Intersex people in Ireland suffer "poor mental health", new report finds
Released on May 14, the report is titled Healthcare experiences, wellbeing and mental health of people who have variations in sex characteristics in Ireland and is a focused sub-report of the wider Being LGBTQI+ in Ireland study, published in 2024.
The report analyses responses from 31 individuals who identified as intersex and uncovers high levels of psychological distress across a number of indicators. Despite the limited sample size, the findings are stark and echo similar patterns seen in international studies.
Among the key statistics:
61% reported moderate or severe symptoms of depression
68% experienced moderate or severe anxiety
50% reported moderate or severe levels of stress
38% were found to be at risk of an eating disorder
60% had self-harmed
74% had experienced suicidal thoughts, with the average age of first ideation just 14
50% had attempted suicide
50% said they were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with their body
Professor Agnes Higgins, who led the research team, commented on the findings, saying: 'While the number of respondents is small, the levels of distress they report cannot be ignored. These findings mirror global evidence of poor mental health outcomes for intersex people and highlight an urgent need to address how healthcare systems and wider society support and understand this community.'
Participants pointed to the stigma surrounding intersex variations as a major driver of poor mental health. Many shared that the way others responded to their identity—often with confusion, silence or rejection—caused significant psychological harm. Respondents described feeling isolated and misunderstood, frequently left out of societal conversations due to the persistent binary view of sex and gender.
The report also brings attention to the lasting impact of non-consensual or poorly explained medical interventions, sometimes referred to as 'corrective' procedures carried out to make intersex bodies fit binary norms. These include surgeries and hormonal treatments often performed during infancy or childhood.
Participants reported enduring a wide range of negative outcomes from these interventions, including chronic pain, urinary and sexual dysfunction, sleep problems, mental health issues, gender dysphoria, and body image struggles.
Worryingly, 16% of participants did not know whether they had undergone medical interventions, reflecting a lack of transparency and communication around such procedures. Several also questioned whether they had been able to give meaningful consent, particularly where interventions occurred at a young age or without full understanding of the risks involved.
The report concludes with a strong call for systemic change particularly in the areas of healthcare, education, and policy. It urges training for healthcare professionals, improved access to mental health support, and an end to non-consensual medical interventions on intersex children. It also calls for greater public understanding and respect for bodily diversity.
Board Member at Intersex Ireland, Dr Adeline Berry, commented on the research, saying: 'This report could not be timelier as anti-LGBTQIA+ rhetoric spreads seemingly unchecked with the rise of fascism, foretelling troubling times ahead for our communities. Recent research from the European Union shows sharp increases in violence and discrimination against intersex people, as well as transgender people.
'Because of the lack of intersex awareness in medical and mental health settings, intersex people in Ireland and elsewhere struggle to access adequate and appropriate care. Although we comprise as much as 1.7 percent of the population, we are rendered invisible through a combination of factors including stigma, shame and a lack of cultural representation, as well as secretive medical practices.'
Overall, this report paints a stark picture of the lived experiences of intersex people in Ireland and highlights the urgent need for action to ensure dignity, autonomy, and wellbeing.
The post Intersex people in Ireland suffer "poor mental health", new report finds appeared first on GCN.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
When The Brain Remembers Cold, The Body Burns Fat
Anyone who has shivered through winter knows how powerfully the body responds to cold. But what if simply remembering the cold could trigger the same effect? Cold is one of the oldest forces our bodies have had to reckon with. For mammals, surviving it depends on a delicate coordination between the brain and the body's heat response systems, especially brown adipose tissue, a specialized fat that burns energy to generate heat. A new Nature study from Trinity College Dublin reveals that this ancient survival mechanism can be stored as a memory and reactivated on demand. Mice trained to associate a specific environment with a frigid 4°C chill later mounted the same full-body heat response when placed in that environment at a comfortable 21°C. Their metabolism surged, oxygen consumption increased and brown fat genes switched on: exactly as if they were back in the cold. The effect was traced to 'engram' neurons in the hippocampus, which encodes memory, and the hypothalamus, the brain's temperature-control center. These neurons stored the cold experience and, when activated, signaled the body to turn on its heat-generating systems. When scientists artificially stimulated these neurons with light, the cold-memory effect appeared instantly, even in warm conditions. Silencing them erased the effect entirely. Brown fat is emerging as a critical factor in metabolic health. People with more active brown fat tend to have better glucose control, healthier cholesterol levels and lower risk of obesity and cardiovascular disease. Current strategies to activate brown fat, such as extended cold exposure, are often uncomfortable and impractical. If humans share this memory-based mechanism, it could be possible to design interventions that activate brown fat through sensory cues, immersive environments or targeted brain stimulation, without subjecting people to prolonged cold. Such approaches could open new pathways for treating obesity, type 2 diabetes and age-related metabolic decline. For countless generations, survival hinged not just on fire and shelter, but on the body's ability to anticipate and withstand the freeze. Imagine an early human clan returning each winter to the same windswept valley. Long before the snow fell, the very memory of that place could prime their bodies for hardship, raising metabolism, warming the blood, preparing muscles to endure. Memory was not simply a story of what had happened. It was a tool for survival, reaching deep into the body's physiology. This ancient machinery has not disappeared. It lies within us still, silent but ready to be awakened. This study suggests that the brain's recollection of cold can act as a switch, turning on the metabolic furnace of brown fat even when the surrounding air is mild. In other words, the mind does not just recall the past; it rehearses it in the flesh. The implications stretch far beyond cold itself. Science has already shown that memories of stress can elevate blood pressure, while cherished experiences can bolster immunity. Now, temperature memories join this list, showing how the mind scripts the body's responses. Our inner life is not sealed off from our organs. It writes instructions that ripple through heart, liver, muscle and fat. The challenge ahead is both technical and imaginative. How might we safely harness these circuits? Could a sound, a smell or a virtual landscape serve as a key to unlock the body's hidden stores of resilience? Could physicians prescribe an environment or an experience in the same way they prescribe a pill? To do so would be to redefine medicine itself, turning memory from a passive archive into an active instrument of healing. Our memories, it turns out, are not ghosts of the past. They are levers of the present, tools we may one day learn to wield with precision. What began as an evolutionary trick to survive the cold may become a strategy to live longer, healthier lives. The story of memory is no longer only about who we are; it is about who we might yet become.
Associated Press
26-06-2025
- Associated Press
Landmark Study Affirms MolecuLight's Efficacy in Real-Time Bacterial Detection for Improved Wound Management
PITTSBURGH, June 26, 2025 /PRNewswire/ - MolecuLight Corp., a global pioneer in point-of-care fluorescence imaging for wound care, proudly announces the publication of a landmark systematic review by researchers at Trinity College Dublin and the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI). Titled 'The Clinical Utility of Autofluorescence Imaging for Bacterial Detection in Wounds', this review is the first to systematically compile data from 17 studies on fluorescence imaging.1 It conclusively establishes the crucial role of MolecuLight's technology in enhancing wound assessment by equipping clinicians with real-time, actionable information to effectively detect elevated bacterial burden, fundamentally transforming wound management. 'This new publication is a crucial step forward for MolecuLight. It provides a comprehensive review of existing evidence, further underscoring the essential role of MolecuLight's fluorescence imaging in elevating wound care,' said Anil Amlani, CEO of MolecuLight. 'Bacterial bioburden leads to infections and is a critical factor inhibiting wound healing, and this paper clearly articulates how our technology empowers clinicians to not only identify the presence and location of bacteria but also to guide targeted interventions. Ultimately, this leads to faster and more effective healing for patients, further strengthening the growing body of evidence supporting our technology's profound impact.' 'As a co-author of this systematic review and an academic and researcher who utilized MolecuLight's technology in practice, I can attest to the profound impact it has on clinicians' ability to manage complex wounds,' said study author Rosemarie Derwin, PhD, MSc, PG Dip, BNS, RGN, RNT, experienced nurse, educator, and researcher at the School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin. 'The real-time visualization of bacteria provides immediate practical information that guides treatment decisions, leading to more effective care plans and ultimately, better outcomes for patients. This study affirms what many of us have seen clinically: MolecuLight is a vital asset in modern wound care.' This detailed systematic review of current evidence underscores the capability of MolecuLight devices to identify clinically significant levels of bioburden. This bioburden, frequently undetectable via visual inspection and present in over 80% of chronic wounds,2 frequently causes infection and necessitates targeted intervention. By visualizing bacterial fluorescence, clinicians are equipped to: MolecuLight continues to build on a robust foundation of clinical evidence. With over 100 peer-reviewed publications demonstrating the utility and impact of its fluorescence imaging technology, this systematic review powerfully reinforces that managing bacterial burden is essential for effective wound care. It affirms that MolecuLight devices provide an invaluable and proven tool for clinicians to achieve this, by enabling more precise and targeted interventions that hold strong promise for improved healing trajectories and enhanced patient quality of life. The company remains dedicated to advancing wound care through innovative solutions that improve patient lives and reduce healthcare costs. About MolecuLight Corp. MolecuLight Corp. is a privately owned medical imaging company with a global presence that manufactures and commercializes the MolecuLight i:X® and DX™ wound imaging devices. These are the only Class II FDA-cleared point-of-care imaging devices for the real-time detection of elevated bacterial burden in wounds. They also provide accurate digital wound measurement for comprehensive wound management, supported by strong clinical evidence including over 100 peer-reviewed publications. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE MolecuLight
Yahoo
25-06-2025
- Yahoo
When Do Babies Become Conscious?
Jeffrey Lawson was born prematurely in February 1985. Shortly afterward, the newborn had to undergo heart surgery without anesthesia. He remained awake throughout the procedure, given only Pavulon, a muscle relaxant, to prevent movement. He died five weeks later. After Jeffrey Lawson's death, his mother was told that her son had been too young to tolerate anesthesia. And the anesthesiologist had attempted to reassure her that there was no evidence premature babies felt any pain. The Lawson family's story, famous in pain research, was not an anomaly. Until the 1980s, surgical procedures on infants were routinely performed with little or no anesthesia. Even clear defensive reactions to painful stimuli were considered to be mere reflexes. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] But more than 20 years after Jeffrey Lawson's operation, an international research team found evidence that the brains of newborn premature babies react to pain stimuli in a very similar way to those of adults. More specifically, the researchers observed an increased oxygen supply in parts of the cerebral cortex that were associated with conscious experience. This evidence of increased neuronal activity indicated that premature babies do indeed feel pain. Understanding the experiences of infants has presented a challenge to science. How do we know when infants consciously experience pain, for example, or a sense of self? When it comes to reporting subjective experience, 'the gold standard proof is self-report,' says Lorina Naci, a psychologist and a neuroscientist at Trinity College Dublin. But that's not possible with babies. Among the debates surrounding the developing mind is the question of when consciousness first emerges. And that question is tied to the scientific challenge of defining conscious experience. Various philosophical, psychological and neurobiological models have attempted to explain what it is and what underlies it. Investigating whether this phenomenon exists across early development may offer new insights and ways to assess theories of consciousness. Many scientists now recognize multiple types of consciousness and suspect that certain forms exist earlier than others in development. That insight has helped address some issues but has left others unresolved. 'The answer to the question of when children become conscious depends on what exactly is meant by consciousness,' says developmental psychologist Norbert Zmyj of TU Dortmund University in Germany. Broadly speaking, there are two camps among researchers when it comes to consciousness in early development, Naci says. Some take a strict view that consciousness emerges in early childhood and that a being is only conscious once it reaches a stage where it can demonstrate abilities such as decision-making and self-reflection. For example, one influential idea is that a mental state becomes conscious when a thought is directed toward it. So if you see a red apple and then think, 'I see a red apple,' you are conscious of this sensation because you have a higher-order thought that represents it. With that definition, consciousness only arises in the course of childhood because it requires higher thought processes. Another type to consider is the awareness of oneself as a distinct being, which emerges around 18 months. From about that age of one and a half, most toddlers who receive a dab of paint on their cheek without noticing it will, if then placed in front of a mirror, not only recognize themselves but also touch the affected area or point it out to others. 'The children obviously have an idea of themselves and compare it with their reflection,' Zmyj says. 'Younger children, on the other hand, see their reflection as a play partner or touch the spot in the mirror instead of their face.' The second camp of researchers thinks of consciousness in a broader way that includes what is sometimes called primary, or core, consciousness. That's the awareness of the present moment and of sensations. And in that framing, consciousness could be present much earlier in life. In a review paper published in 2023, Naci and her colleagues discussed behavioral evidence that infants experience some form of subjective sensation—or primary consciousness—shortly after birth. For example, newborns fixate on faces, contort their expression in response to pain and react to sounds in ways that indicate they distinguish their mother's voice from that of strangers. That last ability is notable because it implies learning and would require memory, which researchers also believe is critical to certain types of consciousness. The catch is that these examples could be explained away as automatic. Observing these behaviors is not enough to be confident about an infant's experiences of the world. 'We need better methods to study early consciousness, both to define it … and to detect it,' says neuroscientist Julia Moser of the University of Minnesota, who was a co-author of the 2023 review. To really understand conscious awareness, she and others argue, we need to look to the brain. The relationship between consciousness and perception is complicated. As just one example, people affected by 'blindsight' have sustained damage to their primary visual cortex, part of the brain's visual system. If you ask them whether they can recognize an object in their field of vision, they answer in the negative. But if you ask people with blindsight to guess where an object is located, in many cases, they can reach for it or at least point in the right direction. That ability suggests the brain is processing visual stimuli unconsciously, even though the person does not have the impression of seeing anything. Many experiments involve manipulating the visibility of an object with the hopes of identifying consistent patterns in brain activity that could be markers of conscious experience. For instance, in a typical experimental setup, people view two images in such rapid succession that the second effectively 'covers' the first in their perception. As a result, people do not report seeing the first image. In the first 200 to 300 milliseconds of visual processing, however, reactions do occur in sensory areas of the brain. Much like the blindsight cases, the brain is perceiving something that the person is not consciously aware of seeing. By tweaking these experiments, scientists have confirmed that a visual must appear for at least 300 milliseconds for people to perceive it correctly. That experience is accompanied by a synchronized, widely distributed brain response in the frontal and parietal lobes. This peak in the brain's response, measured by tracking electrical activity known as the P300 wave, is considered a reliable indication of conscious perception. A team of researchers based in France looked for such patterns in infants. The group included cognitive neuroscientist Stanislas Dehaene of the College of France and pediatrician Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz of the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research. In one study, the group used caps fitted with electrodes to record fluctuations in electrical brain activity in 80 children aged five months, 12 months or 15 months. While wearing these caps, the young participants saw faces on a screen for different lengths of time. These images were embedded in visual patterns to make them more difficult to detect. Using this setup, the researchers documented a slow brain wave in children aged one year and older that resembled the P300 brain response of adults—although it appeared much later than in adult participants. In five-month-old infants, the wave again appeared, albeit less pronounced and even more delayed than in the older babies. Based on this brain activity, the team concluded, infants as young as five months could have conscious visual impressions. Another way to explore the development of consciousness is to check for brain activity associated with this state in adulthood with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). For example, Naci and her colleagues have looked for the interplay of two brain networks: the frontoparietal and default mode networks. The frontal and parietal regions are part of the brain's dorsal attention and executive control networks, which support our ability to plan and work toward goals. These networks are also important to theoretical models of consciousness, such as global neuronal workspace theory. The default mode network, so named because it is active when we are not doing anything in particular, supports activities such as thinking about oneself and allowing one's mind to wander. In healthy adults, these areas have a complementary, coordinated relationship: one activates while the other is suppressed, and vice versa. By contrast, that back-and-forth does not play out as normal when people are under anesthesia or in a vegetative state. In a study published in 2022, Naci and her colleagues looked at measurements of the spontaneous brain activity of newborns at rest, which allowed the scientists to record the communication between neurons in different areas of the brain. Not only did they see the frontoparietal and default mode networks; they also found that the brain regions already exhibited a pattern of complementary activation. And in 2025 Naci and her colleagues published findings with another signature of brain activity linked to consciousness in adults. The team observed a pattern of brain connectivity associated with the efficient transfer of information called small-world architecture. They found that not only did full term newborns have this pattern of connectivity but that a majority of premature infants, born at 32 to 35 weeks, did as well—albeit in a less developed form. Meanwhile Moser and her colleagues have designed experiments that combine imaging with a specific task to observe whether the brain's hardware in utero is engaged in the same kinds of processes that are present in later life. Specifically, they used a method called fetal magnetoencephalography to measure brain activity in 56 healthy fetuses between the 25th and 40th week of pregnancy with sensors on the pregnant person's abdomen. The researchers then set up a classic experiment that was related to consciousness and involved rule violation: they played a repeating sequence of sounds, then altered this pattern to observe any changes in brain activity that might indicate awareness of that disruption. In their study, fetuses as young as 35 weeks showed changes in activity that suggest a recognition of the changed pattern. 'This is, for us, a sign of this very primary, sensory form of consciousness, because basically your brain was able to cover a memory span of more than a minute,' Moser says. 'Then your brain adapts its response to what has been learned.' Other studies by researchers such as Franziska Schleger of the University of Tübingen in Germany point in a similar direction. Based on brain activity, they saw evidence that newborns and fetuses notice when the number of sounds played changes. Still, Moser stresses that this work does not indicate that a fetus is conscious. 'A lot of the things we've been studying are sensory awareness,' she explains. These capacities could be early pieces of what will become conscious experience. There is also a notable anatomical boundary that limits when even the earliest forms of consciousness could arise. In 2020 Hugo Lagercrantz of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden observed that consciousness can only awaken when there are connections between brain areas called the thalamus and the cerebral cortex. The thalamus acts as a control center and transmits sensory signals to various areas of the cerebral cortex. The corresponding nerve fiber connections develop around the 24th week of pregnancy. From then on, according to Lagercrantz, consciousness is at least theoretically possible. But, he says, 'I'm not sure whether a fetus is really conscious yet. Most of the time, it sleeps, even if it reacts to pain, touch and the mother's voice.' After birth, it is a different story, as a child's expanded behavioral repertoire makes clear. A newborn can imitate their parents and react more strongly to human conversation than to other sounds, for instance. These can all be taken as signs of minimal consciousness. And Lagercrantz and Moser agree that consciousness does not emerge from one moment to the next but builds gradually. According to Moser, this fits in well with our understanding of development in other areas of cognition, such as memory. 'Most abilities grow gradually, even those that have little to do with cognition, such as the ability to see accurately or control muscles,' she says. Why would consciousness be an exception? This article originally appeared in Spektrum der Wissenschaft and was reproduced with permission.
