logo
Money for foreign animal disease prevention is vital for US agriculture

Money for foreign animal disease prevention is vital for US agriculture

USA Today06-02-2025

Money for foreign animal disease prevention is vital for US agriculture | Opinion The bird flu outbreak is just the latest warning that our food security depends on healthy flocks and herds nationwide.
American farmers and ranchers undertake incredible responsibilities to feed and fuel our country and the world. They work from sunup to sundown to ensure that our grocery stores and meat counters are fully stocked and that we can enjoy nutritious meals. Yet, American agriculture faces a multitude of threats to this core mission.
Regulations like Waters of the United States saddle our producers with regulatory uncertainty. High input costs caused by inflation squeeze margins. Low commodity prices hamstring farm income. The death tax threatens to end rural traditions and put family farms out of business permanently. Taken together, these challenges make farming and ranching — already demanding professions — even more difficult.
An additional, covert — yet extremely alarming — threat that requires our constant attention is the spread of foreign animal disease within our borders.
The most recent data from the federal government confirms that more than 147 million birds — mainly chickens and turkeys — have been affected by bird flu, and over 11,000 wild birds have tested positive for the virus. To contain further spread, tens of millions of birds have been depopulated, causing egg prices to skyrocket and leaving poultry and egg producers with major uncertainty about the path forward.
We must also remain vigilant about the threats lurking at our doorstep, such as African Swine Fever. According to research conducted at Iowa State University, African Swine Fever would cause nearly $80 billion in economic losses for the pork and beef industries, cut 60,000 American jobs, and lead to a reduction in pork and beef prices anywhere between 50% and 60%.
The bird flu outbreak is just the latest warning that our food security depends on healthy flocks and herds nationwide. It's the responsibility of lawmakers — particularly those of us on the U.S. House Committee on Agriculture — to do more to support the surveillance, prevention, and mitigation of foreign animal disease outbreaks.
In August, the day before spending time at the Farm Progress Show in Boone, Iowa, we had the unique opportunity to tour the Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory Iowa State University in Ames, which is one of only 11 fully accredited Tier 1 labs within the National Animal Healthy Laboratory Network. We met with veterinarians, diagnosticians and veterinary toxicologists to learn more about how they test animal samples to detect various illnesses and diseases. The lab also works closely with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service on prevention, surveillance, and mitigation initiatives.
In the farm bill we passed out of the Agriculture Committee with bipartisan support last May, we acknowledged the importance of foreign animal disease prevention and response by fully funding the three-legged stool: the laboratory network, the National Animal Disease Preparedness and Response Program, and the National Animal Vaccine and Veterinary Countermeasures Bank. The three-legged stool of animal health supports on-farm biosecurity efforts, vaccine stockpiles, diagnostic test kits, emergency response, and farm education initiatives on foreign animal disease prevention and mitigation. Coordination among local, state and federal partners; farmers and ranchers; our university systems; and other pertinent stakeholders is vital to keeping animal diseases out of our country and responding to emergencies in an effective and efficient manner.
The Beagle Brigade Act, signed into law on Jan. 6, calls for the National Detector Dog Training Center to train dogs, including beagles, to inspect cargo, baggage, and vehicles at our borders and detect foreign diseases that pose a significant threat to agriculture. These detection measures at our border and other ports of entry protect American agriculture from a scourge of disease outbreaks, safeguard the health and well-being of livestock and poultry, and keep our farmers, ranches, and producers financially whole.
While our work to prevent and combat the spread of foreign animal disease never truly ends, investments like those in last year's committee-passed farm bill are crucial to responding to the current bird flu outbreak and keeping African Swine Flu and foot-and-mouth disease out of our hog confinements and cattle yards. Representing agricultural producers in Iowa and Pennsylvania, and advocating for American farmers in all 50 states, we recommit our efforts to passing the farm bill and ensuring that President Donald Trump can sign it into law as quickly as possible.
We cannot ignore the current crisis nor wait for the next to take decisive action for the good of American agriculture.
G.T. Thompson, a Pennsylvania Republican, chairs the U.S. House Agriculture Committee. Randy Feenstra, who represents Iowa's 4th Congressional District, is a member of the committee.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump
Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump

Time​ Magazine

time16 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump

The breakdown in relations between President Donald Trump and his one-time ally Elon Musk has played out over social media in spectacular fashion, with the two engaging in a tit-for-tat spat. The row initially started over politics. Musk expressed his vehement disapproval of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and encouraging people to 'kill the bill.' Meanwhile, Trump maintained that the fall-out was prompted by Musk being upset over the removal of electric vehicle subsidies —a provision that made Tesla vehicles more affordable. But the fight has since taken a far more personal turn, bolstered by Musk's allegation that Trump is listed in the files related to the late financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk said in a post shared via his social media platform, X. He did not provide evidence pertaining to this. The accusation has spurred Democrats to chase the full unsealing of the Epstein files. California Rep. Robert Garcia and Massachusetts Rep. Stephen F. Lynch—Democratic members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform—sent a letter on June 5 to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Kash Patel. 'We write with profound alarm at allegations that files relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have not been declassified and released to the American public because they personally implicate President Trump,' read the letter titled 'Is Trump Suppressing The Epstein Files?' The White House responded, saying that the move by the Oversight Committee members was 'another baseless stunt that bears no weight in fact or reality.' Here's what to know about the Epstein files and the renewed push to declassify them following Musk's allegation. What do we know about the Epstein files so far? On Feb. 27, Bondi released more than 100 pages of declassified documents related to Epstein—as part of the Trump Administration's vow to be more transparent regarding the high-profile case. During the presidential election, Trump promised to appease the clamoring for the alleged 'client list' of Epstein's since his arrest and subsequent death by suicide in 2019. Though Bondi called this the 'first phase' of declassified files, people were underwhelmed by the published pages, as much of the text had been redacted. Bondi's release included Epstein's 'black book,' which had previously been published. It featured names like Trump and former President Bill Clinton, but as the New York Times reported, there were people in the book with whom Epstein had never even met, and thus listed names are not necessarily connected to Epstein's activities. One of the only never-before-seen documents included in the release was an 'Evidence List' of catalogued evidence obtained by investigators. Bondi blamed the FBI for the fact that the report was incomplete, suggesting in a published letter to Patel that the FBI had more information related to Epstein. Bondi ordered Patel to deliver the rest of the investigation documents and 'conduct an immediate investigation' to understand why she had only received parts of the files. There is much discussion as to whether a fully-fledged 'Epstein client list' even exists. Jacob Shamsian, Business Insider's legal correspondent who has covered the Epstein case for years, said via social media on Feb. 27: 'I should also point out that the 'Jeffrey Epstein client list' does not exist and makes no sense on multiple levels (you think he made a list???). But if Pam Bondi wants to prove me wrong, I welcome it.' Will the Musk allegations prompt the release of further Epstein files? Musks' allegations have brought the Epstein files back into the spotlight, but there were already calls for them to be published in full. In April, Trump was asked by a reporter about when the next phase of the files are due to be released, to which he responded: 'I don't know. I'll speak to the Attorney General about that. I really don't know.' Since then, Democrats have continued to push for more documents to be released. Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman of New York released a statement in May, 'demanding that [Bondi] promptly release the Jeffrey Epstein Files in full.' Spurred by Musk's allegation, Democrats including Garcia, Goldman, and Lynch are now renewing these calls for more transparency. But it remains to be seen whether or not the pressure will be enough for Bondi, Patel, or Trump to provide more answers. What do we know about Trump's relationship with Epstein? Trump's connection to Epstein dates back decades. In a 2002 interview with New York magazine, he famously said that Epstein was 'a lot of fun to be with.' 'It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump told the reporter. In July 2019, NBC News' TODAY released unearthed video footage believed to be from 1992, which showed Trump greeting Epstein at his Mar-a-Lago estate. The two men could be seen laughing as they engaged in conversation. After Epstein's 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Trump made strides to distance himself. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office in 2019, Trump said: 'I had a falling out with him [Epstein]. I haven't spoken to him in 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you.'

Lululemon Stretched by Tariffs, Macro
Lululemon Stretched by Tariffs, Macro

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lululemon Stretched by Tariffs, Macro

Lululemon beat Wall Street's top- and bottom-line expectations, but it cut guidance over macroeconomic concerns. The company's international business posted solid growth, but the Americas region was weak. Lululemon is taking steps to mitigate the impact of tariffs, but until U.S. consumer confidence grows, there is little the company can do to bounce back. 10 stocks we like better than Lululemon Athletica Inc. › Here's our initial take on Lululemon Athletica's (NASDAQ: LULU) financial report. Metric Q1 2024 Q1 2025 Change vs. Expectations Revenue $2.2 billion $2.4 billion 7.3% Beat Earnings per share $2.54 $2.60 2% Beat Comparable sales 6% 1% -500 bps n/a Gross margin 57.7% 58.3% 60 bps n/a Athletic apparel specialist Lululemon beat Wall Street top- and bottom-line expectations for the quarter, delivering 7.3% revenue growth and a slight uptick in earnings per share. But CEO Calvin McDonald warned of a "dynamic macroenvironment" that the company expects to weigh on results in the quarters to come. First, the good news. Revenue growth came in toward the top of Lululemon's guidance, fueled by strong 6% international comparable sales. Overall international net revenue increased by 19%, or 20% when adjusted for currency fluctuations. But Americas comp sales were down 2% and overall revenue was up by just 3%, pressured by an uncertain American consumer. Lululemon does not expect those pressures to ease in the months to come. The company cut its full-year guidance, saying it now expects to earn between $14.58 and $14.78 per share. That's down from its previous $14.95 to $15.15 per share guidance, and below Wall Street's $14.89 consensus estimate. The somber tone and cut guidance appeared to have caught investors off guard. Lululemon shares, already down 11% for the year heading into earnings, were down 20% in after-hours trading ahead of the New York open Friday. McDonald pledged to "leverage our strong financial position and competitive advantages to play offense, while we continue to invest in the growth opportunities in front of us." Lululemon has the wherewithal to weather this storm, but there is only so much the company can do in this environment. Chief financial officer Meghan Frank, on the post-earnings call, said the company is looking to take "strategic price increases" to mitigate the impact of tariffs, as well as evaluating sourcing options. But any efficiency gains made will take time to play out. The good news for investors is Lululemon market share held up well in a rough environment, which implies there is nothing wrong with the brand. But until there is more certainty on the macro front, Lululemon stock could be stuck in neutral. Full earnings report Investor relations page Additional coverage Before you buy stock in Lululemon Athletica Inc., consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lululemon Athletica Inc. wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Lou Whiteman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Lululemon Athletica Inc. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Lululemon Stretched by Tariffs, Macro was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

If Elon Musk's Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across America, How Much Money Would Every Person Get?
If Elon Musk's Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across America, How Much Money Would Every Person Get?

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

If Elon Musk's Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across America, How Much Money Would Every Person Get?

We've seen the headlines that reveal how rich the world's top billionaires are — but it's hard to comprehend just how rich they are. Consider this: Let's say you had $1 billion in your bank account and had to spend $100,000 every day, for an entire year. After 365 days, you would still have $963,500,000 (nine hundred sixty-three million five hundred thousand). Discover More: Find Out: Over the last two decades, billionaires have ballooned their wealth to unparalleled levels. In 2005, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates ranked as the world's richest person, with a net worth of $46.5 billion, as reported by CNN. Today, that title belongs to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, whose net worth stands at $368 billion as of June 5, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Even when adjusted for inflation, Gates' former net worth would be equivalent to roughly $76 billion in today's dollars. It is worth noting that other billionaires have also increased their wealth during the same time. For instance, tech billionaires Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos are worth $229 billion and $227 billion, ranking second and third globally. For many Americans, this trend is not sitting well. The sky-high cost of living has catalyzed support for redistributive tax policies, especially among younger voters and the progressive base of the Democratic Party. While higher taxation may or may not happen in the years to come, here's hypothetically how much you'd get if the world's richest man gives a check to every American. The United States Census Bureau estimates the current population to be around 341 million people, ranking only behind India and China. If Musk's enormous $368 billion were equally divided in the U.S., each person would receive $1,079 (rounded to the nearest dollar). A couple would receive $2,158, while a family of four would get $4,316. Despite the enormous wealth of billionaires, much of their fortune is tied up in stocks, real estate, and other holdings. Only a small percentage of their assets is held in cash. Based on data from Forbes, Musk has a 12% ownership stake in Tesla and to date, he remains the largest shareholder in the $1.15 trillion electric vehicle company. This is in addition to a 42% slice in SpaceX and a 54% interest in xAI, among many other businesses. Interestingly, Bloomberg reported that Musk's financial holdings appreciated by 77% after joining the campaign trail with President Donald Trump late last year, as reported by Bloomberg. Investors became bullish on Tesla and Musk became the first person to ever reach a net worth exceeding $400 billion. Since then, Tesla's market value has fluctuated as a result of volatile market conditions, macroeconomic factors and the threat of a global trade war. Editor's note: Data is accurate as of June 5 and is subject to change. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Says Trump's Executive Order To Lower Medication Costs Has a 'Real Shot' -- Here's Why This article originally appeared on If Elon Musk's Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across America, How Much Money Would Every Person Get?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store