
‘Wearing thin': Trump-Musk bromance descends into a jaw-dropping feud that is funny, dismal and nauseating
Things unravel fast.
The arrangement was for
chancellor Merz
and the German party to spend the night across from
the White House
in Blair House after their Thursday visit to the Oval Office.
The football enthusiasts in the visiting contingent may have intended unwinding with the highlights of the fabulous France-Spain game. But like everyone else in Washington, DC, the German visitors undoubtedly spent their late afternoon and Thursday evening glued to their screens as the once-heated connection between president
Donald Trump
and
Elon Musk
degenerated into a jaw-dropping social media feud that is funny and nauseating and dismal all at once.
By nightfall, the richest man in the world had made the unsubstantiated claim, on the social media platform he owns, that president Trump is 'in the Epstein files'. He had reposted decades-old footage of Trump in the company of the late and now-reviled Epstein, whose FBI files remain a source of fascination to a strand of the Maga support base.
READ MORE
Musk's barrage of posts criticising the Trump budget Bill began during chancellor Merz's sit-down in the Oval Office and continued over the course of a day when his personal wealth fell by an estimated $34 billion, even as shares in Tesla slumped.
Once freed from his diplomatic duties, during which Trump admired Mr Merz's facility with German and looked less than thrilled to receive a framed birth certificate of Freidrich Trump, the German grandfather of whom he never speaks, the president was free to attack Musk on his own social media account.
Piqued, he noted that the 'easiest way' to save money in the budget is to 'terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts'. He also went public with an observation that had become clear over the past six weeks as Musk's prominence within the administration steadily faded.
'Elon was 'wearing thin'. I took away his EV mandate that forced everyone to buy electric cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do) and he just went CRAZY!'
As ever, the drama once again sent the 47th presidency rocketing into the realm of not just a rolling television soap opera, but the darkest parody of the landmark American political dramas. With president Trump, the old line of history repeating itself doesn't fully apply: the tragedy and farce seem to occur simultaneously.
Over the course of their Oval Office press spray, chancellor Merz, restrained and impressive, made several serious and sombre points about the Ukraine and Russia war but it was unclear if Trump permitted the clarity and gravity to penetrate. For much of the time, the German visitor sat silent while Trump riffed on his relationship with Musk, which was, on live television, experiencing the same return-to-Earth's-orbit fate as one of the billionaire's SpaceX rockets.
By teatime, Steve Bannon, a long-time vitriolic critic of Musk, had called for his deportation. Meanwhile, the Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill tasked with meeting Trump's expectation that the budget Bill pass the Senate vote and be on his desk for his preferred deadline of July 4th, Independence Day, took stock of the spectacular feud.
'I have a rule. I never get between a dog and a fire hydrant,' the Louisiana senator John Kennedy told a reporter.
Kennedy is one of several senators who want to see the Bill amended before it goes to a vote. The Republicans can afford just three defections if it is to get through the Senate. It is already clear that two senators, Kentucky's Rand Paul and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, represent a hard No to the Bill. 'The math doesn't add up,' Paul posted earlier this week. 'I'm not supporting a Bill that increases debt by $5 trillion.'
Kentucky congressman Thomas Massie sounded gleeful when he was asked who he would choose in the playground fight between Trump and Musk.
'I choose math. The math always wins over the words. I trust the math over the guy who lands the rocket backwards, over the politician's maths. I think the patient is on life support and if the Senate thinks they are going to rehabilitate it and rewrite it, I think they are endangering this patient. Because people over here are looking for more reasons to be against it.'
Now, with Trump's estranged 'genius' and the world's richest man seeking to sabotage the Bill with venom, it looks more fragile than ever.
Even during the height of their public union, when they engaged in a public mutual seduction, with Trump attracted to Musk's limitless wealth and Musk dazzled by Trump's mass public appeal and the peerless power that comes with the presidency, it was clear to everyone that it would be short lived. But as recently as February, Musk was moved to post: 'I love Donald Trump as much as a straight man can love another man.'
Perhaps he is just a rank sentimentalist at heart. But this week Musk discovered the limitations and the cold commercialism of the presidential love reciprocated. On Monday, even as reports of his rampant narcotics use circulated, Musk suffered the indignity of a going-away present of an outsized golden key which, Trump clarified, he gives to 'very special people'. It created the impression that there is a thousand identical keys crammed into a cupboard near the Oval Office.
The billionaire was sporting a black eye, which he claimed he acquired while horsing around with his young son. Musk said he invited young X to 'punch me in the face' and the youngster – perhaps aware of his deteriorating future fortune – didn't hesitate in socking one to the old man.
For the past four days, Musk found himself gone from the White House, his magic lanyard and access returned with nothing but a ceremonial key which opens no doors. And for all of the callous indifference to the vulnerable and impoverished Musk displayed as he set about implementing the federal cuts in his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, he may have believed that at some level Trump valued his work.
The Bill proposal represents not just an additional burden to America's national debt; it is a personal snub to the man-hours Musk has put in since January. For a man with boundless intellectual vanity, to be made to feel a fool represents the worst insult. And there was a cold truth, too, to Trump's rationale as to why Musk has suddenly gone rogue on him.
'I think he misses the place. He's not the first. People leave my administration and then at some point they miss it so badly. Some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile.'
The feud does not bode well for the administration. For the Democrats came the welcome novelty of watching the other crowd infighting. But the bitter and reckless war of words will ask deeper questions of the many Republicans who championed Musk during the days when he was the president's favourite courtier. And the critical decision over the big, beautiful Bill still looms.
'When 15 million people lose their health care and plunge into personal crisis,' Connecticut Democrat senator Chris Murphy wrote on Thursday evening, 'none of them are going to give a shit about a made-for-clicks twitter fight between two billionaires arguing about who gets the bigger share of the corruption spoils.'
In happier days, Trump made a shrewd observation about Musk. 'He's a true patriot,' he praised. 'And I don't even know if he is a Republican.'
He may be about to find out.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
7 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Police and protesters clash in LA amid immigration raids
Masked and armed federal agents carried out sweeping immigration raids in Los Angeles yesterday, while others pounced on migrants at a New York courthouse, in forceful displays of US President Donald Trump's crackdown on people without papers. From courthouses to hardware store parking lots in two of the most diverse cities in the world, federal agents wrestled migrants into handcuffs and unmarked vehicles. Agents used extreme tactics, conducting unprecedented raids on at least three areas of Los Angeles to detain dozens of people. At one sweep less than two miles from Los Angeles City Hall, agents threw flash-bang grenades to disperse angry crowds of people following alongside a convoy of ICE vehicles, as protesters hurled eggs and epithets at the agents, media reported. "As a Mayor of a proud city of immigrants, who contribute to our city in so many ways, I am deeply angered by what has taken place," LA Mayor Karen Bass said in a statement. "These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city." White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who grew up in LA's Santa Monica community, responded on X, insisting that Ms Bass had "no say in this at all." "Federal law is supreme and federal law will be enforced." Service Employees International Union leader David Huerta was among those briefly detained in Los Angeles. "Hard-working people, and members of our family and our community, are being treated like criminals," Mr Huerta said in a statement after his release. Homeland Security Investigations spokesperson Yasmeen Pitts O'Keefe told the Los Angeles Times that federal agents were executing search warrants related to the harboring of people illegally in the country. As the sun set in Los Angeles, broadcaster ABC7 reported a growing standoff as hundreds of protesters marched downtown to demand the release of detainees, where police officers in riot gear ordered them to disperse. Arrests in New York courthouse Across the country in New York, US agents in plainclothes pounced on two immigrants in the hallway of a New York courthouse. Officers were seen yelling for the men not to move before forcing them to lay face-down on the ground as they were cuffed and arrested. It was not immediately clear exactly why these two men were arrested. Mr Trump was elected to a second term with broad support for his promise to crack down hard on the entry and presence of undocumented migrants. In recent weeks ICE agents have intensified such operations in and around American immigration courts. After Mr Trump swept back into power in January, the Department of Homeland Security revoked regulations that limited agents' access to protected areas like the courts. One of the men arrested in New York was a 34-year-old Dominican named Joaquin Rosario who arrived in the US a year ago, registered as he came in, and who had his first immigration hearing yesterday, a relative named Julian Rosario said. "He was at ease. He did not think anything was going to happen," the relative said, adding that Rosario was so unworried he had not brought his lawyer with him. The other detainee arrived accompanied only by one of many immigration advocacy group volunteers who walk immigrants to and from the courtroom. The volunteers screamed out as the agents arrested the two men, but it did nothing to halt the raid. Human rights groups are outraged by these operations, arguing that they sap trust in the courts and make immigrants wary of showing up for appointments as they try to gain US residency. "They're illegal abductions," said Karen Ortiz, herself a court employee who was demonstrating against these sudden arrests of migrants. "We need to sound the alarm and show the public how serious this is and one way we can do that is actually physically putting ourselves between a masked ICE agent and someone they're trying to detain and send away," she said. Since returning to power Donald Trump has dramatically tested the limits of executive power to crack down on foreigners without papers, arguing that the US is being invaded by criminals and other undesirables.

The Journal
7 hours ago
- The Journal
Snared by the 'Spider's Web' - How Ukraine carried out their 'audacious' weekend drone attack
DESPITE BEING OUTNUMBERED and outgunned, Ukraine managed to use inexpensive drones to destroy Russian nuclear-capable bombers worth billions of dollars last weekend, in an operation carried out after months of planning. The operation targeted dozens of strategic air bases and delivered a major blow to Moscow's long-range bomber fleet. US news outlets described the attack as 'stunning' and 'audacious', UK press said it was 'unprecedented' and 'broad' – and all of them agreed that the major attack on Russia's nuclear-capable strategic bombers highlighted Ukraine's strategic savvy against its much larger invader. Codenamed 'Spider's Web' – or simply 'Web' – the operation was named for its wide geographic coverage across remote Russian locations previously thought to be beyond the reach of Ukraine's long-range drone capabilities. Some military commentators and pro-Russian bloggers even called it the country's 'Pearl Harbour'. The strikes seem to have got to Putin – with Donald Trump admitting this week that the Russian leader 'very strongly' told him he 'will have to respond' to the drone attack. Russia has since launched large-scale drone and missile strikes on Ukraine's capital and other parts of the country in an apparent retaliation. How did Ukraine do it? Planning for the operation began over 18 months ago. Ukrainian agents secretly smuggled about 150 small strike drones, modular launch systems, and 300 explosive payloads into Russia using covert routes. Babr Mash Babr Mash The drones were hidden inside wooden cabins, which were then loaded onto ordinary cargo trucks. A truck used to release some of the Ukrainian drones that attacked Russian air bases. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo A key part of the plan relied on covert logistics within Russian territory, involving unwitting Russian civilians – the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) reportedly recruited Russian truck drivers to transport the mobile drone launchers disguised as regular cargo. These drivers were instructed to arrive at specific times and park at preselected spots near strategic Russian air bases, such as fuel stations and remote roadside areas. At the appointed time last weekend, the roofs of the cabins were remotely opened, and drones launched directly from inside the trucks. Footage of a Ukrainian FPV strike drone rising from a cargo truck and heading towards Russia's Belaya Airbase. The drone launch and airbase hit were over 4000 km (2500 mi) from Ukraine. — OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) June 1, 2025 This allowed the drones to strike from very close range, bypassing Russia's layered air defenses – including Pantsir and S-300 systems – before they could respond. Russian sources confirmed the drones launched just outside airfields, from places like fuel stations and roadside laybys. After launch, the trucks exploded, triggered by self-destruct mechanisms. Ukrainian leaders, including President Zelensky and SSU chief Vasyl Maliuk, were reportedly involved in planning and real-time coordination. What was the impact? In total, 117 drones were launched, striking at least 41 aircraft. Advertisement Ukraine's SBU put the estimated cost to the Kremlin at $7 billion. Footage from a Ukrainian drone striking Russian planes deep in Russia's territory. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Ukrainian estimates claim this damaged 34% of Russia's strategic cruise missile platforms, including some of the few remaining A-50 early warning aircraft critical for Russia's air surveillance and targeting. Russia's major losses include strategic bombing, aviation, and airborne early warning and control aircraft. An overhead view of the damage at Olenya air base. Sumy Oblast government Sumy Oblast government The Russian Defence Ministry confirmed the attacks had occurred in five regions of Russia – Murmansk, Irkutsk, Ivanovo, Ryazan and Amur – but stated planes had been damaged only in Murmansk and Irkutsk, while in other locations the attacks had been repelled. One of the air bases impacted by the strikes was 2,500 miles behind Russian borders, deep in Siberia. Yohann Michel, a researcher at the French university Lyon 3, said the loss of the aircraft was 'a serious blow to Russian offensive capabilities'. 7 млрд. доларів США. Така орієнтовна вартість стратегічної авіації ворога, яка була вражена сьогодні в результаті спецоперації СБУ «Павутина». Вражено 34% стратегічних носіїв крилатих ракет на основних аеродромах базування рф. Слава Україні! Героям Слава! 🇺🇦 — СБ України (@ServiceSsu) June 1, 2025 'The main impact could be felt in several weeks' time with a reduction in the number of sorties by the rest of the fleet' due to difficulties in finding spare parts for the Soviet-era planes, which are no longer in production, he said. Maxim Starchak, a fellow at the Centre for International and Defence Policy at Queen's University in Canada, said it would take Russia a long time to replace the lost aircraft. 'Russia is extremely slow and inefficient in developing new aircraft for its nuclear forces,' he explained. 'Essentially untracable' Michael Shurkin, a former CIA officer, said Ukraine's operation was likely to have struck fear into militaries across the world, adding that potential targets for such drone attacks could include refineries, ballistic missile silos or military bases. 'This technology is akin to stealth technology: The threat is difficult to detect both because it emerges near the target and is too small and too low to be picked up by sensors designed to catch aircraft or missiles,' said Shurkin, director of global programs for the consultancy 14 North Strategies. Footage from a Ukrainian drone targeting Belaya Air Base in Russia's Irkutsk region in Siberia last week. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Ukrainian military analyst Oleksii Kopytko said anyone delivering a pizza or driving a horse-drawn cart could present a danger. 'The organisers and main perpetrators are essentially untraceable,' he said. A French arms manufacturing executive said Ukraine could even have trained AI algorithms to recognise aircraft or guide the drones in case of jamming. 'New tools are forcing us to completely rethink defence systems and how they are produced,' said the executive, who asked not to be named. 'It opens up possibilities that we hadn't even imagined.' Zelensky 'just proved that he and Ukraine are more than able to pull aces out of their combat fatigue sleeves,' said Timothy Ash, an emerging market economist focused on Russia. Additional reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

The Journal
9 hours ago
- The Journal
A new organisation has taken over Gaza food distribution with disastrous results - who's behind it?
WHILE THE ENTIRE population of the Gaza Strip in Palestine remains on the brink of famine, and Israel refuses to allow in thousands of truckloads of humanitarian aid, an organisation called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has taken over food distribution, with already disastrous results. The introduction of this new US and Israeli-backed entity into the besieged Palestinian territory has been part of Israel's plan to circumvent UN agencies and NGOs that already work in Gaza and have done so for decades. Those UN agencies and officials repeatedly condemned the establishment of the organisation, warning that it would allow Israel to weaponise the provision of food. NGOs said it would only serve to allow Israel to carry out a plan proposed by US President Donald Trump, and endorsed by Israeli government officials, which is to remove the Palestinian population from the area. At Nasser hospital in Khan Younis, people mourn those killed while gathering near a GHF centre on 3 June Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Trump's proposal to 'clean out' Gaza has been widely condemned as a plan for ethnic cleansing. The man who was initially heading up the organisation, US military veteran Jake Wood, resigned the day before it began operating in Gaza, citing similar concerns to those expressed by the UN. Israel has said the GHF is a means of preventing food and other supplies from falling into the hands of Hamas. In mid-May, Tom Fletcher of the UN's humanitarian affairs office called the Israeli-US plan to take over aid distribution 'a cynical sideshow'. 'Please stay away' Israeli forces have on a number of occasions now opened fire on crowds of hungry people who were making their way to distribution points operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The term Orwellian may be overused in modern discourse but, in this case, it seems to be the most appropriate description for an ostensibly humanitarian organisation whose distribution centre almost immediately became the site of massacres. One witness to the latest Israeli attack told AFP: 'It's a trap.' Since Wednesday, the GHF has suspended all aid distribution until further notice after Israel declared roads leading to its hubs 'combat zones'. 'Please stay away from distribution sites for your safety,' the GHF said in a Facebook post on Friday. All of the Israeli attacks have taken place at a centre in the Tal al-Sultan area outside Rafah City in the far south of the territory. Advertisement Palestinians carry boxes and bags containing food and humanitarian aid packages delivered by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo The first deadly incident happened on the morning of Sunday, 25 May, when 31 Palestinians were killed by Israeli gunfire , according to the Gaza Civil Defence agency. The following morning, Israeli forces shot dead three people, according to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). And last Tuesday, 27 people were killed by Israeli fire near the site, according to health officials. Israel has denied firing on civilians, saying it fired 'warning shots ' and calling early reports 'false' while the GHF initially did likewise. The Israeli military did admit firing at 'suspects' who they said had moved in their soldiers' direction on Tuesday. Who funds and runs the GHF? The short answer to the question of who funds the GHF is, we don't know. The organisation is registered in the United States and while it has a website , all it says is: 'Delivering critical aid and support to the people of Gaza. More information coming soon'. The New York Times reported that the idea for an organisation like the GHF first came from Israel and opposition politician Yair Lapid has suggested it is funded by the Israeli government. People carry away supplies from a GHF centre in Gaza Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo The GHF said last month that a Western European country had donated more than $100 million but did not name the country. As for who runs the GHF, a little more is known. A former USAID contractor, John Acree, took over as John Wood's interim replacement and an evangelical preacher and former Trump campaign advisor named Reverend Johnnie Moore was named the new chairman on Tuesday. Also on Tuesday, US consulting firm Boston Consulting Group, whose participation had not previously been disclosed, terminated its contract with the GHF. With reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... Our Explainer articles bring context and explanations in plain language to help make sense of complex issues. We're asking readers like you to support us so we can continue to provide helpful context to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay. Learn More Support The Journal