Another federal judge strikes down Trump's ban on trans people in the military: ‘Plainly discriminates'
A second federal judge has blocked Donald Trump 's ban on transgender service members in the U.S. military, a 'plainly' discriminatory directive with 'no evidence' to support the administration's claims, according to the ruling.
'The government's arguments are not persuasive, and it is not an especially close question on this record,' George W. Bush-appointed District Judge Benjamin Settle wrote in a 65-page opinion Thursday.
— one of several that explicitly removes federal recognition of trans people — claims that the 'adoption of a gender identity inconsistent with an individual's sex conflicts with a soldier's commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one's personal life.'
'The government has … provided no evidence supporting the conclusion that military readiness, unit cohesion, lethality, or any of the other touchstone phrases long used to exclude various groups from service have in fact been adversely impacted by open transgender service,' Settle wrote.
'The Court can only find that there is none,' he said.
Settle's decision — the second nationwide injunction targeting the Trump administration's policy — follows a lawsuit from the Human Rights Campaign Foundation and Lambda Legal representing seven actively serving trans troops.
'Transgender service members meet the same rigorous standards and requirements as any other soldier and this ban does nothing other than compromise our country's national security for the sole purpose of discrimination,' Human Rights Campaign Foundation legal vice president Sarah Warbelow said in a statement after the decision.
The decision 'affirms what we have long maintained: that banning Americans from military service solely because they are transgender is not only unconstitutional but undermines our national security and military readiness,' according to Lambda Legal counsel Kell Olson. 'These brave individuals deserve to be judged on their ability to serve, just like everyone else. While this injunction is an important step forward, we continue to fight until this discriminatory ban is permanently struck down.'
Last month, the Department of Defense ordered that the removal of all trans service members across all branches of the military 'must be completed' no later than June 25. The order also immediately bans access to gender-affirming care for all trans service members.
Following a separate lawsuit from more than 20 plaintiffs, including decorated trans service members, Washington, D.C., District Judge Ana Reyes temporarily blocked what she called a policy that is 'soaked with animus and dripping with pretext' to discriminate against trans people.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Pentagon officials scrambled to issue new guidance, but District Judge Ana Reyes ruled this week that the government's arguments supporting the changes — which scrutinized service members' history of gender dysphoria — were 'equally unpersuasive.'
'Defendants cannot evade discriminating against transgender people simply by labeling the policy as addressing gender dysphoria,' she wrote in a scorching opinion Wednesday.
The Trump administration has appealed both rulings.
'Thousands of transgender service members currently serving have clearly demonstrated they meet all military standards, with many deployed to critical missions worldwide, proving their capabilities beyond question,' according to Jennifer Levi, senior director of transgender and queer rights at GLAD Law, which is suing the Trump administration on behalf of two dozen trans service members.
'President Trump's executive order and Secretary Hegseth's implementation represent a policy that cannot be constitutionally justified,' she added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
How RFK Jr. is quickly changing U.S. health agencies
WASHINGTON — In just a few short months, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has begun to transform U.S. health policy: shrinking staff at health agencies, restructuring the focus of some regulators and researchers, changing Covid vaccine regulations and reshaping the mission of his department to focus more on alternative medicine. The directives are all part of the same issue set that drove a slice of health-conscious, left-leaning Americans to eventually vote for a Republican president whose favorite meal is from McDonald's, Trump and Kennedy catered to a type of voter who has grown distrustful of America's health care establishment — but possibly fomented a new type of distrust in federal health policy along the way. Bernadine Francis, a lifelong Democrat who backed Joe Biden for president in 2020 before supporting Donald Trump in 2024, told NBC News in an interview that she approves of Kennedy's efforts so far, despite his 'hands being tied' by entrenched forces in the administration and in Congress. 'From what I have seen so far with what RFK has been trying to do,' she said, 'I am really, really proud of what he's doing.' Francis is among the voters who left the Democratic Party and voted for Trump because 'nothing else mattered' apart from public health, which they — like Kennedy — felt was going in the wrong direction. Concerns about chemicals in food and toxins in the environment, long championed by Democrats, has become a galvanizing issue to a key portion of Trump's Republican Party, complete with an oversaturation of information that in some cases hasn't been proven. It's wrapped up, as well, in concerns about the Covid vaccine, which was accelerated under Trump, administered under Biden and weaponized by anti-vaccine activists like Kennedy amid lockdowns and firings in the wake of the devastating pandemic. 'We knew in order to get RFK in there so he can help with the situation that we have in the health industry, we knew we had to do this,' said Francis, a retired Washington, D.C., public school administrator, who said she left her 'beloved' career because she had refused the vaccine. 'It seemed to me, as soon as [Biden] became president, the vaccine was mandated, and that was when I lost all hope in the Democrats,' Francis told NBC News, referring to vaccination mandates put in place by the Biden administration for a large portion of the federal workforce during the height of the pandemic. There are not currently any federal Covid vaccine mandates. There have been 1,228,393 confirmed Covid deaths in the United States since the start of the pandemic, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. How RFK Jr.'s picks are changing public health agencies Dr. Marty Makary, Kennedy's hand-picked commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration and a John Hopkins scientist and researcher, told NBC News in an interview that he wants to transform the agency, which he said faced 'corruption' over influence from the pharmaceutical and food industries. 'I mean, you look at the food pyramid, it was not based on what's best for you, it was based on what companies wanted you to buy,' he said, referring to the 1992 and later iterations of official government nutritional guidance. He said there would be 'entirely new nutrition guidance' released later this year, as soon as this summer. He praised the FDA's mission of research and regulation, saying the agency is 'incredibly well-oiled, and we've got the trains running on time.' He also highlighted the 75-page 'Make America Healthy Again' commission report — which focused on ultraprocessed foods and toxins in the environment — as having set 'the agenda for research' at the FDA, HHS and agencies overseeing social safety net programs such as Medicare and food stamps moving forward. (The MAHA report initially cited some studies that didn't exist, a mistake that Kennedy adviser Calley Means said was a 'great disservice' to their mission.) 'I think there's a lot we're going to learn. For example, the microbiome, which gets attention in the MAHA report, needs to be on the map. We don't even talk about it in our medical circles,' Makary said. 'The microbiome, food is medicine, the immune response that happens when chemicals that don't appear in nature go down our GI tract.' Pressed on other areas of the administration, like the Environmental Protection Agency, making decisions that run counter to the pro-regulatory ideas presented in the MAHA report, Makary said he can 'only comment on the FDA' where they are 'committed to Secretary Kennedy's vision.' But Kennedy's public health agenda goes beyond looking at the food supply and chemicals. Recently, Kennedy said in a video posted on X last month that the Covid vaccine is no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women, a change in CDC guidance that skipped the normal public review period. Days later, after critics questioned the decision and raised concerns over a lack of public data behind the move, the administration updated its guidance again, urging parents to consult with their doctors instead. Pressed about the confusion and whether Americans are now trading one side of public distrust in the health system for another, Makary defended Kennedy, who has been criticized for spreading misinformation. 'My experience with Secretary Robert F. Kennedy is that he listens. He listens to myself, he listens to Jay Bhattacharya, listens to Dr. Mehmet Oz, he listens to a host of scientists that are giving him guidance,' Makary argued, referring to the director of the National Institutes of Health and the administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, respectively. 'So he may have big questions, but the questions he's asking are the questions most Americans are asking.' The intersection of medicine and healthy lifestyle choices Dr. Dawn Mussallem, a breast cancer oncologist and integrative medicine doctor — a physician who combines conventional treatments with research-based alternative therapies — has tried to help her patients wade through medical misinformation they encounter online and in their social circles. Mussallem has an incredible story of personal survival: While in medical school, she was diagnosed with Stage IV cancer and, after conventional therapies like chemo saved her life, was diagnosed with heart failure. After undergoing a heart transplant, Mussallem ran a 26-mile marathon just one year later. 'I learned a lot in medical school, but nothing compared to what I learned being a patient,' said Mussallem, who dedicates, on average, 90 minutes each in one-on-one sessions with her patients. 'This is not about any one political choice. But we know lifestyle matters.' For example, a new study from the American Society of Clinical Oncology that finds eating food that lowers inflammation in the body may help people with advanced colon cancer survive longer. Mussallem's mission, along with her colleagues, is to elevate the modern medicine that saved her life, as well as encouraging her patients to live healthy lifestyles, including regular exercise, minimally processed foods, less screen time, more social connection and better sleep. But politics do get in the way for millions of Americans who are inundated daily with social media influencers and 'nonmedical experts,' as Mussallem puts it, who stoke fear in her patients. 'Patients come in with all these questions, fears,' she said. 'I've heard this many times from patients, that their nervous system is affected by what they're seeing happening in government.' Mussallem acknowledges that 'a lot of individuals out there' have questioned traditional medicine. For her, it isn't one or the other — it's both. 'We have to trust the conventional medicine,' she said. 'With the conventional care that marches right alongside more of an integrative modality to look at the root causes of disease, as well as to help to optimize with lifestyle, is where we need to be.'
NBC News
9 hours ago
- NBC News
Mahmoud Khalil responds to 'grotesque' charges in new legal filing, says arrest caused 'irreparable harm'
Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University student detained in March by immigration agents, responded for the first time to the charges against him and described the "irreparable harm" his arrest has had on him and his family. "I have suffered—and continue to suffer—as a result of the government's actions against me," he said in a declaration included in a letter his legal team filed on Thursday in support of his bid for a preliminary injunction in his federal case. "The most immediate and visceral harms I have experienced directly relate to the birth of my son, Deen. Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone," Khalil said. "I listened to her pain, trying to comfort her while 70 other men slept around me. When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep." His wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, was eight months pregnant when Khalil was arrested March 8 at his New York apartment building. She said she had requested his presence at the birth but was denied by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Khalil said that not being able to see his family has been "devastating." In his declaration, he condemned the White House and President Donald Trump over the "grotesque and false" claims made against him. Khalil was targeted for deportation after he helped organize pro-Palestinian rallies on the university's campus. He is being held at a facility in rural Jena, Louisiana. A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said in a statement that "it is a privilege to be granted a visa or green card to live and study in the United States of America." "When you advocate for violence, glorify and support terrorists that relish the killing of Americans, and harass Jews, take over buildings and deface property, that privilege should be revoked, and you should not be in this country," the statement added. DHS said Khalil was granted a contact visit with his wife and son before his court appearance and has been given the option of self-deporting. The Department of Justice declined to comment, and ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment. "It is hard to describe the humiliation and pain of seeing mugshot-style images of myself circulated from the highest levels of the U.S. government—accompanied by inflammatory language, grotesque and false accusations, and open celebration of my deportation," Khalil said in the declaration. "These were not just attacks on my character; they were efforts to erase my humanity." Khalil said his wife and family have also been subjected to harassment after the government labeled him a "U.S. foreign policy concern" and accused him of supporting Hamas. He said the allegations against him are false and "deeply racist." Khalil's attorney said in the letter that his arrest has damaged his reputation and "severely" undermined his pursuit of one day working in international diplomacy and human rights advocacy. Khalil said he had accepted a position at Oxfam International as a policy advisor, but the job offer was revoked. "I strongly believe that the Rubio Determination, my arrest and detention—and the public stigma that followed— played a significant role in this decision," he said. "I was not surprised; roles like this depend on your reputation." Oxfam International did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday. In a separate declaration, Khalil's wife described how she is "afraid for our safety." "Mahmoud's case has impacted every aspect of our life," she said. "I have experienced Islamophobia my whole life as a Muslim woman who wears a hijab, but it has been amplified by Mahmoud's detention and ongoing case. Mahmoud's and my careers, our desire for a stable life, and Deen's future will forever be impacted by these false allegations against him."
The Guardian
11 hours ago
- The Guardian
Men appear in court over fires at properties linked to Keir Starmer
Two men charged with arson over fires at homes and a car linked to Keir Starmer made their first appearance at a crown court on Friday. The Ukrainian national Roman Lavrynovych, 21 and the Ukrainian-born Romanian national Stanislav Carpiuc, 26, appeared at the Old Bailey in London via video link from Belmarsh prison. Petro Pochynok, 34, a Ukrainian national, refused to leave his cell and did not appear in court. Lavrynovych has been charged with three counts of arson with intent to endanger life, while Pochynok and Carpiuc are accused of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life. Last month, a spate of fires occurred across north London at properties and a car linked to the prime minister. One took place at the Starmer's family home in north-west London, which he lets to his sister-in-law. A car that Starmer sold to a neighbour last year was set alight four days earlier on the same street. On 11 May, firefighters dealt with a small fire at the front door of a house where the Labour leader is understood to have lived in the 1990s before it was converted into flats. Lavrynovych, speaking via a Ukrainian interpreter, confirmed his name and date of birth to the court. Carpiuc also confirmed his name and date of birth. Lavrynovych said the court was 'very, very hushed' after he was asked by his interpreter whether he could hear the room well. His barrister also mentioned concerns around his health: 'I've already spoken to his mother to see if we could get his health records as well. He has heart issues [that] need to be looked into immediately.' Pochynok's barrister said he last saw the defendant a week ago and had 'no explanation as to why he has refused to leave his cell'. Carpiuc was arrested last month at Luton airport. At a previous hearing, the court heard he had lived in the UK for nine years and had recently finished a two-year business studies degree at Canterbury Christ Church University. He was working in construction and living in east London at the time of his arrest. Lavrynovych was the first person to be arrested and charged. The BBC reported that he worked as a builder and roofer. All three defendants were remanded in custody to next appear for a plea and trial preparation hearing at the same court on 17 October. A fourth person, a 48-year-old man, was arrested by police at Stansted airport on Monday on suspicion of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life in connection with the incidents. The Metropolitan police said he had been released on bail until next month. A provisional trial date was set for 27 April next year.
