
‘Ganba' in Kiev: Zelensky goes to war with Washington's men
Since July 22, thousands have taken to the streets chanting 'Ganba!' ('Shame!'), echoing the spirit of past Maidan uprisings. But this is no popular revolt. It's a turf war – an internal power struggle between two rival camps in Ukraine's elite.
On one side are Zelensky and his right-hand man, Andrey Yermak – let's call them the 'Office faction,' based in Bankova Street. On the other are the foreign-funded NGOs, intelligence-linked assets, and the remnants of former President Pyotr Poroshenko's political machine. These include the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) – bodies created at the West's insistence to impose external control over Ukrainian politics.
The spark was a recent bill rammed through the Rada in emergency mode. The law stripped NABU and SAPO of their autonomy and placed them under the control of Ukraine's Prosecutor General – effectively, Zelensky's office. In other words, the very agencies tasked with investigating corruption must now report to the people they're meant to investigate.
Unsurprisingly, the 'anti-corruption' camp cried foul. But this isn't really about clean government – it's about influence. For years, NABU and SAPO operated as instruments of Western leverage, particularly from the Democratic Party establishment in Washington. They answered more to US and EU embassies than to the Ukrainian people. And Zelensky has finally had enough.
The timing is no accident. With Donald Trump back in power, the institutional support once enjoyed by the Poroshenko-era clique is fading. Zelensky saw an opening – and struck.
His first move came earlier this year with corruption cases targeting Poroshenko himself. Now, he's gone after the crown jewels of Western liberal influence in Kiev. The message is clear: there is to be no parallel power structure. The president wants full control.
But it may be a gamble too far. Western European officials, already frustrated with Kiev's domestic conduct, quickly warned that Ukraine's EU accession bid could be blocked. The opposition, sensing blood, brought people into the streets – and unlike previous protests, these gained traction fast. On Wednesday, the Bankova realised the crowd wasn't going home.
The real question now is whether Zelensky will stand firm or retreat. Early in his presidency, he was terrified of sharing Viktor Yanukovich's fate and often folded under public pressure. But war changes men. He now rules over a cleansed political landscape, has a wartime excuse to quash dissent, and is backed by a disciplined vertical of power. Yermak, a ruthless operator, may urge him to dig in.
Yet the risks are considerable. Zelensky has never managed to convince Western Europe that he's irreplaceable. If Brussels decides to pull the plug – financially or politically – his position could unravel fast. The same donors who once backed him could soon be shopping for a more pliant successor.
And even if he climbs down and restores NABU and SAPO's powers, the damage is done. The opposition has momentum. Western backers will start asking tough questions. And the illusion of Zelensky as a unifying, democratic wartime leader will take another hit.
None of this means Ukraine is headed for collapse – but it does suggest Zelensky is more vulnerable than he appears. His grip on power now depends on how far he's willing to go to silence opposition, both foreign and domestic. If he wins this standoff, he'll emerge as the undisputed master of Ukraine. If he loses, it could trigger a slow bleed of authority that leads to a political reckoning.
The most likely outcome? A messy stalemate. Zelensky may backtrack enough to appease the EU but not enough to restore full control to the Western-funded agencies. The protests may fizzle or grow, depending on how much oxygen the opposition and its foreign patrons can pump in.
But whatever happens, one thing is clear: Ukraine's politics are fracturing again. The West's man in Kiev is no longer playing by the West's rules. And his enemies – both at home and abroad – are watching closely.
For now, all we can do is enjoy the show. And hope it runs a while longer.This article was first published by the online newspaper Gazeta.ru and was translated and edited by the RT team

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump tariffs to cost German car giants over €10bn
Germany's leading carmakers are set to lose over €10 billion ($11.6 billion) in cash flow this year due to US trade tariffs, according to a study cited by the Financial Times. The industry is already contending with soaring energy costs, falling sales, and intensifying competition from China. The US is Germany's top foreign market but the latter's car industry has been among the hardest hit by President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs. In March, Trump imposed a 25% tariff on foreign-made vehicle imports. After months of talks, the EU and US reached a deal on Sunday that sets a baseline 15% tariff on most exports, including cars, while steel and aluminum duties remain at 50%. Mercedes-Benz is expected to see its cash flow plunge from nearly $11 billion to about $3 billion this year, according to analytics platform Visible Alpha, cited by the FT. Forecasts for Volkswagen were slashed to $3.8 billion – less than half of last year's $9.5 billion – while BMW's cash flow is projected to dip slightly to $5 billion. On Friday, Volkswagen said tariffs had already cost it over $1 billion in the first half of the year and warned the burden could rise further. Suppliers have reportedly passed on higher costs of foreign-sourced components and raw materials such as aluminum and steel, further eroding margins. The EU-US deal, reached during a meeting between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, was hailed by both as a 'powerful' and 'stabilizing' breakthrough. However, it triggered backlash across the bloc. Some EU officials called it 'scandalous' and 'a disaster,' claiming it failed to secure any concessions from the US. The German Federation of Industries labeled it an 'inadequate compromise,' with the tariff cut the 'only positive aspect.' The German auto sector's decline has deepened concerns over the health of the EU's largest manufacturing economy, which endured a recession last year. The IMF has forecast zero growth for Germany's economy this year, predicting it to be the only G7 country to stagnate.


Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump ate von der Leyen for breakfast
US President Donald Trump dominated European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen during trade negotiations, resulting in a bad deal for the EU, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has said. The trade pact was finalized on Sunday following months of tense negotiations. 'This was no agreement... Donald Trump ate Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast,' Orban said on a podcast on Monday. 'The European agreement is worse than the UK one. Setting it up for success will be difficult later on,' he argued. Washington set a 10% tariff on British imports in its deal with the UK last month. By comparison, EU exports to the US will face 15% tariffs, while American goods sold in the EU will face no retaliatory duties. Additionally, Brussels has pledged to invest another $600 billion in US industries, buy $750 billion worth of American energy, as well as purchase 'hundreds of billions of dollars' in US weapons, according to Trump. Von der Leyen said these investments will take place over the next three years. According to Orban, it is unclear who exactly will pay for this. The European Commission – the president of which signed the deal – lacks its own army and does not have the capital to buy US arms and energy resources, he said. 'In whose name was the agreement made?' he asked. Other officials in the EU also blasted the deal as lopsided. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou on Monday accused the bloc of caving to US coercion. Benjamin Haddad, France's minister in charge of European affairs, also criticized the 'unbalanced' trade pact, and called on Brussels to retaliate economically. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned in a speech on Monday that the deal will 'clearly' lead to the 'further deindustrialization of Europe and capital flight.' According to Russian Security Council Deputy Chairman Dmitry Medvedev, 'Trump wiped the floor with Europe.'


Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
West could be behind Ukraine's anti-graft rallies – ex-Austrian FM
Recent protests in Ukraine sparked by Vladimir Zelensky's crackdown on anti-corruption agencies may have been orchestrated by Western countries, former Austrian Foreign Minister Karin Kneissl has claimed in an interview with TASS. Thousands reportedly took to the streets across Ukraine last week after Zelensky placed the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under executive oversight. The decision followed a series of raids by security services targeting NABU staff. Protesters accused Zelensky of betraying the country and demanded he reverse the law. Zelensky defended his actions by claiming the anti-corruption bodies had come under Russian influence. His critics, however, described the overhaul as an authoritarian consolidation of power. The move has also been criticized in the West, as the independent agencies are a prerequisite for Ukraine's integration into the EU. 'It looks rather strange for a country and leadership that are heavily dependent on the West [to take this step],' Kneissl told TASS on Monday. She went on to suggest that the protests may not have been spontaneous. 'It's possible that they were organized,' she said. Opponents of the bill have drawn parallels to Ukraine's 2014 Maidan uprising, which led to the ousting of then-President Viktor Yanukovich. Kneissl echoed this view, noting that the Euromaidan protests were 'very well organized, generously funded,' and likely supported by US Embassy staff. She pointed to widely shared images of US diplomat Victoria Nuland handing out cookies to protesters in Kiev. The latest protests at home and backlash from abroad have since forced Zelensky to backpedal on the clampdown and introduce a new bill that contains 'full-fledged guarantees of the independence of anti-corruption agencies' and is designed to 'keep out' any alleged Russian interference. Kneissl, who served as Austria's foreign minister from 2017 to 2019, is known for her close ties to Russia. She sat on the board of state-owned oil giant Rosneft until resigning in 2022. That year, she left Austria and eventually settled in a village in Ryazan Region, Russia, citing death threats and professional isolation.