logo
There's one major fix for the housing crisis — but both major parties are ignoring a key issue

There's one major fix for the housing crisis — but both major parties are ignoring a key issue

SBS Australia26-04-2025

Experts outline key steps for the two major party leaders to take to address the housing crisis. Source: SBS News Australia's housing crisis has been a key focus in pitches to voters during the federal election campaign, with a particular emphasis on first-home buyers. But whether you rent or buy, the Grattan Institute says the lack of housing affordability is exacerbated by one key issue: the lack of supply. Brendan Coates, program director of housing and economic security at Grattan Institute, said: "We've not built enough housing to meet the needs of our growing population." "That is largely because state land use planning regimes have made it too hard to build more homes in the established suburbs of our major cities," he told SBS News. Last year, Master Builders Australia said building the average house had blown out from nine months to 12.7 months — a 40 per cent increase — since 2010-11.
In areas closer to the city, it said the slow pace of development applications and height and density restrictions placed on big developments were part of the "red tape" slowing down construction. While the biggest levers for boosting construction sit with state and territory governments, which oversee planning and building regulations, Coates argues the Commonwealth still plays a role in increasing housing supply. Experts have weighed in on how the major parties are addressing bottlenecks in the industry and increasing supply, as well as what more needs to be done.
A quick recap of the main housing pitches to voters from the major parties: Will expand the First Home Guarantee scheme and the Help to Buy shared equity loan scheme, both of which will allow first-time home buyers to buy a home with a deposit of 5 per cent or less. However, the latter gives the government a 30 to 40 per cent stake in your home.
Build 100,000 new affordable homes exclusively for first home buyers, with construction starting in 2026/27.
Provide a $10,000 incentive for apprentices in housing construction — paid in instalments — in a bid to speed up the construction of homes.
Aim to deliver 55,000 social and affordable homes over five years under the Housing Australia Future Fund — which will be scrapped by the Coalition. First home buyers will be able to access $50,000 of their superannuation for a deposit.
They will also be able to claim tax deductions on interest payments against the first $650,000 of their mortgage in the first five years.
A $5 billion fund to build infrastructure such as sewerage and water will be set up to support the construction of 500,000 new homes.
Businesses that employ apprentices in areas with a skills shortage can receive a payment of $12,000 per year for the first two years.
The Coalition believes cutting migration will alleviate pressure on the housing market, pledging to reduce net migration levels by 100,000 places. Dr Liam Davies, a lecturer in urban planning and sustainability at RMIT University, said both major parties are tackling supply through different approaches. He told SBS News the Liberal Party wants to ensure the right infrastructure is in place ahead of development, through its $5 billion fund. Alternatively, Labor would facilitate supply by actively intervening in the market, directly funding projects like 100,000 homes for first-time buyers.
In August 2023, the National Cabinet agreed on a target of building 1.2 million "new, well-located homes" across the country by 2029. To achieve the target, 60,000 homes need to be built every quarter. In 2024, roughly 45,000 houses and units were built each quarter — a total of 181,789, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The Grattan Institute estimates the target is unlikely to be met, forecasting 900,000 homes will be built over the five years.
Coates argues the Homes Accord target should be revised to incentivise states to build more. Currently, federal funding incentives for each home built are dependent on that jurisdiction reaching its individual target. "There's not really a real incentive for the states to act to get more housing built, because even if they do, they will struggle to meet that baseline of one million homes, let alone the 1.2 million," he said. "So we need to revise that target down, that baseline down, so that states start to qualify for the $15,000 [per home] if they do act."
"There hasn't been a harder time to build more housing anytime in the last 20 years," Coates said, attributing this to a spike in construction costs, interest rates making financing projects more difficult, and shortages in skilled labour. He said the federal government could "speed the process up" by getting more skilled migrants into the country and financing new construction — acknowledging the latter is part of Labor's pitch. Denita Wawn, CEO of Master Builders Australia, estimates the industry needs roughly 200,000 more workers to meet demand. She has repeatedly called for the fast-tracking of tradie visas, warning the gap cannot be met domestically alone. "We know there's at least 20,000 skilled migrants in the country at the moment that are finding it difficult to get their skills recognised and undertake their gap training," she told SBS News.
Labor has since announced it will fast-track the qualification of at least 6,000 tradies already in the industry through a $78 million program that will help recognise prior learning and identify gaps for further training, which will be offered for free. Wawn said Labor's pilot program is not enough to compete with priority pathways offered by other countries, urging both parties to clearly lay out their skilled migration strategies to voters ahead of 3 May. "Where both parties have let us down is [there's] really no policies on the issue around skilled migration," she said. Wawn did note that the Coalition were "ahead" of Labor when it came to apprentices, "given that they've made a commitment to employer incentives as well as employee incentives". She was referring to a two-year incentive pledged by the Coalition for businesses that hire apprentices in areas with a skills shortage, and its support for Labor's $10,000 apprenticeship program.
Other bottlenecks the industry faces are planning delays for things like development applications, title approvals and occupancy certificates — all of which reduce the capacity to build more homes quickly, although responsibility for these sits with local and state governments. Wawn acknowledged Labor is the only party to mention working in collaboration with states and territories to address the issue of housing. However, she credits the Coalition with having a "deregulation focus". In March, Opposition Treasury spokesperson Angus Taylor committed to establishing a productivity taskforce to assess the cost of regulation and how to reduce red tape. Wawn concludes the parties are "neck-and-neck" at the moment, but argues the 1.2 million build target is achievable if these issues are addressed.
From a planning perspective, Davies said homes need to be built near infrastructure and utilities — including parks, schools, hospitals — and conducive to people having socially engaged lives. You can achieve this by either developing areas near existing infrastructure, or by building infrastructure to allow easier access to greenfield sites, which are undeveloped plots of land typically on the outskirts of urban areas, he said. "If you want to live in an urban area, the Labor policy may suit your lifestyle slightly better," he said. "If you want to live in an outer suburban area, the Liberal Party policy may suit your lifestyle slightly better." He argues while both are crucial, the government needs to focus on diversifying the type of homes being built. He highlights there is a gap for family homes — three or four-bedroom apartments — in urban areas.
Coates said first home buyers on lower incomes will be able to buy homes they might not otherwise have access to, through Labor's first home buyer guarantee and shared equity schemes. But high-income earners, who are more likely to be able to buy a home, will be the greatest beneficiaries of the Coalition's tax deduction on existing mortgages scheme. "Labor is more likely to boost the rate of home ownership. The Coalition will allow wealthier people to buy bigger homes than otherwise." Visit the to access articles, podcasts and videos from SBS News, NITV and our teams covering more than 60 languages.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Entirely unacceptable': Ambassador condemns Australian sanctions on senior Israeli ministers
‘Entirely unacceptable': Ambassador condemns Australian sanctions on senior Israeli ministers

The Age

time3 hours ago

  • The Age

‘Entirely unacceptable': Ambassador condemns Australian sanctions on senior Israeli ministers

At Ben-Gvir's direction his ministry purchased thousands of rifles for settler communities, where some groups have been dispossessing Palestinians and committing violent acts. Smotrich has also made inflammatory public remarks, including stating that Gaza 'will be entirely destroyed' and suggesting Palestinians be forced to emigrate. Last year, he indicated the deaths of 2 million Palestinians by starvation in Gaza might be 'justified', comments that drew rebukes from allies including Germany. But British officials said the sanctions were also designed to pressure Netanyahu to negotiate a ceasefire as humanitarian conditions in the strip become increasingly dire. Hamas has not agreed to release all the remaining hostages. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the international community's patience had run out, declining to rule out further sanctions on the government of Israel. 'The situation in the West Bank and the situation in Gaza are untenable, both for civilians and long-term peace in the form of a two-state solution,' she said in Canberra on Wednesday. Wong gave multiple media interviews and a press conference about the sanctions on Wednesday in a departure from Labor's more reserved tone on the matter in its previous term of government, when former opposition leader Peter Dutton frequently castigated the government for breaking with Israel. The Israeli ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon, said the Israeli government would meet early next week to determine how to respond. 'The decision to impose sanctions on two Israeli cabinet ministers is deeply concerning and entirely unacceptable. These ministers are part of a government that operates under the principle of collective responsibility, making such measures unreasonable,' Maimon said. Coalition foreign affairs spokesman Michaelia Cash did not make any comments supporting the two most hardline members of Netanyahu's cabinet. But she did question whether the Magnitsky-style sanctions used by the government were appropriate to impose on a democratically elected government. 'We are concerned that there is a pattern of decisions by the Albanese government targeting the Israeli government, rather than Hamas,' she said. The rocky pathway to a two-state solution will capture global headlines later this month at a New York summit to be hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron and Saudi Arabia. Australia has been involved in working groups for the summit, but officials at home and abroad have cast doubt on the prospects of reaching consensus, as diplomats hastily scramble to put together a clear agenda for the gathering. The two-state solution has been key Western policy for decades, but the Trump administration's ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, suggested this week that the US was no longer pursuing the goal of an independent Palestinian state. Asked by Bloomberg News if a Palestinian state remained a US aim, he said: 'I don't think so.' Under Australia's Autonomous Sanctions Regulations 2011, sanctions can be applied against individuals responsible for serious violations of human rights, including the right to life and protection from torture. Any Australian found to be dealing with the sanctioned individuals' assets faces penalties of up to 10 years' imprisonment or fines reaching $825,000. A leading Palestinian advocate in Australia, Nasser Mashne, said the sanctions were 'crumbs, tossed by the Australian government 613 days too late.' Loading 'While Australia has hesitated for more than 20 months, Israel has annihilated families, communities, journalists, aid workers, civil infrastructure, every last shred of life in Gaza,' he said. Daniel Aghion, of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, said the two ministers' behaviour was 'reprehensible' and about 80 per cent of Israelis did not support them. 'However, if Australia were to sanction every cabinet minister in every government who has incited hatred and violence, we would end up breaking off diplomatic relations with half the world. This measure is an exercise in performative politics,' he said.

Education non-profit group Teach for Australia apologises for MAGA-style email
Education non-profit group Teach for Australia apologises for MAGA-style email

West Australian

time14 hours ago

  • West Australian

Education non-profit group Teach for Australia apologises for MAGA-style email

A national organisation that recruits high-achievers to become teachers has issued an apology for circulating an email entitled 'help make education great again'. Teach for Australia sent out an email seeking donations on Wednesday morning with a heading that reflected US President Donald Trump's election slogan of 'Make America Great Again'. A few hours later, TFA sent out another message, signed by 'the TFA philanthropy team', apologising for the previous 'poorly worded' subject line. 'We sent an email this morning with a subject line that was poorly worded and unintentionally did not reflect our intent or values,' it said. 'Our intended message was: 'Help Give Every Child a Great Education'. 'We sincerely regret our initial wording and any confusion or concern that may have been caused. 'We apologise and thank you for your understanding and support.' Former Coalition frontbencher Jacinta Nampijinpa Price copped criticism for engaging in US-style politics during last month's Federal election when she vowed in a speech to 'make Australia great again'. She later claimed she had not even realised she was echoing Mr Trump's slogan. TFA is a non-profit organisation that recruits talented individuals to teach in schools serving disadvantaged communities. Its first email called for donations to help students who were being left behind because of where they lived. 'Through no fault of their own, and without being able to change these factors, their postcode or socioeconomic background hinder their access to the same quality of education that their inner city counterparts often enjoy,' it said.

I have good news and bad about your superannuation
I have good news and bad about your superannuation

Sydney Morning Herald

timea day ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

I have good news and bad about your superannuation

Economists have long believed that the cost is passed back to the workers. And empirical studies have confirmed this. A study by one of the great experts in this area, the Grattan Institute's Brendan Coates, has found that, on average, about 80 per cent of the cost is passed back to employees over the following couple of years. (Which raises an interesting point. Few if any commentators – including me – have thought to point out that some part of the cost-of-living pain working families have felt in the post-COVID period is explained by the government indirectly requiring them to increase their saving for retirement, thus leaving them less to spend.) Between July 2021 and today, employees' super contribution has been increased by 2 per cent of their pre-tax wage. In three weeks' time, that will increase to 2.5 per cent. Of course, you'll get that money back, with interest, but not until you retire. Loading For years, many people have worried that they aren't saving enough to live comfortably in retirement. And for years, the banks and fund managers that make their living looking after your super fund savings – which they do by taking a seemingly tiny percentage of your accumulated savings each year – have given people an exaggerated impression of the size of the lump sum they'll need to have on retirement to be comfortable, in the hope that people will add their own contributions to their employer's contributions, this adding to the fund managers' fees. The worriers should remember this. Compulsory employer contribution started in 1992, at 3 per cent of wages. This was gradually increased to 9 per cent in 2002. As we've seen, between 2013 and next month, it will have gradually increased to 12 per cent. Get it? For older people, the more of their working years that have been in this century, the less cause they have to worry about not having enough. And for younger people, the more of their likely total of 45 years working that are ahead of them, the more the risk of not having enough should be the furthest thing from their minds. Remember that the less you have in super, the more help you'll get from the age pension. But the more super you have, the less eligible you'll be for a part pension. It oughtn't to be too long before it's rare for people to retire on a full pension, and common for people to have so much super their eligibility for a pension is wiped out. Loading The big qualification to all that, however, is whether you own your home. Life can be a lot tougher for those retirees dependent on renting in the private market. Pensioners who rent get some assistance from the government – and more than they used to – but it can still be a struggle. Remember, too, that it's easy for a person still working to overestimate how much they'll need to live comfortably in retirement. They'll be paying far less, if any, income tax. They won't be putting money into their super. They won't have dependent kids. They'll go on a few overseas trips – and then they'll decide they can't be bothered going on another. The older you get, the less you want to run around doing expensive things. Coates' research confirms that many retirees end up saving rather than spending all their retirement income. The more pertinent question is whether some young person who spends all or most of their working years getting annual contributions of 12 per cent will retire with far more than they need to live comfortably – whether they'll end up living like kings (if they have the energy). So here's the bad news: once you accept that workers actually pay for their employer contributions by receiving smaller pay rises over their working years, will they be forced to exchange a lower living standard while they're working for more money than they want to spend in retirement?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store