Canadian Armed Forces deployed to assist northwestern Ontario wildfire evacuations
Carney said in a social media post that Ottawa has accepted Ontario's urgent request for assistance in and around Sandy Lake First Nation, and the military will help with emergency airlift evacuations.
'We're prepared to mobilize every resource needed to keep Canadians safe,' Carney wrote.
In response to rapidly spreading wildfires in northwestern Ontario, the federal government has accepted a Request for Federal Assistance from the province.
We've deployed Canadian Armed Forces aircraft and personnel to support emergency airlift evacuations…
As of Sunday, the Ontario government said the Red Lake 12 wildfire, near Deer Lake First Nation, is out of control and more than 1,500 square kilometres in size. The fire is about six kilometres from the community of Sandy Lake First Nation, it said.
'Overnight growth was minimal, but the fire has been exhibiting high intensity activity this morning,' the Ministry of Natural Resources said.
Helicopters and fire ranger crews are continuing to suppress the fires and are focusing on structure protection, the ministry said, adding that minimal rain is forecasted in the next 24 hours.
The ministry said Sandy Lake First Nation is conducting a phase one evacuation of residents by air, and boats will be available if needed. The province said Deer Lake First Nation remains evacuated and is being protected by fire rangers.
Aerial suppression activities will continue as smoke conditions allow, with helicopters and 11 FireRanger crews continuing suppression operations and focusing on structure protection. Minimal rain is forecasted over the next 24 hours.
It said the province's northwest region had 26 active fires as of Saturday night, seven of which were out of control.
Videos and photos on social media showed one fire approaching a construction site near Sandy Lake First Nation on Saturday, with multiple cargo containers catching on fire and crews reportedly escaping the blaze by sheltering in one of them.
Manitoba-based construction company Sigfusson Northern confirmed their crew was safely evacuated after they were working on a job site near the First Nation.
'Our crews showed an extreme level of professionalism and courage in the face of a rapidly changing situation,' the company said in a social media post.
Other provinces, including Manitoba and Saskatchewan, are also undergoing evacuation efforts in some areas due to wildfires.
The wildfires have prompted air quality alerts in Ontario. Environment Canada warned that smoke is causing poor air quality and reduced visibility in areas including Sioux Lookout, Summer Beaver and Ear Falls.
The weather agency added that some northeastern areas, including Timmins, Kapuskasing and Attawapiskat, are under a special air quality statement Sunday due to the smoke.
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark
nationalpost.com
and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted,
here
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada News.Net
35 minutes ago
- Canada News.Net
Air Canada flight attendant 'unlawful' strike exposes major fault lines in Canadian labour law
Share article Air Canada flight attendants say they will continue to defy a government back-to-work order after the federal labour relations board declared the strike "unlawful." The walkout, which began early on Aug. 16, grounded hundreds of flights and left passengers stranded. Less than 12 hours into the strike, the federal government intervened in the dispute between Air Canada and the union representing its flight attendants. Minister of Jobs and Families Patty Hajdu invoked Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to impose binding arbitration and order employees back to work. The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) condemned the move, accusing the government of "crushing flight attendants' Charter rights." Air Canada reportedly encouraged the government to intervene, while CUPE pushed for a negotiated solution, arguing binding arbitration would ease pressure on the airline to negotiate fairly. After a Sunday hearing, the Canada Industrial Relations Board released an order reiterating flight attendants should "cease all activities that declare or authorize an unlawful strike of its members" and "resume the performance of their duties." As an expert in unions and the politics of labour, I see this dispute as highlighting several fault lines in Canada around work, how we value it and the ways the law affects workers. Prime Minister Mark Carney currently faces the first labour crisis of his term. Carney had worked alongside labour leaders in the face of United States President Donald Trump's tariff threats, even appointing Lana Payne, president of the Unifor trade union, to the new Canada-U.S. Relations Council. The federal government's decision to invoke Section 107 to send Air Canada and its flight attendants to arbitration continues a growing trend of its increasing use. Section 107 has been part of the Canada Labour Code since 1984. It was rarely used for decades, but became more common last year when Justin Trudeau's government invoked it several times to end work stoppages at ports, rail yards and Canada Post. This is part of a longer history. Dating back to the 1970s, federal and provincial governments started interfering with free and fair collective bargaining through back-to-work legislation or by imposing contracts on public sector workers. What has changed in recent decades is the federal government's growing creep into the private sector. Under Stephen Harper's Conservative government, there were increasing threats to use back-to-work legislation, targeting CN Rail, CP Rail and Air Canada. These interventions were justified as protecting an economy emerging from a global financial crisis. The Harper government followed through with back-to-work legislation in the Air Canada and CP Rail cases. If the Carney government continues to use back-to-work legislation, it could alienate unions that once saw him as a potential ally. Yet the public may be more receptive to it, given the country's economic weakness and continued Trump threats. The Air Canada strike could effect the trajectory not only of the government, but also the labour movement as well. It's a strike that has major consequences for all workers in Canada, and its outcome will signal to workers across the country what they can expect in these uncertain times. CUPE's decision to defy the Canadian government's use of Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code comes with big risks but also potential victories. A union or workers defying the law is hardly unprecedented, but is increasingly rare in an era where unions have been in an overall decline in Canada and globally. The risks are significant for workers: heavy fines, termination of employment or even jail time for flight attendants and union officials. If CUPE is successful, it would have a galvanizing effect, sending a message to workers across the country that they can stand up not only to their bosses, but to the state, in order to improve their labour circumstances. However, for any kind of unlawful strike to be successful, there must be an incredible amount of unity among the workers. While CUPE leadership and the Canadian labour movement are strongly supportive of continuing the strike, rank-and-file flight attendants must be willing to stand their ground. Even in a legal strike, unions only take the step of stopping work if they have an overwhelming amount of the membership on board. That need for solidarity is even greater for illegal action. The reason why Canada has laws allowing unions, workplace safety and strikes is because of industrial militancy that often defied the law to force governments to enact legislation allowing for unions and strikes. The flight attendant strike could be a barometer of increased labour organizing and action experienced across Canada since the COVID-19 pandemic, and whether that momentum for the labour movement can continue. Another key issue at the heart of the strike is the gender wage gap, which continues to be an issue in Canada. While it has narrowed during this century, women in Canada still earn on average 12 per cent less than men. This gap is even wider for women who are newcomers, Indigenous, transgender or living with disabilities. This disparity is closely tied to sectors where women are overrepresented, such as flight attendants, a workforce overwhelmingly made up of women. Across the Canadian workforce, 56 per cent of women are employed in the "5 Cs": caring, clerical, catering, cashiering and cleaning. These occupations tend to be precarious and underpaid. While airlines are part of transportation, the work that flight attendants perform is unmistakably service-based and covers much of the 5 Cs, including emotional labour and customer care. For Air Canada flight attendants, the situation is compounded by the fact they are paid only while the plane is in motion, meaning they often perform unpaid work. The gender dynamics become even clearer when comparing the treatment of flight attendants with that of Air Canada pilots. In 2024, Air Canada pilots - who are mostly men - won a 26 per cent wage increase in the first year of their new contract and a 42 per cent increase overall. Air Canada's most recent offer to its flight attendants was only an eight per cent increase in year one and 38 per cent overall. "Air Canada's male-dominated workforce received a significant cost-of-living wage increase. Why not the flight attendants, who are 70 per cent women?" Natasha Stea, president of the CUPE division that represents the Air Canada flight attendants, said in an Aug. 15 CUPE article.
Toronto Sun
an hour ago
- Toronto Sun
Letters to the Editor, Aug. 19, 2025
Tuesday letters Photo by Illustration / Toronto Sun THE LONG GAME This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Many people, including some of your columnists, are criticizing Prime Minister Mark Carney for not rushing into a 'deal' with Donald Trump on tariffs. I, for one, am pleased he is holding out and essentially telling Trump to stuff it. The European Union and some countries have cowardly shamed themselves in disgracefully capitulating to Trump's crime boss extortion tactics, agreeing to pay him billions. Canada must never give in to this criminal activity, and we must settle for nothing less than a 0% tariff agreement with the U.S. We are a patient and resilient people, and we can endure some hardship for a while. We can, and we will, outlast this lunatic president. Gordon Tremblay Cornwall (Time will tell if patience was a virtue in this scenario) This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. CBC NEEDS SCHOOLING Hats off to Warren Kinsella for calling CBC on their crapaganda against Israel ('CBC peddling Hamas propaganda,' Aug. 7). Those of us who used to watch CBC know that they are great defenders of those they perceive to be the underdog. The truth and facts are irrelevant. The uninformed stand CBC has taken against Israel is based on mythology and a true blood libel against the Jews. Shame on them. Journalism must be based on facts, not personal preference, balanced with both sides of a story. Who started the war? What heinous acts did Hamas commit to incite the wrath of a peace-loving country that has been under siege since its birth? Where are the hostages after almost two years? How about a history lesson along with a refresher on journalistic integrity? CBC is a disgrace. Marjie Zacks (Why let misguided agendas get in the way of facts?) ELEVATED WOKENESS A description of woke people: They are people who won't live on the 13th floor of a building but are perfectly happy to if it's called the 14th floor. It's still the 13th floor, but they have just been brainwashed to believe it's the 14th. All Liberals live on the 14th floor. Davis Hull Milton (That about sums it up) Canada Columnists Sunshine Girls Columnists Toronto & GTA
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Indigenous leaders on lessons learned from Trans Mountain as Carney aims to fast-track major projects
Two former Indigenous leaders on both sides of the debate over the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion say the federal government can't ignore First Nations on future infrastructure projects it seeks to approve. Their comments come as Prime Minister Mark Carney aims to fast-track major projects, such as pipelines and mines, through his government's newly adopted 'Building Canada Act.' Following years of delays and legal challenges, the expanded Trans Mountain pipeline, known as TMX, began operating last year. The project took more than 10 years to complete, after a court cited inadequate consultation with Indigenous groups in its decision to quash the federal government's initial approval of the expansion. The Canadian Press spoke with two former Indigenous leaders – one who supported TMX and one who opposed it – about what lessons have been learned from Trans Mountain, and whether they expect anything different from Carney's plans to accelerate more major projects. Leah George-Wilson, former chief of the Tsleil-Waututh Nation, doesn't believe Ottawa has learned any lessons. 'I think we will see more First Nations turning to the courts over this piece of legislation,' she said of the Building Canada Act. Opinion: How Indigenous peoples and the private sector can work together to get major projects done George-Wilson's B.C.-based First Nation fought in court against the Trans Mountain expansion pipeline, which ends in Burrard Inlet, part of her people's ancestral territory. They initially succeeded in reversing the Trudeau government's approval of the project in 2018 over a lack of consultation. However, after the government reapproved the project in 2019, First Nations such as Tsleil-Waututh were unable to stop it. It was during this legal battle that the federal government purchased the Trans Mountain project from Kinder Morgan, which had been preparing to withdraw. The TMX saga has left George-Wilson feeling pessimistic about the government's approach to other projects. 'Even today … the government has not responded to the significant impacts that Trans Mountain has had and continues to have on our community,' she said. She says she is not reassured by Carney's promise to respect section 35 of the Constitution Act – which guarantees the ancestral rights of Indigenous peoples – nor by the meetings he held over the summer with Indigenous leaders on his government's plans to quickly approve infrastructure projects. Some Indigenous communities have said they were not consulted during the drafting of the new legislation and fear it will infringe on their rights. Nine First Nations in Ontario have already filed a legal challenge against the Building Canada Act. With the law, Carney wants to speed up projects that Ottawa considers to be in the national interest, with the goal of limiting approval times to two years. 'I don't think this piece of legislation is going to speed up the projects at all because they're going to end up in court,' she said. Opinion: Why the Carney government should treat the TMX pipeline as a model investment However, Joe Dion a former grand chief in Alberta, says he thinks the Carney government will respect Section 35 and honour the principle of free, full, and informed consent of First Nations. 'For the government to revoke this section or to go against it would be a national shame. So I don't think it's going to happen,' said Dion, who is the CEO and director of the Western Indigenous Pipeline Group. The group includes dozens of Indigenous communities that, in partnership with Pembina Pipeline Corporation, want to acquire TMX. Ottawa has signalled its intention to divest itself of the pipeline ever since it purchased it from Kinder Morgan, though it has not yet done so. Dion believes that things have changed significantly since the Trans Mountain saga began, and believes the Carney government intends to fully involve Indigenous communities in future projects labelled as in the national interest. 'The government is now saying that the First Nations and the Indigenous groups will have equity, will have ownership in these projects,' he said in an interview. 'When TMX started, there was no promise of that at all … We had to fight for it, we have to fight for it." Dion acknowledges that the Building Canada Act has drawn criticism from many Indigenous communities, but he said, 'You will never have unanimity, whether it's First Nations or non-First Nations.' In his view, projects that would 'severely affect' Indigenous communities will simply not go ahead, and won't be selected as being in the national interest.
