SC asks Sambhal mosque panel to respond to UP govt status report on well in 2 weeks
A bench of Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar gave the committee two weeks to respond to the UP government's status report filed on February 22, even as it wondered whether the dispute over the well cannot be resolved amicably.
The bench was hearing an application filed by the committee in a pending appeal against the November 19, 2024, direction of a local court appointing an advocate commissioner to survey the mosque following Hindu side's claims over it.
The Hindu side claims that the Mughal-era mosque was built after destroying a temple called Hari Mandir.
The application by the committee contended that a public poster purportedly issued by Sambhal Nagar Palika, regarding a well adjoining the mosque, referred to it as being located in a corner of the Hari Mandir. Hearing the application on January 10, the court stayed the execution of the notice and sought a status report from the UP government.
'The well…locally known as 'Dharani varah koop'.. is situated near and not inside the disputed religious site, and as such, has no relation/connection with the mosque/disputed religious site.
Even the disputed religious site is itself situated on public land. It is submitted that the well is a public well and is not situated anywhere inside the mosque/disputed religious site. In fact, there is no access to the subject well from inside the mosque,' said the status report filed by the UP government on February 22.
On Tuesday, the bench sought to know why the reply to the report had not been filed yet.
Senior Advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, appearing for the mosque committee, sought three weeks' time to file its reply on the ground that the president of the mosque committee Zafar Ali was in jail.
Ali was arrested on March 23 after being questioned in connection with the November 24, 2024 violence during protests against a court-ordered survey of the mosque, in which four people were killed.
'Take a 'mulaqat' (meeting with an inmate in jail) and do it. Somebody else can also file the response. Please do it in two weeks,' the CJI said.
The bench sought to know if the well is partly inside and partly outside. Additional Solicitor General K M Nataraj, appearing for the UP government, said it is completely outside the mosque. Ahmadi disagreed. The ASG said the state has photographs to prove its claim.
When the court sought to know if the well is covered, the ASG said it is not and that there is no water inside. Ahmadi, however, said that it is covered with cement on top, and water for religious purposes etc inside the mosque was being drawn using a pump and now the state wanted to open it. The CJI said that normally wells are never closed but kept open.
Seeking to know if an amicable settlement was possible, the CJI asked, 'Can this issue not be resolved? I think this issue can be resolved. Because let's assume that you (mosque) are using the well, but let others also use the well.'
'The difficulty is, the well is right at the foot of the mosque. If you want to use it, it's not a question of merely using the water, but the question is the performance of religious ceremonies,' Ahmadi said. To this, the CJI said, 'You do your religious ceremonies wherever you want to.' Ahmadi replied: 'The apprehension is something else.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Dhar admn seals Imambada, hands it over to PWD
Mhow: Dhar district administration sealed an Imambada on the intervening night of Tuesday and Wednesday after getting it vacated and later handed it over to Public Works Department (PWD). A heavy police force was deployed in the town to prevent any untoward incident while the Imambada was being vacated and sealed. The Imambada, operated from a section of PWD building in Hatwara area of the town, had been under the possession of Tajiya committee for decades. Hindu organisations had contested that it was a govt-owned building meant for running cultural activities and should be available for all communities. The Tajiya committee argued that permission was granted for storing Tajiyas (tableaux). The action was taken following a complaint filed at the Dhar SDM court. The SDM court had ordered for the vacation of the premises. Challenging the order, the Tajiya committee had filed an appeal in Commissioner's revenue court, which also maintained the SDM court's order on Tuesday. Dhar SP Manoj Kumar Singh told TOI, "On the orders of the SDM court, the portion was vacated and handed over to PWD. Looking at the issue, additional police force was deployed in the area as well as the whole town to ensure that nothing untoward takes place. As far as the situation in Dhar is concerned, it is peaceful and fully under control, and the force will remain there round the clock." Abdul Samad, Sadar (head) of Muslim community, said that he was unaware of the action but claimed that a petition in this regard was filed in the Supreme Court. "I'm waiting for the hearing on my petition, which is expected on August 22 or 23," he added. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Capt. Chowta urges Karnataka government not to impose unreasonable restrictions on Hindu festivities
Capt. Brijesh Chowta, Dakshina Kannada MP, on Wednesday urged Chief Minister Siddaramaiah not to hurt sentiments of Hindus by imposing unreasonable restrictions on festivities through the police. In a statement from New Delhi, Capt. Chowta alleged that the state government was using the police to hurt HIndu sentiments. Referring to recent guidelines by the Mangaluru city and the Dakshina Kannada district police which, among other things, restricted the use of DJ system, holding festivities beyond 10 p.m. etc., the MP said several socio-cultural-religious programmes take place throughout the year in Tulunadu. However, the Mangaluru police booking a case against the organisers and seizing the sound system at a Mosaru Kudike celebration in Kavoor, was deplorable, the MP said. When people were celebrating festivals with great fervour, the police interruptions were not good. During the erstwhile BJP rule too, there were restrictions on the use of loudspeakers; yet the police did not interfere in the celebrations, he noted. Now it appears that the government has given specific instructions to the police to disturb Hindu festivities, he alleged. Owners of sound systems were contemplating not to use loudspeakers in any public function after the police booked one of them in Kavoor. The restrictions would adversely affect people engaged in the business. Capt. Chowta noted that elected representatives of the region had raised the issue before Home Minister G. Parameshwara during his recent visit to Mangaluru. However, the Minister did not resolve the issue then. If the government continues to meddle with Hindu sentiments, it would be held responsible for any consequences, the MP cautioned. The Kavoor police on August 16 booked the organisers and sound system owners at the Mosaru Kudike celebrations at Panjimogaru for using DJ system and obstructing traffic movement on a public road.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
States will be at whims of governor if nod to Bills withheld: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Wednesday said that the power of the governor to permanently withhold assent to bills would leave the state government, which is elected with majority, at his 'whims and fancies'. 'Would we not be giving total powers to the governor to sit in over an appeal. The government elected with the majority will be at (the) whims and fancies of (the) governor,' Chief Justice of India(CJI), Justice B R Gavai, said. The court was hearing the maintainability of the reference made by President Droupadi Murmu under Article 143. The reference was concerning the April 8 ruling of the top court that set timelines for governors and the President to grant assent to bills passed by the legislature. In the April 8 judgment, a bench of Justice J B Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan invoked its special powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to fix deadlines for the President and governors to act on state bills. Replying to the query of the CJI, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, told the Constitution Bench of CJI B R Gavai, Justice Surya Kant, Justice Vikram Nath, Justice P S Narasimha, and Justice Atul S Chandurkar that everyone derives power from the Constitution. On the powers of the governor under Article 200, Mehta said the governor has four options- assent to the bill, withhold assent, reserve the bill for consideration of the President or send it back to the legislature. He said that when the governor withholds assent, the bill falls through. Article 200 of the Indian Constitution outlines the governor's powers regarding assent to bills passed by the state legislature. If a bill is returned, the legislature can pass it again with or without amendments, and the governor is then bound to give assent. The bench, however, remarked that the governor has to communicate his or her decision and that the focal point of the debate would be whether withholding is temporary or permanent. Mehta said the power to withhold is to be used rarely and only in the first instance, as it leads to the death of the bill. 'The governor is not just a postman. He represents the Union of India, appointed by the President. The President is elected by the entire nation by way of the entire election and that is also a way of democratic expression,' Mehta said. After the April 8 judgment, the President invoked Article 143(1) of the Constitution of India to consult the Supreme Court. This Article, commonly referred to as the power of 'Presidential Reference', empowers the President of India to seek the Supreme Court's opinion on questions of law or fact of public importance. President Murmu, on May 13, posed 14 questions to the Supreme Court of India on several aspects of law, including the ambit of the powers under Article 142. In response, the states of Kerala and Tamil Nadu filed an application questioning the maintainability of the reference. It urged the Supreme Court to return the reference unanswered and said it was an attempt by the Centre to indirectly overrule binding judgments without disclosure. Meanwhile, the central government supported the reference, arguing that the power of governors and the President to act on bills cannot be bound by judicial timelines. The hearing will continue on Thursday.
