GM Korea's labor dispute intensifies over possible walkout, facility sale tensions amid US tariff woes
According to the sources, the National Labor Relations Commission earlier in the day suspended its mediation of wage negotiations between GM Korea's management and the union, citing deep differences in the positions between the two sides.
The suspension legally allows the union to begin collective action, intensifying a standoff already marked by widespread worker opposition to the company's plan to sell GM's South Korean service centers nationwide and unutilized facilities at its plant in Bupyeong in Incheon, west of Seoul.
The union has demanded the withdrawal of the asset sale plan as a precondition for the wage negotiations.
In a vote carried out last month, 88.2 percent of GM Korea's 6,851 union members voted in favor of a walkout, the highest approval rate for a strike in the union's history.
The dispute comes amid mounting anxiety over the possibility that GM could reduce or eliminate its South Korean manufacturing footprint if the United States maintains its 25 percent tariffs on auto imports, part of a policy pledge of US President Donald Trump during his reelection campaign.
GM Korea exports approximately 410,000 vehicles annually, with about 85 percent of those shipments headed to the US.
On the wage front, the union is demanding a monthly base salary increase of 141,300 won ($103) and a performance-based bonus of 41.36 million won per worker.
In contrast, GM Korea's management has defended its restructuring plan, informing employees of its intent to gradually sell the company's service centers and dispose of low-utilization facilities.
The company says customer support will continue via its 386 partner service centers in the country and that employees at the affected sites will retain their jobs.
A union spokesperson said unless the company withdraws its sale plans, labor will hold internal discussions to raise the intensity of its actions, adding, "We are keeping all options open." (Yonhap)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul shares start slightly higher despite tariff woes
South Korean stocks opened a tad higher Monday despite renewed tariff threats by US President Donald Trump over the weekend. The benchmark Korea Composite Stock Price Index climbed 7.15 points, or 0.23 percent, to 3,182.92 as of 11:20 a.m. On Saturday, Trump said he has sent letters to key trade partners, including the European Union and Mexico, threatening duties of 30 percent on imports and setting the negotiations deadline on Aug. 1. In Seoul, major shares started in mixed territory. Market bellwether Samsung Electronics fell 0.8 percent, and its chipmaking rival SK hynix rose 2.21 percent. Top carmaker Hyundai Motor added 0.72 percent, but its sister Kia retreated 0.6 percent. K-pop powerhouse Hybe declined 0.18 percent, and entertainment giant CJ ENM increased 0.58 percent. The local currency was trading at 1,376.55 won against the US dollar at 11:20 a.m., down 1.15 won from the previous session. (Yonhap)
![[Koichi Hamada] How to negotiate with Trump](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F07%2F13%2Fnews-p.v1.20250713.64b3ecc276d946f8b231d4e24a626407_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
6 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Koichi Hamada] How to negotiate with Trump
Since Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, it has been virtually impossible to keep up with all the extreme measures, incendiary rhetoric, personnel changes, policy reversals, and breaches of rules and norms. That is by design: Like European fascists in the 20th century, Trump knows that it is far easier to manipulate and suppress an overwhelmed, divided, and disoriented public than an informed, engaged and assured one. The relentless stream of declarations, policy U-turns, and legal violations confuses and exhausts Trump's opponents, making it difficult to devise a clear strategy for resisting him. And the flood of often-false or misleading information, combined with continued appeals to popular grievances, prevents Trump's supporters from recognizing that he is often actively working against their interests. For example, cuts to Medicaid under the just-passed 'Big, Beautiful Bill' — which will amount to about $1 trillion over a decade — will leave millions of Americans, including many Trump voters, without health care. Yet Trump's supporters remain largely fixated on the 'enemies' against whom Trump promises to 'protect' America. If you have an angry base and can conjure scary bogeymen, you do not have to justify your policies; you need only keep stoking voters' anger and fear. The international community, too, has been struggling to figure out how to respond to Trump's behavior, from his bombing of Iranian nuclear sites to his rejection of multilateral agreements. When it comes to tariffs, however, the path forward should be clear. On April 2, Trump unilaterally announced 'reciprocal' tariffs on countries running trade surpluses with the United States. But on April 9 — less than 24 hours after the tariffs took effect — he announced a 90-day 'pause,' during which the affected countries were supposed to reach new trade agreements with the US. True to form, the Trump administration has just moved the deadline again: Now, countries apparently have until Aug. 1. Trump's tariffs defy economic logic. A well-established theoretical framework, based on centuries of evidence, explains why international trade is fundamentally a win-win proposition: each country can produce and sell goods and services in the fields where it has a comparative advantage. The Trump administration, however, treats trade like a zero-sum game: if other countries are benefiting, then the US must be losing. Trump hopes that by weaponizing tariffs, he will secure 'victories' for US industry. The problem is that the added costs fall primarily to domestic importers — not foreign producers — and are then passed on to consumers. The result is reduced access to foreign goods, weaker domestic competition, and higher prices. Other countries feel considerable pressure to strike timely deals with his administration. They must resist that pressure. As game theory indicates, patience is crucial for finding cooperative solutions to seemingly intractable conflicts — especially when the uncooperative party is showing impatience. Countries should also remain open to the possibility that trade negotiations can bring mutual benefits, particularly if their scope is broadened beyond industrial products, to include agricultural products and even security issues. Trade talks between the US and Japan are a case in point. So far, bilateral negotiations have focused not only on automobiles — US imports of Japanese cars are far higher than Japanese imports of American cars — but also on rice, an industry that Japan protects with tariffs and subsidies. But reports of excess production capacity suggest that these protections are not doing Japan much good. Add to that high prices — a reflection of high production costs — and Japan has good reason to liberalize the sector, quite apart from facilitating a trade agreement with the US. Trump's aggressive tactics have already motivated Europe to take responsibility for its own security — a welcome development in an increasingly insecure world. At last month's NATO summit, member countries (with the exception of Spain) committed to increasing their defense spending to 5 percent of GDP by 2035. Incorporating defense considerations into trade negotiations could prove constructive. Japan's share of defense spending was affected by the US occupation policy after World War II, which was intended to prevent Japan from becoming a major military power again. Now confronted with the military might of neighboring China and North Korea, and with new demands for increased defense spending from the US, the Japanese will need to consider the issue seriously. None of this justifies Trump's economically counterproductive, highly destabilizing policies. But rather than become overwhelmed or distracted, and end up striking unfavorable trade deals, countries must take their time, think strategically, and, where possible, bring mutually beneficial offers to the table.
Korea Herald
18 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee Jae Myung to send special envoys to key partner countries
President Lee Jae Myung has stacked up special envoys to be dispatched to the European Union, France, the UK and India starting next week. According to the presidential office Sunday, South Korean delegations led by the newly appointed special envoys would travel to the EU and the three countries from Monday to communicate the Lee administration's agenda. Yoon Yeo-jun, a former environment minister who helped steer the Lee presidential campaign, has been picked as the special envoy to the EU. Kang Kum-sil, who was the first woman to serve as the country's justice minister, will lead the delegation to France. Heading to the UK as special envoy is Democratic Party of Korea Rep. Choo Mi-ae, another former justice minister. Former Prime Minister Kim Boo-kyum has been announced as special envoy to India. The delegation to the EU will visit Belgium, where the EU has its headquarters, to talk about ways for expanding its strategic partnership with South Korea, the presidential office said. In France, the delegation will discuss boosting exchanges between the two countries across sectors such as artificial intelligence, space technology and defense industry, according to the presidential office. The delegation to the UK will address bilateral cooperation on global challenges such as climate change, while in India, talks will touch on marking the upcoming 10th anniversary of diplomatic ties, the presidential office said. The presidential office added further announcements that special envoys to other key countries would be made as soon as negotiations with their counterparts are completed.
