logo
Worm-Inspired Treatments Inch Toward the Clinic

Worm-Inspired Treatments Inch Toward the Clinic

Medscapea day ago

The experiment was a striking attempt to investigate weight control. For 6 weeks, a group of mice gorged on lard-enriched mouse chow, then scientists infected the mice with worms. The worms wriggled beneath the animals' skin, migrated to blood vessels that surround the intestines, and started laying eggs.
Bruno Guigas, a molecular biologist at the Leiden University Center for Infectious Diseases in the Netherlands, led this study some years back and the results, he says, were 'quite spectacular.' The mice lost fat and gained less weight overall than mice not exposed to worms. Within a month or so, he recalls, the scientists barely needed their scale to see that the worm-infested mice were leaner than their worm-free counterparts. Infection with worms, it seems, reversed obesity, the researchers reported in 2015.
While it's true that worms gobble up food their hosts might otherwise digest, that doesn't seem to be the only mechanism at work here. There's also some intricate biology within the emerging scientific field of immunometabolism.
Over the past couple of decades, researchers have recognized that the immune system doesn't just fight infection. It's also intertwined with organs like the liver, the pancreas and fat tissue, and implicated in the progression of obesity and type 2 diabetes. These and other metabolic disorders generate a troublesome immune response — inflammation — that worsens metabolism still further. Metabolic disease, in other words, is inflammatory disease.
Scientists have also observed a metabolic influence of worms in people who became naturally infected with the parasites or were purposely seeded with worms in clinical trials. While the physiology isn't fully understood, the worms seem to dampen inflammation, as discussed in the 2024 Annual Review of Nutrition .
'We're never going to cure or treat metabolic disease with worm infections,' says Guigas. They cause unpleasant side effects like nausea, and it would be impractical to dose millions of people with parasites. But worms can be valuable tools for scientists to understand the feedback between inflammation and metabolism. The findings could inspire more traditional, less ick-inducing treatments.
The Worms' Good Turns
The worms we're talking about are helminths such as flukes and roundworms. While they've largely been eliminated from developed nations, an estimated 1.5 billion people worldwide carry them. They can be dangerous in high numbers, and cause symptoms such as diarrhea and malnutrition in those at high risk, including children and immunocompromised individuals, and during pregnancy.
But for most people, infection with a few worms is pretty benign. 'Throughout human evolution, I think, there's been this nice sort of truce,' says Paul Giacomin, an immunologist at James Cook University in Cairns, Australia. As part of that detente, he says, helminths evolved molecules that tell the human immune system, 'I'm not here, don't worry about me.' In turn, people might have evolved to depend a bit on worms to temper inflammation.
Today, metabolic disease is a massive global problem, with obesity affecting an estimated 890 million people. Another 580 million have type 2 diabetes, which arises when the hormone insulin, which controls blood sugar levels, is in short supply or the body's cells become insensitive to it.
Links between metabolic disease and worm infection emerged from research on human populations. Studies in Australia, Turkey, Brazil, China, India and Indonesia showed that people with metabolic conditions such as diabetes were less likely to have helminth infections, and vice versa. 'This observation is quite strong,' says Ari Molofsky, an immunologist at the University of California, San Francisco.
Going a step further, scientists observed what happened when they provided deworming treatments.' The overwhelming majority of the studies showed that deworming worsens your metabolic health,' says Giacomin.
Scientists looked to lab mice for additional clues. Molofsky and colleagues, in 2011, reported that when they infected mice on high-fat food with the gut worm Nippostrongylus brasiliensis , the infection improved blood sugar control. Similarly, in Guigas' study, published in 2015, the worms — blood flukes called Schistosoma mansoni — improved not just weight, but also blood sugar processing. And the worms needn't be alive: Even molecules collected from crushed worm eggs improved metabolism.
The going hypothesis is that metabolic problems kick off a vicious immunometabolic cycle. First, Guigas says, damaged cells in metabolic organs cry for help, releasing molecular signals that call in immune cells. When the immune cells arrive, they morph into forms that promote a type of inflammation called Th1. Th1 responses are good at combating viruses, but they're the wrong choice here. Th1 can aggravate metabolic problems by impairing insulin manufacture, altering insulin signaling and amplifying insulin resistance.
Thus, instead of helping, the immune cells cause further stress in the metabolic tissues. So the tissues call in more immune cells — and the cycle repeats.
Worms seem to break the cycle. In great part, that's probably because their 'I'm not here' message causes a different kind of immune response, Th2, that dampens the Th1 reaction and re-normalizes the system. Other mechanisms might also be at work: Worms might reduce appetite; it's known they can alter gut microbes; and Guigas suspects they can also manipulate creatures' metabolisms via non-immune pathways.
'The parasitic worms are real masters at controlling inflammation,' says Giacomin, who coauthored an article on helminths and immunity in the 2021 Annual Review of Immunology . Thus, scientists interested in controlling immunometabolic disease might take cues from these wriggly little metabolic masterminds. In fact, researchers have already tested helminths to control inflammation in autoimmune conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease.
The accumulating evidence linking worms to metabolic benefits in animals and people inspired Giacomin and colleagues to conduct a trial of their own. Commencing in 2018, they decided to try the hookworm Necator americanus in 27 obese people who had insulin resistance, putting them at risk for type 2 diabetes. The researchers applied worm larvae in patches on the subjects' arms; after passing through the skin, the worms would travel through the blood stream, to the lungs and then to the small intestine. An additional 13 participants were assigned to placebo patches with Tabasco sauce to mimic the itch of entering worms.
N americanus is a common cause of hookworm infections across much of the world. While most cases are asymptomatic, the time when the worms are attaching to the intestinal wall can cause symptoms like nausea and low iron levels, especially if there are a lot of worms. So the main goal was to determine if the treatment was safe, trying doses of 20 or 40 worms. Many subjects suffered short-term unpleasantness such as bloating or diarrhea as they adjusted to their new intestinal tagalongs, but overall, most did fine.
After 12 months, the people who got hookworms had lower insulin resistance and reduced fasting blood sugar levels. After two years, those who received 20 worms had lost an average of 11 pounds — though not all individuals lost weight, and some gained.
'It was quite convincing that the worms were having some sort of beneficial effect,' says Giacomin. The subjects were convinced too: When the study was over, the researchers offered deworming, but most participants elected to keep their worms.
Giacomin and Guigas hope to identify worm components or invent worm-inspired molecules to produce similar effects without whole parasites. Giacomin cofounded a company, Macrobiome Therapeutics in Cairns, to develop hookworm molecules into treatments. Such medications might be based on the wriggly parasites, but they'd be an easier pill to swallow.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Primary Progressive MS: Myths vs. Facts
Primary Progressive MS: Myths vs. Facts

Health Line

time34 minutes ago

  • Health Line

Primary Progressive MS: Myths vs. Facts

Misconceptions about primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) are common, especially since the condition can look different for everyone. Knowing what's true (and what's not) can help you feel more informed and empowered. Primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is a complex condition that looks different from person to person. Symptoms, experiences, and rates of progression can vary widely. Because PPMS isn't as well-known as other types of multiple sclerosis (MS), myths and misconceptions often fill the gaps. That can make it harder to find trustworthy answers when you're trying to learn more about the condition. Here, we break down some of the most common myths about PPMS and share the facts behind them. Myth#1: There will never be a cure for PPMS Fact: While there's no cure yet, treatment options are expanding, and research is ongoing. In 2017, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Ocrevus (ocrelizumab) as the first disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for PPMS. In 2024, a new formulation called ocrelizumab and hyaluronidase-ocsq (Ocrevus Zunovo), a subcutaneous injection administered twice a year, was approved. This new injection offers a quicker, approximately 10-minute administration alternative to the traditional intravenous infusion. Ocrevus and Ocrevus Zunovo are currently the only FDA-approved DMTs for PPMS. However, researchers are actively exploring new therapies. For instance, tolebrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, is undergoing phase 3 trials to assess its potential in slowing PPMS progression. Additionally, scientists are investigating treatments aimed at repairing myelin, the protective sheath around nerves damaged in MS. One such study involves combining metformin, a common diabetes medication, with clemastine, an antihistamine, to promote myelin repair. Myelin repair is important because it may help restore nerve function and slow disease progression. Although a cure for PPMS has yet to be found, these developments reflect a growing commitment to improving treatment options and outcomes. Myth: PPMS primarily occurs in females Fact: PPMS affects people of all sexes at the same rate. While relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is more common in people assigned female at birth (AFAB), affecting them two to three times more often than those assigned male at birth (AMAB), PPMS affects AFABs and AMABs in roughly equal numbers. It's important not to assume the type of MS based solely on sex. Regardless of gender, if you experience symptoms suggestive of MS, consult a healthcare professional for an accurate diagnosis. Myth: PPMS is an older person's disease Fact: PPMS typically begins in mid-adulthood, not old age. While PPMS tends to have a later onset than other forms of MS, it doesn't primarily affect older adults. On average, people with PPMS start experiencing symptoms around the age of 40. Myth: A PPMS diagnosis means you'll be disabled Fact: Disability progression in PPMS varies widely, and many people maintain mobility and independence for years. PPMS can lead to physical disability, but how quickly or whether it develops looks different for everyone. Some people notice gradual changes, while others may stay stable for long stretches of time. Not everyone will need mobility aids like canes or wheelchairs, especially early on. A 2022 study found that about 10% of people with MS experience severe disability within 5 years of diagnosis. That number rises to 25% within 10 years and then increases to 50% after 18 years. Still, this doesn't mean you should expect disability after receiving a PPMS diagnosis. The location of lesions, your overall health, and how early you begin treatment can all play a role in how the condition progresses. Working with your doctor on a treatment plan that includes physical or occupational therapy and regular movement can help you stay active and independent for longer. Myth: Having PPMS means you have to quit your job Fact: Many people with PPMS continue working, sometimes with a few adjustments. A PPMS diagnosis doesn't automatically mean you need to stop working. While symptoms like fatigue, changes in memory or thinking, or mobility issues can make certain jobs more challenging, many people with PPMS continue in full- or part-time work, especially in the early stages. Everyone's experience with PPMS is different, so your ability to work will depend on your specific symptoms and the demands of your job. If you're facing obstacles, workplace accommodations, like flexible hours, assistive devices, or ergonomic adjustments, may help you stay on the job. A conversation with your doctor or a vocational (work) counselor who understands chronic conditions can also help you explore options that support your health and independence. Myth: No medications help PPMS, so you should investigate natural remedies Fact: There are FDA-approved medications that can help slow the progression of PPMS, including ocrelizumab. While some natural remedies might offer symptom relief, they aren't always safe or proven to be effective. For years, there were no FDA-approved treatments for PPMS. That changed in 2017 when Ocrevus (ocrelizumab) became the first medication approved specifically for PPMS. In a study of 732 people with PPMS, those who received Ocrevus experienced a slower rate of disability progression compared to those who received a placebo. It remains the only approved disease-modifying therapy for this form of MS. Doctors may also prescribe medications to manage specific symptoms, such as antidepressants for mood changes or muscle relaxants for spasms. Some people turn to natural remedies like herbal supplements, acupuncture, or cannabis. Research into these options is ongoing, but so far, there's no strong evidence that they're safe or effective for treating MS symptoms. Some supplements can even interact with prescription drugs. If you're considering natural treatments, talk with your doctor first to avoid potential side effects or interactions. Myth: PPMS is ultimately an isolating disease — no one will understand what you're going through Fact: You're not alone, and you don't have to go through it alone either. While PPMS can feel isolating at times, many others are navigating similar challenges. It's estimated that nearly 1 million people in the United States are living with MS, and about 10% to 15% of them have PPMS. Thanks to growing awareness and advocacy, there are now more resources and support networks than ever. Support groups, both in-person and online, offer a space to connect with others who understand what you're going through. If group support isn't for you, that's OK too. Talking with a trusted friend, loved one, or therapist can still help ease feelings of isolation and improve emotional well-being. What matters most is finding a form of support that feels right for you. Myth: PPMS is deadly Fact: PPMS is a lifelong condition, but it's rarely fatal. The progressive nature of PPMS and the fact that there's no cure can understandably lead to fears about long-term outcomes. But while PPMS can affect mobility, thinking, and daily functioning, it's not considered a life threatening illness. Most people with MS who don't have severe disabilities can expect to live another 30 to 35 years after diagnosis. Recent research has shown that even after significant disease progression, many people continue to live for years. For example, after someone loses the ability to walk independently, on average, at around age 51, life expectancy is about 13 more years. Advances in treatment, early intervention, and lifestyle changes can help manage symptoms, reduce complications, and support overall health. Taking care of your physical and emotional well-being through exercise, a balanced diet, regular checkups, and support can make a big difference in quality of life. It's important to note that with ongoing advances in treatment, the outlook for people with PPMS continues to improve. Current data on disability and life expectancy may not reflect what's possible in the future. Takeaway Misconceptions about primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) can add confusion and fear to an already complex condition. However, the reality is that PPMS doesn't always follow the path people expect. From treatment options to life expectancy, the facts paint a more hopeful and nuanced picture. While every experience with PPMS is different, understanding the reality behind the myths can help you make informed choices, find support, and feel more in control of your journey.

Danny Boyle Reveals SUNSHINE Was Originally Meant to Be a Trilogy — GeekTyrant
Danny Boyle Reveals SUNSHINE Was Originally Meant to Be a Trilogy — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time3 hours ago

  • Geek Tyrant

Danny Boyle Reveals SUNSHINE Was Originally Meant to Be a Trilogy — GeekTyrant

It turns out the Danny Boyle-directed Sunshine wasn't just a one-way mission to reignite the dying sun, it was almost the start of a much bigger journey. In a recent interview with Collider, Boyle dropped a bit of info for fans of his 2007 cult classic. While the film has found love over the years, bolstered by a stacked cast (Cillian Murphy, Michelle Yeoh, Chris Evans, Benedict Wong), it didn't exactly set the box office on fire when it first hit theaters, and that, unfortunately, may have cost us a full-blown trilogy. Boyle said, referring to screenwriter and frequent collaborator Alex Garland: 'Originally, when we were doing it, Alex wrote two other parts. It was supposed to be a trilogy. It wasn't two other scripts; he had an outline for where the story would go.' It wasn't just more sun-scorched tension or another twist on psychological sci-fi horror. Boyle teased: 'It was a planetary trilogy. It was to do with the sun itself, with two other stories.' While he didn't go into too much detail, likely out of deference to Garland, he hinted at some pretty ambitious territory: 'What's interesting is Alex has a natural instinct as a storyteller to want to tell these expanding stories, and that is why 28 Years Later wound up as a trilogy. 'An extraordinary idea on kind of Elon Musk scale, even though he's lost a lot of credibility. But it was interplanetary stuff, it had more to do with that … there's no rich man in it. But the idea of looking outside and moving.' He didn't spill anymore info, just in case Garland ever wants to revisit or repurpose those ideas. But, it's hard not to imagine what could've been… a trilogy about humanity's push into deep space, built around science, sacrifice, and sun-soaked dread. Given that 28 Years Later is finally becoming a trilogy decades after 28 Days Later , maybe Sunshine isn't completely out of orbit just yet. Boyle has a knack for returning to stories that deserve a second (or third) shot. And if Garland's blueprints are still lying around somewhere, who knows? May it could happen.

Biotech Start-Ups Feel the Pain of Federal Funding Cuts
Biotech Start-Ups Feel the Pain of Federal Funding Cuts

Bloomberg

time4 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Biotech Start-Ups Feel the Pain of Federal Funding Cuts

The Trump administration's attack on the National Institutes of Health is strangling the biotech industry's innovation engine — and it could get much worse. The ongoing, brutal termination of grant funding for academic research has rightfully dominated the headlines. These cuts will eventually become a real problem, as fewer dollars mean fewer discoveries to be pulled from academia and into biotech and pharmaceutical companies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store