logo
Trump's proposed ‘immigrant worker tax' will drive money transfers underground, experts warn

Trump's proposed ‘immigrant worker tax' will drive money transfers underground, experts warn

Yahoo05-06-2025

Donald Trump's proposed tax on immigrant workers sending money home from America will take billions out of poor economies and drive the transfers underground, aid and industry experts have warned.
The US president wants to impose a 3.5 per cent tax on remittance transfers sent by anyone who is not an American citizen, as part of his 'big beautiful' tax bill currently passing through Congress.
The new tax would apply to an estimated 40m people in the US, including those with green cards or on working visas, and would include Britons working in America.
The tax comes as part of broader legislation to cut down on illegal migration, and will make America the most expensive G7 country for workers to send money home from.
The measure would effectively cut the amount of money being sent back home, experts say, hitting families that rely on remittances as an economic lifeline.
Some countries in Latin America stand to lose as much as one per cent of their Gross National Income from the measure, research has estimated, with more money sent home from the United States than any other country in their world.
The proposed tax also comes on top of sweeping cuts to US foreign aid which has already left large holes in the government budgets of many poor countries.
Mexico stands to lose the most money in absolute terms, or around $2.6bn (£1.9bn) annually, according to modelling from the Centre for Global Development, a Washington-based global development think tank.
But in terms of the proportion of their income, the worst hit will be El Salvador at just over 1 per cent, Honduras at 0.9 per cent and Jamaica at 0.7 per cent.
Several African countries will also be badly hit, including the Gambia and Liberia.
The centre said: 'For many countries, the remittance tax would be a further crushing blow after the recent cuts to US aid.
'For example, Liberia is a country heavily reliant on both foreign aid and remittances: a quarter of the country's foreign assistance came from the US, and remittances totalled more than three times Liberia's bilateral foreign aid in 2023.
'The US aid cuts were already projected to remove the equivalent of 2 per cent of GNI; even though it is small, the remittance tax will remove another 0.2 per cent.'
Remittances sent back to Mexico have already fallen sharply, as Mr Trump has vowed to toughen up immigration enforcement and enact mass deportations.
Mexico earlier this week said it had received 12 per cent less in April from a year earlier. Economists said the fall was due to a slowing US labour market and fear of deportation among immigrant workers.
Gabriela Siller, director of economic analysis at Grupo Financiero Base, told Bloomberg: 'This was due to the fact that migrants in the United States are afraid to go out to work and send remittances because they could be deported.'
Remittances are a huge part of the global economy, with the World Bank estimating that some $656bn (£484bn), equivalent to the GDP of Belgium, was sent home by workers abroad in 2023.
The flow of money is deemed so important for development, that the United Nations has targets to bring the cost of remittances down by 2030.
World Bank figures show that in the third quarter of 2024, the global average cost of sending a remittance of $200 (£148) was 6.62 per cent.
The majority of that cost was taken up by fees to the provider, such as a bank, mobile phone app, or transfer firm like Western Union. The rest of the cost was due to foreign exchange margin.
Looking at the G7 richest countries alone, the average cost to send money home was an average of 6.14 per cent, including 6.03 per cent in the US and 5.75 per cent in Britain.
Mr Trump's new tax would put the US cost close to 10 per cent.
Under the legislation, the tax would start in 2026 and hit anyone who is not a US citizen or US national, including green card holders and those visiting for work.
Banks and money transfer services would collect the tax for every transaction and hand it on to the US Treasury, according to FXC Intelligence.
Yet experts said the measure risked instead forcing large sums out of heavily regulated financial channels and into more informal underground routes which have no safeguards against money laundering, or criminal financing.
The Atlantic Council this week said: 'Countries that have enacted punitive measures on cross-border payments and currency exchange have often undermined their own ability to combat financial crime, thereby weakening their economies and diminishing their foreign influence.'
An original version of the bill wanted the tax to be set at five per cent, but it was cut back at the last minute.
The current version is heading to the Senate and is expected to still face stiff opposition from transfer companies.
Payments-industry trade groups representing companies like Western Union and Visa have written to Congress members saying the measure would hit migrants sending money back to relatives, on top of posing a greater money-laundering risk.
The letter said: 'This provision would create a dangerous new precedent with respect to government overreach by invading the privacy of Americans, harming American businesses, and - for the first time - intruding on payment transactions between private individuals.'
'Everyday Americans would be asked to turn over sensitive identification information in order to use a regulated and licenced financial services provider to conduct ordinary, everyday financial transactions.'
Protect yourself and your family by learning more about Global Health Security
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump revokes California's nation-leading electric vehicle mandate
Trump revokes California's nation-leading electric vehicle mandate

Politico

time28 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump revokes California's nation-leading electric vehicle mandate

President Donald Trump moved Thursday to eliminate California's nation-leading vehicle emissions standards, upending strict rules that had become a template for states across the nation to realize their greenhouse gas ambitions. Trump signed three Congressional Review Act resolutions rolling back a trio of California's rules at a White House signing ceremony, delivering on his Day 1 executive order to quickly roll back electric vehicle mandates around the country. 'We officially rescue the US auto industry from destruction by terminating California's electric vehicle mandate, once and for all,' Trump said at a Oval Office signing alongside House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin. The president, in a wide-ranging speech before the signing, used the moment to hit on a range of issues, including inflation, his disdain for windmills and his recent fallout with Tesla CEO Elon Musk. 'Now we know why Elon doesn't like me so much,' Trump quipped, before saying that Musk never asked him to save EV rules and that their break was over other 'smaller things.' While the Trump administration has also gone on the offensive against federal vehicle standards, California's regulations aimed at phasing out gas-powered passenger vehicles and heavy-duty diesel trucks — which are followed by a dozen other states — have drawn the stiffest opposition from the auto and fossil fuel industries. 'Worse than unachievable, these EV mandates were going to be harmful,' said John Bozzella, president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation. 'Harmful to auto affordability, to consumer choice, to industry competitiveness and to economic activity.' The move takes place against the backdrop of worsening relations between Trump and Gov, Gavin Newsom, with the president ordering the military to quell unrest in Los Angeles over immigration raids. It also comes as Tesla CEO and former White House adviser Elon Musk clashed with Trump last week over electric vehicle policies. Trump's signature revokes the Golden State's unique permission to exceed federal vehicle pollution standards, which it's used for decades to set nation-leading rules. A dozen other Democrat-led states have opted to follow California's rules, representing one-third of the U.S. auto market. California's regulations aim to require automakers to sell increasing percentages of zero-emission vehicles, culminating in a 2035 target of all new-car sales being electric or otherwise carbon-free. Trump had targeted California's rules in his first term and on the campaign trail for his second term. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin asked Congress to revoke them using the Congressional Review Act, which allows Congress to overturn rules passed in the waning days of the previous administration. The request triggered a debate among Republicans about whether to stretch congressional norms by using the CRA to roll back California's rules, which Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough and the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office have said aren't subject to the law. In addition to the rules for passenger vehicles, Thursday's signings roll back California's authority to enforce zero-emission sales targets for commercial trucks and higher standards for heavy-duty diesel engines. The fight over whether Congress acted lawfully will now head to the courts. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta said last month they would sue immediately after Trump signs the resolutions. The outcome of that court case will have widespread implications, as Democratic leaders seek to wean drivers and industry off fossil fuels and hit lofty greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals. But the question is especially acute for California, which has struggled for decades to reduce the nation's worst smog in the Los Angeles area and Central Valley and comply with federal air quality standards under the Clean Air Act. Failure to reach those standards could result in sanctions and withholding of federal highway funds, which both Republican and Democratic administrations have floated in the past. Trump's EPA threatened sanctions against the state in 2019, just days after the agency revoked an earlier version of its electric vehicle rules. 'It is hard to imagine that they will not threaten sanctions,' said Ann Carlson, who was head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration under former President Joe Biden. 'The president clearly has it out for California, and Los Angeles is obviously in his sights.' EPA said in a statement when asked about the possibility of sanctions that it will enforce the Clean Air Act. 'EPA will continue to implement the Clean Air Act as provided in law and will continue to hope that California can get into attainment after decades of nonattainment,' the agency said. EPA could develop its own plan for California to meet federal standards, though air quality experts say that's unlikely because the agency would have to take unpopular steps like restricting driving. California Air Resources Board spokesperson Lindsay Buckley said in a statement that without the waivers, the state will need to find an alternative to reach compliance. CARB chair Liane Randolph told state lawmakers during a hearing last month that she's 'confident California will prevail in litigation,' but that could take years, during which the rules are not enforceable. Randolph suggested that the state could consider approaches like district emissions rules for 'indirect sources' like warehouses that attract commercial trucks, incentives to encourage EV purchases and putting more funding towards public transit.

People Are Absolutely Dragging JD Vance For His "Cringe" Tweet About "Les Mis"
People Are Absolutely Dragging JD Vance For His "Cringe" Tweet About "Les Mis"

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

People Are Absolutely Dragging JD Vance For His "Cringe" Tweet About "Les Mis"

Vice President JD Vance and his wife, Usha Vance, joined President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump for a performance of Les Misérables at the Kennedy Center on Wednesday evening. Many found it ironic, given that the musical is about an uprising against abusive authority figures. But just before the show, Vance wanted to make it very clear he had no idea what it was about. The vice president posted: @JDVance / Via In a follow-up tweet, the vice president added: 'That's apparently a different thing called Sweeney Todd.' @JDVance / Via Twitter: @JDVance Given that Les Misérables is one of the most enduring and widely performed modern musicals ― and that it's based on what's considered one of the most important novels of the 19th century ― not many people are buying Vance's ignorance. And they let him know on X: @DSAOrangeCounty / Via @SonnyBunch / Via @alex_shephard / Via Related: The Internet Is Having A Field Day Over Marjorie Taylor Greene's Tweet About Homeschooling With An Altered Map @CanadianKobzar / Via @Biedersam / Via @realStevenWalk / Via @AttalAurelia / Via Related: A NSFW Float Depicting Donald Trump's "MAGA" Penis Was Just Paraded Around Germany, And It' LauraBedrossian / Via @Richard_Vixen / Via @jaredlipof / Via @taylorttt / Via @dwaldenwrites / Via @StatisticUrban / Via @mccue / Via @Letterb0xed / Via @The_Wireman / Via This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: JD Vance Shared The Most Bizarre Tweet Of Him Serving "Food" As Donald Trump's Housewife Also in In the News: This Senator's Clap Back Fully Gagged An MSNBC Anchor, And The Clip Is Going Viral Also in In the News: AOC's Viral Response About A Potential Presidential Run Has Everyone Watching, And I'm Honestly Living For It

Britain ready to implement US tariff deal, trade minister says
Britain ready to implement US tariff deal, trade minister says

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Britain ready to implement US tariff deal, trade minister says

LONDON (Reuters) -Britain is ready to implement its side of a tariff deal with the United States and is hopeful for a proclamation from U.S. President Donald Trump to put the agreement into effect in the coming days, trade minister Jonathan Reynolds said on Thursday. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Trump on May 8 agreed to reduce tariffs on UK imports of cars and steel to the U.S., with Britain agreeing to lower tariffs on beef and ethanol, but implementation of the deal has been delayed. Reynolds met U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday and discussed the implementation of the deal. Asked on Thursday if there would be an update by the end of the week, Reynolds said he was "very hopeful". "We're ready to go, and as soon as the president and the White House are ready to go on their side, we'll implement (our) part of the deal," Reynolds told reporters. Reynolds said he would issue a government order known as a statutory instrument to implement the changes to reciprocal tariffs. Officials said that the update on implementation was likely to come early next week. One of the details to be ironed out before the deal can be implemented is steel quotas. Reynolds added that he wanted to make sure the tariff reductions applied to every bit of the UK steel industry, as the U.S. finalises quotas that will place supply chain requirements on British steel exports to the United States. The bioethanol industry has warned its future is under threat, with Associated British Foods deciding on the fate of a plant later this month. Reynolds acknowledged the deal could increase competition but said the industry was already struggling. "We are very sensitive to the ethanol issue... (but) they're losing a lot of money already," Reynolds said, adding regulatory tweaks could help, but that for financial support: "any intervention I make has to be a clear route to profitability." "So there are much wider issues for these partners than just the U.S. trade deal." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store