
Will the Trump tariff wars end by 2028? We asked economists.
Trump has enacted a flurry of tariffs in the early days of his administration. Tax rates now range from zero (on certain exempted products, such as duty-free items from Canada and Mexico) to more than 100% (on many imports from China, among other trade targets).
Tariff policy seems to shift almost daily. It's tough to predict where the rates will sit in a week, let alone in three years, at the end of Trump's term.
But it's a question worth asking. Consumers want to plan future car and iPhone buys. Retailers want to predict where prices are headed on clothing and computers. Manufacturers want to divine where to build their next factory.
We asked four economists and academicians to predict what Trump's tariff policy may look like in 2028, and what factors might shape it.
Here's what they told us. These are their comments in full, edited for clarity.
Colin Grabow, associate director, Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, Cato Institute
No crystal ball is needed to see that tariffs will almost certainly be higher in 2028 than when President Trump took office in January - the only question is by how much. Another outcome would be deeply surprising. For America, the tariff man cometh.
Between his first term and the early days of his second, Trump has managed to bury the United States under an avalanche of tariffs. The onslaught has been so extensive that the United States now has its highest average tariff rate in over a century - and more seem on the way. Digging the United States out of this mess will take some doing.
Unfortunately, few seem eager to grab shovels.
Congressional Republicans are highly reluctant to cross a leader who remains incredibly popular within the party, while Democrats have traditionally been more supportive of protectionist policies favored by organized labor. Assembling a veto-proof coalition to restore sanity to US tariff policy is a tall order.
Absent such an intervention, President Trump's de facto tariff switch is likely to remain in the 'on' position. Although some relief could be found in 'deals' with certain countries, or as part of a market-calming exercise, a complete unwinding is deeply improbable.
Josh Bivens, chief economist, Economic Policy Institute
In 2028, average tariffs could be 5% - about double their level when Trump took office. Or they could be 25%, or even higher than that.
The fact that nobody can say with any certainty where tariff rates will be is absolute poison for every business and family in America trying to make plans for their future.
Should you build a new factory? Buy a new home? Take out loans for your kids' college? Choose a different industry to work in? All these crucial decisions depend on the state of America's interconnectedness with the rest of the world.
Until this is clarified - and truly clarified, not subject to the ever-changing whims of one man - all Americans will be held in limbo, and this will crush economic growth.
Most economic policies create winners and losers. The Trump tariff policy is almost entirely creating losers, unless some insiders are timing their stock market purchases around advanced knowledge about new announcements and pauses. What was once unthinkably dumb and corrupt now seems entirely possible.
Bernard Yaros, lead U.S. economist, Oxford Economics
It's difficult, if not impossible, to know where tariffs will end up in 2028. However, a safe bet would be to assume that the significantly higher tariffs on China will remain in effect, as decoupling from the world's second-largest economy seems to be one of the administration's clearest goals amid the chaotic rollout of reciprocal tariffs this month.
Sector-specific tariffs on steel, aluminum, motor vehicle and motor vehicle parts, and others will likely stick as well. Yet, it's probable that the across-the-board reciprocal tariffs on all countries other than China and all products outside certain sectors will either get significantly watered down or go away by 2028.
The administration could water down these reciprocal tariffs via further exemptions, targeted toward consumer goods, in a bid to mitigate the inflationary impact.
On the other side of the 2026 midterms, you could craft a scenario in which enough lawmakers on both sides of the aisle turn against the reciprocal tariffs and a supermajority in both chambers of Congress overrides a presidential veto to vote down the reciprocal tariffs.
Robert Gulotty, associate professor of political science, University of Chicago
In 2028, the Trump administration will be in campaign mode and may be trying to take actions that limit blowback from tariffs.
In the previous Trump administration, this meant using ad hoc authorities to allocate billions of dollars of cash to farm communities affected by Chinese retaliation.
My research with Anton Strezhnev suggests that those efforts moved voters in the 2020 election, particularly in rural communities. They will likely try again.
We also saw reversals on the tariffs themselves, as exemptions on steel and aluminum were granted to Canada and Mexico in advance of the approval of a renegotiated NAFTA.
However, I worry new cash disbursements and targeted tariff exemptions will have little effect on the overall state of trade policy for the U.S.
Unless things dramatically change by 2028, the world will have gone through four years of dramatic and unpredictable policy swings. Measures of formal trade restrictions, like the average tariff, mean little for firms that cannot guess whether their customers will face a tax or not.
There may be an appetite for some kind of global deal to reduce this uncertainty, but who would bother negotiating a treaty with a government that is unconstrained by scraps of paper?"
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
44 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump ratchets up steel tariffs to 50%
One of America's most storied industries is getting a massive boost from President Donald Trump's latest tariffs push — at the potential cost of a broader slowdown elsewhere in the U.S. economy. Trump signed an executive order increasing the already substantial 25% duties on steel imports he first set in March to 50%. He signaled last week that the tariff rate hike was coming. It went into effect at midnight Wednesday. 'We're going to bring it from 25% to 50% — the tariffs on steel into the United States of America,' Trump said at a rally in Pennsylvania, 'which will even further secure the steel industry in the United States.' The new 50% duties also affect aluminum products. The tariffs on steel, along with those on imported automobiles and auto parts, have been imposed under authorities not affected by recent court decisions that cast doubt on the president's powers to enact trade barriers. U.S. steel firms have hailed Trump's renewed push to raise the cost to American firms that rely on imports of steel. It's a notably favorable reaction to tariffs amid what has broadly been a backlash against them. "American-made steel is at the heart of President Trump's plan to revitalize domestic manufacturing and return our country to an economic powerhouse," the Steel Manufacturers Association said in a statement that applauded Trump's remarks about the new 50% tariffs. Investors have rewarded the steel firms accordingly, sending shares of U.S. steelmakers soaring across the board Monday as U.S. steel and aluminum prices jumped. Today, the steel manufacturing industry directly employs 86,000 U.S. workers. It's a fraction of the half million-strong workforce the industry counted in the decade after World War II, though employment levels have stabilized more recently. While trade globalization bears substantial responsibility for steel's decadeslong downturn, experts say advances in technology have played an equally significant role. Steel production increasingly revolves around so-called electric arc furnace technology, a more efficient means of production than the classic open blast furnace operations that prevailed for much of the 20th century. The same levels of output from steel's heydays can now be achieved with just a fraction of the workforce. As recently as the early 1980s, it took about 10 man-hours to produce a ton of steel. Today, the rate is as little as a single man-hour assuming multiple steel mills are working in tandem. "The way we make steel in the U.S. has changed a lot," said an expert on the local impact of industrial transitions, Ken Kolb, chair of the sociology department at Furman University in South Carolina. "There is simply no way to bring that scale of employment back if a fraction of that workforce is needed to essentially reach the same production levels," Kolb said. He estimated that perhaps 15,000 new direct jobs could be added assuming capacity levels increase. But the broader cost to industries dependent on steel inputs, like autos, construction and solar panels — which relies on tariffed aluminum components — would be likely to negate those gains. "Theoretically you're going to be able to hire some people, but in reality, the tariffs just raise the average price of steel," Kolb said. "And when the price of a commodity like that goes up, businesses just buy less and sideline investment." A study found that while Trump's 2018 steel tariffs created 1,000 new direct jobs, it cost downstream industries that rely on steel to make their products as many as 75,000 jobs because they became less competitive thanks to higher costs. While some limited capacity could come back online in the near term, the on-again, off-again nature of the tariffs limit any immediate job gains, said Josh Spoores, head of Steel Americas Analysis at the CRU Group consultancy. If the higher tariffs remain, there could be new investments, Spoores said in an email — but building new steel mills can take at least two years. Nor is it clear that American steelworkers themselves are entirely in favor of the tariffs. The United Steelworkers union signaled only tepid endorsement for the measure in a statement after its Canadian chapter rebuked Trump's announcement. 'While tariffs, used strategically, serve as a valuable tool in balancing the scales, it's essential that we also pursue wider reforms of our global trading system, working in collaboration with trusted allies like Canada to contain the bad actors and excess capacity that continue to undermine our industries,' the union said. The union has also shown signs of a split when it comes to Trump's proposed "partnership" between U.S. Steel and Japan's Nippon Steel, whose takeover of the U.S. firm he previously opposed. Trump now sees the deal "creating" as many as 70,000 jobs. 'There's a lot of money coming your way,' Trump told supporters at the Pennsylvania rally Friday. The United Steelworkers signaled lingering doubts about the Nippon arrangement in a statement Friday. 'We have not participated in the discussions involving U.S. Steel, Nippon Steel, and the Trump administration, nor were we consulted, so we cannot speculate about the meaning of the 'planned partnership' between USS and Nippon," it said, using an initialism to refer to the American firm. It continued: 'Whatever the deal structure, our primary concern remains with the impact that this merger of U.S. Steel into a foreign competitor will have on national security, our members and the communities where we live and work."


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
EUROPE No 'best offers' yet as tariff deadline looms
A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Ankur Banerjee Today is the deadline for U.S. trading partners to submit their "best offer" to avoid punishing import tax rates, the same day that U.S. duties on imported steel and aluminium kick in, and investors are more jittery than usual. So far, only Britain has struck a preliminary trade agreement with the U.S. during Trump's 90-day pause on a wider array of tariffs. That pause is set to expire in about five weeks and investors have been worried about the lack of progress in hashing out deals. Adding to the angst, Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said Tokyo has not received a letter from Washington asking for its best proposals on trade talks. The on-again-off-again tariff pronouncements from Trump this year have investors fleeing U.S. assets and looking for safe havens and alternatives, including gold. They expect trade uncertainties will take a heavy toll on the global economy. The main question in financial markets has been where the money that usually flowed into U.S. assets will end up going. For years, money managers embraced the fatalistic presumption that "there-is-no-alternative" (TINA ... yes, markets love acronyms) but perhaps there are options now. As Manishi Raychaudhuri, the founder and CEO of Emmer Capital Partners Ltd, puts it: While Europe may be the obvious destination, relative value metrics may favour emerging Asia. The data so far does not give a complete picture. But what it does show is investors are lowering their exposure to U.S. assets, and only time will tell where they end up. Asian markets rose on Wednesday, boosted by tech stocks as traders hope a deal could still be possible if and when U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping talk this week. The spotlight in Asia was also on South Korean assets. Seoul's benchmark share index (.KS11), opens new tab surged to 10-month top and the currency firmed as liberal presidential candidate Lee Jae-myung's election victory raised expectations for swift economic stimulus and market reforms. European futures point to a slightly higher open ahead of a series of manufacturing data from the region and as the European Central Bank starts its policy meeting. The ECB is all but certain to cut rates on Thursday and stay on its easing cycle as muted wage growth, a strong euro and lukewarm economic growth all point to easing inflation. Data on Tuesday showed euro zone inflation in May eased below the ECB target of 2%. Key developments that could influence markets on Wednesday: Economic events: May PMI data for UK, euro zone, Germany and France Trying to keep up with the latest tariff news? Our new daily news digest offers a rundown of the top market-moving headlines impacting global trade. Sign up for Tariff Watch here.


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Why doesn't Musk like Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'?
👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 It's day 135 of Donald Trump's second term, and our US correspondents Mark Stone and Martha Kelner discuss Elon Musk's exit from his Department of Government Efficiency role last week, and his harsh criticism of Trump's 'big beautiful' spending bill in a furious X post on Tuesday. Plus, Hamas and Israel have reacted to Mark's Monday interview with former State Department spokesman Matt Miller, who said that 'without a doubt' war crimes had been committed in Gaza by Israel, which is in stark contrast to what he said in office. If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@ You can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.