logo
Employer in Sumo Salad case was fully reimbursed by insurer, which did not flag if fraud was involved: MOM

Employer in Sumo Salad case was fully reimbursed by insurer, which did not flag if fraud was involved: MOM

CNA5 days ago
SINGAPORE: The employer in the Sumo Salad work injury case was fully reimbursed by the insurer on Jun 26 and 27 for medical bills and medical leave wage claims submitted up to that point, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) said on Friday (Aug 1).
MOM also has not received any indication of fraud from the insurer to date and has not observed any evidence that a syndicate was involved in the case.
The ministry provided this update during a media briefing on the Work Injury Compensation Act (WICA), following intense public interest in the case. MOM did not name the insurer involved in the case.
The issue arose following the death of the owner of eatery Sumo Salad, Ms Jane Lee, who had published Facebook posts about a foreign employee who she claimedfiled a false work injury claim to get compensation.
In a Facebook post on Jul 18, a day before she died, Ms Lee said that "because of an unfortunate gap in our insurance coverage, we are now being targeted by what I believe to be a fraudulent scheme".
The work injury claim was filed against EatGreen, the operator of Sumo Salad.
The ministry previously said that the worker involved was covered under the WICA, and that it was working with the employee's insurer to "assess the validity of the case".
On Friday, MOM said the work injury incident took place on Jun 6 and the employer subsequently submitted a work injury report to the ministry. It said the employer was covered by a valid insurance policy.
MOM said it was unable to give more details on the case as its investigations are ongoing. The Singapore Police Force is also investigating Ms Lee's unnatural death.
"We have not received any indication from the insurer that there is fraud. But that is different from saying that there is no fraud, because we are investigating," said the ministry spokesperson.
The spokesperson added that the claims process in the Sumo Salad case has not concluded.
Asked about the status of the worker involved, the spokesperson said MOM does not typically comment on the employment status of particular individuals. The ministry may issue special passes for workers involved in some investigation cases to legalise their stay in Singapore.
AROUND 12 CLAIMS REFERRED YEARLY FOR SUSPECTED FRAUD
MOM said about 28,500 work injury claims are filed each year, and compensation is paid out for around 26,800 claims a year.
Insurers refer about 12 claims a year for MOM to investigate potential work injury compensation fraud.
The ministry said WICA imposes caps on compensation to limit employers' financial liability and protects employers against sudden large payouts due to work injuries.
At the same time, it gives workers social protections by providing a low-cost and expeditious route for work injury compensation.
Employers must buy work injury insurance for all manual workers regardless of salary, and non-manual workers earning S$2,600 or less a month. Platform operators must also have insurance coverage for all platform workers.
WICA covers medical expenses, medical leave wages and a lump sum compensation for permanent incapacity and death.
Over the past three years, 94 per cent of WICA claims were paid out by insurers. Most of the remaining 6 per cent of claims were directly paid out by employers that are exempted from buying work injury insurance.
MOM said that multiple levels of safeguards against fraud are in place. Work injury claims are assessed by insurers, who act as "gate-keepers"; and doctors, whose assessments of a worker's incapacity are "tightly prescribed".
All parties also have the opportunity to raise objections to a work injury claim.
Timeline of the Sumo Salad case
Jun 6, 2025: A work injury accident allegedly took place at Sumo Salad. The employer subsequently filed the work injury incident report with MOM.
Jun 26 and 27, 2025: The insurer reimbursed the employer fully for medical bills and medical leave wages submitted up to that point. The employer was notified.
Jul 18, 2025: The owner of Sumo Salad, Ms Jane Lee, published two Facebook posts about a foreign employee who allegedly filed a false work injury claim to get compensation.
Jul 19, 2025: Ms Lee died, according to her obituary.
Jul 21, 2025: MOM said it has been looking into the false work injury claim and is working with the insurer to assess the claim's validity. It also said it was in communication with Ms Lee before her death. The Singapore Police Force said it was investigating Ms Lee's unnatural death.
Jul 24, 2025: Minister of State for Manpower Dinesh Vasu Dash reiterated that the ministry was probing the matter and working with the insurer.
SME ASSOCIATION CALLS FOR MORE EDUCATION, SUPPORT
In a separate statement following MOM's briefing, the Association of Small and Medium Enterprises (ASME) said a work injury that is not genuine has an impact that goes "far beyond the financial cost".
"It inflicts significant psychological distress on owners who must continue running their business while managing the dispute," ASME said in a statement.
"While ASME does not track specific data on such cases, we are attuned to the deeper structural vulnerabilities that make SMEs more exposed."
Based on feedback ASME receives, many SMEs face a steep learning curve in compliance and human resource (HR) practices.
This association said it saw this as a "classic 'starting up' challenge" that stems from a critical gap in foundational business knowledge.
As a result, SME owners are "forced to learn reactively, often only after a major incident occurs", it said.
One way to address this is preventive education. ASME said it advocates for a structured "Business 101" onboarding programme for new entrepreneurs that integrates HR best practices and HR technology. It has a dedicated committee looking into this.
ASME said it is also exploring how to enhance the support it provides when incidents occur, as it sees a need for "a trusted, central point of guidance". It is looking at ways to strengthen the advisory role of its SME Centre.
ASME added that to uphold the integrity of existing policies that are "pro-ecosystem", there is a need to ensure such measures "are not misused by either employers or employees so as to protect the trust and fairness these policies are built on".
Helping entrepreneurs build strong foundations will not only protect them from disputes but prepare them for scaling up, it added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MRT commuter with walking stick criticised after complaining that woman didn't give up her seat
MRT commuter with walking stick criticised after complaining that woman didn't give up her seat

Independent Singapore

time5 hours ago

  • Independent Singapore

MRT commuter with walking stick criticised after complaining that woman didn't give up her seat

SINGAPORE: A male commuter who took to social media to complain about a woman not giving up her seat on the MRT ended up facing backlash, with netizens calling him out for acting entitled and making assumptions. In a post shared on Sunday (Aug 3) in the 'Complaint Singapore' Facebook group, the man said he boarded the train at Aljunied station while using a 'walking stick.' As the train was crowded at the time, he said he stood directly in front of a younger woman who was seated, hoping she would notice his condition and offer him her seat without needing to be asked. However, according to him, the woman kept her eyes on her phone and didn't acknowledge him at all. Frustrated, he snapped a photo of her and uploaded it to the group, saying he couldn't understand why 'some people do not have a heart.' He later shared that another passenger, an elderly man seated nearby, eventually noticed him and kindly gave up his seat. 'Just because you walk with a stick doesn't mean someone owes you a seat.' While these kinds of complaints usually garner sympathy from the online crowd, this time, it invited criticism. Many labelled the man as the 'entitled' one. Some netizens also questioned why he was specifically targeting the woman when 'she's not even sitting in a priority seat.' One netizen said, 'She never committed a crime and never did anything against the law, it's not even a priority seat. She paid transport fare same as you, so it's fair. Your entitlement is not anyone's responsibility, and you taking her photos without her consent and posting it here, you are the one breaking a law.' Another commenter, a 70-year-old man, added, 'Just because you walk with a stick doesn't mean someone owes you a seat. Let's be honest—expecting a lady on the MRT to give up her seat simply because you're older or have a walking stick is self-fulfilling.' A third pointed out that the woman may have been dealing with an invisible condition, which might explain why she chose to ignore the man with the walking stick. 'A person may look well, but they've what we called silent illness. It could be BVVP, body pains, knee issue, etc. Don't just assume one looks young means they're healthy,' they wrote. In other news, an employer has decided to terminate the contract of her domestic helper after discovering through CCTV footage that her one-year-old daughter was being neglected while she was away at work. In a post shared anonymously in the 'Direct Hire Transfer Singapore Maid/Domestic Helper' Facebook group, the employer claimed that the helper spent most of her time watching television instead of attending to the baby. Read more: Employer terminates maid's contract after discovering through CCTV that her 1-year-old child was neglected

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store