logo
Authorities in Indian-administered Kashmir ban books by eminent writers, scholars

Authorities in Indian-administered Kashmir ban books by eminent writers, scholars

Arab News4 days ago
SRINAGAR, India: Indian authorities have banned 25 books in Kashmir that they say propagate 'false narratives' and 'secessionism' in the disputed region, where strict controls on the media have escalated in recent years.
The ban threatens people with prison time for selling or owning these works by authors such as Booker Prize-winning novelist and activist Arundhati Roy, constitutional expert A.G. Noorani, and noted academicians and historians like Sumantra Bose, Christopher Snedden and Victoria Schofield.
The order was issued on Tuesday by the region's Home Department, which is under the direct control of Lt. Gov. Manoj Sinha, New Delhi's top administrator in Kashmir.
Sinha wields substantial power in the region as the national government's representative, while elected officials run a largely powerless government that took office last year after the first local election since India stripped the disputed region of its special status in 2019.
The order declared the 25 books 'forfeit' under India's new criminal code of 2023, effectively banning the works from circulation, possession and access within the Himalayan region.
Various elements of the code threaten prison terms of three years, seven years or even life for offenses related to forfeit media, although no one has been jailed yet under them.
'The identified 25 books have been found to excite secessionism and endangering sovereignty and integrity of India,' the Home Department said in its notice. Such books played 'a critical role in misguiding the youth, glorifying terrorism and inciting violence against Indian State,' it said.
The action was taken following 'investigations and credible intelligence' about 'systemic dissemination of false narratives and secessionist literature' that was 'often disguised as historical or political commentary,' it said.
In compliance with the order, police officials on Thursday raided bookstores, searched roadside book vendors and other establishments dealing in printed publications in the main city of Srinagar and across multiple locations in the region to confiscate the banned literature, police said. However, officials didn't specify if they had seized any such material.
Bose, a political scientist and author whose book 'Kashmir at Cross Roads' was among the banned works, rejected 'any and all defamatory slurs' on his work, the Press Trust of India news agency reported.
'I have worked on Kashmir — among many other subjects — since 1993,' Bose said.
'Throughout, my chief objective has been to identify pathways to peace so that all violence ends and a stable future free of fear and war can be enjoyed by the people of the conflict region, of India as a whole, and the subcontinent.
'I am a committed and principled advocate of peaceful approaches and resolutions to armed conflicts, be it in Kashmir or elsewhere in the world,' he said.
Nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan each administer part of Kashmir, but both claim the territory in its entirety.
Militants in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir have been fighting New Delhi's rule since 1989. Many Muslim Kashmiris support the rebels' goal of uniting the territory, either under Pakistani rule or as an independent country.
India insists the Kashmir militancy is Pakistan-sponsored 'terrorism.' Pakistan denies the charge, and many Kashmiris consider it a legitimate freedom struggle. Tens of thousands of civilians, rebels and government forces have been killed in the conflict.
Since 2019, authorities have increasingly criminalized dissent and shown no tolerance for any narrative that questions India's sovereignty over Kashmir.
In February, police raided bookstores and seized hundreds of books linked to a major Islamic organization in the region.
In 2011, police filed charges against Kashmir education officials over a textbook for first graders that illustrated the word 'tyrant' with a sketch resembling a police official.
A year earlier, police arrested a college lecturer on charges that he gave his students an English exam filled with questions attacking a crackdown on demonstrations challenging Indian rule in the region.
In some cases, the accused were freed after police questioning, but most of these cases have lingered on in India's notoriously slow judicial system.
Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, a key resistance leader in Kashmir, condemned the book ban.
'Banning books by scholars and reputed historians will not erase historical facts and the repertoire of lived memories of people of Kashmir,' Mirwaiz said in a statement.
He questioned authorities for organizing an ongoing book festival to showcase its literary commitment but then going on to ban some books.
'It only exposes the insecurities and limited understanding of those behind such authoritarian actions, and the contradiction in proudly hosting the ongoing Book Festival,' he said.
Banning books isn't common in India, but authorities under Prime Minister Narendra Modi have increasingly raided independent media houses, jailed journalists and sought to rewrite history in school and university textbooks to promote the Hindu nationalist vision of his governing Bharatiya Janata Party.
Meanwhile, curriculums related to Muslim Mughal rulers who ruled much of India between the 16th and 19th centuries have been altered or removed. Last year, an Indian court ended a decades-long ban on Salman Rushdie's 'The Satanic Verses', owing to the absence of any official order that had banned the book in 1988.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India pushes ahead with US trade talks despite tariff hike to 50 percent
India pushes ahead with US trade talks despite tariff hike to 50 percent

Arab News

time9 hours ago

  • Arab News

India pushes ahead with US trade talks despite tariff hike to 50 percent

NEW DELHI/MUMBAI: India hopes trade talks with the US will continue even as the US hiked tariffs on its exports to 50 percent due to New Delhi's purchase of sanctioned Russian oil, two lawmakers said on Monday, citing a briefing to a parliamentary panel on foreign affairs. Last week, President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 percent tariff on Indian goods due to Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil, bringing the total duty on Indian exports to the US to 50 percent — among the highest of any American trading partner. 'Our relations with the US are multi-dimensional, and should not be seen only through the prism of trade,' one of the lawmakers said, citing the foreign secretary's briefing to the panel. Shashi Tharoor, an opposition Congress party leader, who heads the panel, said trade talks would continue. 'As of now, there is no change in the existing plans for the sixth round,' he said, referring to a scheduled visit of a US trade delegation to New Delhi from August 25. Earlier, junior finance minister, Pankaj Chaudhary told lawmakers that about 55 percent of India's merchandise exports to the United States would be covered by the new tariff. His estimate factored in the initial 25 percent levy, he said in a written response to a lawmaker's query. 'The Department of Commerce is engaged with all stakeholders' for their assessment of the situation, Chaudhary added. Goods trade between the United States and India — the world's biggest and fifth-largest economies, respectively — was worth about $87 billion in the last fiscal year, according to Indian government estimates. The panel separately voiced concerns over Pakistani army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir's reported remarks on nuclear threats in South Asia during a visit to the US 'Nuclear blackmail will not work with India, and no party, or representative disagrees with this view,' Tharoor said, adding the external affairs ministry had condemned the comments.

Court of Arbitration's latest award on Indus Waters Treaty vindicates Pakistan's stance — FO
Court of Arbitration's latest award on Indus Waters Treaty vindicates Pakistan's stance — FO

Arab News

time10 hours ago

  • Arab News

Court of Arbitration's latest award on Indus Waters Treaty vindicates Pakistan's stance — FO

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Monday said the latest award on the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), rendered by Court of Arbitration, is in line with Pakistan's interpretation of the relevant provisions of the treaty, which India has threatened to put in abeyance. India announced in April it was putting the 1960 World Bank-mediated treaty, which ensures water for 80 percent of Pakistani farms, in abeyance a day after an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that New Delhi blamed on Pakistan, an allegation Islamabad denies. Pakistan has previously said the treaty has no provision for one side to unilaterally pull back and that any blocking of river water flowing to Pakistan will be considered 'an act of war.' The IWT grants Pakistan rights to the Indus basin's western rivers — Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab — for irrigation, drinking, and non-consumptive uses like hydropower, while India controls the eastern rivers — Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej — for unrestricted use but must not significantly alter their flow. India can use the western rivers for limited purposes such as power generation and irrigation, without storing or diverting large volumes, according to the agreement. In a statement issued on Monday, Pakistan's foreign office said it welcomed the award rendered by the Court of Arbitration on Aug. 8 on issues of general interpretation of the IWT, explaining the designed criteria for the new run-of-river hydropower projects to be constructed by India on the western rivers of Chenab, Jhelum and Indus. New Delhi has not yet commented on the development. 'In a significant finding, the Court has declared that India shall 'let flow' the waters of the western rivers for Pakistan's unrestricted use. In that connection, the specified exceptions for generation of hydro-electric plants must conform strictly to the requirements laid down in the Treaty, rather than to what India might consider an 'ideal' or 'best practices' approach,' the foreign office statement read. '​The Court's findings on low-level outlets, gated spillways, intakes for the turbines, and free-board are in line with Pakistan's interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Treaty. The Award also limits India from maximizing the pondage volume.' The South Asian neighbors have been arguing over hydroelectric projects on the shared Indus river and its tributaries for decades, with Pakistan complaining that India's planned hydropower dams will cut its flows. Notably, the Court observed that the awards of a Court of Arbitration are 'final and binding on the parties (India and Pakistan),' and have a controlling legal effect on subsequent Courts of Arbitration and neutral experts, according to the Pakistani foreign office. Recognizing Pakistan's vulnerability as the downstream riparian, the Court has further observed that the object and purpose of the Indus Waters Treaty, as it relates to the western rivers, is to de-limit the two states' respective rights and obligations, in conjunction with mutual cooperation and effective dispute resolutions procedures. 'The award carries special significance in the wake of India's recent announcement to hold the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance, and its earlier decision to boycott the proceedings of the Court of Arbitration. It is an endorsement of Pakistan's historical stance on the afore-stated issues,' the foreign office said. 'Pakistan remains committed to full implementation of the Indus Waters Treaty. It also expects India to immediately resume the normal functioning of the Treaty, and faithfully implement the award announced by the Court of Arbitration.'

Pakistan denies India's ‘sabre rattling' allegations, vows ‘matching response' to aggression
Pakistan denies India's ‘sabre rattling' allegations, vows ‘matching response' to aggression

Arab News

time11 hours ago

  • Arab News

Pakistan denies India's ‘sabre rattling' allegations, vows ‘matching response' to aggression

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan's foreign office on Monday rejected Indian allegations of 'sabre rattling' as misleading, promising a 'matching response' to any aggression by New Delhi. India's ministry of external affairs (MEA) accused Pakistan of 'sabre rattling' and 'irresponsibility' after media reports on remarks about nuclear threats in South Asia made by Pakistan's army chief while on a visit to the United States (US). Pakistan's Field Marshal Asim Munir was said to have made the remarks at a black-tie dinner hosted by a Pakistani-origin businessman in Florida on Saturday, where he spoke to a crowd of more than 100 people. An excerpt of his speech shared by Pakistani security officials did not include such remarks, while the foreign office in Islamabad said the Indian MEA's statement was yet another demonstration of their 'chronic tendency to distorting facts and twisting statements out of context.' 'The Indian narrative of an alleged 'nuclear blackmail' is a misleading and self-serving construct,' it said in a statement. 'Pakistan remains firmly opposed to the use or threat of use of force. India's sabre rattling and war mongering, whenever confronted, invite unfounded allegations bereft of rationality.' India and Pakistan both possess nuclear weapons and fought their deadliest battle in decades in May, sparked by an attack on tourists the previous month in Indian-administer Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians. 'Nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan's stock-in-trade,' Randhir Jaiswal, the spokesperson of India's MEA, said, adding that it was regrettable that the reported remarks have been made while in a friendly third country. 'The international community can draw its own conclusions on the irresponsibility inherent in such remarks.' In a version of the speech shared by Pakistani security officials, Munir said: 'The (Indian) aggression has brought the region to the brink of a dangerously escalating war, where a bilateral conflict due to any miscalculation will be a grave mistake.' The Pakistani army chief was on a visit to the US to attend a farewell event for General Michael Kurilla, the 15th commander of the United States Central Command. India previously lodged a private diplomatic protest with Washington when President Donald Trump hosted Munir for a lunch at the White House in June. In its statement on Monday, the foreign office said Pakistan is a responsible nuclear weapon state with an elaborate command and control structure under full civilian control, and it has always exercised discipline and restraint while dealing with the issues of such importance. 'The Indian MEA's spurious insinuations are irresponsible and without a shred of evidence,' it said. 'We also note with concern a pointless reference to the third countries, in a bid to exert pressure on Pakistan. This not only reflects India's lack of diplomatic confidence but also constitutes a futile attempt to unnecessarily involve other countries.' Some analysts believe that India's disagreement with Washington over the May 10 ceasefire with Pakistan, and Trump's renewed engagement with Islamabad, have contributed to a recent setback in ties between New Delhi and Washington under the Trump administration. Pakistan shall continue to act as a responsible member of the comity of nations, its foreign office reiterated. 'However, any act of Indian aggression or violation of Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity will be met with an immediate and matching response,' it said. 'The onus of any ensuing escalation will rest squarely with the Indian leadership.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store