logo
North Carolina professor who waged 'war on DEI' at university touts win

North Carolina professor who waged 'war on DEI' at university touts win

Fox News11-04-2025
North Carolina State University professor Stephen Porter is celebrating after his university ditched DEI in its strategic plan following his formal complaint.
Porter has taught applied statistics and data analysis to graduate students at NC State since 2011. The self-described "populist Republican" has been fighting against DEI policies at the university for the past decade and believes he achieved his first victory in February.
"Two weeks ago, I filed a complaint citing four violations of the UNC System's policies on institutional neutrality and the ban on compelled speech. The university has now conceded on three out of four counts—but they're saying as little as possible about it," Porter wrote on his blog.
In an interview with Fox News Digital, Porter said he was surprised and thrilled when he learned the university announced it would be making changes, just two weeks after he had filed his complaint.
"I wasn't sure exactly what was going to happen. So I was really, really happy with the final outcome," he said.
The university announced on February 25 that it had made revisions to the language in its strategic plan and vision and values statements in order to align with the UNC System's equality policy.
Porter had filed a complaint to the UNC Board of Governors on February 8 alleging NC State was violating the UNC System policies on institutional neutrality and compelled speech in multiple ways, including in its strategic plan.
In 2023, the UNC Board of Governors voted to ban DEI statements and compelled speech from admission, hiring, promotion and tenure practices at 16 public universities.
UNC also repealed and replaced its diversity and inclusion policy with an "equality policy," which requires schools to "comply with nondiscrimination laws, comply with institutional neutrality, refrain from compelling others' speech, and refrain from promoting political or social concepts through training or required beliefs."
Porter said these policies "marked a significant victory for intellectual freedom in North Carolina's public universities."
Yet he says his university simply moved its DEI measures "underground" rather than actually eliminating them.
For example, DEI terms remained in NC State's strategic plan and other strategic plans in various colleges at the university, he said. The university also renamed its DEI office multiple times rather than abolish the office.
"To me, it was really insulting when they just renamed the office. It's like, really? That's how you're complying with this?" he remarked.
The university should have gotten rid of this office and hired people "who actually believe in equality of opportunity as opposed to equality of outcomes," he added.
Porter's complaint to the board cited other alleged violations, such as 4,750 references to "diversity, equity and inclusion" on administrative websites and text on the university's Pride Center website which said that students and faculty members are required to use a student's preferred pronouns. That text has since been removed from the university website.
In Porter's complaint, he asked the board to review these alleged violations and take any necessary corrective action.
Although he didn't hear anything back, he was pleasantly surprised to see the university announcement and said it appeared that the university had been "quietly scrubbing" language from some of the websites he flagged in his complaint.
"I was astonished I won on the strategic plan," he told Fox News Digital. "That was the one I really cared about. I thought, boy if anything can happen, if we can get this stuff out of the strategic plans, that is just a huge, huge victory."
When reached for comment, North Carolina State University referred Fox News Digital to the university's February statement about the changes.
The UNC Board of Governors did not respond to a request for comment.
The professor's victory comes after he lost a federal civil rights lawsuit against NC State in 2021 in which he alleged retaliation for criticizing DEI and social justice at the university.
The university announcement came just two weeks after universities in the state were ordered to drop any mandated diversity, equity and inclusion course credits, in order to comply with President Trump's anti-DEI executive order, Inside Higher Ed reported.
Porter told Fox News Digital he was pleased by the Trump administration's actions tackling DEI in education.
"I wake up every day eager to read the news," Porter said. "It's been absolutely delightful. A fantasy come true."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zelensky Returning to White House With Backup After Trump Clash
Zelensky Returning to White House With Backup After Trump Clash

Newsweek

time19 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Zelensky Returning to White House With Backup After Trump Clash

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. European leaders and the NATO Secretary General will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Monday's White House meeting, offering up a coordinated show of support for Kyiv after President Donald Trump failed to reach a ceasefire deal with Russia last week. Why It Matters European officials have looked on with concern as the Trump administration placed itself as the chief negotiator between Russia and Ukraine, jockeying to stay in the loop—and influential—as the Republican appears unwilling to strongarm Russia into concessions. European countries, many of which feel their own security is at stake with an agreement for Ukraine, have repeatedly echoed Kyiv's demands for a ceasefire deal that does not gift Russia territory recognized internationally as Ukrainian, and for Kyiv to have firm security guarantees to deter future Russian attacks. Ahead of Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, European leaders made it clear they did not support any change in borders by force. Trump had said in advance of the summit that both sides would need to cede territory. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, right, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky participate in a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, on August 17, 2025. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, right, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky participate in a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, on August 17, 2025. AP Photo What To Know British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron will be among the leaders making the trip to Washington. Also expected to attend are Ursula von der Leyen, the head of the European Commission, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who has sought a tight relationship with Trump. Finnish President Alexander Stubb may attend, Politico reported on Sunday. The Finnish leader has broken the ice with Trump, bonding over a shared love of golfing while leading a country with a significant land border, and apprehension toward, Russia. Stubb is a "very good player," Trump previously said. Zelensky's previous visit to the White House in February ended in disaster, descending into a public show of fractured relations between Kyiv and Washington. "Most likely, there will be little mutual understanding between Trump and Zelensky," Oleg Dunda, a Ukrainian MP who is part of Zelensky's Servant of the People party, told Newsweek. "Zelensky has already firmly rejected any proposals regarding territories." Trump told European leaders after meeting Putin that he backed a plan in which Ukraine would cede territory it still controlled to Russia, The New York Times reported, citing two senior European officials. Reuters reported that Russia had said it would offer slivers of land it currently controls in Ukraine in exchange for Kyiv giving up chunks of land in the east that Russia does not currently control, citing sources briefed on the Kremlin's thinking. Under the proposal, Ukraine would fully withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk, with the current front lines in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions to the south frozen in place, according to the report. Kyiv has said it will not reward Russia's invasion with territory, and to cede these areas would go against the country's constitution. Russia has tried to frame European nations as stumbling blocks to the peace agreement the Trump administration has pledged to broker. Following the Anchorage summit, Putin urged European politicians to "not make attempts to disrupt the planned progress through provocations and behind-the-scenes intrigues," or to become "obstacles." Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said on Sunday that despite the Alaska summit yielding no deal, Ukraine would have "Article 5-like" protections to ward off any future attempt by Russia to attack its neighbor. Article 5 is the provision in NATO's founding treaty that means that an attack on any member country in the alliance is treated as an attack on all. Moscow has insisted Ukraine cannot become a member of NATO, while Kyiv sees joining the alliance as a way to make sure Russia cannot attack the country again. "Now it is really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump told Fox News following the Alaska summit. "I would also say the European nations have to get involved a little bit." What People Are Saying Dominique Trinquand, a retired general who previously headed up France's military mission to the United Nations, told The Associated Press: "The Europeans are very afraid of the Oval Office scene being repeated and so they want to support Mr. Zelensky to the hilt." What Happens Next It's not clear how much concrete progress will be made in Monday's meeting, the Russian and Ukrainian demands remaining apparently irreconciliable.

States are trying to keep disasters apolitical in the new Trump era
States are trying to keep disasters apolitical in the new Trump era

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

States are trying to keep disasters apolitical in the new Trump era

'This decision was petty. This decision was partisan, and this decision was punishing.' Moore said. And after the Los Angeles wildfires in January, California Gov. Gavin Newsom was quick to propose that politics could play a role in Trump's approval or denial of funding for his state. 'He's done it in the past, not just here in California,' Newsom said on Pod Save America. 'The rhetoric is very familiar, it's increasingly acute, and obviously we all have reason to be concerned about it.' A review by Seattle-based public radio station KUOW in June found that FEMA denied six of the 10 major disaster requests that Democratic states filed between February and June, while denying just one of 15 requests from Republican states. Asked about the analysis, a White House official said that 'Democrat state requests were denied in the first six months because they were not disasters. In the past, states have abused the process. President Trump is right-sizing FEMA and ensuring it is serving its intended purpose to help the American people.' Democratic Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs became the rare governor to criticize the federal government's disaster management in mid-July when she called for an investigation following a destructive fire on federal land that burned down a beloved Grand Canyon lodge. Hobbs said that she does not intend her call for an investigation to be viewed as a criticism of the Trump administration. 'I don't, and I think it's really important,' Hobbs said in an interview, adding that good working relationships between officials managing tribal, federal and state land are key. 'This is not intended to undermine that collaboration, but … we need to look at what led to that decision being made.' Steve Ellis, former deputy director of the Bureau of Land Management who worked for the agency and the U.S. Forest Service under multiple administrations, said that any federal agency involved in managing a fire of the magnitude and destructiveness as the one in the Grand Canyon should be launching an investigation without a governor's need to call for it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store