Manjeet's advocacy a courtroom masterclass, says fellow lawyer
KUALA LUMPUR : The late Manjeet Singh Dhillon was beyond a shadow of a doubt one of the best criminal lawyers this country ever has produced, and was especially skilled in cross-examining prosecution witnesses, a lawyer said.
Ravinder Singh Dhalliwal said Manjeet's courtroom advocacy was 'an art and a joy to watch'.
'Manjeet's cross-examinations were legendary—precise, cutting, and always with purpose,' he said at a reference proceeding held on Friday for 20 legal practitioners who passed away last year.
Justices Amarjeet Singh and Anand Ponnudurai co-presided over the event at the High Court here.
According to Ravinder, Manjeet often said: 'Go for the jugular. Don't waste time with irrelevant questions.'
He said Manjeet defended some of the most difficult cases, including the S. Nallakaruppan arms possession case as well as the murder trials of cosmetics millionaire Sosilawati Lawiya and former minister Mokhtar Hashim.
'He stood in the fire when others backed away from the heat,' said Ravinder.
Manjeet also represented Abdul Razak Baginda, a former aide of ex-prime minister Najib Razak, in a RM100 million civil suit filed by the late Altantuya Shaariibuu's family.
Manjeet was also described as a wordsmith, and was a skilled writer who expertly used language—often with a focus on creativity and eloquence.
Manjeet, Ravinder said, stood as both a pillar of the legal fraternity and a relentless sentinel of justice.
'He was, in the truest and most noble sense of the word, a 'lawyer's lawyer'. He was not merely learned in law – he was devoted to its spirit, uncompromising in its ethics, and unafraid in its pursuit,' he added.
Noted for his no-nonsense approach in human affairs, Ravinder said Manjeet also had a soft spot for animals and once served as president of PAWS Animal Welfare Society.
He read law at Middle Temple and was admitted to the Bar in 1977.
Manjeet served as magistrate, sessions court judge, deputy public prosecutor, and Treasury solicitor before going into private practice.
He also served as the Malaysian Bar's secretary and vice-president before being its president in 1991 and 1992.
Prior to embarking on his legal career, Manjeet was an English teacher, having trained as an educator at Kirby in the United Kingdom.
He said Manjeet could be confrontational, even difficult, but always spoke the truth, even if it was liable to backfire on him.
Ravinder said that in the tumultuous wake of the 1988 judicial crisis, 'when the rule of law trembled beneath executive force', Manjeet, as the Bar secretary, affirmed an affidavit alleging misconduct by then acting lord president Hamid Omar.
The affidavit accused Hamid of attempting to prevent, frustrate and interfere with a Supreme Court sitting relating to proceedings involving his predecessor, Salleh Abas.
Manjeet's affidavit was filed in support of an application seeking committal proceedings against Hamid for contempt of court. This led to contempt proceedings against Manjeet himself, for which he was found guilty and fined.
'Above all, Manjeet was a true officer of the court – not just in title, but in spirit. His loyalty was to justice, not favour; his conscience owed allegiance only to the law,' he said.
Ravinder said, upon Manjeet's passing, tributes poured in from across the legal and political spectrum. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim described Manjeet as a remarkable lawyer and a dear personal friend.
Manjeet, aged 82, died at his home in Bukit Damansara here on Oct 28.
Also present at the reference proceedings were Bar secretary Murshidah Mustafa, Kuala Lumpur Bar committee chairman Nimalan Devaraja and Joennily @ Siti Badariah Yusof, representing the Attorney-General's Chambers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Creating Anwar's legacy — ending ‘gomenshud'
One of the most common Malaysian words I hear is 'gomenshud'. This is used whenever an issue of concern arises and the 'government should' do something about it rather than the private sector or, heaven-forfend, that individuals should fix it for themselves. It is ironic that people complain of incompetence, systemic corruption and moral turpitude within the executive, legislature, judiciary and the permanent civil service at federal and state levels but still demand that more money, responsibility and interference opportunities should be handed to them. The economics of government and policy design, called 'public choice theory' tells us clearly that people in government are not driven by the 'greater good' or the 'public interest', they are, just like the rest of us, driven by personal and collective self-interest. This is not meant to be cynical or offensive but simply to help us understand those in public policy as human beings — they have hopes and dreams, they want to make life easy for themselves as far as possible and if there is a chance to make a few bucks they will take it. Each year the auditor-general reports hundreds of millions lost in wastage and leakages across the government sector. The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) estimates RM277 billion lost to corruption between 2018 and 2023. The think tank Emir Research estimates that RM4.5 trillion was lost to corruption in the last 26 years. This is all identified after the fact and to stop this haemorrhage of resources we need to address the 'gomenshud mentality' which defaults to intervention from the start without proper evaluation of the costs and benefits and the likely losses due specifically to policy design. A common form of policy design in Malaysia is the 'patronage cascade' where projects, concessions and access routes to money are specifically built-in to benefit middlemen often through pre-allocated packages and contracts. With this in mind, the 13th Malaysia Plan which will be tabled this week should reduce the role and interference of government. We should be cautious if we see 'patronage cascades' where policies are specifically designed to pass projects to vested interests. Instead, broad-based universal programmes, available to everyone, with open and transparent access routes should be the emphasis. This can be achieved first by government exiting commercial activities which crowd out large businesses, SMEs and micro enterprises and leaving these activities to the private sector. Second by slashing regulations and focusing only on minimum standards of health and safety, anti-corruption, good governance and anti-trust issues. Finally, by focusing on the basic role of government in many areas where there are direct and legitimate concerns for public policy including public health, education and social protection. Economic mechanisms we hope to see in the 13MP include liberalisation of markets, reducing regulatory burdens, limiting government interference and promoting creative, innovative, agile, competitive businesses. The US tariff issue also sends us a lesson that protectionist policies come with a reciprocal cost. So removing restrictions to market access should also be a priority for the 13MP. Proper independent assessments have rarely been made of the targets of previous Malaysia plans and many have not been delivered, fully or at all. The main unfulfilled target of every Malaysia plan is to build in a mechanism to end the need for future plans. In other words, these are 'forever wars' against dreamed up economic challenges more typical of centrally planned economies. They are increasingly irrelevant in a modern technology-driven economic environment in which anything laid down in July 2025 will be obsolete by December 2025 let alone by 2030 — gomenshud recognise this and end it once and for all. The views expressed are the writer's own and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Tussle over custody behind 6-year-old's murder, say police
Family members awaiting the results of a post-mortem examination in Rembau on July 29 after the body of M Tishant was found in Jempol. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : Family matters, including arguments over child custody, are believed to be the main motive behind the murder of six-year-old M Tishant, according to Negeri Sembilan police. State police chief Ahmad Dzaffir Yussof said the police had not discovered any other motive so far. He said the boy's parents were in the process of getting separated and were battling for custody, according to a Kosmo report. Dzaffir said that Tishant's body had been buried in Jempol as the suspect was familiar with the area. The boy was reported missing at Taman Bukit Indah in Johor on July 24 but was found buried in Jempol four days later. The body was discovered after Tishant's 36-year-old father was arrested. An autopsy found that he had been strangled to death with a cable tie.
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Review 25km ‘straight-line' travel allowance for Sabah teachers, says union
The union said several teachers in Sabah were forced to pay back the travel allowances they had received. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : The education ministry and public services department have been urged to review the implementation of a new 25km 'straight-line' travel allowance rule for teachers in Sabah. The allowance for teachers travelling from their home to their schools is capped at a travel distance of 25km, measured as a straight line on a map rather than the actual distance covered by road. The Sabah government teachers' union (KGKS) said this rule cannot be implemented rigidly in Sabah given the state's hilly terrain and lack of infrastructure, like roads. KGKS president Gundohing Murkam Hussien cited the example of teachers working at SK Penimbawan Tuaran, which can be reached by boat or road, The Borneo Post reported. 'The first way is by boat along the river, which takes between 10 and 15 minutes, depending on weather conditions. The second is to use a car and drive for 78km. 'This means that strictly enforcing the 25km requirement is not appropriate. After considering the views of all KGKS members, the union has agreed to appeal to the ministry to review this issue,' he said. Gundohing said several teachers under KGKS were taking home lower salaries now because of this rule. Previously, they were given the travel allowance after it had been verified by the district education office. Gundohing also said some teachers were ordered to repay the allowances they had 'wrongly' received, forcing a few of them to apply for bank loans or sell their cars to pay off the amount. 'Of course, the teachers involved have been badly affected, leading to a decrease in their enthusiasm for work. 'All those involved in the process (of approving the allowances for the teachers) should by right be held responsible and share the cost of these claims,' he said.
