
South Korea moves to end 'baby exports,' state to take full responsibility
South Korea will officially end its decadeslong practice of allowing private agencies to handle adoptions and begin a new era in which the state takes primary responsibility for the process, grounded in public oversight and the protection of children's rights.
The shift is more than a bureaucratic change. It is a historical reckoning.
For over 70 years, beginning in the aftermath of the Korean War, South Korea sent more than 170,000 children overseas for adoption, a number some experts say is closer to 250,000 when unofficial records are considered. This made Korea one of the most prolific 'exporters' of children in the world.
Data and records show that countless children who did not truly need to be sent away were 'exported' for adoption.
"There are some babies that should not have been sent overseas for adoption," said Hellen Noh, professor emeritus of social welfare at Soongsil University.
Noh's research revealed that some adoptees were taken from their families under false pretenses. She told cases where hospitals told mothers their newborns had died or were too sick to survive, only to secretly hand those babies over to adoption agencies to be sent abroad.
Official paperwork was often forged or manipulated. Noh notes that it became 'almost customary' to label children as 'abandoned' even when they had known parents or relatives.
By the late 1980s, private adoption agencies were acquiring the majority of infants directly from hospitals. In 1988, about 60 percent of the children adopted out of Korea came straight from maternity wards, often through illicit arrangements between agencies and hospitals.
What's changing
Under the new system, domestic and international adoptions will be regulated separately by two new laws: the Special Act on Domestic Adoption and the Act on Intercountry Adoption.
Both were passed by the National Assembly in 2023 and come into force this Saturday. With these changes, the Ministry of Health and Welfare becomes the primary authority on adoption policy, while local governments and the National Center for the Rights of the Child will directly oversee procedures.
'From July 19, the state, local governments and the NCRC will carry out what private adoption agencies have handled until now,' the NCRC said in a written response. 'All procedures will be based on the best interests of the child, as laid out in the Hague Adoption Convention.'
The reforms reorganize how adoptions are handled from beginning to end, both domestically and internationally.
In domestic adoptions, local governments will identify and protect children in need of adoption before placement. Prospective adoptive parents will apply through the NCRC, which will assign certified agencies to conduct family counseling and home studies.
The Ministry of Health and Welfare's adoption policy committee will review and approve child-parent matches, with the NCRC serving as its secretariat. Courts will continue to issue final adoption approvals and now have the power to authorize temporary custody before final approval, to support early bonding.
In international adoptions, the state becomes the official 'central authority,' responsible for overseeing both outbound (Korean children abroad) and inbound (overseas children to Korea) adoptions. The Ministry of Health and Welfare negotiates procedures with other countries and monitors post-adoption welfare.
Certified agencies conduct screening and monitoring, while the courts finalize placements.
Children's participation is also newly enshrined in law. Courts must now listen to adoptees' views regardless of age, a change from the previous threshold of 13 years old.
Regarding the future of the private adoption agencies, their role in the adoption process would be eradicated.
"If they apply and pass as the ministry's outsourced social welfare institutions, they can work in certain parts but they will not have a special position in the process because they were once adoption agencies," a Health Ministry official confirmed.
'It's not just a system, it's our life'
While many adoptees have welcomed South Korea's adoption reform, they emphasize that for them, the issue is not just administrative — it is deeply personal.
'I think it's great to move all those files to the government,' said one adoptee who was sent to a European country as a child and requested anonymity. 'But there's real chaos in the adoptee community right now,' she said.
'We don't know what's going on with the file transfer. Are we sure they're really moving everything? Are they giving up on anything along the way? That's what we're scared of.'
Private adoption agency officials carry babies who are finalised for adoption on to a plane. - Photo: National Archives of Korea
For many adoptees, their adoption records — sometimes just a handwritten note or an intake form from decades ago — are the only remaining link to their birth families and origins. The nationalization of adoption has meant that these records are now being transferred from private agencies to the NCRC. But the process, some say, has been opaque and confusing.
'It's not just a document. It's about who we are. These documents are the only legacy we have from Korea," she emphasised.
Access to the files is also a growing issue. During the transition, adoptees have faced delays and uncertainty.
'For the past few months, we haven't been able to access anything. Not from the agencies, not from the NCRC,' she said. 'They need time to archive and organize the materials, and I understand that. But we need to be told what's happening.'
For her, the hope is that greater public awareness, stronger support systems, and more inclusive attitudes will lead to a future where children in need are embraced within Korean society.
"Korean society should see us as assets. Not discriminating (against) us by saying, 'Why don't you speak Korean?'" she added."It's not the pity look we need, we would love to hear how Korea is proud of us, how much they want us here, how much they welcome us."
Challenges ahead
Despite the landmark reform, structural and logistical challenges loom large.
As of mid-2025, the state has received original documents from only four major adoption agencies. Records held by many child welfare institutions remain unaccounted for. Even among those received, secure and permanent storage remains a challenge.
The NCRC had requested 2.4 billion won this year to establish proper storage facilities, but only 1.78 billion won was approved. A temporary archive has been established controversially, in a former logistics warehouse near Goyang's Jichuk Station.
'It's painful to hear that adoptees' documents, these irreplaceable pieces of their identity, are sitting in a remote warehouse with poor transportation access,' said Noh said.
The government has pledged to build a permanent adoption archive in the future, but no timeline has been announced. Meanwhile, access to records remains heavily restricted.
Under current law, adoptees may only obtain personal information about birth parents if the parents are deceased and the request meets a narrowly defined medical or legal threshold.
A constitutional review is now underway on whether such limits violate adoptees' right to know their origins.
'Adoption must be the last resort'
For Noh, the deeper issue is not how well the adoption system works but how little is done to prevent the need for adoption in the first place.
'Adoption is not the solution we should be working toward,' she said. 'What we need to build is a society where every family, regardless of its form, has the support to raise their own children.'
She pointed to the legacy of coercion and profit in South Korea's international adoption system.
'Too many children were sent abroad not because it was best for them, but because it sustained institutions and made money,' she said. 'That must never happen again.'
She also underscored the need for support services for struggling families, including single parents, disabled caregivers and low-income households, so that children are not separated due to poverty or stigma.
'If a child can grow up safely and lovingly in their birth family, that's what should happen,' she said. 'Only when that is impossible, and I mean truly impossible, should adoption be considered.'
South Korea, she added, must also confront its social biases.
'When a single mother wants to raise her child, she's often called selfish. There's no celebration, only shame. That has to change,' she said.
The shift to public adoption coincides with South Korea's long-delayed ratification of the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption, which is expected to take effect in late October.
The convention, adopted globally in 1993, seeks to prevent child trafficking and ensure ethical standards in international adoptions. Korea had joined the treaty in 2013 but failed to ratify it due to misalignment with domestic law, a gap now being closed through the 2023 legislation.
Still, the road ahead is uncertain. Many of the reforms will require further legislative action and budgetary support under the new administration following the June 3 presidential election. - The Korea Herald/ANN
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dundee University ‘fell well short', says interim boss in response to report
Previous management at the University of Dundee 'fell well short' of the standards expected of them, the interim boss has said in his response to a damning report. Former Glasgow Caledonian University principal Professor Pamela Gillies was asked to look into the culture, leadership and financial management at Dundee earlier this year after a £35 million black hole was discovered, leading the institution to consider cutting hundreds of jobs. The report found former principal Professor Iain Gillespie, who has since resigned, ex-interim principal Professor Shane O'Neill, and previous chief operating officer Jim McGeorge had acted as a 'triumvirate', making decisions amongst themselves, and it also questioned the quality of information about the university's finances given to other senior officials. In publishing the university's response to the report on Wednesday, interim principal Professor Nigel Seaton said: 'It was evident from the Gillies report that there had been clear failings in financial monitoring, leadership, and governance at the university. 'The entire UK higher education sector has been forced to deal with significant external factors in recent years but our university's response to these, and its management of finances, fell well short of the standards that everyone should have expected.' Dr Ian Mair, the acting chairman of the university court, said: 'The actions we propose to take in the short, medium and long term are designed to ensure the university has a sustainable future built upon strong governance, financial competence, transparency, and accountability. 'Our response provides detailed assurances to our stakeholders that the immediate, robust, and impactful action required to implement significant operational and cultural change is under way.' The response looked at the financial dealings of the university, its culture and governance, laying out short, medium and long-term actions to ensure its improvement. The appointment of a permanent principal, chief financial officer and chief operating officer could take up to 18 months, according to the response, which puts the hiring of the three roles in the 'longer term (12-18 months)' category. The replacement principal, the response said, must have 'experience of transformation and change and with a people-focused leadership style'. Prof Gillespie was criticised in the Gillies report for not consulting with staff, as well accusing him of 'hubris' in his leadership and being unable to take criticism. In the next six months, it is hoped a new chairman of the university court can be found, along with regular members of the body, including those with 'financial skills and experience'. The university said it will cancel or defer all 'non-essential capital projects' and use financial modelling to devise rolling five-year budget forecasts for key areas to get back on its feet financially. The response also pledged to listen more to staff and students, with a number of events already being planned to do so.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The John Cena retirement tour: Which opponents could be on deck?
The John Cena heel turn has come and gone, extinguished in a burst of color, like the end of winter in Narnia. Will the experiment prove to be a stain on the Cena retirement tour? Thankfully, there are enough dates left on the calendar that WWE really should be able to turn this around, particularly if the crowd reactions for Cena at 'SmackDown' and SummerSlam are anything to go by. When it comes to the next steps for the 17-time champion, the roster isn't short of worthy opponents, plenty of whom have history with Cena. And with at least three PLEs on the calendar — as well as a rumored special Saturday Night's Main Event in Cena's home state — there's enough time to spin a proper narrative and give us something to help extinguish the memories of WrestleMania 41. As for what that might look like, here's what we know is happening before Cena retires in December, as well as some likely (and less likely) options for the coming months: Logan Paul Those who follow the backstage politics of WWE will know the promotion has been keen to do John Cena vs. Logan Paul for a while now — at one point it was considered for last year's WrestleMania XL. Cena's big heel turn in March presumably forced it to put any plans on ice, with the creatives choosing to have the two heels team up at MITB instead to face Cody Rhodes and Jey Uso. With the deck finally reset, it's back to the original plan, as Cena and Paul meet at Clash in Paris in Cena's first singles match since dropping the Universal Championship. For all his prodigious in-ring work and superstar quality, it's still a big pat on the back for 'The Social Media Megastar' to be one of the few non-legacy names chosen to get his time with the GOAT of WWE. Then again, no one ever went broke betting on Logan Paul getting big opportunities in WWE. No doubt the two of them will deliver an enjoyable match at Clash itself, but I'd be surprised if the feud continues after their respective planes take off from France. Brock Lesnar After that ending to SummerSlam we all know this one is happening. We also know from his big promo on last week's 'SmackDown' that John Cena feels more than ready to take on 'The Beast' in what will be their first singles encounter since 2014. As for when the match is actually happening, we're still in the dark. Given Brock Lesnar hasn't always been that keen on traveling internationally — purely as a personal preference — the overseas shows were always unlikely, with Paris now off the table entirely. Indeed some reports say Cena vs. Lesnar will take place at an unconfirmed U.S.-based PLE in September. Given the massive reaction to their interaction at SummerSlam, perhaps there's a case for stringing this one out beyond that. Having 'The Beast Incarnate' hovering over Cena like a television show-style 'big bad' — perhaps emerging again after Cena beats someone else in September to deliver another F-5 — could help build anticipation for their eventual showdown. Gunther If the reports are to be believed, WWE has its eyes set on Gunther to serve as Cena's final opponent, with the match taking place at a special SNME (yet to be confirmed) in Massachusetts just before Christmas. On the face of it, you can't fault the plan. Who better to provide that final match than one of the most ferocious competitors — and a proudly old-fashioned wrestler too — on the current roster? It's certainly the kind of thing that would add to the prestige around Gunther: a man who likely has a good 10 years, at least, as an upper-card star. That said, we know WWE likes to mislead the fan base (and the media) with these supposed leaks. And does it really make sense to give Cena exactly the same final match as Goldberg — given the latter happened just two months ago? AJ Styles Given the focus on going 'one last time' with Cena's classic opponents, it's probably still more likely this match happens than not — even if we haven't yet seen any teases that the WWE is planning on doing Cena vs. Styles. Another dance between two of WWE's most accomplished stars of the 2010s would merit a spot on any of the remaining PLEs. Then there's the fact that Cena is also set for a one-off appearance on 'Raw' (probably his last appearance on that particular show before retirement) in Massachusetts in September: Could that be the moment that we get Styles vs. Cena? Who else might we see? After the colossal shock of the Lesnar return, we probably shouldn't rule out another unexpected opponent for Cena. He and Seth Rollins obviously have history, even if the latter has his hands full right now. Could they battle one last time? We also know Cena likes putting over the younger talents (don't forget his most recent singles matches pre-2025 were against Austin Theory and Solo Sikoa). With that in mind, maybe we should keep an eye on the likes of Bron Breakker and Dom Mysterio, either of whom could put on a future classic with babyface Cena. The chances of seeing Edge, Batista and The Rock feel like very remote possibilities right now (albeit for different reasons), certainly for any kind of in-ring stuff. But might they show up in some form in the final stages of the retirement run? We are literally dealing with wrestling history here, after all. Finally, it might be nice to see some kind of encounter with the Wyatt Sicks, given Cena has said himself how much he enjoyed working with the late Bray Wyatt. An actual match would almost certainly be overkill, but a spooky backstage interaction could be fun, particularly if it had a callback to the Firefly Fun House. What dates will Cena be working? According to WWE and the man himself, Cena has another 11 dates to go until he hangs up those boots in December. Although we obviously shouldn't discount the possibility that there's a secret plan to add an extra date, particularly given we're still expecting that last SNME to be announced. Either way, here are the shows that we know Cena will be appearing at: Aug. 22: 'SmackDown' (Dublin) Aug. 29: 'SmackDown' (Paris) Aug. 31 – Clash in Paris Sept. 5: 'SmackDown' (Chicago) Sept. 15: 'Raw' (Springfield, Massachusetts) Oct. 11: Crown Jewel: Perth (Australia) Nov. 29: Survivor Series (You can maybe add an asterisk on Crown Jewel: Perth as Cena isn't actually listed on the WWE website. However, he is named on the stadium's ticket sales platform. In the event that he isn't working that show, Perth might not be too happy about it …) That leaves four dates to go, with more likely candidates being: Sept. 20: WWE PLE (at least if reports are correct …) Oct. 10: 'SmackDown' (Perth, Australia) Nov. 28: 'SmackDown' (TBA, but likely San Diego, given Survivor Series) December TBA: 'SmackDown,' pre-SNME episode December TBA: special episode of SNME (Boston)
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's Why You Should Consider Selling Your Baxter (BAX) Shares
Parnassus Investments, an investment management firm that focuses on owning a concentrated portfolio of U.S. large-cap stocks, released its Parnassus Value Equity Fund second-quarter 2025 investor letter. The full letter is available for download here. For the second quarter of 2025, the fund reported a net return of 7.24%, outperforming its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index, which returned 3.79% for the same period. The fund's top 5 holdings are also listed in the letter, showing the firm's main investment positions heading into 2025. One of the companies mentioned in the letter is Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX). Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX), through its subsidiaries, provides a portfolio of healthcare products in the United States. Over the past month, Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX) fell by -16.45%, and its shares lost 35.47% of their value over the last 12 months. On August 12, 2025, Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX) shares closed at $23.98, with a market capitalization of $12.3 billion. Here is what they have to say about Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX) in their investor letter: "Despite Baxter International Inc.'s (NYSE:BAX) defensive characteristics, we became concerned about its capital allocation decisions, recent management changes and sensitivity to hospital budgets. We traded Baxter for Linde, where we see higher long-term risk-reward potential." A patient viewing their medical diagnosis on a digital healthcare ecosystem. Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX) is not included in our list of the 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds. According to our data, 36 hedge fund portfolios held positions in Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX) at the end of the first quarter of 2025, same with the previous quarter. BAX misses on earnings expectations as it reported an EPS of $0.59, missing expectations of $0.6. While we acknowledge the potential of BAX as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. In another article, we covered Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX) and Artisan Partners' views on the company. In addition, please check out our hedge fund investor letters Q2 2025 page for more investor letters from hedge funds and other leading investors. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data