Court suspends blocking order for only two YouTube channels
Additional District and Sessions Judge Afzal Majoka, while hearing the petitions challenging an earlier order by Judicial Magistrate Abbas Shah, who had approved the blocking of 27 channels, ordered the suspension of the previous judgment only up to two channels belonging to journalist Matiullah Jan and Asad Toor.
Advocates Riasat Ali Azad, Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha appeared before the court.
Earlier, Judicial Magistrate Abbas Shah had issued orders to block the 27 YouTube channels on the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA)'s petition.
Judicial Magistrate Abbas Shah in its two-page written order says, the enquiry officer of the police station Cyber Crime Circle Islamabad (CCCI), of the NCCIA has approached the court under Section 94 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC), 1898, and stated that during the course of inquiry evidence regarding 27 YouTube channels it came on record the channels are involved in publicly disseminating/propagating false, misleading and fake information against the state institutions/officials.
The order says that in the light of facts explained and evidence presented by the enquiry officer, this court is convinced that the subject matter constitutes offences punishable under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act and Penal Laws of Pakistan.
The head/officer incharge of the security department/custodian of records to Google LLC, D/B/A YouTube 901 Cheery Ave, San Bruno, CA 94066, USA, is therefore directed to block/remove the 27 channels.
The list of channels ordered to be blocked includes those operated by Haider Mehdi, Siddique Jaan, Sabee Kazmi, Orya Maqbool Jan, Arzoo Kazmi, Rana Uzair Speaks, Sajid Gondal, Habib Akram, Matiullah Jan MJtv, Asad Toor Uncensored, Imran Riaz Khan, Sabir Shakir, Imran Khan, Aftab Iqbal, Abdul Qadir, Wajahat Saeed Khan, Ahmad Noorani Youtube, Nazar Chohan Youtube, Moeed Pirzada Youtube, Makhdoom Shahabud Din, and Shayan Ali.
The court also ordered blocking of channel namely, Charsadda Journalist, Naya Pakistan, Daily Qudrat, Real Entertainment TV, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, and Naila Pakistani Reaction.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Police raid Neon's livestream with Iggy Azalea after swatting and illegal gambling allegations
A livestream hosted by controversial internet personality Rangesh 'N3on' Mutama, better known as Neon, was abruptly interrupted on August 4, 2025, after a reported swatting incident led police to raid the show mid-broadcast. Australian rapper Iggy Azalea was a guest on the stream, which aired on Kick. Clips circulating online show uniformed officers entering the set as the broadcast continued live. Several individuals were reportedly detained at the scene amid accusations of illegal gambling activities occurring during the show. However, whether these allegations are valid or part of the swatting hoax remains unclear. Multiple people were arrested on Neon's stream with Iggy Azalea after they were swatted over suspected illegal gambling 👀 — FearBuck (@FearedBuck) August 4, 2025 Swatting is the act of falsely reporting an emergency to provoke an armed police response — a serious federal crime that has affected numerous streamers. In this case, the tip-off allegedly included claims of unlicensed gambling taking place live. While Neon has a history of online controversy — including a prior swatting incident in 2024 and an arrest in Dubai — this latest disruption highlights rising tensions between livestreaming and public safety. Among the guests on the stream was Iggy Azalea, who has recently ventured into livestreaming and cryptocurrency-related content. Although she appeared on camera during the police entry, there is no suggestion that Azalea was involved in or aware of any wrongdoing. The earliest report of the incident surfaced via a post from user FearedBuck, who wrote, 'Several were detained during Neon's stream with Iggy Azalea after they were swatted due to suspected illegal gambling.' That quote has since spread widely across TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts, often without attribution or verification. As the footage continues to trend, law enforcement has not released an official statement. Until more reliable reporting emerges, speculation around arrests or confirmed gambling activity remains unverified.
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Anthony Fantano issues apology over resurfaced clips containing racial slurs and controversial remarks
Anthony Fantano, the music critic behind The Needle Drop, has issued a public apology after resurfaced video clips from his past content began circulating online. Alleged audio has leaked of white closeted hip hop reviewer Anthony Fantano saying the n-word 😳🤦♂️ — Akademiks TV (@AkademiksTV) July 31, 2025 In a video posted to his secondary YouTube channel and on X, Fantano addressed footage from the mid-2010s when he ran a separate channel known as thatistheplan. Two clips gained attention. The first showed Fantano using the N-word and the F-slur. He explained: 'Early on in my YouTube career, I had some pretty lax views when it came to quoting the language of others. My point of view was 'what does it matter? It's not me saying it.'' He admitted that quoting the words was 'in bad form and unnecessary.' He added: 'All I can do is take ownership of having quoted these words in this way. And obviously say that I'm sorry. Which, I am, in fact, sorry about this.' The second clip led to claims that Fantano was laughing at the death of Trayvon Martin. He denied the accusation, explaining: 'The way this clip has been presented is a lie. It's been heavily edited.' Fantano said he was reading a viewer's super chat which confused Trayvon Martin with YouTuber Tre Melvin and that his reaction was directed at the mistake, not the tragedy. Fantano concluded the video by criticising DJ Akademiks, whose affiliated page helped circulate the clips. He stated he will no longer appear on platforms that share or support ideas he fundamentally disagrees with.
Express Tribune
5 days ago
- Express Tribune
The people's mandate cannot be censored: why PTI still stands strong
Barrister Dr. Muhammad Ali Saif In the shadows of an increasingly autocratic political landscape, the people of Pakistan are witnessing a dangerous paradox. A political party which is silenced across traditional media, relentlessly demonised, legally persecuted, and institutionally cornered is somehow still standing and perhaps even stronger than ever in the hearts and minds of Pakistanis. That party is Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). The more it is targeted, the more it grows. The more it is censored, the louder its voice echoes through every corner of this country and even abroad. And the question that is getting under the skin of the political mafia and haunting its sponsors is why don't people just let go of PTI? Over the last two years, the scale and intensity of the crackdown against PTI have exceeded even the darkest chapters of our political history. From midnight raids and enforced disappearances to mass disqualifications, party defections under coercion, media blackouts, social media throttling, and dozens of politically engineered court cases, the message has been loud and clear, this party must be erased at all costs. Yet the public response has been equally resolute, not without a fight, not without our vote. If we examine this unique phenomenon of political resilience of PTI from a sober and analytical lens, it becomes clear that you cannot convince people to start loving the leaders they themselves rejected. In any functional democracy, media plays the role of a mirror. In Pakistan, that mirror has been shattered. In a desperate attempt to marginalise PTI after toppling their elected government, a campaign was initiated to erase PTI and Imran Khan. Mainstream television networks were instructed to erase Imran Khan's name, blur his image, or pretend he does not exist. Anchors were taken off air, columnists silenced, and editors summoned for "guidance." The campaign continues to get viscous and ruthless with every passing day. Communication experts believe that propaganda is only as effective as the public's willingness to believe in it. People listen to what they want to listen. This has been the first flaw in the state's strategy i.e. you cannot convince a population to hate the very leader they themselves chose, defended, and trusted especially when the alternative is riddled with incompetence and corruption. Following the ouster of Imran Khan from the government, he was replaced with an alliance of almost 12 opposition parties. As inflation spiked, governance collapsed, and the public lost hope in the alliance, the tailored media narrative began to collapse under its own weight. Instead of tarnishing PTI, censorship transformed the party into a symbol of resistance. Another key variable that was drastically underestimated was the internet. The architects of this repression didn't anticipate the rise of digital resistance. When one screen went dark, thousands of phones lit up. YouTube, TikTok, X (Twitter), and Instagram became the new battlegrounds and the people showed up in large numbers. No big studios, no funding, no instructions, just young men and women, volunteers at home, students, overseas Pakistanis, everyone adding their voice. Each telling the truth. Each refusing to accept silence. Despite attempts to throttle the internet and arrest online activists, this digital resistance lives on. And through it, PTI stayed connected with the people instantly, honestly, and unfiltered. Perhaps the most misunderstood aspect of PTI's resilience is that its supporters do not see it merely as a political party. They see it as a moral cause. In their view, this is not a fight for power, it is a fight for dignity, justice, and national independence. Imran Khan's political narrative, whether you agree with it or not, is the voice of many Pakistanis. The narrative that the Pakistani citizen is not a subject of dynastic families or foreign dictates, but a stakeholder in this nation's future. This idea struck especially deep in the youth, the middle class, and professionals. These segments were historically disengaged from politics but are now fully activated. This moral dimension i.e the belief that PTI is standing for truth against tyranny, is what makes it unshakable, even in the face of brutal repression. Purge, inquisitions, arrests , bans, and smear campaigns only validate their belief that the system is corrupt, and the struggle is righteous. Nowhere is this political loyalty more visible than in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where PTI has governed with consistency and transparency for over a decade. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's political relationship with PTI is one of trust. Even in the face of federal neglect, financial strangulation, and security threats, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa under PTI demonstrated better service delivery, cleaner administration, stronger anti-corruption measures, and more responsive leadership. In tribal districts, FM radio network, public outreach programs, and developmental efforts built a bond of trust with communities that had long been ignored by the state. When the people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa re-elected PTI with a landslide in the 2024 provincial elections, despite all odds and with zero establishment support, it was a message to the rest of Pakistan, "This is not about propaganda. We have seen results. We have lived under your governance. And we choose PTI again." Authoritarian strategies often fail not because they are weak, but because they are blind to human psychology. When the state resorts to visible injustice i.e. parading handcuffed leaders, dragging women into courts, slapping terrorism charges for tweets, it may silence some, but it radicalizes others. The crackdown after 9th May only deepened the divide between ruler and ruled. Instead of crushing PTI, it gave birth to questions that radicalised people's thinking and gave rise to one basic question: Is this a crackdown on criminals or a punishment for challenging the status quo? The answer for most Pakistanis has become crystal clear. Attempts to brand an entire political party as anti-Pakistan has backfired. It has revealed interests in control rather than constitutionality. Currently, Pakistan stands at a critical juncture. The institutions that were meant to protect democracy are being used to manipulate it. The courts are struggling between conscience and coercion. The media is wounded. The economy is crumbling. And the people's voice is being suffocated. But in this darkness, the continued popularity of PTI is not just a reality, it is a beacon for hope. It proves that the Pakistanis are neither ignorant nor indifferent. That despite censorship, economic pain, disillusionment, and inquisitions, they are paying attention and they remember Imran Khan's economic performance. They remember the dignity of a leader who refused NROs, who returned IMF money with honor, who spoke for national sovereignty on global platforms. And most importantly, they remember what betrayal looks like and who orchestrated it. What PTI represents today is more than a party. It is an idea whose time has come and ideas do not fade away with television bans or court cases. You can jail leaders, you can confiscate properties, you can censor speeches but you cannot jail a consciousness that has already awakened.
