Support for NASA returning to the moon and going to Mars is surging
Sixty-seven percent of respondents favor a return to the moon and just 33 percent oppose one. On Mars, sixty-five percent favor sending astronauts to the red planet with 35 percent in opposition.
Support for sending astronauts back to the moon tracks favorably among all age groups, with 71 percent of 18 to 29-year-olds in favor.
The current favorable view of the Artemis program contrasts with what people thought of the Apollo program to land men on the moon while it was ongoing. As space historian Roger Launius pointed out, most Americans, with the exception of one poll taken in July 1969, took a dim view of going to the moon.
'Consistently throughout the decade, 45-60 percent of Americans believed that the government was spending too much on space, indicative of a lack of commitment to the spaceflight agenda,' Launius wrote.
Incidentally, the CBS News poll shows that now Americans believe that the Apollo program was worth the effort, 77 to 23 percent. The findings were consistent with those taken on the 50th and 40th anniversaries of the first moon landing.
The fact that support for going back to the moon and on to Mars is uniform across all age groups jumps out. In times past, some have suggested that supporters for sending astronauts beyond low Earth orbit mainly consisted of boomers nostalgic for the glories of the Apollo program.
If that was ever the case, it isn't any longer.
Laura Seward Forczyk, a space career consultant, video blogger and author of ' Rise of the Space Age Millennials,' likely spoke for a lot of younger people on X when she posted, 'I hope to live to see humans walking on another world again. Artemis III can't come soon enough.'
Her sentiment expresses a desire for something beautiful and glorious in a world often ugly and dispiriting. Come to think of it, that was the Apollo 11 moon landing in the midst of the turmoil of the 1960s.
A lot of famous space influencers, such as former NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine, billionaire private space traveler Jared Isaacman, video blogger Eliana Sheriff and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk were not alive when men first walked on the moon.
One word of caution should be made about how poll results can often be influenced by question-wording. In 2023, the Pew organization released a poll suggesting that returning to the moon and on to Mars were of lower priority than things like asteroid detection and measuring climate change. Nevertheless, when combining the answers 'top priority' and 'important but lower priority' space exploration still enjoyed healthy support, with 57 percent favoring a return to the moon and 56 percent going to Mars.
People are looking forward to witnessing the first footsteps on the moon in over 50 years and the first ever on Mars. Donald Trump was the latest president of the United States to make that promise when he started the Artemis program during his first term. Now, he has to deliver.
Unfortunately, President Trump is in serious danger of blowing it. Over six months into his second administration, America still does not have a permanent NASA administrator, thanks to Trump's capricious, last-minute withdrawal of Isaacman's nomination.
The White House and the Congress are wrangling over NASA science funding and how long the space agency should retain the Orion Space Launch System architecture for returning to the moon.
Trump needs to move quickly to nominate a permanent head of NASA. He could change his mind again about Isaacman, though he may be loath to admit to making a mistake.
The White House also needs to reestablish the National Space Council as a center for the formulation of space policy. The council performed great service during the first Trump administration. It can do so again.
Finally, Trump and Musk should resolve their feud. The most powerful man in the world and the world's richest man work better together than at cross purposes.
Trump has won some great domestic and foreign policy victories. It will be a pity if his legacy is one of letting China get back to the moon before we do.
Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled ' Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon? ' as well as ' The Moon, Mars and Beyond ' and, most recently, ' Why is America Going Back to the Moon? ' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
A Nuclear Reactor on the Moon? Come Again?
The acting administrator of NASA has issued a directive to fast-track efforts to put a nuclear reactor on the moon. 'To properly advance this critical technology to be able to support a future lunar economy, high power energy generation on Mars, and to strengthen our national security in space, it is imperative the agency move quickly,' Sean Duffy, the secretary of transportation whom President Trump appointed last month as temporary leader of the space agency, wrote in the directive, which was sent out on Thursday. Politico was first to report on the directive. In it, Mr. Duffy cites plans by China and Russia to put a reactor on the moon by the mid-2030s as part of a partnership to build a base there. If they were first, China and Russia 'could potentially declare a keep-out zone' that would inhibit what the United States could do there, Mr. Duffy said. The directive calls for the appointment of a NASA official to oversee the effort within 30 days and for a request seeking proposals from commercial companies to be issued within 60 days. The reactor will be required to generate at least 100 kilowatts of electrical power — enough for about 80 households in the United States — and to be ready to launch in late 2029. One lunar day lasts four weeks on Earth — two weeks of continual sunshine followed by two weeks of cold darkness. That harsh cycle makes it difficult for a spacecraft or a moon base to survive with just solar panels and batteries. Current exploration efforts, both by NASA and by the Chinese-Russian partnership, are focusing on the south polar region, where the sun is never high over the horizon and the bottoms of some craters lie in permanent shadows. Over the years, NASA has financed nuclear reactor research, including the awarding of three $5 million contracts in 2022 to companies developing initial designs. Those designs were smaller, producing 40 kilowatts and weighing under six metric tons. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Old Mars rovers can learn new tricks! NASA's Curiosity marks 13-year milestone with new science capabilities
Can you teach an old Mars rover new tricks? NASA says the answer is a resounding 'yes.' Following its landing on Mars 13 years ago, Curiosity has been given new capabilities, allowing it to do science on the Red Planet while expending less energy from its batteries. Essentially, it can now multitask. 'We were more like cautious parents earlier in the mission,' Reidar Larsen, of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, said in a statement. 'It's as if our teenage rover is maturing, and we're trusting it to take on more responsibility. As a kid, you might do one thing at a time, but as you become an adult, you learn to multitask.' Larsen led a group of engineers who developed the new capabilities for their six-wheeled teen. The agency said improvements to Curiosity will allow the rover to make the most of its energy source, which is a type of nuclear battery known as a radioisotope thermoelectric generator also used by the Perseverance rover. Managing the rover's daily power budget as the plutonium in the battery decays, Curiosity can now safely talk to a local orbiter while driving, moving its robotic arm, or snapping images. Curiosity can now decide to take a nap if it gets its work done early, ensuring there is less recharging necessary before the next day. 'Even actions that trim just 10 or 20 minutes from a single activity add up over the long haul, maximizing the life of the MMRTG for more science and exploration down the road,' the lab said in a release. These developments build on years of work developing other capabilities, including enhanced driving ability, the ability for Curiosity's head to capture panoramas without a color filter wheel on one of its 'Mastcam' cameras, a new way for Curisotiy's arm drill to collect rock and regolith samples, and an algorithm to help reduce wear and tear on the rover's wheels. The rover has recently been exploring formations of hardened ridges that were believed to have been created by underground water billions of years ago, finding rocks that were formed by the minerals deposited by ancient water flows and wind. 'A big mystery is why the ridges were hardened into these big patterns and why only here,' Curiosity's project scientist Ashwin Vasavada said earlier this year. 'As we drive on, we'll be studying the ridges and mineral cements to make sure our idea of how they formed is on target.' Solve the daily Crossword
Digital Trends
5 hours ago
- Digital Trends
How the heck does an astronaut wash their hair in space? Here's how
The microgravity conditions of the International Space Station (ISS) mean that its human inhabitants are barred from eating crumbly foods as the particles could float away and clog up air vents and other machinery, and could even become a hygiene issue. Similarly, liquids also have to be carefully managed, as loose droplets could cause havoc if they find their way into electronic systems aboard the orbital outpost. So, how do astronauts tackle the seemingly tricky task of washing their hair during a six-month mission aboard the station? Recommended Videos Well, NASA astronaut Nichole Ayers on Monday shared a video (below) of herself doing just that. Sunday was hair wash day! — Nichole 'Vapor' Ayers (@Astro_Ayers) August 4, 2025 'It's not unlike [how you do it] on Earth, but you don't have the advantage of gravity pulling the water or letting the water flow,' Ayers, who arrived at the station in March, explains as she gets started. To wet her hair — and in Ayers' case there's a lot of it — the astronaut uses a water-filled pouch with a one-way valve that lets her carefully control the release of water. To prevent droplets from becoming airborne, she presses the tube directly onto her scalp before releasing the water. She also releases water into the ends of her hair, which is the longest among all of the astronauts currently aboard the space station. While it's hardly soaking at the end of the process, it's wet enough that she can apply some shampoo — using a shampoo bar — to start washing it. 'For the rinses, I'll usually just do my scalp,' Ayers says. 'That way, you can work it through to the rest of my hair.' After giving it a quick dry, she adds some conditioner, gives it a quick brush, and then says that she'll let it dry naturally. 'The water will dry, get into the air, and then we'll reclaim it, and it'll probably become somebody's coffee tomorrow,' Ayers says in a nod to the station's recycling systems. For more on how astronauts live their daily lives on the ISS — including the delicate act of going to the bathroom — check out these short videos made by the crewmembers themselves over the years.
