logo
Don't expect Putin to make peace any time soon

Don't expect Putin to make peace any time soon

Euractiv16 hours ago
Konstantin Eggert is a Russian-born journalist with DW, Germany's international broadcaster. He is based in Vilnius and was previously editor-in-chief of the BBC Russian Service Moscow bureau.
There are three impressions that stuck in my mind having watched broadcasts from Washington on Monday. To start with, Volodymyr Zelenskyy looked almost at home there, as opposed to the disastrous February visit. The European leaders also looked (and spoke) as if they finally understood – their common interest in containing and pushing back against Russia does not depend on who sits in the White House. And thirdly, Donald Trump never once called the Europeans "allies", as any other US president before (and, hopefully, after him) would – especially in such circumstances.
But in spite of this, the Transatlantic alliance seems to still hold, even if with difficulty.
The first impression is actually closely linked to a second one: The Ukrainian president no doubt felt reassured by the presence of the Europeans. He also seems to have understood that in modern-day Washington 'money talks' like never before in living memory. His offer to buy $100 billion-worth of American arms (ostensibly with Europe's blessing and financing) is a smart step that chimes in well with Trump's policy of "no freeloading", even by America's friends.
And the US president seems to have appreciated this. But even bearing in mind his unpredictability and quick temper, the idea that he can throw Zelenskyy and Ukraine under Putin's bus with impunity is a fantasy. Always was. In spite of its reliance on Western help, Ukraine remains sovereign. Come to think of it, today it is more of a traditional nation state than some of the EU countries. This author, who first travelled to Kyiv in 1991 and continues to do so, can attest to this.
Ukrainian society, although tired, will not accept "peace at any price'. Simply because a much better surrender protocol could have been signed with Vladimir Putin in 2021 or 2022, without so much death and suffering. Zelenskyy knows it too. His historical legacy – and possible political future – depends on giving Russia a good political and diplomatic fight before accepting any deal. If he does not, he'd rather not return to Kyiv from Istanbul, Geneva, Malta or wherever the future peace talks may be held.
And by the way, he may never have to go there in the first place. At least, in the immediate future.
If one looks at Putin's behaviour, there is nothing in it that says he is ready for such talks. His insulting offer to meet Zelenskyy in Moscow, if true, belies his ultimate goal – to sabotage the peace effort and blame it all on the Ukrainian leadership.
24 hours before the Washington talks, the Kremlin started rolling out new conditions to Kyiv and the West: giving the Russian language in Ukraine an official status (which means changing the Ukrainian constitution); restoring full rights to the Russian Orthodox Church (which Ukraine sees as an instrument of Russia's not-so-soft power); reiterating territorial claims; and finally, that no troops from NATO counties are deployed to Ukraine in the framework of security guarantees (this one is old). No side that wants to move towards the real deal would engage in such behaviour.
Putin's main goal did not change. It is not so much a full-scale occupation of Ukraine – although he wants to keep what he got already. The aim is to put Ukraine under Moscow's full political control and limit its sovereignty, most probably by gradually promoting and installing in Kyiv a pliant administration that will forsake the goals of EU and NATO membership.
He sincerely thinks that his economy can withstand more sanctions (with the help of China), that he still has enough Russians prepared to kill Ukrainians for money, and that Russia's demographic edge over Ukraine will bring him victory – with a bit of luck and patience.
Putin's other goal is old and well-verified: to undermine the West. He wants to sow discord among Ukraine's allies, buy himself time to increase military production and find new ways and partners to game the sanctions regime. All this plus proving to Russia's international allies on the right and left, plus the so-called "global South", that Ukraine and its supporters are in the wrong and "his" Russia is in the right.
Putin does not want peace talks. But talks about talks suit him just fine.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Greece says it will not send troops to post-war Ukraine
Greece says it will not send troops to post-war Ukraine

Euractiv

time3 hours ago

  • Euractiv

Greece says it will not send troops to post-war Ukraine

ATHENS – Greece is not planning to send troops to post-war Ukraine as part of security guarantees, a government official said today. 'No, there is no such plan, nor is one being considered,' Greek government spokesperson Pavlos Marinakis said in an interview with the TV channel Skai. Marinakis added that it is for individual member states to make such decisions and explained that, depending on how developments unfold, Athens will offer support – but not at a military level. Greece has supported Ukraine since the beginning of Russia's war and has provided Kyiv with, among other things, Kalashnikov rifles, ammunition, and BMP-1 armoured vehicles. However, late last year, it refused to dispatch Patriot and S-300 missile systems, which were requested by Ukraine. That said Athens is aligned with the EU position that borders cannot be changed by force, having always considering the Turkish occupation of northern Cyprus since 1974 to be another example of this. 'Greece respects international law and, under no circumstances, will it water down its position on border violations,' Marinakis said. (cp)

Russia says must be part of Ukraine security guarantees talks
Russia says must be part of Ukraine security guarantees talks

Euractiv

time4 hours ago

  • Euractiv

Russia says must be part of Ukraine security guarantees talks

Russia's foreign minister downplayed the meeting between Trump and European leaders, describing it as a 'clumsy' attempt to change the US president's position on Ukraine AFP Aug 20, 2025 16:43 3 min. read News Service Produced externally by an organization we trust to adhere to journalistic standards. Russia said on Wednesday it had to be part of any discussion on security guarantees for Ukraine and downplayed the likelihood of an imminent summit with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, tempering hopes for a quick peace deal. NATO military chiefs were meanwhile scheduled to hold a virtual summit on security guarantees for Ukraine, the latest in a flurry of global diplomacy aimed at brokering an end to the nearly three-and-a-half-year conflict. Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned that "seriously discussing security guarantees without the Russian Federation is a utopia, a road to nowhere". Moscow signed the Budapest Memorandum in 1994, which was aimed at ensuring security for Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan in exchange for them giving up numerous nuclear weapons left from the Soviet era. But Russia violated that first by taking Crimea in 2014, and then by starting a full-scale offensive in 2022, which has killed tens of thousands of people and forced millions to flee their homes. On Tuesday, top US officer Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, held talks with European military chiefs on the "best options for a potential Ukraine peace deal," a US defence official told AFP . In eastern Ukraine, far from the diplomatic deliberations, Russian forces claimed fresh advances on the ground and Ukrainian officials reported more deaths from Russian attacks. Donald Trump brought Zelenskyy and European leaders to the White House on Monday, three days after his landmark encounter with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Russia's long-serving foreign minister downplayed the meeting between Trump and European leaders at the White House, describing it as a "clumsy" attempt to change the US president's position on Ukraine. Trump, long a fierce critic of the billions of dollars in US support to Ukraine, earlier said European nations were "willing to put people on the ground" to secure any settlement. He ruled out sending US troops but suggested the country might provide air support. Russia has long said it will never tolerate the presence of any Western troops in Ukraine. While Trump said Putin had agreed to meet Zelenskyy and accept some Western security guarantees for Ukraine, Russia has not confirmed this. Lavrov also cast doubt on an imminent meeting between the sworn enemies, saying that any summit between Putin and Zelenskyy "must be prepared in the most meticulous way" so it does not lead to a "deterioration" of the situation surrounding the conflict. (mm) Euractiv is part of the Trust Project

European Parliament sues Council over €150 billion defence loan scheme
European Parliament sues Council over €150 billion defence loan scheme

Euractiv

time5 hours ago

  • Euractiv

European Parliament sues Council over €150 billion defence loan scheme

The European Parliament decided to go ahead and take the Council of the EU to court after being left out of discussions about the major SAFE loan defence scheme, its press service announced on Wednesday. In a bid to boost Europe's defence industry and incentivise EU states to rearm, the European Commission activated an emergency procedure to bypass the Parliament, dissatisfaction of its elected officials. 'The Parliament has today (20 August) lodged a request with the Court of Justice for the annulment of the SAFE regulation,' its press service told Euractiv. SAFE, a €150 billion defence loan programme, was proposed by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in March to stimulate spending as soon as possible. In May, EU ministers gave their final approval, without consulting the European Parliament. Eighteen EU countries have thus far formally expressed interest in taking out loans for bids amounting to at least €127 billion. While the Parliament stresses that the 'instrument has the full support of Parliament [...] It is about the legal basis that was chosen, which undermines democratic legitimacy.' To skip parliamentary approval, von der Leyen wielded a part of the EU treaties (Article 122 TFEU), normally reserved for emergencies such as the Covid-19 pandemic, which speeds up the legislative process by reducing Parliament's negotiation time significantly. 'The use of Article 122 for SAFE as a legal basis was, in Parliament's view, procedurally incorrect and simply unnecessary. It undermines democratic legitimacy in the eyes of the public, and there is no Parliament in the world that would accept that,' the Parliament's press service told Euractiv. 'That is why, Parliament brings a case on grounds of inadequate legal basis.' In a letter to von der Leyen, the Parliament's President Roberta Metsola warned in May that the Commission could be taken to court. Von der Leyen rejected the complaint, arguing that using the emergency clause is 'fully justified' as SAFE is 'an exceptional and temporary response to an urgent and existential challenge'. EU countries, which are counting on the loans, are still in the clear for now. In its request to the Court, the Parliament asked to maintain the effects of the regulation until a replacement is adopted. (cp)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store