Tens of thousands of women traveled for abortion care again last year as state policies continue to shift
But abortion wasn't an option in Wisconsin, where a 175-year-old state law had effectively banned the procedure at the time. That law has since been overturned, but Ladd, her family and her doctors were stuck in a legal gray area that raised fear and worry. And instead of being surrounded by familiar comforts at one of the most distressing points of her life, Ladd had to take time off from work, coordinate child care for her 2-year-old son and travel more than 100 miles from home to a health care provider she had never met.
'In the moment when it was all happening … I was more focused on just getting through the grief of that time. But as the months went on and I was sitting with what happened able to process it, I just got really mad,' Ladd said. 'How asinine is it that my health care providers can say, 'Yes, this is what you need, this is the best option for you, but we can't do it. You have to go here because our hospital is uncomfortable due to legal reasons to provide this procedure'?'
Instead, Ladd spent an hours-long ride home lying uncomfortably the back seat of the car, nauseated and in pain – a trip that tens of thousands of others also made last year, often for even an even longer time, and sometimes alone.
More than 1 in 7 people who had an abortion in the United States last year crossed state lines to do so, according to new estimates from the Guttmacher Institute, a research and policy organization focused on sexual and reproductive health that supports abortion rights. The patterns highlight the lasting impact of the US Supreme Court's Dobbs decision, which revoked the federal right to an abortion and created a fractured landscape of care – with ongoing policy changes that continue to affect tens of thousands.
About 155,000 people traveled out of state for an abortion in 2024, according to the new Guttmacher estimates — more than twice as many as in 2019.
Nearly half of those who traveled for an abortion last year came from a dozen states that have enacted total bans, the Guttmacher data shows, including more than 28,000 Texas residents who left the state for an abortion last year – more than any other state.
Most often, those Texas residents traveled to neighboring New Mexico, where abortion is legal. Kansas and Colorado also welcomed thousands of Texas residents for abortions last year.
For some Texas residents, getting to a neighboring state requires a full day of travel. But in some parts of the country – particularly in the Southeast – options for abortion care require people to travel through multiple states.
In the first year and a half after the Dobbs decision, Florida had become a key access point for abortion care. In 2023, more than 9,000 people traveled from other states to get an abortion in Florida, according to Guttmacher data. About 1 in 12 abortions nationwide and 1 in 3 abortions in the South were performed in Florida at that time.
But in May 2024, a six-week ban took effect in Florida – limiting abortions to a point before most women know they're pregnant. The number of people who traveled to Florida for an abortion last year was cut in half, Guttmacher data shows. And nearly 8,000 people left Florida to get an abortion in another state last year, often crossing through least three states for care.
Despite the restrictions imposed by North Carolina law – a 12-week gestational limit and a 72-hour waiting period – the great gap created by Florida's new, even tighter restrictions drove a significant increase in travel from Florida to North Carolina for abortion care. Floridians traveled even farther north for abortion care, too: About 10 times more people traveled from Florida to Virginia in 2024 compared with 2023, and more than 2,000 people traveled up to New York last year.
'We keep relearning the same lesson with these data, in some ways, which is that what happens in one state doesn't stay in one state and really has ripple effects in many others,' said Isaac Maddow-Zimet, a data scientist with Guttmacher. 'Especially when it comes to travel patterns, the decisions that people are making about where they can travel are so complicated and so impacted by a network of restrictions that people are having to navigate, particularly in the Southeast.'
Illinois has remained a key access point for people traveling for an abortion nationwide; More than a fifth of the people who traveled for an abortion last year went to Illinois, the new Guttmacher data shows. The state drew more than 35,000 out-of-state residents for an abortion in 2024, more than any other state.
Experts say that stakeholders across Illinois have made their stance on abortion rights clear, with politicians, advocates, providers and more committing to protect access.
'We are not just working on advocacy and not just passing good laws; we are directly investing in abortion funding, which is life-saving, and that has an immediate impact. Up and down the state, we take that very seriously,' said Megan Jeyifo, executive director of the Chicago Abortion Fund.
The investments around abortion care in Illinois – including clinics opening, expanded hours and growing the number of providers – have also meant there are a lot of appointments available, she said.
'When you are pregnant and do not want to be, one more week makes a big difference,' Jeyifo said. 'The conditions we've created here in Illinois are not only available to people of means, they are available to all.'
Choices Center for Reproductive Health opened a new clinic in southern Illinois in late 2023, and the vast majority of the patients seen there – about 90% – come from other states, President and CEO Jennifer Pepper said.
'I pull into the parking lot and I see license plates from Texas and Louisiana and Tennessee, so I know that these patients have traveled a minimum of four hours,' Pepper said. 'If they could just go down the street to their regular ob/gyn, they could be in and out under an hour. It's a lot of wasted hours for a lot of people that are taking care of children and teaching and being nurses and just caring for our communities. That's what I think about when I see the patients.'
The clinic's policy is to see any patient who makes it to its doors.
'We don't turn people away for abortion care, even if they're four hours late, because that's care they need. They've gone through a lot, and they've traveled a great distance to access it, so we take care of them,' Pepper said. 'Cars break down, tires go flat, you get caught in traffic, children have to eat, the babysitter shows up late – these are all things that happen, and it takes a lot of compassion and willing to be flexible.'
The clinic is able to be flexible in large part because its schedule is not overbooked. Pepper says part of that may be thanks to the growing use of telehealth to access medication abortion, including those that are accessed through shield laws by individuals living in states with abortion bans.
Another new report, published Monday by the Society of Family Planning, found that 1 in 4 abortions in 2024 were provided through telehealth – up from 1 in 5 in 2023 and just 1 in 20 in 2022.
At the end of 2024, an average of 12,330 abortions each month were provided under shield laws, up about 40% from the start of the year.
'Millions of people live in states where abortion is banned or restricted, and traveling for care isn't an option for everyone,' Dr. Angel Foster, co-founder of the Massachusetts Medication Abortion Access Project (The MAP), a shield law practice, said in a statement. 'By providing safe, affordable medication abortion via telemedicine, we make sure people can get the care they need – no matter where they live or what they can afford.'
Overall, data from Guttmacher shows that the number of people traveling for an abortion has dipped slightly: About 9% fewer people crossed state lines for an abortion last year than in 2023, a difference of about 15,000 people.
While access to telehealth abortions has increased, there is also less funding available for people who want to or need to travel.
Choices was once able to cover 100% of the abortion costs for patients in need, but that has now dropped to 50% or less, Pepper said. And in mid-2024, the Chicago Abortion Fund also had to stop providing support to people who were traveling to states other than Illinois, Jeyifo said, jeopardizing the state's ability to absorb the increase in need for appointments.
'Telehealth has become a vital tool in expanding abortion care—especially for people in states with bans,' Dr. Ushma Upadhyay, co-chair of the #WeCount project from the Society of Family Planning and professor at the University of California, San Francisco's Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, said in a statement. 'But this access is far from guaranteed. Anti-abortion extremists are using junk science and now turning their attacks toward telehealth, trying to dismantle a lifeline for people in ban states by attempting to roll back access.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
FDA Suggest Walmart Recalls Frozen Shrimp After Radiation Detected At Port
The Food and Drug Administration is warning that some Great Value brand frozen shrimp sold at Walmart could be contaminated with radioactive isotope Cesium-137 after Customs and Border Protection detected the substance in shipping containers at four major American ports and at least one sample of shrimp. Cesium-137 was detected in some frozen shrimp coming from Indonesia—but none that have been sold in stores yet. getty The FDA is investigating the potential contamination and has not 'confirmed the presence of contamination in any product in commerce,' they are still warning consumers to avoid eating shrimp that come from the same Indonesian producer BMS Foods. The FDA is recommending Walmart recall frozen shrimp coming from BMS Foods, and the retailer has not returned a request for comment from Forbes. This is a breaking story and will be updated.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Medical group goes against CDC, recommend COVID shots for young kids
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) no longer recommends the COVID-19 vaccine for children — but a major medical group is going against that guidance. On Tuesday, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) released its latest annual immunization schedule for children — and it includes vaccines for COVID-19, in addition to flu and RSV. "Infants and children 6 through 23 months of age are at the highest risk for severe COVID-19," the AAP states in its release. "Given this, the AAP recommends a COVID-19 vaccine for all children ages 6 through 23 months old to help protect against serious illness." The AAP also recommends a "single dose of age-appropriate COVID-19 vaccine" for kids and teens 2 and older who are at high risk of severe COVID, have never been vaccinated before, and who live with people who are at a high risk of severe disease. "The AAP also recommends the vaccine be available for children aged 2-18 who do not fall into these risk groups, but whose parent or guardian desires them to have the protection of the vaccine," the release states. "Among the reasons we decided to move to a risk-based recommendation for healthy older children is the fact that the hospitalization rate for young children and children with underlying medical conditions remains high, in line with rates for many of the other vaccine-preventable diseases for which we vaccinate," said Sean O'Leary, M.D., chair of the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases, in the release. In May 2025, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that COVID-19 vaccines would be removed from the CDC's routine immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women. Instead of a universal recommendation, the CDC's updated guidance calls for "shared clinical decision-making," in which parents and doctors discuss the benefits and risks of vaccination for each individual case. "Where the parent presents with a desire for their child to be vaccinated, children 6 months and older may receive COVID-19 vaccination, informed by the clinical judgment of a healthcare provider and personal preference and circumstances," the CDC's guidance states. In total, the AAP's schedule includes immunizations against 18 diseases, recommended for all children from birth to age 18. The AAP noted in a press release that its vaccine schedule "differs from recent recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the CDC." For more Health articles, visit Other included updates involve the pentavalent meningococcal vaccine, the starting age of the human papilloma virus vaccine, and removal of a hepatitis vaccine that is no longer available, the release states.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Walmart's Great Value shrimp has risk of radioactive contamination, FDA says. Here are the details.
Some frozen shrimp sold at Walmart under the Great Value label are at risk of radioactive contamination and shouldn't be consumed, according to a warning from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The frozen shrimp were imported from Indonesian company PT. Bahari Makmur Sejati and sold at Walmart stores as Great Value brand frozen raw shrimp, the FDA said on Tuesday. The agency noted it has recommended that Walmart recall the product. Walmart didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The shrimp could be contaminated with a radioactive isotope called Cesium-137, although the FDA said that no products as of yet have tested positive for it. The agency said it issued the warning about Walmart's Great Value shrimp after it had detected Cesium-137 in a single shipment of frozen shrimp from PT. Bahari Makmur Sejati. That shipment "did not enter U.S. commerce," the FDA said. Here's what to know about the warning. The FDA said that consumers "should not eat or serve certain lots of Great Value raw frozen shrimp from Walmart." The lots are: Consumers who bought the shrimp cited in the FDA's notice should throw it away, the agency said. "Distributors and retailers should dispose of this product and should not sell or serve this product," the FDA added. Cesium-137, or Cs-137, is the radioactive form of the element cesium, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Produced by nuclear fission, it's used in medical devices and is also a byproduct of nuclear fission in nuclear reactors and weapons testing, the EPA notes. The Cesium-137 detected in the imported shrimp was about 68 Bq/kg, which the FDA said sits below its threshold of 1200 Bq/kg for "levels of concern" for imported foods. "At this level, the product would not pose an acute hazard to consumers," the FDA said in its warning notice. However, the FDA noted that repeated low-dose exposure to Cesium-137 carries an "elevated risk of cancer, resulting from damage to DNA within living cells of the body." It added, "Avoiding products like the shipment FDA tested with similar levels of Cs-137 is a measure intended to reduce exposure to low-level radiation that could have health impacts with continued exposure over a long period of time."
