Violent arrest of Black student shows benefits of recording police
William McNeil Jr. was pulled from his car and punched in the head during the ordeal in February.
He captured the incident – which began as a traffic stop – on his phone, which was mounted above his dashboard.
It provided the only clear video of the violence, including the punches to his head, which could not be seen clearly in police body camera footage released by the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office.
As McNeil had the foresight to record the incident from inside the vehicle, 'we got to see firsthand and hear firsthand and put it all in context what driving while Black is in America,' civil rights attorney Ben Crump, one of several lawyers advising McNeil, said.
'All the young people should be recording these interactions with law enforcement," Crump said.
'Because what it tells us, just like with George Floyd, if we don't record the video, we can see what they put in the police report with George Floyd before they realized the video existed.'
Officers pulled McNeil over saying his headlights should have been on due to bad weather, his lawyers said.
The video shows him asking the officers what he did wrong. Seconds later, an officer smashes his window, strikes him as he sits in the driver's seat and then pulls him from the car and punches him in the head.
After being knocked to the ground, McNeil was punched six more times in his right thigh, according to a police report.
The incident reports do not describe the officer punching McNeil in the head. The officer, who pulled McNeil over and then struck him, described the force this way in his report: 'Physical force was applied to the suspect and he was taken to the ground.'
The video went viral after McNeil posted his video online in July.
The sheriff's office then launched an internal investigation, which is ongoing. A sheriff's office spokesperson declined to comment about the case this week, citing pending litigation, though no lawsuit has been filed over the arrest.
McNeil said the ordeal left him traumatized, with a brain injury, a broken tooth and several stiches in his lip. His attorneys accused the sheriff's office of trying to cover up what really happened.
'On 19 February 2025, Americans saw what America is,' said another of McNeil's lawyers, Harry Daniels.
'We saw injustice. You saw abuse of police power. But most importantly we saw a young man that had a temperament to control himself in the face of brutality.'
The traffic stop, he said, was not only racially motivated but 'it was unlawful, and everything that stemmed from that stop was unlawful."
McNeil is not the first Black motorist to record video during a traffic stop that turned violent — Philando Castile's girlfriend livestreamed the bloody aftermath of his death during a 2016 traffic stop near Minneapolis. But McNeil's arrest serves as a reminder of how cellphone video can show a different version of events than what is described in police reports, his lawyers said.
Christopher Mercado, who is retired as a lieutenant from the New York Police Department, agreed with McNeil's legal team's suggestion that drivers should record their police interactions and that a camera mounted inside a driver's car could offer a unique point of view.
"Use technology to your advantage," Mercado, an adjunct assistant professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, said. 'There's nothing nefarious about it. It's actually a smart thing in my opinion.'
Rod Brunson, chairman of the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Maryland, said he thinks it is a good idea for citizens to film encounters with police — as long as doing so does not make the situation worse.
'I think that's a form of protection — it's safeguarding them against false claims of criminal behavior or interfering with officers, etc.,' Brunson said.
Although the sheriff's office declined to speak this week, Sheriff T.K. Waters has spoken publicly about McNeil's arrest since video of the encounter went viral. He pushed back against some of the allegations made by McNeil's lawyers, saying that McNeil was told more than a half-dozen times to exit the vehicle.
At a news conference in July, Waters also highlighted images of a knife in McNeil's car. The officer who punched him claimed in his police report that McNeil reached toward the floor of the car, where deputies later found the knife.
Crump, though, said McNeil's video shows that he 'never reaches for anything,' and a second officer wrote in his report that McNeil kept his hands up as the other officer smashed the car window.
A camera inside a motorist's vehicle could make up for some shortcomings of police bodycams, which can have a narrow field of view that becomes more limited the closer an officer gets to the person being filmed, Mercado said.
However, after the police murder of Floyd, some states and cities debated how and when citizens should be able to capture video of police.
The Constitution guarantees the right to record police in public, but a point of contention in some states has been whether a civilian's recording might interfere with the ability of officers to do their job. In Louisiana, for example, a new law makes it a crime to approach within 25 feet (7.6 meters) of a police officer in certain situations.
Waters acknowledged those limitations at a news conference in 2024, as he narrated video of a wild brawl between officers and a fan in the stands at EverBank Stadium during a football game between the universities of Georgia and Florida.
The sheriff showed the officers' bodycam videos during the start of the confrontation near the top of the stadium. But when the officers subdued the suspect and were pressing against him, the bodycam footage did not capture much, so the sheriff switched to stadium security video shot from a longer distance away.
In McNeil's case, the bodycam video did not clearly capture the punches thrown. If it had, the case would have been investigated right away, the sheriff said.
For the past 20 years, Brunson has been interviewing young Black men in several U.S. cities about their encounters with law enforcement. When he first began submitting research papers for academic review, many readers didn't believe the men's stories of being brutalized by officers.
'People who live in a civil society don't expect to be treated this way by the police. For them, their police interactions are mostly pleasant, mostly cordial," Brunson said.
'So it's hard for people who don't have a tenuous relationship with the police to fathom that something like this happens,' he said. "And that's where video does play a big part because people can't deny what they see.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
By bringing back Brock Lesnar amid federal suit, WWE exhumes the ghosts of Vince McMahon's ugly departure
You have to hand it to WWE: It takes one hell of a twist to blow both of your main event competitors out of the water — at least in terms of the conversation online — within minutes of said massive main event finishing. It isn't like we didn't have enough to talk about. We'd already had the confirmation that the John Cena heel turn is done, as the now-former champ brought back his full-color entrance this past Sunday, prompting elation from the live crowd at WWE SummerSlam Night 2. We'd already had Cody Rhodes reclaiming the Universal Championship in a sensational match, turning a page on the events of WrestleMania 41 and giving Cena a chance to show that he can still summon a vintage night at age 48. Then, just as the broadcast appeared to be wrapping up, it happened. That shriek-like guitar lick which can only mean one thing: The return of one of WWE's most dominant — and controversial — talents, 'The Beast Incarnate.' Leaving aside the potential storyline implications for now, it's worth saying that the choice to bring back Brock Lesnar is a bold call by WWE given the former champion's involvement in one of the company's bigger controversies of the 21st century, the Vince McMahon sex trafficking scandal. We should be clear from the off: Lesnar himself is not being sued or investigated for anything. But he is named in an ongoing federal lawsuit against McMahon and WWE, which very much has yet to be resolved. Given that, it's worth a recap of the pertinent facts and how they relate (or not) to Lesnar. In January 2024 — four months after helping to oversee the TKO merger — McMahon resigned from WWE's parent company, following a bombshell report in the Wall Street Journal that a former WWE employee, Janel Grant, filed a lawsuit against the company (as well as McMahon and former WWE executive John Laurinaitis) alleging that McMahon had sexually assaulted and trafficked her. How does that affect Brock Lesnar? As part of its claims against McMahon, the lawsuit alleges that WWE's founder had shared sexually explicit images of Grant with what it called a 'world-famous athlete' and 'former UFC fighter," in order to entice the performer to sign a new WWE contract. While the lawsuit didn't name Lesnar, the Journal was able to look at the specific details and come to the conclusion that it couldn't possibly be anyone else. Grant's legal team have since amended their complaint to explicitly name Brock Lesnar. After the story broke, WWE reportedly shelved a plan to bring back Lesnar for the 2024 Royal Rumble. Since then, he's been gone from WWE programming, though not entirely persona non grata — Lesnar's old matches have recently been posted to the company's YouTube channel, for example, and he still gets mentioned from time to time on commentary. But he hasn't appeared in-person. At 9.45 p.m. local time Sunday in New Jersey, that all changed when Lesnar made his unannounced return to attack Cena, presumably setting up a match for Aug. 31's Clash in Paris event or Crown Jewel: Perth later this year in October. It was an explosive end to what was already a massive weekend in the pro-wrestling calendar. But what will it mean for WWE and Lesnar? Again, Lesnar himself isn't in any legal jeopardy, and we can probably assume from his return that the WWE doesn't see any risk of that situation changing soon. (Indeed the Wrestling Observer Newsletter has reported that WWE's legal team came to that conclusion four weeks ago.) Of course, that doesn't mean they're not risking any reputation fallout by working with Lesnar. We can see from Grant's lawsuit (which has been the subject of some stellar reporting from Brandon Thurston) that the descriptions of Lesnar's alleged actions are fairly vulgar, to say the least. It isn't implausible that brand sponsors carry out their own risk assessment. There will inevitably be awkward questions to come at press availabilities and the danger that conversations get out of hand on social media. What we can safely say from Sunday night is that WWE has decided that working with Lesnar — a massive draw, in anyone's estimations — is worth risking that kind of backlash. In fairness, it isn't like WWE CCO Paul Levesque hasn't been asked about Lesnar in the recent past. Last year, he told the Daily Mail that WWE would be 'open' to a return provided that Lesnar was interested. At last night's post-show, he suggested that it was Cena's desire to work with Lesnar once more that tipped the balance. As for the lawsuit itself, there's no confirmation (yet) that it will go to trial. TKO continues to say they treat any allegations seriously, while McMahon has claimed that the case is a 'smear campaign.' Laurinaitis has since settled with Grant out of court. Lesnar has never made a public comment. No doubt some will link Lesnar's return to WWE's increasing willingness to alienate some parts of his fan base (for example, by promoting Levesque's appearance at the White House last week). But, in truth, the sheer star power of the man probably meant that a return was more likely than not in the long run. 'It's about John being able to go out the way he wants to go out,' said Levesque on WWE's Sunday night post-show, suggesting that the bigger story is what will happen in the ring with Cena and Lesnar. He's certainly right that it will be a massive event — but he's kidding himself if he thinks it will be the only story.


CBS News
14 minutes ago
- CBS News
Shark sightings at Rockaway Beach force swimmers out of the water
Rockaway Beach was shut down for swimming Monday afternoon after several shark sightings. There were at least three sightings reported. Authorities closed the beach for swimming for an hour just after noon. The beach remained open while beachgoers waited to resume swimming. Authorities used drones to confirm the shark sightings. Protocol for shark sightings is to close beaches for swimming for an hour about one mile in each direction of the location where the shark was spotted. It's not the first time sharks have shut down Rockaway beach this summer. It happened several times during July, including on July 4th. Shark attacks are rare. Data from 2024 shows 28 shark bites across the U.S., with one person killed. Experts said it was a juvenile sand tiger shark that bit a woman in the waters off Jones Beach in June.


CBS News
14 minutes ago
- CBS News
Deputies seek information over indecent exposure incidents in Rochester Hills, Auburn Hills
Deputies are seeking the public's help in identifying a man accused of indecent exposure toward a group of girls who were seated in an outdoor food court in Rochester Hills, Michigan. The Oakland County Sheriff's Office said the incidents under investigation happened about 4 p.m. on June 29 outside the Shake Shack and then a few minutes later outside the Barnes & Noble Bookstore, which are both on North Adams Road. The suspect may also have been involved in a separate incident in Auburn Hills the same day. "We are asking for the public's assistance in identifying and apprehending this disturbing individual," Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard said. "Repeatedly targeting young girls and exposing oneself is not only vile – it's a serious crime. ... Now is the time to intervene and stop it before it goes any further." The suspect appeared to be about age 20 to 30, according to a description provided by authorities. He had blondish-brown hair. He was wearing sunglasses, a gray collared shirt and greenish-gray cargo shorts at the time of the Rochester Hills incidents. The girls, described as "pre-teenage" age, told detectives they were seated outside the Shake Shack when the man walked past them. As he lifted his shirt, the girls noticed the pants zipper was down and he exposed himself. A few minutes later, the girls had moved in front of the nearby bookstore when they saw the same man walk by. He again lifted his shirt and exposed himself, the report said. The girls yelled at the man after the second such instance, and he quickened his walking pace. Several women who were nearby asked the girls if they needed help. In response, the man began running through the outdoor food court. He was last seen in a nearby parking lot. Deputies ask that anyone who can assist in the investigation contact the Oakland County Sheriff's Office at 248-858-4950.