Toyota considers making tiny trucks for U.S. market as demand booms
Toyota is looking into offering a compact pickup in the U.S., potentially joining Ford and Hyundai in competing in the growing market for entry-level trucks.
Full-size and midsize pickups dominate the U.S. market, but their price — along with their size — have increased steadily in recent years. Average new vehicle transaction prices hit $48,699 in April and, with U.S. President Donald Trump's trade policies threatening to send them even higher, drivers are increasingly looking for more affordable trucks with pint-sized beds.
Ford's Maverick and Hyundai's Santa Cruz models, both of which debuted in 2021, have tapped into that demand. Now, Toyota executives say the Japanese automaker is listening to U.S. dealer requests for a truck smaller than the brand's best-selling Tacoma midsize and Tundra full-size pickups.
"We're looking at it,' Mark Templin, Toyota's chief operating officer in the U.S., said in an interview.
Toyota executives declined to give details on how far along the plans are or when a tiny truck could be launched.
The potential foray into smaller pickups comes alongside a broader revamp of Toyota's lineup. The carmaker is rapidly expanding its offerings of hybrid gas-electric models and plans to roll out several fully battery-electric models in the U.S.
With a starting price of $28,145, Ford sold 131,142 Mavericks in the U.S. last year, up 39% from the previous year. It offers the truck in gas-only or hybrid versions. Hyundai's Santa Cruz sports utility truck, which starts at $28,750, saw 2024 sales in the U.S. fall 13% to 32,033.
Toyota views the compact truck market as an opportunity to attract budget-minded retail and fleet buyers who don't want to pay a premium, but desire the utility of a pickup.
"We could really do well in that segment, so we're trying to do it,' Cooper Ericksen, a senior vice president in charge of planning and strategy at Toyota Motor North America, said in a separate interview. "It's a matter of timing.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
The MAGA odd couple turns combustible
Relationship status: It's complicated. The simmering feud between U.S. President Donald Trump and tech titan Elon Musk has gone public, sending Tesla's stock tumbling then rebounding, calling his government contracts into question and leaving Trump possibly in a more commanding position over the world's richest man. But really, who knows what to make of this always-odd pairing between two erratic men? Late Thursday, Musk signaled he was open to a detente. Reports of a Friday phone call surfaced and were then dismissed by Trump, and all against the backdrop of pleadings from a MAGA world riven by the prospect of their leaders turning on each other. Yet little is permanent in Trump world, except for chaos and disruption. Where this goes from here and how it ends is anyone's guess, but what's clear is that the political friendship that saw two of the world's most powerful men attached at the hip at the beginning of Trump's presidency has now become an unstable mess. This, of course, is no way to run a country. The daylong brawl starkly revealed what had always been plainly obvious: This relationship is transactional and has always smelled of corruption, with Musk's $270 million campaign contribution buying him a powerful foothold in the government, including billions in contracts and access to data and the inner workings of federal agencies. It was only last week that Trump gifted Musk with a golden key to the White House, saying his "service to America has been without comparison in modern history' and commemorating his final day as a special government employee. But that send-off couldn't paper over the increasing cracks in the friendship. Musk had become a political liability to Trump, even as the president became a business liability to the world's richest man. The union has cost Musk billions, damaging his brand and leading him to suggest he was done with politics. "I think I've done enough,' Musk said in a Bloomberg interview last month when asked about his political spending on Trump and the Republican cause. The billionaire, who operates the Building America's Future PAC, had vowed to spend $100 million on the midterms, though that's now in doubt. And in ceding such power to Musk, Trump marred the first 100 days of his presidency with erratic cuts, mistakes and walk-backs that led to infighting among staff and cabinet members who couldn't control Musk. His Department of Government Efficiency was largely a failure, with costs likely outweighing savings, federal spending continuing to rise and the Trump administration now undoing some of DOGE's firings. In the days after his official tenure wrapped up, Musk then proved just how uncontrollable he was, training his fire on Trump's massive reconciliation bill, calling it an "abomination.' "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' Musk, the wannabe kingmaker, threatened on X on Tuesday. But the feud has the potential to be as damaging to both men as their unlikely friendship proved to be. At stake for Trump is the kind of muscle, megaphone and money that only Musk can bring, given his status among the powerful techno right bros who fueled Trump's campaign and the GOP more broadly. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote on X. "Such ingratitude.' Most of Trump's political alliances have had a sell-by date, but his relationship with Musk has been like no other. For Trump, Musk was a force multiplier, magnifying his stature and bringing other billionaires, tech bros and regular bros along with him. But in challenging Trump, and particularly by bringing up his connection to Jeffrey Epstein, Musk tests his power over MAGA and puts himself — and his companies — at risk of canceled contracts and potentially even federal government investigations. Trump holds tremendous power over Musk's vast wealth. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social. "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' This was scorched earth, revealing Trump's strong hand and Musk's big weakness. Ultimately, MAGA belongs to Trump. As for the massive bill, it will still likely pass in some form, though Musk has now put a spotlight on the worst parts of it — it adds $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade and is hardly MAGA. Meanwhile, some Democrats have suggested that Musk is a potential free agent and should be courted and brought into the fold. But that would be a mistake. An alliance with Musk is akin to having a tiger by its tail in a very small and crowded tent. There are no good choices and the only certainty is chaos. Nia-Malika Henderson is a politics and policy columnist for Bloomberg Opinion.
Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Trump vs. a united ASEAN
U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs — especially the ultrahigh 'reciprocal tariffs' that he says will be reintroduced on July 8 for any country that has not struck a trade deal with his administration — have sent countries around the world scrambling to respond, adapt and limit the fallout. ASEAN's 10 members — Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam — have been among the most proactive. Their leaders quickly recognized that, after decades of spectacular gross domestic product growth, ASEAN is an economic force that the Trump administration would have to reckon with in a serious way. In 2000, Japan was the world's second-largest economy, some eight times larger than ASEAN; today, it is only 1.1 times larger, and by 2030, ASEAN's economy will overtake it. In 2010-20, ASEAN contributed more to global economic growth than the European Union did. ASEAN owes much of this progress to open trade. Between 2003 and 2023, its trade with the rest of the world exploded, from $618 billion to $2.8 trillion. But the real secret to ASEAN's success is strong and competent leadership, exemplified, in the grouping's early years, by Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, a Cambridge-educated lawyer, and Indonesian President Suharto, a Javanese military leader and mystic. It was their unlikely partnership that kept ASEAN together. Today, such leadership is exemplified by another group of seeming political opposites: Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, Vietnamese General Secretary To Lam and Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong. Anwar and Prabowo both experienced prolonged periods in the political wilderness and became friends during this time. ASEAN's leaders have upheld relative peace and stability in their countries, while cultivating a culture of consultation and consensus (musyawarah and mufakat in Indonesian) in guiding regional relations. This stands in stark contrast to the experiences of many other developing countries and regions. Just a few weeks ago, neighboring India and Pakistan narrowly avoided full-scale war. The Middle East remains gripped by instability and violence, with Israel winning wars and losing the peace. The leaders of Latin America's two largest economies, Brazil and Argentina, are barely on speaking terms. After 48 years of regular ASEAN meetings — with over 1,000 ministerial and lower-level meetings taking place annually — constructive engagement is a deeply engrained habit in the region. To be sure, ASEAN is often accused of lowest-common-denominator cooperation. But without such a measured approach, one guided by pragmatism, consensus-building and compromise, ASEAN's member countries would not have managed to remain united through multiple shocks, including the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 and the global financial crisis a decade later. ASEAN is now bringing these strengths to bear in its response to Trump's tariffs. To be sure, the individualized nature of the tariffs — which vary widely within ASEAN, from 49% on Cambodia to 10% on Singapore — limits countries' prospects for true collective bargaining. But ASEAN's member states are well aware that they are stronger together. That is why, at the just-concluded ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur, hosted by Anwar Ibrahim, the group proposed a summit attended by Trump and ASEAN's 10 national leaders. This builds on ASEAN's April declaration that it would develop 'an enhanced, robust and forward-looking ASEAN-U.S. economic cooperation framework,' which strengthens 'constructive engagement' and drives 'innovative initiatives' to deliver a 'mutually beneficial economic relationship,' with 'particular focus on high-value sectors.' The statement reflects ASEAN's awareness of its value to the U.S., which runs a significant trade surplus in services with the region. It is no coincidence that the U.S. invests heavily there — nearly $500 million in 2023. ASEAN's value is set only to grow, owing not least to its efforts to deepen its ties with other regional organizations and economic powers. Its just-concluded summit with China and the Gulf Cooperation Council — the first of its kind — sent a clear message: ASEAN is not pinning its future on its relationship with the U.S., but it is not turning its back on open trade. This aligns with the global mood: while Trump continues to brandish tariffs as a weapon against America's trade partners, other countries have refrained from raising tariffs unilaterally. ASEAN is also seeking to boost internal resilience by strengthening trade among its member countries. While intra-ASEAN trade has been declining as a share of total trade, from 25% in 2003 to 21.5% in 2023, this is only because trade with the rest of the world grew so rapidly. In any case, the group is now seeking to dismantle nontariff barriers — more than 99% of goods already flow through ASEAN tariff-free — and exploring other measures to boost trade within the bloc. The U.S. economy is formidable and Trump's tariffs may well undermine ASEAN's growth in the short term. But, by spurring the ASEAN countries to deepen cooperation with one another and with others, U.S. tariffs could bring about an even more prosperous — and, crucially, resilient — grouping. This is especially likely if ASEAN makes the most of existing arrangements — for example, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, which could seek to negotiate a new partnership with the EU. Fortunately, ASEAN has the kinds of leaders who can spearhead such an effort, beginning with the bloc's current leader, Anwar Ibrahim. Kishore Mahbubani, a distinguished fellow at the Asia Research Institute of the National University of Singapore, is the author of many books, including "The ASEAN Miracle: A Catalyst for Peace" (NUS Press, 2017). © Project Syndicate, 2025
Japan Times
7 hours ago
- Japan Times
Meta set to throw billions at startup that leads AI data market
Three months after the Chinese artificial intelligence developer DeepSeek upended the tech world with a model that rivaled America's best, a 28-year-old AI executive named Alexandr Wang came to Capitol Hill to tell policymakers what they needed to do to maintain U.S. dominance. The U.S. needs to establish a "national AI data reserve,' supply enough power for data centers and avoid an onerous patchwork of state-level rules, Wang said at the April hearing. Lawmakers welcomed his feedback. "It's good to see you again here in Washington,' Republican Representative Neal Dunn of Florida said. "You're becoming a regular up here.' Wang, the chief executive officer of Scale AI, may not be a household name in the same way OpenAI's Sam Altman has become. But he and his company have gained significant influence in tech and policy circles in recent years. Scale AI uses an army of contractors to label the data that tech firms such as Meta Platforms and OpenAI use to train and improve their AI models, and helps companies make custom AI applications. Increasingly, it's enlisting doctorate holders, nurses and other experts with advanced degrees to help develop more sophisticated models, according to a person familiar with the matter. Put simply: The three pillars of AI are chips, talent and data. And Scale AI is a dominant player in the last of those. Now, the startup's stature is set to grow even more. Meta is in talks to make a multibillion-dollar investment in Scale AI. The financing may exceed $10 billion in value, making it one of the largest private company funding events of all time. The startup was valued at about $14 billion in 2024, as part of a funding round that included backing from Meta. In many ways, Scale AI's rise mirrors that of OpenAI. Both companies were founded roughly a decade ago and bet that the industry was then on the cusp of what Wang called an "inflection point of AI." Their CEOs, who are friends and briefly lived together, are both adept networkers and have served as faces of the AI sector before Congress. And OpenAI, too, has been on the receiving end of an 11-figure investment from a large tech firm. Scale AI's trajectory has shaped, and been shaped by, the AI boom that OpenAI unleashed. In its early years, Scale AI focused more on labeling images of cars, traffic lights and street signs to help train the models used to build self-driving cars. But it has since helped to annotate and curate the massive amounts of text data needed to build the so-called large language models that power chatbots such as ChatGPT. These models learn by drawing patterns from the data and their respective labels. Meta is in talks to make a multibillion-dollar investment in Scale AI. | Bloomberg At times, that work has made Scale AI a lightning rod for criticisms about the unseen workforce in places such as Kenya and the Philippines that supports AI development. Scale AI has faced scrutiny for relying on thousands of contractors overseas who were paid relatively little to weed through reams of online data, with some saying they have suffered psychological trauma from the content they're asked to review. In a 2019 interview, Wang said the company's contract workers earn "good' pay — "in the 60th to 70th percentile of wages in their geography.' Scale AI spokesperson Joe Osborne noted that the U.S. Department of Labor recently dropped an investigation into the company's compliance with fair labor regulations. Its business has evolved. More tech firms have begun to experiment with using synthetic, AI-generated data to train AI systems, potentially reducing the need for some of the services Scale AI historically provided. However, the leading AI labs are also struggling to get enough high-quality training data to build more advanced AI systems that are capable of fielding complex tasks as well as, or better than, humans. To meet that need, Scale AI has increasingly turned to better-paid contractors with graduate degrees to improve AI systems. These experts participate in a process known as reinforcement learning, which rewards a system for correct answers and punishes it for incorrect responses. The experts who work with Scale AI are tasked with constructing tricky problems — tests, essentially — for the models to solve, according to a person familiar with the matter who asked not to be named because the information is private. As of early 2025, 12% of the company's pool of contributors who work on the process of improving these models had a doctorate in fields such as molecular biology and more than 40% had a master's degree, law degree or MBA in their field, the person said. Much of this process is aimed at companies that want to use AI for medical and legal applications, the person said. One area of focus, for example, is getting AI models to better answer questions regarding tax law, which can differ greatly from country to country and even state to state. Bets like those are driving significant growth for the company. Scale AI generated about $870 million in revenue in 2024 and expects $2 billion in revenue this year. Scale AI has seen demand for its network of experts increase in the wake of DeepSeek, the person familiar with the matter said, as more companies invest in models that mimic human reasoning and carry out more complicated tasks. Scale AI has also deepened its relationship with the U.S. government through defense deals. Wang, a China hawk, has cozied up to lawmakers on the hill who are concerned about China's ascendance in AI. And Michael Kratsios, a former executive at Scale AI, is now one of U.S. President Donald Trump's top tech aides, helping to steer U.S. policy on AI. For Meta, partnering more deeply with Scale AI may simultaneously help it keep pace with AI rivals such as Google and OpenAI, and also help it build deeper ties with the U.S. government at a time when it's pushing more into defense tech. For Scale AI, a tie-up with Meta offers a powerful and deep-pocketed ally. It would also be a fitting full-circle moment for Wang. Shortly after launching Scale AI, Wang said he was asked by one venture capitalist when he knew he wanted to build a startup. In response, Wang said he "rattled off some silly answer about being inspired by The Social Network,' the film about the founding of Facebook.
