Sustainable Switch: Trump targets wind and solar cuts
This is an excerpt of the Sustainable Switch newsletter, where we make sense of companies and governments grappling with climate change, diversity, and human rights on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays.
To receive the full newsletter in your inbox for free sign up here.
Hello!
The Trump administration and its climate change law rollbacks are back as the focus of today's newsletter.
This time, the Trump team took steps to rescind a Biden-era regulation that lowered fees for renewable energy projects on federal lands, saying the rule unfairly favored development of wind and solar facilities.
The rule, which was finalized in 2024, formalized a roughly 80% cut in project fees for wind and solar energy developments on federal lands. Developers had complained for years that they were too high to draw investment.
The Interior Department said that the White House would review the planned rescission before it was formally proposed and opened to public comment.
The move aligns with U.S. President Donald Trump's goal to undo regulations introduced by his predecessor, Joe Biden, that were aimed at expanding clean energy and addressing climate change.
Shortening approvals for oil and gas
The renewables rollbacks come as the Trump administration announced a plan to shrink the time it takes to review potential land parcels on federal lands for oil and gas development by about half, to six months, the Interior Department said.
'This policy puts us on a fast track to Energy Dominance — opening up more federal land for responsible development, cutting review times nearly in half, and sending a clear message that the United States is serious about job creation, low energy costs, and putting American energy first," Adam Suess, the Interior Department's acting assistant secretary for land and minerals management, said in a statement.
The Interior Department's Bureau of Land Management said the parcel reviews, which consider whether oil and gas leasing is aligned with regional land use plans, will be conducted at the same time as congressionally mandated environmental reviews.
The acceleration of energy permitting processes on federal lands has prompted concerns from environmental groups, who argue that the policies may prioritize corporate interests over public health and environmental protection.
Pushing back
Some industry groups are pushing back against the various environmental cutbacks by the Trump administration.
Trade group Advanced Energy United, which represents a range of clean energy, transmission, technology and transportation companies including NRG, Sunrun, Enel and Microsoft, launched a national ad campaign targeting lawmakers in five states whose districts benefit from investments spurred by the Inflation Reduction Act.
The House Ways and Means committee proposed the phase-out or cancellation of several lucrative subsidies from Biden's signature climate law, the IRA.
On the block are several related to wind and solar power, hydrogen, and other technologies meant to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
The ads, which specify how much a congressional district has received in IRA-generated private sector and manufacturing investments, will run until a final budget bill passes in the House. Speaker Mike Johnson wants the bill passed by May 26. AEU did not divulge total spending on the ads, but called it a "six-digit" campaign.
ESG Lens
Consumers have voted with their wallets – Target has faced financial setbacks since scrapping its diversity, equity and inclusion program that included a goal to increase the number of Black employees by 20% over three years. A Target spokesperson said the new approach "is all about driving business results by increasing relevance with U.S. consumers and making Target a destination for talent."
Click here for an in-depth Reuters feature about DEI programs in U.S. corporations.
Today's Sustainable Switch was edited by Emelia Sithole-Matarise
Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also subscribe here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Amazon to spend $20 billion on data centers in Pennsylvania, including one at a nuclear power plant
Amazon said Monday that it will spend $20 billion on two data center complexes in Pennsylvania, including one it is building alongside a nuclear power plant that has drawn federal scrutiny over an arrangement to essentially plug right into the power plant. Kevin Miller, vice president of global data centers at Amazon's cloud computing subsidiary, Amazon Web Services, told The Associated Press that the company will build another data center complex just north of Philadelphia. The announcements add to the billions of dollars in Big Tech 's data center cash already flowing into the state. Since 2024 started, Amazon has committed to about $10 billion apiece to data center projects in Mississippi, Indiana, Ohio and North Carolina as it ramps up its investment in infrastructure to compete with other tech giants to meet growing demand for artificial intelligence products. The rapid growth of cloud computing and artificial intelligence has fueled demand for data centers that need power to run servers, storage systems, networking equipment and cooling systems. The majority owner of the Susquehanna nuclear power plant, Talen Energy, announced last year that it had sold its data center to Amazon for $650 million in a deal to eventually provide 960 megawatts. That's 40% of the output of one of the nation's largest nuclear power plants, or enough to power more than a half-million homes. However, the arrangement between Talen and Amazon — called a 'behind the meter' connection — has been held up by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in the first such case to come before the agency. It has raised questions over whether diverting power to higher-paying customers will leave enough for others and whether it's fair to excuse big power users from paying for the grid. ___
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain's biggest solar farm threatens Domesday villages
The developer of Britain's largest solar farm has told residents of three Norfolk villages that appear in the Domesday Book that their land may be 'required'. Dozens of villagers in Hempnall, Saxlingham and Tasburgh were sent letters warning them that their homes may be needed to create space for the East Pye Solar project. The development will cover 2,500 acres, an area the size of Chichester, in West Sussex, and it is 10 times bigger than the UK's current largest solar farm in Flintshire, Wales. Letters sent in the last two months asked villagers detailed questions about their mortgages. In total, residents in 23 villages between Long Stratton and Diss are believed to have been sent the letters, which state their land may be 'required'. If the East Pye Solar proposal goes ahead, it would deliver up to 500 megawatts of electricity, enough to power 115,000 homes annually. As the plans are deemed a nationally significant infrastructure project (NSIP), the developer, Island Green Power, could have the power to compulsorily purchase land. Farmers around the UK have been threatened with the possibility of compulsory purchase orders for solar farm development, but this is believed to be the first time homeowners have been approached. Residents of Hempnall, which has a population of 1,238, criticised the letter's 'impertinent' and 'unreasonable' line of questioning. Yvonne Davy, 89, is among dozens of residents who received letters from the developer's lawyers, Dalcour Maclaren. Ms Davy, who has lived in Hempnall since 1973, said she received three letters, dated April 9, May 2 and May 29, and an unwanted phone call. The great-grandmother, who has an electric car and solar panels on her roof, said: 'I thought that can't be right. They were asking about my finances and my mortgage. It is quite impertinent. I wasn't very pleased when they rang me at the seaside, and I told them what they're planning to do isn't very nice at all. I don't know how they got my number.' Developers would get her land 'over her dead body', she added, saying: 'They're putting these vast numbers of panels, and it's going to blight the countryside. Where I walk and where I live is going to be surrounded by solar panels the height of a house. It would be dreadful. 'I'm going to be 90 this year, and I'm happily settled. I don't want to lose my property.' Robert Eagle, 77, has also received multiple letters, with the first in early April, followed by three reminders to fill out the questionnaire. Mr Eagle, who has lived in Hempnall for 27 years, said he felt 'unreasonably' chased by the company for his financial information. He said: 'At first I was surprised to receive the letter because I didn't realise such detailed information would be needed at this stage. If I had to give up my home, I would certainly not be pleased. We've been here a long time and we'd like to remain here. 'The thing that really hits us is how unreasonable the project is in terms of scale.' David Hook, the chairman of Hempnall Parish Council, said it was 'extremely concerned' about the solar farm proposals. He said: 'The East Pye scheme, if permitted, would surround our village and cover in total 2,718 acres of South Norfolk countryside with solar panels. 'Our objection to these schemes is due primarily to the fact that their construction would result in the industrialisation of large areas of attractive, tranquil countryside with solar panels and security fences. 'The NSIP regime also provides developers with compulsory purchase powers and this is causing great concern to many local residents, in Hempnall and many other villages included in the scheme, who have received letters saying their home 'may be required'. Island Green Power said: 'As part the development consent order process, East Pye Solar will be undertaking land interest questionnaires to identify people and organisations that have a legal interest in land or property that may potentially be impacted by the scheme. 'This is a statutory obligation under the 2008 Planning Act, and is routine for helping to identify those with legal interest in land. 'Completing land referencing questionnaires allows these stakeholders to be consulted on the development consent order application and ensures they receive formal notification such as when the scheme is accepted for examination.' The Telegraph has contacted the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Earthquake felt by thousands rattles California as anti-ICE raid protests hit San Francisco
Thousands of Californians were rattled by an earthquake Sunday evening. The US Geological Survey (USGS) recorded a magnitude 3.3 quake at 9:30pm PT (12:30am ET), centered about 22 miles north of San Francisco. More than 4,100 people reported feeling the tremor, with reports stretching as far north as Vallejo. The epicenter was located in Pinole, near the Hayward Fault, a 74-mile fault line that runs along the base of the East Bay hills. While the 800-mile-long San Andreas Fault typically draws the most attention in seismic research, scientists warn that the Hayward Fault may also be overdue for a major event. Experts say there is growing concern about the potential for an earthquake greater than magnitude 7.0 in the coming years — the last time it blew was 1886. A USGS simulation known as the HayWired Scenario suggests that a magnitude 7.0 quake on the Hayward Fault could cause between 800 and 2,500 deaths across major Bay Area cities such as San Francisco and Oakland. The smaller Sunday quake hit around the same time as anti-immigration raid protests filled the streets of San Francisco. At least 60 people were arrested Sunday evening after the demonstration turned violent. Shaking from the earthquake was reportedly felt about 20 miles south as protests erupted in downtown San Francisco. There have been no reports of injuries or damages as a result of the earthquake but, according to the 4,194 people who reported feeling shaking. The quake came hours before crowds hit the streets of San Francisco in what they say was solidarity with protests in Los Angeles. The protest was said to have begun peacefully at 6pm PT near a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement office on Sansome Street, but the crowd became tense as it stood toe-to-toe with police. Officers began making arrests several hours later after protestors started vandalizing buildings and shattering windows. Mayor Daniel Lurie said: 'Everyone in this country has a right to make their voice heard peacefully, and local law enforcement will always protect that right and the rights of everyone in our city to be safe. 'But we will never tolerate violent and destructive behavior. … Violence directed at law enforcement or public servants is never acceptable.' Local reports suggested those marching in San Francisco wanted to show solidarity with the protests in Los Angeles. At least three officers have been injured. Nancy Kato, a protester in San Francisco, told ABC 7News: 'We've been watching what's going on in LA, and we're like, no. 'The whole thing about going after immigrants and people who are undocumented, the most vulnerable of our populations that is so wrong.' The protests in Los Angeles broke out on Friday, triggered by immigration raids that resulted in dozens of arrests of what authorities say are illegal migrants and gang members. Tensions escalated Sunday as thousands of protesters took to the streets in response to President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard, blocking off a major freeway and setting self-driving cars on fire as law enforcement used tear gas, rubber bullets and flash bangs to control the crowd. Sunday's protests in Los Angeles, a sprawling city of four million people, were centered in several blocks of downtown. It was the third and most intense day of demonstrations against Trump's immigration crackdown in the region, as the arrival of around 300 Guard troops spurred anger and fear among many residents. The Guard was deployed specifically to protect federal buildings, including the downtown detention center where protesters concentrated. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said officers were 'overwhelmed' by the remaining protesters. He said they included regular agitators who show up at demonstrations to cause trouble. Several dozen people were arrested throughout the weekend of protest. One was detained Sunday for throwing a Molotov cocktail at police, and another for ramming a motorcycle into a line of officers. Trump responded to McDonnell on Truth Social, telling him to arrest protesters in face masks.
