logo
'My eczema medication looked so innocent - but it was hell in a tube'

'My eczema medication looked so innocent - but it was hell in a tube'

STV News15-05-2025

Topical steroids are among the most commonly prescribed medications by GPs
They are used to treat a range of skin disorders and for the vast majority of patients they are safe and effective
But some people say they have suffered adverse reactions far worse than their original condition
Patients and doctors are calling for more research into topical steroid withdrawal (TSW)
Karyn Flett from Fife has used steroid creams to treat her eczema for years
She stopped using them three years ago but has noticed her symptoms get much worse
Karyn found a community of people suffering from similar symptoms on TikTok
Karyn Flett has used topical steroids to control her eczema for most of her life.
The 54-year-old from Thornton in Fife has relied on repeat prescriptions to treat her condition.
But she says she didn't get any help from the NHS when she stopped using the creams three years ago and her symptoms worsened.
'You basically get no sleep whatsoever,' Karyn told Scotland Tonight.
'You've got mass insomnia and you're scratching. It's a deep bone itch, it's like a neuropathic itch. It's nothing like an eczema itch. You tear like you're trying to get down to the bone. It's absolutely relentless.
'You have a thermal dysregulation that happens to your system and you can't control your temperature.
'There's also a part where you don't have the ability to sweat, and this makes you feel like you're just burning from the inside – it's excruciating. STV News Karyn Flett.
'It's something that you wouldn't wish on your worst enemy. I do come from a loving family, but there are times when I was pushed to the limit. I don't want to be here, to be honest.
'I just regret the very day we walked into that doctor's office and I was given those little tubes of cream. They looked so innocent. But as far as I'm concerned, it's absolute hell in a tube just waiting to unfold.'
Topical steroids are among the most commonly prescribed medications by GPs. They are used to treat a range of skin conditions and many Scots have used them at some point in their life.
However, patients and doctors are increasingly calling for more research into the treatment. Some people say they're suffering debilitating reactions that are far worse than their original condition.
Finding answers is proving to be extremely challenging.
There is no medical pathway for topical steroid withdrawal (TSW), because it isn't a clinical diagnosis. Therefore, no formalised treatment plan exists for those who present with the condition.
Karyn found a community of people suffering from similar symptoms on TikTok, where she met Anna Chrystal, a maxillofacial surgeon from Aberdeen. Anna had also used topical steroids to treat eczema, adhering to the guidelines and under her GP's care. STV News Anna Chrystal.
'I used a 1% hydrocortisone cream,' said Anna. 'It didn't react in the same way that it normally did. It took it away, but the second I stopped using the steroid cream, it just came straight back. So I went to my GP and we increased the potency.'
Unfortunately for Anna, her health has been devastated. She was completely debilitated at her lowest point.
'I was oozing, weeping, bleeding and itchy to my bones from head to toe,' she said. 'I was having to be bandaged on my limbs and my neck two or three times a day, and I wasn't even able to feed myself or get to the toilet without help.'
Anna has also had to come to terms with being unable to perform her dream job as a surgeon despite training for years.
She said: 'I spent a large proportion of my life washing my hands and wearing gloves, and that's just not something that I'm going to be able to do going forward. STV News
'So I'm having to pursue other areas of medicine that are not specialised in maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine and look at something a little bit less hands-on.'
Both women are now on strong immunosuppressive drugs, often used for transplant or cancer patients. They have shared their experience of being dismissed by specialists and health professionals, as TSW is not a recognised medical condition.
Anna said: 'I'd spoken to dermatology colleagues (about TSW) when I was a medical student and they all made it clear that they didn't think it was the entity it was being portrayed as on social media, and that it was just people with worsening eczema.'
But Dr Ian Myles of the National Institute for Health has provided some hope to the TSW community.
Earlier this year, he completed some research after learning about TSW from his patients – but he couldn't find anything of substance about the condition.
He said: 'There was a tonne of information on Google and those other search engines. But if you looked at the medical literature, there wasn't really anything other than a few articles arguing back and forth about whether or not the disorder existed.' STV News Dr Ian Myles spoke to Scotland Tonight.
Dr Myles realised he needed to take the next step with his own research. In a study of 16 participants, patients presenting with TSW showed an overproduction of niacin at a cellular level. Crucially, niacin is not present in patients with eczema.
He said: 'When we started the project, I told the patient advocates that either their disease is going to look very, very similar to severe eczema and it'll be hard to tease it apart, or it will look so obvious that we'll all be angry that no one bothered to look earlier.
'So I knew that was a possibility, but it was, I guess, a little surprising just how overwhelmingly clear the signal was. Once you know [about] the niacin overproduction, you can then sit down and explain every other symptom the patients have that are not found in regular eczema.'
He's calling for more research into TSW so clinicians can find out why most people can use topical steroids safely, but others – like Karyn and Anna – are so badly affected. STV News Steroid creams.
'I hope the debate about whether TSW is a real disorder is over,' he said. I hope that other research groups will use the diagnostic criteria to enrol patients in their own studies. I really hope this is the opening conversation about better understanding and better research.'
Scotland Tonight asked to speak to health secretary Neil Gray or an NHS dermatologist about the issue but no-one was available.
A spokesperson for the Scottish Government said: 'When used correctly, for many people, topical corticosteroids are a safe and effective treatment for skin conditions.'
Dr Tony Bewley of the British Association of Dermatologists agrees that topical steroids are safe and the best course of treatment for the vast majority of patients.
'Topical steroids used appropriately under supervision in an appropriate way for appropriate patients are usually very safe indeed,' he said.
However, Dr Bewley treats patients with TSW and has called on colleagues to do more to understand and help those presenting with symptoms.
He said: 'Sadly, I think that the message about the difference between topical steroid withdrawal and other forms of skin problems – including the skin problem for which the topical steroid was originally given – I think there is confusion about that.
'I think there are some people who just haven't even heard of this, but also that healthcare professionals have a bit of a wake-up call and understand that this is an important problem.
'We need to understand it and work with our patients.'
Watch the full report, Scotland Tonight: My Skin, My Story, at 8:30pm on STV and the STV Player.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NHS waiting list for planned treatment falls to lowest level in two years
NHS waiting list for planned treatment falls to lowest level in two years

Powys County Times

time38 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

NHS waiting list for planned treatment falls to lowest level in two years

The NHS waiting list for planned hospital treatment has fallen to its lowest level for two years, figures show. An estimated 7.39 million treatments were waiting to be carried out at the end of April, relating to 6.23 million patients – down from 7.42 million treatments and 6.25 million patients at the end of March. These are the lowest figures since March 2023 for treatments and April 2023 for patients. The news comes after Chancellor Rachel Reeves gave the NHS a cash injection worth an extra £29 billion per year. Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'We are putting the NHS on the road to recovery after years of soaring waiting times, by providing record investment and fundamental NHS reform. 'Thanks to our interventions and the hard work of NHS staff, the overall waiting list has now fallen in April for the first time in 17 years – dropping by almost a quarter of a million since we took office. 'This is just the start. We've delivered millions of extra appointments since July, we are pushing on with our mission to get the NHS working for patients once again as we deliver our Plan for Change.' Within the new NHS figures, the number of longer waits has grown. Some 1,361 patients in England had been waiting more than 18 months to start routine treatment at the end of April, up from 1,164 in March. There were 9,258 patients who had been waiting more than 65 weeks to start treatment, up from 7,381 the previous month. Overall, 190,068 people in England had been waiting more than 52 weeks to start routine hospital treatment, up from 180,242 at the end of March. The figure had previously fallen for 10 months in a row. NHS England said that, overall, the average time patients had been waiting for planned treatment fell to the lowest level since July 2022 – 13.3 weeks – despite services facing greater demand. Meghana Pandit, NHS England's co-national medical director, said NHS staff were working to 'turn the tide for patients waiting for care'. She said while huge pressure on services remains, 'we are starting to see a real difference across our services – this is just the start of the work we're doing to reform care and deliver improvements for patient'. The data also showed fewer people are getting a diagnosis of cancer or having it ruled out within four weeks. A total of 76.7% of patients urgently referred for suspected cancer were diagnosed or had cancer ruled out within 28 days in April, down from 78.9% in March and 80.2% in February. The Government and NHS England had set a target of March 2026 for this figure to reach 80%. The proportion of patients who had waited no longer than 62 days in April from an urgent suspected cancer referral, or consultant upgrade, to their first definitive treatment for cancer was 69.9%, down from 71.4% in March. GPs in England made 264,880 urgent cancer referrals in April, down from 272,165 in March but up year-on-year from 260,516 in April 2024. Rory Deighton, acute director at the NHS Confederation, said: 'This new data shows that the hard work of NHS leaders and their teams is paying off, with waiting lists falling to their lowest level in two years and A&E performance increasing despite incredibly high demand. 'But our members know there is still a long way to go to further drive down waiting lists and hit the 18-week target.' He said the money pledged by the Chancellor was welcome 'but there are fears that this uplift will not be enough to achieve all the Government's manifesto pledges, including hitting the stretching 92% elective waiting time target by March 2029. 'Many of our members have warned they will not hit the interim target, with only one in two confident they will achieve the 65% elective care interim target by March 2026. 'The solution lies in the radical redesign of pathways, in particular outpatient services, which many of our members are already working towards. 'We look forward to working with them to spread best practice across the country.'

Primark fans rush to snap up £18 LED masks which are £382 cheaper than other shops – as beauty buy is back in stock
Primark fans rush to snap up £18 LED masks which are £382 cheaper than other shops – as beauty buy is back in stock

Scottish Sun

time42 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

Primark fans rush to snap up £18 LED masks which are £382 cheaper than other shops – as beauty buy is back in stock

Plus, what the different light colours do with the mask SKIN WIN Primark fans rush to snap up £18 LED masks which are £382 cheaper than other shops – as beauty buy is back in stock Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) PRIMARK caused a stir when they released their own LED masks for just £18 compared to £399 from other brands. If you missed out on the stock earlier this year, panic not, as the bargain retailer has brought them back once again. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 Primark's £18 LED face mask is back and beauty fans are snapping it up Credit: Tiktok/@prmrkbeauty 5 Primark has restocked the mask in stores Credit: Tiktok/@prmrkbeauty Beauty lovers have been racing to snap up the budget-friendly device, which is "rechargeable" and 'suitable for all skin types.' The beauty product features LED lights which can be changed to red, blue, or green, depending on your skin's needs. Red is thought to boost collagen and reduces wrinkles, blue fights acne-causing bacteria, and green calms skin and fades pigmentation. Shoppers have been delighted that Primark's LED mask is back, with one person writing on TikTok: 'Omg need.' Another added: 'No way!' And a third wrote: 'Looks good.' Compared to other LED masks on the market - including Current Body's £399 version - you could save £382 or more. 5 The Current Body mask will set you back £399 Credit: Current Body Do LED face masks work? You might've seen influencers donning the space age-looking masks on social media and wondered what they actually do. Well, they are clinically proven to aid with some skin concerns, although results will vary depending on how powerful the mask is. 'There's a lot of scams out there…most of the time, energies are very, very low,' Glynis Ablon, a dermatologist and associate clinical professor at UCLA, told National Geographic. For red light, the pro recommended 105 milliwatts per centimeter, but blue light can be lower. 5 Primark previously sold the mask back in January Credit: Instagram 5 The mask has three LED colours, red, blue and green Credit: Instagram 'If it's somewhere in that 40 range, I'm ok, but if it ends up being 10, it's probably not doing anything," she added. Primark's website doesn't currently note the strength of the lights on their mask. That said, even with a strong mask it can take time to see real results. Results depend on how often you use it, and your age and skin condition.

I was pregnant with triplets but only delivered one baby after my son 'ate his siblings' in the womb
I was pregnant with triplets but only delivered one baby after my son 'ate his siblings' in the womb

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

I was pregnant with triplets but only delivered one baby after my son 'ate his siblings' in the womb

A mother delivered just one baby despite being pregnant with triplets after he 'casually ate his siblings' in the womb, she has revealed. TikTok user @vfbabygirl28 - believed to be from New Zealand - shared ultrasound scans at different points during her pregnancy on the social media platform in a clip that has been viewed over 2.5 million times at the time of writing. A picture of the first scan showed two embryos as the mother-of-two captioned it: 'Goes into the first scan and find out I'm having twins...' As her pregnancy progressed, a second scan revealed she was actually having triplets. By the time she went in for her next ultrasound to 'check the triplets', only one embryo was visible in the scans as she quipped 'this guy just casually ate his siblings'. She finished her TikTok with a picture of her newborn baby, wearing a mint green jumper and beanie, sleeping peacefully along with the caption: 'Holyf***ingairball.' The video received over 16,000 comments, as several fellow TikTok users questioned whether her baby is a 'Chimera'. 'I've heard that twins or triplets that absorb each other have a higher chance of being Chimeras,' one person wrote. By the time she went in for her next ultrasound to 'check the triplets', only one embryo was visible in the scans as she quipped 'this guy just casually ate his siblings' A Chimera is a person who has cells from two or more sources, or fertilised eggs, resulting in different genetic makeup. According to WebMD, chimerism in humans occurs when a mother is pregnant with twins or triplets and one of the embryo dies or stops developing early on. If this happens, the surviving embryo sometimes absorbs its twin's cells. Several TikTok user shared this explanation for the woman's unusual experience, as one person noted: 'Sometimes when you have more than one baby, one fetus kinda absorbs the other one.' Another said: 'For people who are confused, let me explain. There are two possible reasons for this. 'In early pregnancy, multiple embryos can start developing (like twins or triplets), but then one or more stop growing and just get absorbed by the mother's body or the remaining fetus,' they shared. 'This is more common.' The second reason this might have happened, they continued, is if they're a 'Human Chimera'. They wrote: 'If two embryos fuse very early in development, they combine into one person with two sets of DNA and they become a chimera.' Some of the characteristics include 'patches of skin with different DNA' or two different blood types. Taking to the comments section, one person revealed they are a Chimera, noting: 'Half my stomach is a completely different shade' to the rest of their body. Another also shared: 'Hey! I'm a chimera because I absorbed my twin! I have two DNAs and distinct skin markings down the center of my body.' Springing to the baby's defence, another said: 'Just to clarify for non-medical folks in the comments. 'This adorable baby didn't actually EAT his siblings. Likely they didn't continue to develop (early miscarriage) and both baby and mum absorbed the cells/tissue to avoid miscarry [sic] of a perfectly healthy pregnancy,' they added. While some people made light of the revelation, others paid their respects to the unborn babies and praised the mother for her 'courage' while navigating the loss. One said: 'Everybody making jokes, but I can't imagine going from 1) not pregnant to pregnant, 2) having 1 baby to 2, 3) 2 to 3 babies, 4) 1 baby. 'That's hard!! For mind and body! You are strong girl!' Another asked the mother how she coped with losing two of the three fetuses, adding: 'Do you grieve for them like how mothers would grieve for miscarried children?' The woman, who also has a 13-year-old son, appeared to take the situation in her stride as she told one commenter her baby also 'ate' his siblings' personalities. She also shared insight into how she dealt with the situation, when another mom revealed she'd been through a similar experience. 'Omg mine too,' she began. 'There were two on my first scan & at my second, they told me baby A basically ate baby B. 'I was so confused, but just learnt to accept it over time.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store