&w=3840&q=100)
US vetoes UN Security Council resolution for an immediate Gaza ceasefire
14 of 15 UN Security Council members backed a resolution calling Gaza's humanitarian situation catastrophic and urging Israel to lift all aid delivery restrictions for 2.1 million Palestinians
AP United Nations
The United States on Wednesday vetoed a UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza because it was not linked to the release of hostages.
The resolution before the UN's most powerful body also did not condemn Hamas' deadly attack in Israel on October 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza two other US demands.
The 14 other members of the 15-nation council voted in favour of the resolution, which described the humanitarian situation in Gaza as catastrophic and called on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid to the 2.1 million Palestinians in the territory.
The US vetoed the last resolution on Gaza in November, under the Biden administration, also because the ceasefire demand was not directly linked to the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. Similarly, the current resolution demands those taken by Hamas and other groups be released, but it does not make it a condition for a truce.
President Donald Trump's administration has tried to ramp up its efforts to broker peace in Gaza after 20 months of war. However, Hamas has sought amendments to a US proposal that special envoy Steve Witkoff has called totally unacceptable.
The vote followed a decision by an Israeli and US-backed foundation to pause food delivery at its three distribution sites in the Gaza Strip after health officials said dozens of Palestinians were killed in a series of shootings near the sites this week. Israel and the United States say they supported the establishment of the new aid system to prevent Hamas from stealing aid previously distributed by the UN.
The United Nations has rejected the new system, saying it doesn't address Gaza's mounting hunger crisis, allows Israel to use aid as a weapon and doesn't comply with the humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence. The UN says its distribution system throughout Gaza worked very well during the March ceasefire and is carefully monitored.
The resolution demanded the restoration of all essential humanitarian services in line with humanitarian principles, international humanitarian law and UN Security Council resolutions.
Israel's UN Mission said Ambassador Danny Danon, who will speak after the vote, will say the resolution undermines humanitarian relief efforts and ignores Hamas, which is still endangering civilians in Gaza. He also will say the resolution disregards the ceasefire negotiations that are already underway, the mission said.
Gaza's roughly 2 million people are almost completely reliant on international aid because Israel's offensive has destroyed nearly all food production capabilities. Israel imposed a blockade on supplies into Gaza on March 2, and limited aid began to enter again late last month after pressure from allies and warnings of famine.
The world is watching, day after day, horrifying scenes of Palestinians being shot, wounded or killed in Gaza while simply trying to eat, UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher said in a statement Wednesday. He called for a flood of aid to be let in and for the world body to be the one delivering it.
The Security Council has voted on 14 Gaza-related resolutions and approved four since the war began. That is when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251.
They are still holding 58 hostages, a third of them believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals.
Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which doesn't say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants.
The ministry is led by medical professionals but reports to the Hamas-run government. Its toll is seen as generally reliable by UN agencies and independent experts, though Israel has challenged its numbers.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
25 minutes ago
- News18
News18 Evening Digest: Police Unease In Bengaluru As Heads Roll & Other Top Stories
Last Updated: We are also covering: Donald Trump, Elon Musk To Speak Privately Amid Public Falling-Out, Akhil Akkineni Marries Zainab Ravdjee, and other top stories. In today's evening digest, NEWS18 brings latest updates on Bengaluru stampede, Trump-Musk feud and other top stories. Police Unease In Bengaluru As Heads Roll; BJP, Congress Spar Over 'Scapegoat' Charges Dissent is growing within the Karnataka police following the suspension of senior officers in the aftermath of the Bengaluru stampede, with many personnel believing the police are being made 'scapegoats" for the tragic incident that claimed 11 lives. Read more Pakistan has so far sent four letters expressing concerns over suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) and urging India to reconsider the decision. Read More US President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk are expected to speak privately, following a public clash that turned their once-close alliance into an open feud. A White House official confirmed the call which is arranged at the urging of Donald Trump's aides, who have been working behind the scenes to defuse tensions between the two, the New York Post reported. Read More Nagarjuna and Amala Akkineni's son Akhil Akkineni has tied the knot with Zainab Ravdjee, and first pictures from their wedding ceremony have flooded social media. The lovebirds tied the knot in an intimate wedding ceremony in Hyderabad on Friday, June 6, 2025. As soon as Zainab and Akhil Akkineni's wedding photos began circulating on social media, fans couldn't contain their excitement and flooded the internet with love and admiration for the newlyweds. Read More Senior India batter Rohit Sharma has revealed that his father, Gurunath, was happy but also 'a little disappointed' when he announced his Test retirement last month. Rohit explained that Gurunath has always appreciated red-ball cricket more than ODIs and T20s, and the longest format has always made him more excited — a love that has only gotten stronger seeing his son go up the ranks to the highest level of the sport. Read More First Published: June 06, 2025, 17:42 IST
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
India at BRICS is a balancing force, not anti-US
India may have its own share of grudges with the West or even the US, including its recent experience during Operation Sindoor, but it will prefer bilateral mechanism to register them on a one-on-one basis read more US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick made an explosive statement this week when he said that the United States views India's membership of BRICS in a very negative way because of the grouping's obsession with de-dollarisation, something that does not go down well in making friends or influencing people in America. While Lutnick is right about BRICS's fixation with challenging the dollar hegemony, he is absolutely off the mark when it comes to judging India's role at the grouping. As a matter of fact, if there is one country that effectively tempers the anti-US or the larger anti-West rhetoric and agenda at BRICS then it has to be India. It is a different matter that Trump administration officials such as Lutnick may not want to engage with nuanced arguments while putting charges but even a cursory assessment of reality will prove how India is a genuinely balancing force at BRICS. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD After the end of the Cold War, in the emerging geopolitical scenario of the 1990s, all the three prominent BRICS member countries—India, China and Russia—were duly following a policy of mending their respective bridges with the West. Unlike India and Russia, China had a greater advantage here because its rapprochement with the West had begun a little earlier with the famous 1972 visit by US President Richard Nixon to Beijing. For India, the world had changed drastically in 1991 with the disintegration of the erstwhile Soviet Union and a debilitating balance of payment crisis. India as a much-reformed economy was naturally gravitating towards the capitalist powerhouse of the world, the United States, as best captured in the visit by the then- Prime Minister, PV Narasimha Rao, who declared to corporate America loudly that India is now open for Business. The firm steps of conviction that each of these countries including India, China and Russia were taking towards the west left little doubt towards their intentions. However, an interesting twist came in the late 1990s when Russian foreign minister Yevgeny Primakov gave his famous 'Primakov Doctrine' that advocated for a multipolar world order to counterbalance the US particularly through a strategic triangle between Russia, India and China. Although the RIC strategic triangle has since remained a pipe dream, this coordination took a concrete shape with the establishment of BRICS in the year 2009. Ironically, BRICS was a term that was originally coined by an American economist Jim O'Neill in 2001 to refer to the potential of emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China that according to him would even dominate the global economy by 2050. But soon this term took on a life of its own when a rising and increasingly assertive China and a revisionist Russia started using the BRICS forum to push their own alternative to a West-led world order. One of the leading examples of their efforts is the thrust on expanding the grouping to include countries such as Iran and Cuba which are one of the biggest opponents of the West-led international order. While both China and Russia have their own agenda in using BRICS to create a geopolitical counterweight to the West, India is in a different league altogether. First, India does share the dreams of a multipolar world order with them, one where the US is not the only power to call the shots. But in order to realise this dream, it is counting only on its individual potential to rise as a formidable great power and not membership of any forum such as BRICS. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Nothing sums this up more clearly than Prime Minister Narendra Modi's statement in 2024 when he categorically called for the grouping to avoid becoming an anti-West forum as it expands further. Despite having articulated several times that India is a great power in its own right, PM Modi cautioned against the grouping taking an anti-West character. This proves that multipolarity may be a cherished goal for a rising India but to achieve that it is not willing to lock horns with the West. India's stand on BRICS taking an anti-US stance becomes even more apparent when one takes the issue of de-dollarisation into account. Unlike Russia and China that have taken a lead in promoting de-dollarisation of the world economy, India, a rising economy, has many a times affirmed that it has no intent to undermine the US dollar or back a BRICS currency that seeks to do the same. In a speech given on the floor of Parliament early this year, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar clearly outlined that undermining the American currency was not a part of the country's strategic or economic policy. This stand stems from the stability that India widely enjoys due to its heavy dependence on dollars for international trade, foreign exchange reserves and even remittances. India is also very aware that de-dollarisation would come with an additional risk of Chinese Yuan gaining prominence as an international currency and this is a scenario that India would never find acceptable at all. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India may have its own share of grudges with the West or even the US, including its recent experience during Operation Sindoor, but it will prefer a bilateral mechanism to register them on a one-on-one basis. For India, the scariest geopolitical scenario will be a world where China replaces the US as the hegemon. It is precisely to balance China that India has willingly signed up for the Quad initiative in the Indo-Pacific. Until India and China are locked in this geopolitical tussle, BRICS would never become the kind of forum that US Commerce Secretary Lutnick has accused it to be. In fact, India's presence at BRICS should be seen as a relief by the Americans because it is just the kind of balancing force that they badly need. One of the biggest achievements of India at the forum is to amplify the voice of the Global South and make it a genuinely inclusive grouping. It is time the West, especially the United States, started appreciating the role that India is playing rather than trade charges or undermine the core interests of a so-called ally. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The author is a New Delhi-based commentator on geopolitics and foreign policy. She holds a PhD from the Department of International Relations, South Asian University. She tweets @TrulyMonica. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Issue of our national interest': Russia's Ukraine war is 'existential', says Kremlin; massive strikes hit Kyiv
File photo: Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov (Picture credit: AP) Russia declared its war in Ukraine an 'existential' battle for its survival on Friday, just hours after launching one of its most intense aerial attacks in the three-year conflict. At least three people were killed in Kyiv as more than 400 drones and over 40 missiles were fired across six regions of Ukraine, according to Ukrainian officials. 'For us it is an existential issue, an issue of our national interest, safety, of our future and the future of our children, of our country,' Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters, responding to US President Donald Trump's controversial remark comparing Russia and Ukraine to 'fighting kids'. The overnight assault, described as 'massive' by Russia's defence ministry, was billed as retaliation for a daring Ukrainian drone attack on Russian airbases earlier this week. According to news agency AFP, Ukrainian officials said the barrage struck nine regions, including Lviv, Volyn and Kyiv, leaving dozens injured and critical infrastructure damaged. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy accused Moscow of escalating the war, warning that failure to rein in Russia would amount to complicity. 'If someone does not put pressure and gives the war more time to take lives, they are complicit and responsible. We need to act decisively,' he said on social media. Three emergency responders were killed in Kyiv while attending to earlier strikes, according to Interior Minister Igor Klymenko. 'They were working under fire to help people,' he said, noting nine more were wounded and 'doctors are fighting for their lives.' AFP journalists in Kyiv reported prolonged air raid sirens and explosions through the night. In one district, a multi-storey building was left with a gaping hole, and windows were shattered across nearby homes. 'We heard a drone — we heard it coming very close, and then there was an explosion,' resident Ksenia was quoted as saying by AFP. The attacks follow a Ukrainian strike on Russian airfields that damaged nuclear-capable bombers deep within Siberia. The Ukrainian operation involved smuggling over 100 small drones into Russia, positioning them near airbases, and launching a coordinated assault. In response, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned of retaliation, with Russia's defence ministry claiming it hit Ukrainian 'arms depots, drone factories and repair facilities' using long-range precision weapons. Despite US-backed peace efforts, talks between Kyiv and Moscow have produced no breakthroughs. While Ukraine has proposed an unconditional 30-day ceasefire and direct talks between Zelensky and Putin, the Kremlin continues to demand a full Ukrainian military withdrawal from four occupied regions and a ban on NATO membership — conditions Kyiv rejects. Kyiv officials said at least 49 people were injured nationwide. In Russia, drone attacks reportedly damaged facilities in Tula and Saratov, and air defences downed 174 Ukrainian drones overnight, according to Moscow's defence ministry.
