Japan unseats USWNT in SheBelieves Cup, ending 5-year tournament winning streak
Japan won its first SheBelieves Cup title Wednesday thanks to its 2-1 defeat of the U.S. women's national team in the tournament's final game. It's only the second loss to Japan in USWNT's history and might help reignite a rivalry that peaked across a run of major tournament finals in 2011, 2012 and 2015.
Japan struck first and early in San Diego, with Yuka Momiki scoring in the second minute of the game. The U.S. found an answer soon enough, with youngster Ally Sentnor scoring her second international goal (and her second of this tournament), assisted by Catarina Macario.
Defender Tōko Koga provided the game winner for the Nadeshiko in the second half, poaching a goal after U.S. goalkeeper Jane Campbell made a leaping stop on a Japan free kick.
Despite several changes following the opening goal, the USWNT was unable to find an equalizer, let alone a winning goal. It came close in the final minute of regular time, with Lynn Biyendolo sending it back to center back Tierna Davidson for a long-range shot. Japan goalkeeper Ayaka Yamashita got enough of a hand to the ball to push it over the bar.
Wednesday's loss to Japan was also Emma Hayes' first defeat as head coach of the USWNT, having previously won 15 games and drawn two since taking the job last year.
Clumsy sequences were expected in this tournament given the number of untested players that Hayes selected. In the second minute of Wednesday's finale, Japan capitalized on a U.S. mistake. However, it wasn't a pair of newcomers who caused the error.
Japan took a quick throw-in as the United States regained its defensive shape in the opening minutes, creating an advantage of momentum in a short-field setting. A clever through ball found Momiki, who ran beyond Emily Sonnett. As the U.S. defender tried to regain advantageous positioning, she instead tumbled to the ground after not seeing that Campbell made a mistimed lunge toward Momiki and the ball.
It wasn't the first time that Japan had taken the initiative early against the United States, having given Hayes' side its first scare of the Summer Olympics by scoring in the opening minute. On Wednesday, the United States was again caught unaware.
Sonnett's slip came on the high-trafficked zone of Snapdragon Stadium's now notorious surface. The San Diego venue was the site of last year's waterlogged contest against Canada, one that finished with Alyssa Naeher's penalty shootout heroics. Throughout the 2024 season, the San Diego Wave incurred multiple fines due to concerns over player safety on this pitch. The Wave's season finale was forced to be relocated, again due to issues with Snapdragon's surface.
Regardless, the slip couldn't have come at a worse time for Sonnett and her team. With the veteran defender and 2023 NWSL goalkeeper of the year out of the sequence, Momiki set herself up for a very easy finish to open the scoring. The crowd at Snapdragon Stadium was largely stunned — but it was a goal borne from Japanese ambition that forced the hosts into some uncharacteristic mistakes.
Last year concluded with longtime starting goalkeeper Naeher calling time on her international career. She stuck the landing on a tenure that included backstopping to a World Cup title in 2019, coming up big in the Paris Olympics and providing a needed leadership bridge from a difficult 2023 through to Hayes' arrival.
Now, for the first time in three decades, there isn't a clear option atop the goalkeeping depth chart. Hindsight has largely forged a straightforward lineage from Briana Scurry to Hope Solo to Naeher. Alas, there is now a truly open competition in goal — and these three games didn't provide much conclusive evidence toward appointing a new No. 1.
After starting the opening match against Colombia, Campbell made her second SheBelieves lineup on Wednesday. Her attempt to intervene and proactively clear the ball on Momiki's opener was well-intentioned if imperfectly executed, and may have worked as intended if Sonnett hadn't stumbled into her path.
However, Japan's second goal came off of an unforced error by Campbell. In the 49th minute, Yazmeen Ryan — who was among the USWNT's best players in the first half — committed a foul just beyond the penalty arc. Manchester City midfielder Yui Hasegawa took a sharp direct free kick, looping it above the United States' defensive wall and toward the corner to Campbell's right shoulder.
The Houston Dash goalkeeper made a brilliant diving save but ended up taking all velocity off the ball as it fell in front of her. Had Campbell punched the ball toward the flank or pried it beyond the end line for a corner kick, the score may have stayed level. Instead, 19-year-old defender Koga was quick to pounce and was quite literally handed the second international goal of her young career.
Campbell's acrobatic stop on the initial free kick was a worthy showcase of the skill set that has made her among the NWSL's best goalkeepers even as the team in front of her has struggled. However, the ensuing mistake (and, to a lesser extent, the one on the opener) are the types of gaffes that one would hope don't crop up regularly for a team with the United States' ambition.
Mandy McGlynn started the middle match against Australia. She conceded one goal, having been caught with clumsy positioning on a point-blank header. Phallon Tullis-Joyce is probably the most in-form option in the pool as she continues to excel with Manchester United, but she was brought into this camp only as a training player.
As a result, this remains an open question that's seemingly no closer to being answered than it was entering this window.
In the end, Japan deserved to lift the trophy at SheBelieves Cup after the most consistent and cohesive performance across all three matches of the tournament. It's also just fun to watch, even as it's clinical and organized. Mina Tanaka had her breakout performance with four goals and three assists. While the USWNT was successful at limiting her on Wednesday night, it was not enough to contain Japan as a whole.
Ahead of the final game of the tournament, Hayes expected 'a very, very difficult match,' and that's exactly what they got.
'Well, I think it's fair to say Japan as a team are more played-in together than we are, so their connections and their application of their way of playing will probably be more pronounced than ours,' Hayes said Tuesday. 'But that's not to say we can't have success, and it doesn't matter if you have 150-plus caps or your third cap. It's about us playing our way, in our style, with our principles and to execute that at another level, which is what this game will be.'
There will certainly be plenty for Hayes and the technical staff to pick apart after their first loss with the USWNT, but losing to this Japan team in February at this point in the World Cup cycle isn't, nor should be, panic-inducing stuff. Largely, the tournament fulfilled its purpose for this particular edition, for Hayes to rotate through the full roster and evaluate players in the first competitive matches of the year.
'I think you want to learn this lesson now. This is the game I really wanted for players who played less than five games for the national team, (see) what's missing for them and say, 'Listen this is what you're going to need to play at the highest level,'' Hayes told the TBS broadcast after the loss. 'That's what development is. We aren't playing for the World Cup today.'
Australia, on the other hand, should maybe be considering something at least adjacent to panic after its last-place finish. It looked listless and particularly hapless in defense under head coach Tom Sermanni — a puzzling development as multiple players are in season in the Women's Super League in England.
While the NWSL regular season kicks off on March 14, the U.S. is back in action in April for an Olympic gold medal rematch against Brazil.
vs. Brazil at SoFi Stadium, Los Angeles
vs. Brazil at PayPal Park, San Jose, Calif.
This article originally appeared in The Athletic.
US Women's national team, Soccer, NWSL
2025 The Athletic Media Company
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Refinery29
4 hours ago
- Refinery29
Jordan Chiles Swears By Those $14.50 Acne Patches, Too
All linked products are independently selected by our editors. If you purchase any of these products, we may earn a commission. She's a two-time Olympian, Miami Swim Week model, bestselling author — and now, Jordan Chiles is adding beauty ambassador to her already impressive list of accomplishments. The 24-year-old gymnast is the new face of Hero Cosmetics, the viral skincare brand best known for its Mighty Patch hydrocolloid stickers. Chiles, who was part of the gold-medal winning US women's gymnastics team at the 2024 Summer Olympics, has been open about her skin journey, including hyperpigmentation, texture, and breakouts. Chiles is buzzing with energy when we sit down over Zoom to chat about the new partnership. 'People always ask me, 'What do you do for your skincare?' So I was really happy Hero wanted me to be one of their ambassadors,' she exclusively tells Refinery29. 'Whether it's dark spots or a pimple that's coming up and I want it gone, I've always loved Mighty Patch.' In addition to her out-of-this-world strength, artistry, and athleticism, Chiles has also authentically shown up as herself via her competition glam; strong brows, fluttery lashes, glowy skin, and medal-worthy nail art all figured heavily in her most epic Olympic moments. As she tells me, beauty has always been something she's passionate about. 'My older sister, who is my hair and makeup artist, definitely gave me a perspective of understanding that glam is something to enjoy, have fun with, and be creative,' she says. Chiles swears by a less-is-more approach to keeping her sensitive skin looking and feeling its best. 'A majority of the time, I only use a good cleanser, an exfoliator, and then a nice, silky moisturiser,' she says. 'I keep it very simple, but make sure everything is hydrated and my skin looks good and glowy.' When it comes to favourite products, Chiles lights up talking about being 'down bad' (same, girl) for Hero. 'I have Mighty Patches in every bag, my car, my room, and probably in five different bathrooms,' she says. Her favourites? 'Literally all of them, but since I go to practice a lot, [I love] the invisible ones and the dark spot ones with the prickly points.' We also bonded over a shared underrated Hero fave: the Pore Purity Cleansing Clay Mask, made with glacial sea clay and sea kelp bio-ferment to decongest skin. 'It makes my face so soft — I love it,' Chiles says. 'I've been recently using it two to three times a week to get my pores in the right way and all that stuff.' For Chiles, this partnership — which includes brand campaigns, social content, and live events — is anything but skin deep. 'I have [acne] scars here and there, but now I'm finally at a point where I'm positive with myself and my skin,' she says. 'Literally, it took me 22 years to finally be like, look, Jordan, you're a gorgeous girl. You have beautiful skin. Embrace that.'
New York Times
8 hours ago
- New York Times
Blue Jays keep winning, putting 2024 far behind them: ‘Feels so much different'
ST. LOUIS — Blue Jays manager John Schneider thought for a moment, staring forward as he exhaled in the tunnels under St. Louis' Busch Stadium. Toronto had just won its fifth straight series, toppling the Cardinals before finishing the sweep on Wednesday. The manager was asked to think back: When was the last time his team had a stretch this good? Advertisement 'You've got to go back a couple years, I think,' Schneider said. He's right. The Blue Jays haven't won five series in a row since September 2022. Ross Stripling earned Toronto's final win in that stretch. Santiago Espinal had three hits in the last contest, and Raimel Tapia drove in a run. Simply put, it's been a while. There certainly weren't any stretches like this in 2024. The Jays were never better than three games over .500 last season, finishing the campaign with 74 wins — their fewest in a full season since 2019. Toronto's players and staff have vowed all spring and early summer that 2025 wouldn't be a repeat. Things changed, they said. This team was different. Capping off a 14-3 stretch with a 5-2 win over the Cardinals on Wednesday, the Blue Jays are proving it. 'It's the most fun we've had as a group, so far this year and in past years,' Ernie Clement said. 'It just feels so much different. It's just, it's fun showing up to the ballpark.' 22-10 in our last 32 😁 5 Straight Series Wins 😤 5th sWWWeep of the szn 🧹 IMMACULATE VIBES 😉 — Toronto Blue Jays (@BlueJays) June 11, 2025 The Blue Jays brought in new faces in the offseason, trading for Andrés Giménez and signing Anthony Santander and Max Scherzer, among others. Those additions may soon help, but they haven't been the real difference for this 2025 squad. The change has been in mentality, Schneider said. The 2024 Jays played great defence and leaned on veteran starting pitching. This year's team wanted to be known for more — a collective approach. 'You don't want to go through a year like that,' Schneider said. 'But if you're not learning from things, I think you're just standing in place.' With Toronto's struggles last season, it was hard not to prioritize the individual and personal stats, starter Chris Bassitt said. Winning certainly helps get everyone on the same page, but each player on the roster is now focused solely on the outcome of the game, Bassitt said. The stats naturally follow. Advertisement The 2024 Blue Jays had two regular players hit over .265. This year's squad has seven. The 2024 team had 17 different pitchers earn a win. The 2025 Jays have 14 winning pitchers with 94 games to play. This year's Blue Jays are better on both sides of the ball. Toronto's overall ERA has dropped from 4.29 to 4.06. Runs per game has ticked up from 4.14 to 4.35. There's still a long way to go before scoreboard watching and postseason hoping become real. But Toronto's first challenge of 2025 was to prove things were different — there would be no repeat. So far, with the help of this five-series streak, they've done it. 'It's just playing a very unselfish brand of baseball,' Bassitt said, 'where guys are moving runners over. We're trying to pass the baton when it comes to pitching. It's very refreshing when you're on a team that's truly caring about the person behind you. Yeah, I'm blessed to be here.'
New York Times
9 hours ago
- New York Times
Prosecutor calls Michael McLeod the architect of Hockey Canada sexual assault
LONDON, Ont. – The prosecution described Michael McLeod as the 'architect' of the 'group sexual activity' at the center of the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial and said he told 'outright lies' to portray the complainant as the aggressor in the sexual interactions of the night and advance a 'false narrative.' Advertisement Attorney Meaghan Cunningham provided Justice Maria Carroccia an outline of the Crown's argument, showing a power point in a closing submission on Wednesday that she said will demonstrate E.M. did not voluntarily agree to the charged sexual acts of the night. Cunningham began that presentation by telling Carroccia that she intended to prove E.M. did not want to engage in group sex and that McLeod repeatedly lied about his role as the orchestrator of the alleged incident. McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dubé and Cal Foote are all charged with sexual assault after an alleged incident in June 2018 in which a 20-year-old woman — known as E.M., whose identity is protected by a publication ban — has said she was sexually assaulted over the span of several hours in a London, Ont., hotel room. The players were in town for a Hockey Canada event celebrating their 2018 World Junior Championship victory. McLeod is also facing a second charge for 'being a party to the offense' for what the Crown has asserted was his role 'assisting and encouraging his teammates to engage sexually' with E.M. All five players have pleaded not guilty. Cunningham highlighted that a key factual difference between the Crown and defense cases is what prompted McLeod's teammates to come to his hotel room after he and E.M. had consensual sex. She said that the factual issue will 'shape how the evidence is viewed.' The defense has asserted E.M. encouraged McLeod to invite his teammates in seeking what McLeod's attorney David Humphrey described as a 'wild night.' E.M. said that she did not know McLeod was inviting others and was 'surprised' when other men showed up in the room. Cunningham said there was no evidence to suggest that E.M. encouraged McLeod to invite teammates back to his room and laid out five elements to demonstrate why Carroccia should accept E.M.'s version of events – that she did not want group sex and was surprised by men entering the room. She pointed to 1) McLeod's 2018 police interview, 2) the June 20 text exchange between McLeod and E.M., 3) E.M.'s testimony, 4) the witness testimony of Taylor Raddysh and Boris Katchouk, and 5) McLeod's actions in 'recruiting' others to his room. Advertisement Cunningham said that McLeod was well prepared for his November 2018 interview with London Police, which took place under negotiated terms in Toronto with his attorney in the room, and yet did not make any mention of E.M. encouraging him to text his teammates. He also did not disclose the text messages he sent to a 19-person group chat and to Raddysh in the early-morning hours of June 19, 2018. He texted the group chat 'Who wants a 3 way quick' with a follow-up message providing his hotel room number. He also texted Raddysh separately to ask if he wanted a 'gummer,' which is slang for oral sex. Cunningham asked why McLeod would omit these messages in his interview with Detective Steve Newton and why, if it was true that E.M. was the initiator, he wouldn't disclose that in the interview, considering that would bolster his narrative. 'There is no logical or plausible reason why he wouldn't if it was a true fact,' Cunningham said. 'McLeod lies repeatedly to Detective Newton in that interview but it's the Crown's position that he's doing that in furtherance of a false narrative about what happened. The false narrative that Mr. McLeod is trying to craft is that he and his friends are completely innocent and that (E.M) was the instigator and the one demanding sexual activity.' In the interview, McLeod initially told Newton he didn't know why guys 'kept showing up in his room.' When asked directly whether he texted teammates, McLeod acknowledged he texted teammates he was ordering food and had a girl in his room. Cunningham said that if E.M. was the instigator of the group sexual activity, McLeod also would not have expressed the surprise and shock he conveyed to Newton in his interview about what he said was her sexually aggressive nature. 'It's not just that he forgot, it's not just that he didn't mention that he sent those texts. He outright lies to Detective Newton,' Cunningham said. 'He lies to Detective Newton repeatedly but in particular he lies to Detective Newton about the text message he sent or didn't send that night.' Advertisement Cunningham showed Carroccia the text exchange between McLeod and E.M. from June 20, 2018. In that exchange, in which McLeod asks E.M. if she went to the police, E.M. tells him she was OK going home with him but that she didn't expect others to come to the hotel room. She said she felt the players were making fun of and taking advantage of her. McLeod responded, Cunningham said, by re-framing what she said and responding that he was 'sorry that she was embarrassed' but warned about the serious 'implications' if the police matter moved forward. Cunningham said that if E.M. wasn't the instigator, as multiple players had testified, McLeod should have expressed surprise that she was upset about the other players joining them in the hotel room. Cunningham said E.M. was pressed repeatedly on the suggestion that she had prompted McLeod to invite others back to the hotel in pursuit of a 'wild night' but 'never wavered' in her testimony that she was surprised when players arrived in the room. 'Time and again she is pushed on this very same issue and her evidence is always the same, that she was surprised when other people started coming into the room and she does not think she would have ever asked for him to invite other people,' Cunningham said. Cunningham said that Raddysh and Katchouk both testified about E.M.'s behavior that was consistent with the Crown's assertion that E.M. was not seeking group sex. Both players said that they observed E.M. in bed, with the covers up to her shoulders and neck, and that she did not participate in any conversation beyond asking Katchouk for a bite of pizza. She said this was behavior consistent with someone who felt uncomfortable, not someone who was looking to engage others sexually. She said that if the defense theory was true that she was asking McLeod to ask his teammates to come over for group sex — and wanting to engage in group sex — Raddysh and Katchouk's testimony defies logic. Advertisement 'It would make no sense she would make absolutely no effort to engage or attempt to engage with Mr. Katchouk or Mr. Raddysh, not a single offer,' Cunningham said. Cunningham also pointed out that the testimony of both Raddysh and Katchouk differed significantly from other witnesses about E.M.'s behavior that night. Crown witnesses Tyler Steenbergen, Brett Howden and defense witness Carter Hart all testified that E.M. was the aggressor, asking players to have sex with her and insulting them when they declined. When Carroccia pointed out this divergence in stories, Cunningham replied: 'I agree these things are irreconcilable and someone's not telling the truth,' Cunningham said. She noted that Raddysh and Katchouk's description 'is completely at odds' with the testimony of the players who were on the June 26, 2018, group chat. In that group chat, players strategized how to handle the impending Hockey Canada investigation and discussed what to tell investigators. Cunningham said that they were the only two players who saw E.M. in Room 209 that night who were not on that June 26, 2018, group text chain. Cunningham pointed to McLeod's actions from the night to make the case that he was the instigator instead, and facilitated a group sexual encounter unbeknownst to E.M. Cunningham used a visual display of the '3 way quick' and 'gummer' text messages, sent at 2:10 and 2:15 a.m. respectively. She said McLeod made no efforts to vet who came to the room or took any efforts to get people to leave, but instead was 'trying to drum up more business' and 'recruit more people.' Cunningham cited McLeod's phone call to Hart, his recruitment of Katchouk from the hallway and his knocking on Raddysh's door as evidence of this. '(E.M.) was doing nothing either verbally or through her actions to communicate that she was at all interested in engaging in sexual activity with them,' Cunningham said. 'But the evidence does establish that someone was offering sex to Mr. McLeod's teammates in Room 209 and it wasn't (E.M.).' Advertisement Cunningham ended with the fact that by McLeod's own admissions, he said he was consistently checking in on her throughout the night, telling Detective Newton in his 2018 interview that he and his teammates had a 'no phones' policy and that at one point he 'calmed her down' because he said she was upset no one was having sex with her. Cunningham said McLeod was intervening to 'take some responsibility for managing the room' while all the events were unfolding. 'The reason he is doing that is because this was his idea to begin with,' Cunningham said. 'He set this up.' Earlier in the day, the defense teams finished their closing arguments. Julianna Greenspan, who represents Foote, said that her client performed the splits over E.M. as a 'party trick' that was both 'non-threatening,' not sexual and a 'momentary interaction.' Foote is accused of doing the splits over E.M. while she was lying on her back, grazing his genitals over her face. Greenspan said that E.M. was seeking sexual encounters and attention and that Hart's testimony that she was laughing was 'consistent with her performative behavior in the room generally.' 'In plain language, Mr. Hart's evidence was, this was in a playful manner, this was a playful trick, and (E.M.) was absolutely in on it,' Greenspan said. Greenspan spent significant time returning to the issue of E.M. referring to the players as 'men' throughout her testimony, painting the decision as intentional. Greenspan hammered this point repeatedly in cross-examination, but reinforced on Wednesday that E.M. had 'an axe to grind.' Greenspan undermined the credibility of Crown witnesses Brett Howden and Tyler Steenbergen, both of whom said Foote asked in a phone call to leave his name out of what happened in the hotel room prior to the players' participation in the Hockey Canada investigation. Advertisement Greenspan said Howden was in 'protect Howden mode' and suggested that Steenbergen was influenced by Henein Hutchison investigator Danielle Robitaille in his 2022 interview with Hockey Canada; she described that as 'an investigation intended to support and corroborate the complainant's civil lawsuit, one that Hockey Canada had just settled.' Greenspan ended her closing argument by suggesting that the intense level of publicity and interest in the case has compromised the presumption of innocence and subjected the players, their families and their legal teams to unfair treatment, such as bullying and taunting. Lisa Carnelos, attorney for Dubé, finished her closing submissions on Wednesday by arguing that her client did not engage in any collusion via the group chat he participated in with teammates on June 26, 2018 — 'This is the most lame attempt at collusion I've ever seen in my life,' she said — or in either of the phone calls he had with Tyler Steenbergen and Brett Howden. She explained the group chat as 'the banter of young men' who were 'confused' and 'expressing nervousness and shock.' Carnelos described the phone calls Dube had with both Howden and Steenbergen prior to the Hockey Canada investigation — asking them to leave his name out of interviews with Hockey Canada about the incident — as 'innocuous,' and 'context specific.' (Steenbergen testified that Dube asked him not to mention what Dube did in the room to investigators, adding that he wanted to speak for himself. Howden previously told investigators that Dube made the same request of him.) Carnelos suggested it was 'reasonable' that the call was about Dubé's desire to call Hockey Canada staff member Shawn Bullock to tell Bullock himself about what happened. Carnelos also suggested that the Hockey Canada and London Police reopened their investigations as a result of a 'media frenzy' and described the situation as a 'political hot potato.' — The Athletic's Dan Robson contributed reporting remotely from Toronto. (Courtroom sketch of Crown attorney Meaghan Cunningham and Justice Maria Carroccia from earlier in the trial by Alexandra Newbould / The Canadian Press via AP)
