
‘Baap, baccha, farzi CM' & Nitish-Tejashwi clash—slugfest over voter roll revision in Bihar assembly
While the Opposition in parliament and the Bihar assembly came to attend house proceedings in black outfits, the Bihar assembly witnessed acrimonious exchanges between the ruling and opposition benches, with Chief Minister Nitish Kumar dismissing young RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav as a 'bachcha' (kid).
New Delhi: The Opposition Wednesday ratcheted up the pressure on the government over the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, launching protests from Parliament to the assembly in the poll-bound state.
Tejashwi spoke amid the din and tried to corner the Nitish government and the Election Commission on the SIR issue. 'The Constitution has given equal rights to all. We are not opposing the SIR, we are questioning the lack of transparency in the SIR. The EC is not working in a transparent manner. It has not held any press conference on the matter.'
He said the EC has conducted SIR earlier too, even during the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government at the Centre.
'The EC is saying illegal migrants have come. They (the EC) want to conduct it in six months. The EC is saying there are fake voters in Bihar electoral rolls. Did Nitishji become chief minister on illegal votes, is Nitish a farzi (fake) CM? Am I a farzi MLA? Modi won from this voter list. If they had to do this exercise, they should have done so after the Lok Sabha polls,' he said.
'Who is the Election Commission to determine the citizenship of people? It is the work of the home ministry not the EC,' he said.
Tejashwi then trained gun on deputy chief ministers Sinha and Samrat Choudhary and asked if they become deputy CMs based on votes by the illegal Bangladeshi and Nepali voters.
Sinha responded angrily, accusing Tejashwi of misleading people. 'He is attacking the EC only to fool the people of the state.'
Tejashwi hit back at Sinha, calling him a 'halka aadmi' (non-serious man).
The RJD leader then continued with his tirade against the EC. 'The Election Commission has not allowed the Aadhaar card among 11 documents (to be submitted to the EC during SIR). Why ration card or MGNREGA card has not been included in the list of documents?
'Even after the SC rebuked the EC, they did not include these. Bihar has the least penetration for documents, only two percent people have the 11 documents which the EC is asking for. Four crore people have migrated out of Bihar, according to the labour ministry. There is fear, these people will be removed from the voter list. How come poor people will have these documents?'
After Tejashwi finished, Chief Minster Nitish Kumar rose to speak.
Also read: Nitish is not fit to continue as CM, NDA will lose power in Bihar come November—Prashant Kishor
Nitish's caustic response
'You are a bachcha (kid),' he told Tejashwi. 'Your father (Lalu Prasad) was a minister for seven years. Your father was a chief minister too as was your mother. You don't know their history and their deeds. What they have done. Nobody would come out from their houses during their rule due to fear.'
Then Nitish attacked the RJD. 'Whenever any work comes from your side, we do. What was the situation of women earlier? We have done a lot of work for women's welfare. We implemented 50 percent reservation in panchayats. What was the budget size earlier? It's Rs 3 lakh-core now and the Center is helping address the problems of Bihar.'
Tejashwi then rose again to respond to the chief minister. Speaker Nand Kishore Yadav asked him to keep his speech brief which riled up RJD MLA Bhai Virendra who said, 'The House does not belong to anyone's father (Yeh sadan kisi ke baap ka nahi hai).'
When the Speaker asked him to tender an apology for this statement, he refused. Amid the din, Tejashwi sought an apology if the statement hurt anyone.
Deputy CM Sinha remarked, 'These people have massacred thousands of people. They are RJD's goonda.' This prompted sloganeering and a protest by the RJD, leading to the adjournment of the House.
Before that, the Speaker also chided deputy chief minister Sinha when he stood to protest Bhai Virendra's remark.
'Despite being a deputy CM, you want to create a ruckus. I will run the House, not you,' the Speaker told Sinha.
Outside the assembly ,RJD MLA defended Bhai Virendra's remarks.
Back in Delhi, Giridhari Yadav, a Lok Sabha MP from BJP ally Janata Dal (United), attacked the Election Commission for conducting the SIR at a short notice. He said the EC exercise is like a 'Tughlaqi farmaan'.
'The Election Commission has no practical knowledge. It neither knows the history nor the geography of Bihar. It knows nothing. At a time when it is the sowing season… It took 10 days for me to collect all the documents. My son stays in America. How will he do the signatures in just a month?,' the Banka MP told reporters in Delhi.
(Edited by Ajeet Tiwari)
Also read: No legal, valid 'citizenship' document that's issued—how it puts big question mark on ECI's Bihar exercise
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
In Supreme Court, EC may share same draft roll it gave to political parties
New Delhi: The Election Commission of India (ECI) is likely to inform the Supreme Court that it had shared the draft electoral rolls of Bihar with various political parties on August 1 and had also circulated lists detailing reasons for the deletion of nearly 6.5 million electors, people familiar with the matter told HT on Wednesday. The Election Commission of India headquarters in New Delhi(File Photo) The top court, which is hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the ECI's ongoing special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, on Wednesday directed the poll body to file to file a reply by August 9 in response to allegations that over 6.5 million names were deleted from the draft rolls. An official aware of the matter, requesting anonymity, said: 'The roll shared with parties on August 1 has detailed classifications of the 65 lakh (6.5 million) deletions. While there is no separate category for those who didn't fill enumeration forms, they have been grouped under 'migrated'. Suspected foreign nationals are also under review and listed under the same head, but they are being separately verified by electoral registration officers (EROs).' The top court's order came on a plea filed by the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), a non-profit working on electoral and political reforms, alleging that ECI removed a column titled 'Uncollectable Reason' from the version of the draft roll published on August 1. The petition also sought disclosure of booth-wise deletions and their reasons. The top court asked ECI to inform it when were the draft rolls shared to the parties, which parties received these rolls, as well as to submit the list of deleted names. The official cited above said the draft rolls were handed over to all political parties by district collectors at 11 am on August 1, and published on the ECI's website at 3 pm the same day. Booth-level data, the official added, was shared with political party representatives. In a press note on July 25, the commission had said that 2.2 million electors were found deceased, 700,000 were registered in more than one place, and 3.5 million had either migrated permanently or were untraceable. After top court's direction on Wednesday, ECI issued a press note saying: '…lists of electors found dead, permanently shifted, having duplicate entries, or uncontactable after at least three visits by Booth Level Officers (BLOs) had been shared with all political parties and their BLAs on or before July 20.' It further shared a series of posts with various BLAs saying they have received the draft electoral roll and separately a list of the 6.5 million individuals removed from the roll. ECI also said that between August 1 and August 6 (9 AM), no political party had filed claims or objections related to the draft roll. However, 3,659 individual objections and claims have been submitted directly by electors. The Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) rejected EC's 'no objections' received remarks, saying EC is trying to create an impression that everything is fine with the Bihar SIR and there are no complaints coming in. 'Nothing could be farther from the truth', the opposition party said in a post on X, listing several concerns, including the claim that its leaders had submitted complaints which were not being counted because they were not routed through BLAs. It also questioned the assumption that all 15,000 Form 6 applications received were from first-time voters and not from electors who had been deleted from the rolls. 'We have been repeatedly asking the EC to provide us with booth level lists of deletion specifying the ground thereof, but to no avail,' the Left party added.


Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
EC to opposition: Get 'wrongfully excluded' to file claims
NEW DELHI: Brushing aside the allegation by opposition MPs Asaduddin Owaisi and Randeep Surjewala that the special intensive revision of electoral roll in Bihar is an exercise in disenfranchising minorities and precarious communities, the Election Commission on Wednesday asked them to get all such electors to file their claims and objections before Sept 1. "Mr Owaisi and Mr Surjewala should ensure that their state units and booth level agents (BLAs) facilitate those they complain have been wrongfully excluded to file their claims with the ERO to add them back in the electoral roll. Interestingly, even as the national party leaders have been complaining of alleged irregularities and imperfections in the roll, not a single claim or objection was filed by any of the 1.6 lakh party BLAs in the field, between publication of the roll on Aug 1 and 9 am on Wednesday," said an EC official. On the other hand, 3,659 individual electors directly filed their claims and objections during this period. Another 19,186 newly-eligible electors have also filed pleas for fresh enrolment through Form 6, along with the mandatory declaration. EC on Wednesday said it is revising the Bihar roll as per the Constitution and the extant laws, and with full transparency. "Citizens are also aware that revision of electoral roll is mandatory before every election as per Section 21(2)(a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and Rule 25 of the Registration of Electors Rules 1960," said the poll panel. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Overpaying for Car Insurance? Find Out With This Quick and Easy Tool. AutoSaveMax Get Quote While the opposition parties question the purpose of the SIR exercise, EC underlined that it has also led to Bihar becoming the first state in the country to limit the number of electors per booth to 1,200, which is expected to cut queues on polling day. EC said lists of electors reported by BLOs as dead, permanently shifted, having two votes and who could not be contacted after at least three visits of BLOs were shared with all political parties and their BLAs on or before July 20, giving them ample time to report any wrongful additions or deletions.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Contempt rule can't take away CJ's powers'
Kolkata: Senior counsel Parthasarathi Sengupta, while making his arguments in response to senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee's plea in a recent contempt case before the Calcutta High Court Thursday, submitted that the chief justice of a high court enjoys certain general powers under the Constitution that a rule of the Contempt of Courts Act couldn't take away. Sengupta was arguing over the maintainability of the contempt rule issued by a division bench of justices Arijit Banerjee, Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and Rajarshi Bharadwaj against TMC's Kunal Ghosh and seven others in connection with the ruckus where a mob stamped on a photo of a high court judge. He submitted that the chief justice didn't issue the contempt rule. Sengupta submitted that the division bench, after seeking affidavits, issued the contempt rule on its own motion. He argued that the advocate general's taking cognisance of the complaint was not mandatory for the high court to take cognisance of the complaint. The bench will hear the matter again on Aug 14. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata