logo
Proponents moving full steam ahead with passenger rail expansion efforts in Maine

Proponents moving full steam ahead with passenger rail expansion efforts in Maine

Yahoo24-02-2025

Rail ridership on the Amtrak Downeaster line that extends from Boston to Brunswick saw a 9% increase between 2023 and 2024, according to Amtrak data. (Stock photo by Getty Images)
Though not enough lawmakers were on board with a proposal last session to study a potential passenger rail line from Portland to Bangor, proponents are back at it arguing that now is the time to explore the possibility of expanding passenger rail in Maine.
'This is the year,' said Doug Rooks, a consultant with the Maine Rail Group, a nonprofit seeking to expand railroad service in the state. 'If it's ever going to happen, this is probably the year it will start.'
An emergency proposal from Rep. Tavis Hasenfus (D-Readfield), LD 487, is seen as the first step in the expansion. It seeks to direct the Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority to apply for federal funding to identify a potential passenger rail corridor from Portland through Auburn, Lewiston, Waterville, Bangor and ending in Orono. The study could also consider other appropriate station locations.
The bill is co-sponsored by Sen. Joe Baldacci (D-Penobscot), who sponsored the similar proposal that failed last session. Though it wasn't recommended by a majority of the Legislature's Transportation Committee and failed in the House, that bill did pass in the Senate.
Like Baldacci's bill, Hasenfus' is a bipartisan proposal with Republican co-sponsors.
Though the public hearing for Hasenfus' bill isn't scheduled until March 6, the Maine Department of Transportation testified in opposition to the study last session. At the time, the full text of Baldacci's bill wasn't available, but the department still said it was concerned with the intent of the proposal.
In its testimony, the department said a propensity study that wrapped up in 2023 showed that expanding passenger rail would require high capital investment and ongoing subsidizing to compensate for low ridership. Given that, the department argued it would be 'imprudent' to continue studying passenger rail to Bangor.
In response to the latest proposal, Communications Director Paul Merrill said the MaineDOT prioritizes 'pragmatic improvements that balance the department's limited financial resources with anticipated benefits to the greatest number of people.' He added that capital costs for a passenger rail project would likely be even higher today than the study predicted due to inflation.
The new proposal specifically asks for the state to apply to the Federal Railroad Administration's corridor identification and development program, which is part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.
The sweeping Biden-era law that brought $2.5 billion for more than 300 projects in Maine is set to expire in 2026, which is why Hasenfus' bill is so urgent, Rooks explained. Meeting the deadline for this application cycle is vital because the $1.2 trillion law isn't guaranteed to be renewed, especially since President Donald Trump issued an executive order on his first day in office pausing the disbursement of funds under the law.
To provide sufficient time to complete the application, the bill includes an emergency clause that would allow it to take effect before the typical 90 days after adjournment. However, that clause also means the bill will need the support of two-thirds of the Legislature. The previous bill passed the Senate 22-12, which falls short of what this year's proposal will need.
Other related bills slated to go before the Transportation Committee this session include proposals to replace portions of existing railroad tracks near Portland and Brunswick with pedestrian trails.
But given the time constraints, Rooks said the Maine Rail Group is 'laser focused' on LD 487.
Fear of low ridership has been a roadblock for passenger rail expansion efforts in the past, including Baldacci's bill last year.
The department's propensity study concluded it would be more advantageous to improve public transportation with buses. As such, the department worked with Concord Coach Lines to add more round trips between Bangor and Portland, increasing it to six daily, Merrill said.
Additionally, last July the department started a two-year pilot project for a commuter bus service between Portland and Lewiston/Auburn to better understand the demand for more enhanced public transportation between those cities, Merrill explained.
In October, ridership for that new bus line neared 2,200, but has slightly decreased every month since, according to data Merrill shared with Maine Morning Star.
'The highway corridors between Portland and Lewiston/Auburn and between Portland and Bangor are uncongested, predictable, have traffic speeds of up to 70 mph, and provide for efficient travel times for personal vehicles and bus services,' Merrill wrote in an email.
However, Maine Rail Group President Peter Cole looks at the popularity of the Amtrak Downeaster line that extends from Boston through southern Maine to Brunswick as an indicator of rail ridership ridership interest. That line saw a 9% increase in ridership between 2023 and 2024, according to Amtrak data.
While that line is concentrated in the most densely populated portion of the state, there is interest farther north, too.
After Matt Gilley rode the Downeaster from Maine to Boston for the first time last summer, he wondered why he would ever make that drive again.
Thanks to that experience and some inspiration from a train hobbyist friend, Gilley started to think of passenger rail as a solution worth exploring for what he described as a 'front burner issue' at Thomas College in Waterville, where he works.
Thomas College sits a couple of miles southwest of downtown with virtually no public transit options. Without a car, it's challenging for students to move around the city, let alone the rest of the state, Gilley said.
Bringing trains to Waterville could be transformational not only for helping students connect with other parts of Maine and New England, but also as a way to improve recruitment and campus life, he added.
'It checks a lot of boxes here that right now we're struggling to find solutions to,' he added.
As program director for the Centers of Innovation at Thomas, Gilley is responsible for curating projects for the President's Innovation Challenge, which allows students to work alongside professionals on real life problems. For this school year, he connected with the Maine Rail Group to develop a project for students to learn more about efforts to expand passenger rail in the state.
Students participating in the project have learned about the history of passenger rail in Maine, what it took to bring it to places like Saco and other parts of the state, and exploring what role it could play in the state's transportation future, Gilley explained.
Through their work, the students saw enthusiasm for increased train travel options throughout the state and saw an opportunity to try to move the needle on the issue by bringing interested parties together.
That's what sparked the idea for a rail summit where experts, officials and others working on the passenger rail effort can join together on the school's campus to discuss how train travel affects economic development, the environment and tourism.
Gilley said students from Thomas and neighboring Colby College will also speak at the April event about how expanded passenger rail would affect them.
In the meantime, Gilley said students plan on attending the public hearing for LD 487 on March 6 and participating in a day of action promoting rail at the State House later in March.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lackawanna County election board certifies primary results
Lackawanna County election board certifies primary results

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lackawanna County election board certifies primary results

SCRANTON — The Lackawanna County Board of Elections certified Friday the results of last month's municipal primary, making those results official. Democratic Commissioner Bill Gaughan, Republican Commissioner Chris Chermak and county Judge Terrence R. Nealon, who filled the election board vacancy created by former Democratic Commissioner Matt McGloin's late February resignation, voted unanimously to certify the results of the primary held May 20. The results and other election-related information is available online at The last day for unregistered voters who want to vote in November's municipal election to register is Oct. 20. The election itself is Nov. 4. — JEFF HORVATH

How civil rights investigations against schools have changed under Trump admin
How civil rights investigations against schools have changed under Trump admin

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How civil rights investigations against schools have changed under Trump admin

Amid a flurry of civil rights and Title IX investigations, the Trump administration has reopened K-12 schools and universities, signaling a complete 180-degree shift in the interpretation of the mandates. The Trump administration is fighting schools over transgender athletes, bans on Native American mascots and Chicago's 'Black Students Success Plans.' The switch from the previous administration has caused whiplash for schools, with advocates warning students some complaints may not be worth pursuing. 'The Trump Administration has created dumpsters for so-called civil rights violations that are distractingly unresponsive to actual acts of violence, harassment, discrimination and abuse in our nation's educational institutions,' says Shaun Harper, a professor of education, public policy and business at the University of Southern California. 'It is painfully apparent that destructive politicized attacks on DEI are far more important to them than are efforts to ensure the actual civil rights of American students, families and educators,' he added, referring to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The most drastic change has been in the handling of cases involving transgender athletes. The Biden administration notably moved to add protections for LGBTQ individuals to Title IX, a civil rights law that protects students against sex-based discrimination. Former President Biden also proposed protections for transgender students, such as forbidding overarching bans on transgender women in girls' sports, but withdrew the proposal before President Trump took office, so the new president could not take the provision and alter it. Under the Trump administration, dozens of schools have come under fire with alleged Title IX violations over transgender athletes. The biggest threat occurred against California after the Trump administration said it would pull federal funding from the state following a transgender high school track and field athlete qualifying to compete in the state championship. 'It's definitely been tough to have students come to us who are considering filing an Office of Civil Rights [OCR] complaint because they've experienced discrimination at their school, and have to sort of say, 'I'm not even sure if it's a good idea at this moment,' given the way that the Trump administration is enforcing Title IX,' said Emma Grasso Levine, senior manager of Title IX policy and programs at the Title IX advocacy project Know Your IX. 'Having OCR suddenly stop being an option for many students because of the discriminatory way that the Trump administration is operating … really does limit mechanisms for accountability to ensure that schools are handling Title IX cases and preventing sex-based harassment,' she added. In a statement to The Hill, Department of Education spokesperson Julie Hartman said the Trump administration is 'restoring civil rights law and reversing the damage inflicted by the Biden Administration, which stretched the scope of federal anti-discrimination law beyond its statutory purview.' Hartman added, 'By enforcing the law as it is written, the Trump Administration's OCR is using its personnel and resources responsibly to protect all Americans and eliminating wasteful and unfounded investigations.' While the Trump administration has been vague in its definition of what DEI initiatives are at schools, the civil rights investigations the Education Department is opening give a glimpse at its meaning. Chicago Public Schools is currently under investigation over 'Black Students Success Plans' the district made, without making similar plans for students of other ethnicities. The Education Department launched a probe against New York's Education Department after it threatened to strip funding from a school for having a Native American mascot. 'Forcing them to change the name, after all of these years, is ridiculous and, in actuality, an affront to our great Indian population. The School Board, and virtually everyone in the area, are demanding the name be kept,' Trump said about the incident. Supporters of the president are encouraged by the rapid switch in gears in what investigations are brought to schools, pointing out some families have been waiting four years for this. 'The [Biden] administration had a pretty clear stance in favor of what they called equity, but I argue was really racial favoritism and an ideology in favor of identity politics,' said Jonathan Butcher, a senior research fellow in education policy at the Heritage Foundation. 'The Trump administration is, I believe, appropriately viewing the Civil Rights Act in terms of colorblindness and meritocracy and trying to preserve, or at least restore those things to American public life and in public law,' he added. 'It should be a relief to local educators and families who are concerned that the transgender movement has taken over our view of what it means to be male and female.' The relief by some parents — and fear by others — of what cases will be prioritized highlights the struggle with the political whiplash that can occur when the Education Department switches hands. 'Even with the pingponging, it doesn't mean that the Trump administration is accurate, and they're putting forward an unlawful and wrong interpretation of the law by distorting the law and using it as a way to require discrimination against students, and especially students from vulnerable communities,' said Shiwali Patel, senior director of Safe and Inclusive Schools. There are concerns about how the Trump administration is using the Office of Civil Rights, but also if it will even exist by the end of his presidency. Many employees in the office were fired during the Education Department's reduction in force, and Trump has floated moving OCR to the Department of Justice. Some advocates have said the Department of Education will be unable to uphold its legal obligations, especially as OCR cases were already backlogged before the layoffs. 'They're prioritizing weaponizing these laws to require harm against students, against vulnerable groups of students, with the few resources that they have, because now we're now dealing with an OCR that is at almost half of what it used to be because of all the cuts and the layoffs that the Trump administration has engaged in,' Patel said. The North Star for both sides is passing laws either in Congress or on the state level to fight against the executive changes that happen to these investigations every four years. 'I think the states have adopted laws that have prohibited boys in girls' sports,' Butcher said. 'All of these things that states are doing are codifying what the Trump administration is now supporting.' 'At the federal level, it'll definitely be up to Congress, of course, when it comes to putting something into law. And I think that federal lawmakers would do well to be mindful not only of what the Civil Rights statutes say on this issue, but also what voters are feeling like,' he added. 'Voters, I think, have made it clear through surveys that these positions on, again, boys getting access to girls' private spaces and sports, are unpopular.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Hillary Clinton says she's not sure if America will remain the world's top superpower
Hillary Clinton says she's not sure if America will remain the world's top superpower

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hillary Clinton says she's not sure if America will remain the world's top superpower

Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton answering questions during a conference in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on June 8, 2025. (John Cole/Capital-Star) Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a guest appearance in Philadelphia on Sunday morning to participate in a Q&A session at America in One Room/Pennsylvania. Attendees were told that a special guest would be speaking to them, but the crowd was kept in the dark until Clinton took the stage. For 30 minutes, she responded to questions on a variety of foreign affairs topics at the gathering aimed at encouraging civic engagement and finding solutions to the nation's most pressing challenges. Clinton told the room that she's 'intrigued' and 'excited' by what they were doing. '(I'm) hopeful that it can serve as a model for a lot of the tough issues we face,' Clinton said. Once the Q&A began, one particular question gave her pause: Is the United States 'really the top superpower in the world, or are we just the top consumers?' 'I think we still are (the top superpower), but I'm not sure we will remain,' Clinton said. 'Because we are giving away our power in ways that I think are very damaging to our leadership position in the world.' The former first lady, who served as U.S. secretary of state during President Barack Obama's first term, was the Democratic Party's nominee for president in 2016, losing to Republican Donald Trump. She didn't mention President Trump by name, but appeared to criticize his administration's foreign policy. 'I want us to remain the leading superpower. I want us to remain the leading example of a society that can work together, achieve things of importance together, get along with each other across partisan lines,' Clinton said. 'And I know we're in a big battle in our country right now, because other people have a very different view, a view of dominance and a view of power for the sake of power.' Clinton argued that if the United States cedes to someone else as the 'superpower' of the world, it would create a vacuum filled by bad actors and ultimately, lead to a world that is less safe, less fair, and less prosperous. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE However, she said she also fears if the United States no longer leads it could also create spheres of influence for other countries to step into and become dominant. 'You know, there are some people, frankly, who advocate let China control Asia, let Russia control Europe. We'll just stay over here,' Clinton said. 'That was exactly what was said in the 1930s and it did not work out very well.' 'So, I think we have to learn from history,' she added. 'Not be imprisoned by it, but learn from it.' When responding to questions about America's foreign policy in Asia, Clinton said that she believes the United States needs to make it clear to China that if they were to invade Taiwan, it would be crossing a red line. 'We don't want a conflict. That would be the last thing we want,' Clinton said. 'But Taiwan is one of those lines.' Without saying Trump by name, Clinton also criticized the current administration, saying she believes that the United States is not pursuing what she believes is the smartest strategy with Taiwan. She also blasted Trump's tariff policies with China. On May 12, Trump announced that he lowered the 145% tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% for 90 days in an effort to allow for trade talks, while China also reduced its taxes on U.S. products from 125% to 10%, according to the Associated Press. 'We are crippling our economy,' Clinton said. 'We are affecting their economy, maybe not as much as it will eventually affect our economy.' Clinton referenced California's Long Beach port being 'largely empty' right now as a sign that the impact of the tariffs will be felt over the next few months. 'They haven't quite kicked in yet, so we are hurting ourselves economically,' she said. Many Democrats, including Gov. Josh Shapiro, have been vocal against the tariffs that Trump has put in place. However, Republicans, including Pennsylvania U.S. Sen. Dave McCormick, believe the tariffs will benefit American manufacturing. When addressing a question about whether or not the United States needs to rethink the balance between defense spending and investing in diplomacy, Clinton said the country needs both. The Trump administration's effort to slash government spending via the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) led to programs like USAID being cut, which has resulted in pushback from Democratic lawmakers. She also referenced the current war in Ukraine. 'The Russian invasion of Ukraine, a totally aggressive, unprovoked effort to conquer and take over another country, is absolutely against our interests,' Clinton said. 'It's against our interests because we do not want to see aggression rewarded, because you don't know where it will stop, and you don't know who will come after you, or people that you're connected with or that you're invested in.' During the 2024 presidential election, Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party's nominee, differed on the way they believe the United States should handle the war in Ukraine. Trump campaigned on ending the war in Ukraine on 'day one,' if elected, although an agreement to end the conflict has not yet been reached. More than 150,000 people living in Pennsylvania are Ukrainians and Ukrainian Americans, making the Keystone State the home to the second largest population in the nation. Clinton acknowledged that part of the challenge is ending the conflict after it starts and referenced how President Bill Clinton's administration played a role in ending conflicts in Northern Ireland and the Balkans. 'You have to look at all the different levers of power and utilize them appropriately,' Clinton said. 'Where does diplomacy work? Where does military force play a role? And what can we do to promote our values by working with people who want to have freedom and democracy.' On a question about defense spending, Clinton warned that cybersecurity is 'clearly one of our biggest threats' currently facing the United States. She said she believes that deterrence is what is needed right now in the world, arguing it would send a message to the United States' adversaries. 'We know that our adversaries, primarily Russia and China, have the capacity to cripple our infrastructure,' Clinton said. 'We have the capacity to cripple their infrastructure.' 'We have to be better prepared and better able to deter them than they can hurt us,' she added. Sunday was the final day of the gathering at the Sheraton Hotel in Center City. Several Pennsylvania elected officials participated in the multi-day conference, including Gov. Shapiro, House Speaker Joanna McClinton (D-Philadelphia), and state Sen. Joe Picozzi (R-Philadelphia). SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store