk is the boy's father, and in March he claimed he had provided St. Clair $2.5 million and was also sending her $500,000 a month.
'I don't know if the child is mine or not,' he wrote. 'Despite not knowing for sure, I have given Ashley $2.5M and was currently sending her $500k/year.'
St. Clair then fought back, calling Musk a 'petulant man-child' and claiming he 'withdrew most of' his child support payments in response to her public statements.
On her podcast Monday, St. Clair seemed to take another swipe at Musk as she ruthlessly mocked his one-time protégé Edward 'Big Balls' Coristine, 19, who was violently attacked while trying to stop a carjacking on August 3.
'I have to start off with what everybody's been waiting for me to talk about. The story that's dominated the headlines, the one that made the entire world go "This can't be real life, we must be living in a simulation:" Elon Musk. Elon Musk's Big Balls,' St. Clair began.
'Big Balls is the name of Elon Musk's DOGE crony Edward Coristine and recently he got beat up. He got attacked in Washington DC, and depending on who you ask, Big Balls was assaulted by a violent gang.
'In reality, it was two teenagers, but you know, Fox News has a strict policy that any time there's more than one black person or migrant in the same location, it's automatically a gang,' she claimed. 'One is a criminal, two is a march, three is a cartel.'
She went on to note that the suspects 'roughed him up' and gave Coristine a bloody nose.
'The damage was on par with what I sustained after I told my toddler he couldn't watch Paw Patrol,' St. Clair joked. 'It was brutal, violent stuff.'
The MAGA influencer then noted that the brutal beating came after Coristine tried to stop a carjacking.
'He was with his girlfriend, or lady partner, whatever the Musk orbit calls their non-committal fluid breeding vessel contenders these days,' she mused.
'... He got his ass beat so bad, some are calling it "reparations." I, of course, would never do that,' St. Clair quipped.
'But what I don't understand is why didn't you just let them take the car?'
Coristine was the only one injured in the attempted carjacking, and by the time cops arrived on the scene, the suspects fled the scene.
Two 15-year-olds, a boy and a girl from Hyattsville, Maryland, were later arrested, and police released an image of the third suspect who remains on the run.
He appeared to be a black man with short black hair wearing a surgical mask pulled down to his chin and a grey shirt.
President Donald Trump has since used the incident as a pretense to send the National Guard to the nation's capital, claiming the teenager was 'very badly hurt' and 'beat up by a bunch of thugs in DC.'
'We just almost lost a young man, beautiful, handsome guy that got the hell knocked out of him the night before last. I'm going to call him now,' the president added.
'He was left dripping in blood. He thought he was dead with a broken nose and concussion. Can't believe that he's alive.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
9/11 victims' fund architect slams changes to New Hampshire abuse settlement program
An attorney who helped design and implement the 9/11 victims' compensation fund says New Hampshire lawmakers have eroded the fairness of a settlement program for those who were abused at the state's youth detention center. Deborah Greenspan, who served as deputy special master of the fund created after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, recently submitted an affidavit in a class-action lawsuit seeking to block changes to New Hampshire's out-of-court settlement fund for abuse victims. She's among those expected to testify Wednesday at a hearing on the state's request to dismiss the case and other matters. More than 1,300 people have sued the state since 2020 alleging that they were physically or sexually abused as children while in state custody, mostly at the Sununu Youth Services Center in Manchester. Most of them put their lawsuits on hold after lawmakers created a settlement fund in 2022 that was pitched as a 'victim-centered' and 'trauma-informed' alternative to litigation run by a neutral administrator appointed by the state Supreme Court. But the Republican-led Legislature changed that process through last-minute additions to the state budget Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed in June. The amended law gives the governor authority to hire and fire the fund's administrator and gives the attorney general — also a political appointee — veto power over settlement awards. That stands in stark contrast to other victim compensation funds, said Greenspan, who currently serves as a court-appointed special master for lawsuits related to lead-tainted water in Flint, Michigan. She said it 'strains credulity' to believe that anyone would file a claim knowing that 'the persons ultimately deciding the claim were those responsible for the claimant's injuries.' 'Such a construct would go beyond the appearance of impropriety and create a clear conflict of interest, undermining the fairness and legitimacy of the settlement process," she wrote. Ayotte and Attorney General John Formella responded by asking a judge to bar Greenspan's testimony, saying she offered 'policy preferences masquerading as expert opinions' without explaining the principles beyond her conclusions. 'Her affidavit is instead a series of non sequiturs that move from her experience to her conclusions without any of the necessary connective tissue,' they wrote. The defendants argue that the law still requires the administrator to be 'an independent, neutral attorney' and point out that the same appointment process is used for the state's judges. They said giving the attorney general the authority to accept or reject settlements is necessary to give the public a voice and ensure that the responsibility for spending millions of dollars in public funds rests with the executive branch. As of June 30, nearly 2,000 people had filed claims with the settlement fund, which caps payouts at $2.5 million. A total of 386 had been settled, with an average award of $545,000. One of the claimants says he was awarded $1.5 million award in late July, but the state hasn't finalized it yet, leaving him worried that Formella will veto it. 'I feel like the state has tricked us,' he said in an interview this week. 'We've had the rug pulled right out from underneath us.' The Associated Press does not name those who say they were sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly. The claimant, now 39, said the two years he spent at the facility as a teenager were the hardest times of his life. 'I lost my childhood. I lost things that I can't get back,' he said. 'I was broken.' Though the settlement process was overwhelming and scary at times, the assistant administrator who heard his case was kind and understanding, he said. That meeting alone was enough to lift a huge burden, he said. 'I was treated with a lot of love,' he said. 'I felt really appreciated as a victim and like I was speaking to somebody who would listen and believe my story.' Separate from the fund, the state has settled two lawsuits by agreeing to pay victims $10 million and $4.5 million. Only one lawsuit has gone to trial, resulting in a $38 million verdict, though the state is trying to slash it to $475,000. The state has also brought criminal charges against former workers, with two convictions and two mistrials so far. The 39-year-old claimant who fears his award offer will be retracted said he doesn't know if he could face testifying at a public trial. 'It's basically allowing the same people who hurt us to hurt us all over again,' he said.
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fury as school boys who confronted trans student using their bathroom are suspended for sexual harassment
Two teenage boys have been suspended from a Virginia high school for sexual harassment after confronting a transgender student about their presence in the male locker room. The students at Stone Bridge High School were suspended for 10 days on Friday after being found responsible for sexual harassment and sex-based discrimination on school grounds, according to ABC 7News. The controversial decision followed a months-long investigation into a video - recorded by a female student who identifies as male - that captured the boys expressing discomfort over 'a girl' being in the boys' locker room. Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) stated that the district allows students to use bathrooms and locker rooms based on their self-identified gender rather than their biological sex, and, as a result, the students were found to be in violation of rules. But the outcome shocked the boys' parents, who condemned the decision as a deeply troubling and 'concerning development.' 'We're absolutely floored that they came back and branded my son responsible for sexual harassment and sex based discrimination with no solid evidence whatsoever,' said Renae Smith, the mother of one of the suspended boys. 'We're talking about scarring him for life by a biased process that's supposed to protect fairness, but it's shocking. 'It's wrong, and it should terrify every single parent.' The district launched a Title IX investigation into two 10th grade boys in May after they were videotaped inside the building's male locker room, as previously reported by ABC 7News. Title IX investigations involve allegations of sex-based discrimination, including sexual harassment, sexual assault, domestic violence, and other violations. A father of one of the students said the trans student used a mobile phone to record his son and others in the locker room after a gym class in March. Despite the boys being the ones filmed, the footage became the centerpiece of the case - ultimately used to determine their suspension just months later. In the video obtained by the outlet, the trans student begins recording as they walk into the boys' locker room, where several male students already appear to be present. Although the remainder of the video is mostly dark, voices can be heard - voices the school claims were discriminatory toward the student. 'There's a girl in here?' one boy can be heard asking. 'There's a girl?' Moments later, the same boy appears to double down on his concern, saying, 'Why is there a girl? I'm so uncomfortable there is a girl.' 'A female, bro, get out of here,' another teen responds. After the district announced an investigation into the boys' behavior, parents expressed outrage, arguing that the teens were simply having a private conversation among themselves - not targeting or bullying the other student. The boys' parents also questioned why their sons were being scrutinized when they were the ones who had been recorded - a violation of school policy in itself. 'I have a daughter that's in high school as well, and if there was a male in there videotaping her in the locker room, I would have issues,' Seth Wolfe, the father of the other boy involved, told 7News back in May. 'If it's my son and there's a female in the locker room videotaping, I have issues,' he added. 'I believe that this is an invasion of their privacy.' Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin also released a statement at the time, expressing 'outrage' over the news that LCPS was investigating the male students. 'It's deeply concerning to read reports of yet another incident in Loudoun County schools where members of the opposite sex are violating the privacy of students in locker rooms,' Youngkin said. 'Even more alarming, the victims of this violation are the ones being investigated - this is beyond belief,' he added. 'I've asked Attorney General Miyares to investigate this situation immediately so that every student's privacy, dignity and safety are upheld.' Meanwhile, the investigation stretched through the summer, ultimately concluding on Friday evening when the district informed the parents of their sons' suspensions. 'What they're doing to our children is just despicable,' Smith told 7News regarding the district's decision. Josh Hetzler, an attorney representing the families, stated that the punishment includes not only a 10-day suspension, but also a no-contact order prohibiting the boys from being in any of the same classes as the trans student. The boys are also required to meet with school administrators to develop a corrective action plan, according to Hetzler. Smith, who has already withdrawn her son from the district and relocated out of state, worries that the decision will follow him, jeopardizing his chances of college admission since it will remain on his permanent academic record. She also said that if her son ever returns to the district, he will face suspension immediately upon his arrival. The school board had previously refused to comply with the US Department of Education's demands that they, along with other Northern Virginia districts, reverse bathroom and locker room policies allowing trans students to choose facilities based on their gender identity. The trans student's decision to use the boys' locker room was ultimately allowed under Loudoun County School Board's Policy 8040. However, the parents now believe the decision sends a message that anyone who disagrees with the policy will face punishment for speaking out. 'They're going to have to follow what Loudoun County says, what they believe is right, and what goes against other people's beliefs, or what we believe is right,' Wolfe told the outlet. Republican Virginia Lt. Governor Winsome Earle-Sears, who is running for governor, also weighed in on the suspensions, calling them 'ludicrous.' 'Boys are not comfortable undressing in front of nude girls in the same locker room, in spaces that they were not normally have access to,' Earle-Sears told 7News. 'The boys are saying this, and the boys who should be applauded are not being applauded,' he added. 'Instead, they're being punished for something that's common sense. You know, for me, biological differences do matter.' 'It's not political, it's common sense. And it's parental rights, really. So, I'm speaking for parents and families all across Virginia. This is nonsense.' The Founding Freedoms Law Center, representing the families in this case, vowed to continue fighting until the suspension decision is overturned. 'Our clients have done nothing wrong and they deserve to be deemed innocent,' Victoria Cobb, president of the Family Foundation of Virginia, told the outlet. On Friday, the Department of Education informed 7News that it had initiated the process of cutting federal funding to five school districts who refused to change their policies - a move that could cost each district tens of millions of dollars annually.
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
US budget deficit forecast $1 trillion higher over next decade, watchdog says
WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) - U.S. federal budget deficits will be nearly $1 trillion higher over the next decade than projected in January by the Congressional Budget Office as a result of tax and spending legislation and tariffs, a budget watchdog said on Wednesday. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget's latest forecasts show a cumulative deficit of $22.7 trillion from fiscal 2026 to 2035, compared to the CBO's January forecast of $21.8 trillion, which was based on laws and policies that were in place before U.S. President Donald Trump took office in January. The CBO, Congress' non-partisan budget referee agency, said on Monday, opens new tab that it will not issue its customary mid-year budget update this year and will issue its next 10-year budget and economic outlook in early 2026, offering no explanation for the move. The CRFB, which advocates for deficit reduction, projected a $1.7 trillion deficit in fiscal 2025 or 5.6% of GDP, down slightly from $1.83 trillion in 2024 and the CBO's 2025 projection of $1.87 trillion in January. But it said deficits steadily rise over the decade, reaching $2.6 trillion or 5.9% of GDP by 2035. The new CRFB estimates include the budget effects of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act tax and spending bill, as well as Trump's tariffs that are currently in place. But like CBO, they do not include the dynamic economic effects on growth from these changes, a forecasting rule that has drawn criticism from the Trump administration. The group projects the tax cut and spending bill to increase deficits, including interest, by $4.6 trillion through 2035, adding another year to the CBO's $4.1 trillion cost estimate through 2034. But CRFB estimates that this will be offset by $3.4 trillion worth of extra import duty revenue over the next decade due to Trump's new tariffs that are currently in place. New rules restricting eligibility for health insurance subsidies will reduce deficits by another $100 billion through 2035, and Congress' rescission of prior funding to foreign aid, public broadcasting and other programs would save another $100 billion if sustained over a decade, CRFB said. Net interest payments on the national debt will total $14 trillion over the decade, CRFB projected, rising from nearly $1 trillion or 3.2% of GDP in 2025 to $1.8 trillion or 4.1% of GDP in 2035. The forecasts are based on legislative and tariff changes since January but keep CBO's economic forecasts unchanged. Under an alternative scenario forecast by CRFB, the budget picture looks far worse, boosting deficits nearly $7 trillion higher than the CBO baseline. This scenario would see a significant part of Trump's tariffs canceled if the Court of International Trade's ruling against many of Trump's new tariffs is upheld, cutting $2.4 trillion from revenues over a decade. The alternative scenario also assumes extension of a number of temporary tax cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, including tax breaks on overtime, tips, Social Security income and car loan interest, higher state and local tax deduction allowances and full expensing of factory investments, adding $1.7 trillion to deficits over 10 years. CRFB's alternative scenario also ditches the CBO's projection of a decline in 10-year U.S. Treasury yields over the decade to about 3.8%. If that interest rate stays at the current level of about 4.3%, interest costs would grow by about $1.6 trillion through 2035, CRFB said. The total 2035 debt-to-GDP ratio would grow from 118% in the CBO January baseline to 120% under the CRFB's projected baseline scenario and 134% under the CRFB's alternative scenario.
