
The neon-streaked L.A. of ‘Drive', plus the week's best movies
The new 'Superman' is in theaters this weekend, written and directed by James Gunn and starring David Corenswet in the title role, with Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane and Nicholas Hoult as villain Lex Luthor. This film is seen as the first salvo of a relaunch of the DC Universe of characters for Warner Bros. and so there is more riding on it than just the outcome of this one film. There are several new characters introduced in the film, perhaps intended to topline future titles of their own.
Samantha Masunaga got into the history of the Superman character onscreen and took a look at what this might mean for DC's future.
'DC has been playing catch-up with Marvel,' said Arlen Schumer, a comic book and pop culture historian. 'They've given James Gunn the keys to the DC kingdom and said, 'You've got to restore Superman. He's our greatest icon, but nobody knows what to do with him. We think you know what to do with him.''
The film has an impulsive sincerity that can be endearing. As Amy Nicholson wrote in her review, 'Fine, I'll say it. I need Superman. I'm craving a hero who stands for truth and justice whether he's rescuing cats or reporting the news. Cheering for such idealism used to feel corny; all the cool, caped crusaders had ethical kinks. Even his recent movies have seemed a little embarrassed by the guy, scuffing him up with cynicism. I'm with the latest incarnation of Superman (David Corenswet) when he tells Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan) that having a big heart is 'the real punk rock.''
Amy added, 'This isn't quite the heart-soaring 'Superman' I wanted. But these adventures wise him up enough that I'm curious to explore where the saga takes him next. Still, I left chewing over how comic book movies can be so popular and prescient, and yet people who've grown up rooting against characters like Lex Luthor cheer them on in the real world. Maybe Gunn can answer that in a sequel. Or maybe our stubborn myopia is what this Superman means when he says, 'I screw up all the time but that is being human.''
On Saturday the Academy Museum will show Nicolas Winding Refn's 2011 romantic thriller 'Drive' in 35mm. Composer Cliff Martinez will be there in person. The film is showing as part of the series 'Bathed in Light: Saturated Colors in Cinema,' which will also see screenings of Michael Mann's 'Thief,' Walter Hill's 'Streets of Fire' in 70mm (with the director in person), Harmony Korine's 'Spring Breakers,' Barry Jenkins' 'Moonlight,' Pablo Larraín's 'Ema,' Gaspar Noé's 'Enter the Void,' Hype Williams' 'Belly' and more.
A Los Angeles getaway driver, known only as Driver (played with taciturn cool by Ryan Gosling), falls for his neighbor (Carey Mulligan) and soon becomes involved in a caper trying to help out her ex-con husband (Oscar Isaac) that sets him afoul of a local crime boss (Albert Brooks).
'Drive' won the directing prize when it premiered at the 2011 Cannes Film Festival and became something of a cultural sensation at the time of its release, thanks in part to the hypnotic use of dreamy synthesizer music. (And remember Gosling's scorpion jacket?)
In his original review of the film Kenneth Turan wrote, ''Drive' is a Los Angeles neo-noir, a neon-lit crime story made with lots of visual style. It's a film in love with both traditional noir mythology and ultra-modern violence, a combination that is not ideal. … Impeccably shot by Newton Thomas Sigel, 'Drive' always looks dressed to kill. Making fine use of Los Angeles locations, particularly the lonely downtown streets around the L.A. River, 'Drive' has a slick, highly romanticized pastel look calculated to win friends and influence people.'
In an interview with Steven Zeitchik, Gosling and Refn discussed their collaboration and the long drives they would take together around the city.
'We would just drive for hours, talking and listening to music,' Gosling said. 'And I would say, 'This is what we want to capture in the movie, this feeling of being in a trance in a car with pop music playing.''
For his part, Refn added, 'I wanted to play with the classic notion of a fairy tale. Driver protects purity, and yet he can slay evil in the most vicious ways possible.'
Zeitchik and Julie Makinen also created a guide to some of the film's Los Angeles locations, including MacArthur Park, the L.A. River and Point Magu.
This week will see two programs of work by the Chicago-based artist Heather McAdams, who, though primarily known as a cartoonist, has also been creating idiosyncratic, handmade films for decades. On Thursday at the Academy Museum will be a program titled 'Kind of a Drag: Experimental Films, Documentaries and Scratch Animation by Heather McAdams, 1980-1995,' which will explore the range of McAdams' filmmaking practice. An ongoing preservation project undertaken by the Chicago Film Society has spurred a revival of interest in her work.
'I spent a lot of time trying to make stuff happen,' said McAdams during a call this week from her home in Chicago. 'I've always just been really doing a lot of different things, just doing stuff here at home and then all of a sudden the Chicago Film Society discovers this person that's living up on the north side of Chicago. Those guys are really great and they're very organized and they've got connections. I've gone to the Museum of Modern Art and the National Gallery of Art. You sit around all your life and you go, 'Why doesn't somebody call me up?' And then the next thing when they call you up, you go, 'Why are they calling me up?''
Among the films to be shown will be 1980's 'The Scratchman' and 1982's 'Scratchman #2,' in which she scratched right onto the surface of found footage to create lively new images. 'You' from 1983 uses Brian Eno's song 'King's Lead Hat' as the background to a collage of footage. Among other titles showing are two documentary shorts, 1988's 'Meet … Bradley Harrison Picklesimer' and 1995's 'The Lester Film' (co-directed by her husband Chris Ligon), both unconventional portrait films. McAdams will be present for the event, joined by Picklesimer for a Q&A.
'The couple of things that seem to relate to just about everything I do is working with my limitations, the kind of homemade, work-with-what-you-got type thing,' added McAdams. 'I don't see that necessarily as a complete negative, and that runs through my work. And the other thing is humor, I'm always trying to make myself laugh or make other people laugh, even though everything I do isn't funny. Sometimes I just get weird and I go sideways and off the tracks or I make a comment about something that might be more spiritual or more important. Sometimes I make something that I go, 'Oh, God, I wish I didn't do that.''
On Wednesday at 2220 Arts + Archives, Mezzanine and Los Angeles Filmforum will host McAdams and Ligon for what is being billed as 'Chris & Heather's Big Screen Blowout,' a screening drawn from their extensive collection of 16mm ephemera. The program will include trailers for films such as 'Superchick' and 'Trip With the Teacher,' TV performances by Ricky Nelson and Buffalo Springfield and commercials and more. The evening will also include five one-minute animated cartoons McAdams and Ligon made for MTV in the 1990s. The couple will be there for the event as well.
Of the 'Blowout,' McAdams said, 'It's fun to just see how the audience reacts as it's being projected. It's hard to explain to people exactly what it is, unless they're super hip and cool.' With a laugh she added, 'Like you guys are out in L.A.'
'Rosa la rose, fille publique'
On Tuesday, Mezzanine will be putting on 2 shows of the local premiere of a new restoration of Paul Vecchiali's 1986 'Rosa la rose, fille publique' at Brain Dead Studios.
The film is an intensely emotional melodrama about a Parisian prostitute, Rosa, just turning 20 years old and the most popular among the stable of women run by her pimp, as she grapples with what her future should be. Stylishly shot, the film is marked by a richness of character detail, with a deeply felt performance by Marianne Basler as Rosa, as the world around the Les Halles neighborhood feels particularly vibrant even with its undercurrents of intrigue and violence.
Vecchiali, who died in 2023 and besides directing such films as 'The Strangler' and 'Encore' also produced Chantal Akerman's 'Jeanne Dielman,' is among a number of French filmmakers currently undergoing a renewed interest in their work. Luc Moullet will see a tribute series at Lincoln Center in August, while Jacques Rozier currently has a program of his work available on the Criterion Channel. For as much attention as French cinema has gotten over the years, it is exciting to see that there are still new corners to be explored and fresh discoveries to be made.
'Television Event'
On Friday night the American Cinematheque at the Los Feliz 3 will host a screening of Jeff Daniels' documentary 'Television Event,' which takes a look at the end of the Cold War through the lens of the 1983 TV movie 'The Day After,' which dramatized the aftermath of a nuclear weapons attack around Kansas City, Mo., and Lawrence, Kan., with a cast that included Jason Robards, JoBeth Williams, Steve Guttenberg and John Lithgow.
Nicholas Meyer, who directed 'The Day After,' will be present for a Q&A on Friday moderated by his daughter, screenwriter Dylan Meyer. 'Television Event' will also show on Saturday and Monday.
Seen by more than 100 million people when it first aired, the film was shocking for its depiction of the realities of a nuclear attack.
In a 2023 interview with Tim Grierson, Meyer said, 'I realized that I didn't want to make a 'good' movie. I didn't want to make a good movie, because I knew that if I made a good movie, nobody would talk about the subject — they would only talk about the movie. I didn't want a catchy theme song. I didn't want brilliant cinematography, I didn't want Emmy-nominated performances. All I wanted was to make a kind of public service announcement: If you have a nuclear war, this is what it might look like.'
'Les vampires'
On Sunday the Academy Museum will have a rare showing of Louis Feuillade's 1915-16 complete 10-episode serial 'Les vampires.' Set in the Parisian underworld, it follows a ruthless gang of criminals and the woman (played by the electrifying star Musidora) who infiltrates their ranks.
Modern audiences may also know 'Les vampires' as part of the basis for Olivier Assayas' 1996 film 'Irma Vep' and his own 8-episode series adaptation of the film in 2022.
Free Indie Focus screening
This Tuesday we will have an Indie Focus Screening Series event with a free showing of 'She Rides Shotgun' at the Culver Theater. Director Nick Rowland and stars Taron Egerton and Ana Sophia Heger will be there for a Q&A. You can RSVP here.
Adapted from the novel by Jordan Harper by screenwriters Ben Collins and Luke Piotrowski, the crime thriller involves a man (Egerton), newly released from prison, attempting to protect his daughter (Heger) from the violent gang who is now after them both.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
The Twisted Horror Of ‘Weapons,' Explained
'Weapons' directed by Zach Cregger Warner Bros. Weapons is a layered story told through different character perspectives, with a compelling metaphor at the heart of the film. In the very first scene, Weapons jumps right into its terrible mystery—one night, at 2:17am, every child from Mrs. Gandy's classroom left their beds and disappeared into the night, seemingly of their own volition. It's a great hook, followed by a thrilling sequence of chapters showing the different perspectives of multiple characters—when the twist finally arrives, it almost seems obvious. The film starts from the perspective of Justine (Julia Garner), the unfortunate 'Mrs. Gandy' of the missing classroom. The only child left remaining is Alex (Cary Christopher), and he doesn't want to talk about it. The town suspects Justine has something to do with the bizarre disappearances, as the parents are becoming increasingly (and understandably) hysterical. Facing a tragedy that defies any logical explanation, the parents blame the only adult in the room, and Justine is labelled a 'witch,' spelling out the twist villain of the film in bold red letters. The perspective switches from Justine to a cop, Paul (Alden Ehrenreich), to concerned dad, Archer (Josh Brolin), to the school principal, Marcus (Benedict Wong), and petty criminal James (Austin Abrams), who are all pulled into the chaos spiral. Each chapter adds another piece to the puzzle, the characters fumbling through the nightmare with fear, confusion and grief. The big consistency is the black hole at the center of it all—the shadowy doorway of Alex's house. During Archer's dark, prophetic dream, Alex's house is illuminated by a giant assault rifle floating above the roof, bearing the fateful numbers, 2:17. Archer's subconscious seems to be screaming at him, the dream logic implying that the children have been weaponized. Archer is confused, and so are we, but with each new chapter, the viewer gets a little more context. Weapons unfolds perfectly, echoing the unusual structure of Hirokazu Kore-eda's Monster . Each new perspective offers a clearer view of the mystery, and by the time the final card is flipped, revealing Aunt Gladys (Amy Madigan) as the witch at the center of the web, it feels intuitively right. The 'scary witch' reveal could have easily come across as underwhelming or even silly, but Weapons builds up Gladys as a true terror. What is 'Weapons' Really About? Like any film, Weapons supports multiple readings, but the film's witch very much behaves like an abuser, taking advantage of kindness, hiding under a facade of weakness. Gladys enters the home of Alex's parents by appealing to their empathy and transforms the house into her nest, and her hosts into slaves. You could even compare Aunt Gladys to a pathological narcissist, drawing energy from those under her control and always seeking more victims. Once his parents have been reduced to mindless zombies, Alex is told, in no uncertain terms, to never reveal what is happening behind closed doors. If he ever tells another child, teacher or authority figure, then Gladys will punish his parents. She gives Alex a startlingly gruesome display, forcing his parents to enthusiastically stab themselves with forks. This is how Gladys enslaves Alex—no magic, just fear. Soon, she forces Alex to become part of her web. Gladys needs more than two bodies to stay young, as her unnatural longevity seems to be fading. Alex helps her ensnare the other children at school by stealing a personal item from them all, enabling her to summon them to her house. Alex is then tasked with keeping her slaves alive, patiently feeding them one spoon at a time. The stoic Alex is, of course, too frightened to tell a soul. When the kindly Justine tries to reach out to him, he keeps his distance (notably, Justine is reprimanded for being too personal with her students at the beginning of the film). 'Weapons' Reinvents The Witch The bald-headed, aggressively eccentric witch of Weapons is very much in the spirit of Roald Dahl's The Witches , far removed from recent lighthearted depictions. Gladys is also a bit of a vampire, drawing life energy from her victims. Whatever Gladys really is, she doesn't seem human. Amy Madigan's striking performance is both funny and frightening, her witch an ancient, otherworldly being that only really understands power. In her world, power comes from thorny, bloodstained 'wands,' bowls of water and bells. Only by using her own tools against her does Alex succeed. The death of Gladys is surprisingly funny, showing the powerful witch sprinting away from a small army of murderous children who, when they finally catch her, pull her apart like a piñata. The film ends on a bold, bittersweet note—Alex has won, but is too late. The witch has already fed on the life force of these people, and most of them are so damaged that they never spoke again. His parents are alive, but dead. Hence, Alex is sent to live with a 'good aunt,' and has at least escaped the cursed magic of Aunt Gladys. Will There Be A 'Weapons' Sequel? Weapons firmly concludes the story with the death of the witch and the damage done. However, there might be other witches, or other creatures out there in the world of Weapons . Director Zach Cregger seems open to a sequel, telling Variety, 'I have another idea for something in this world that I'm kind of excited about.' 'I'm not going to do it next, and I probably won't do it after my next movie,' Cregger added, 'but I do have one and I'd like to see it on the screen one day.' MORE FROM FORBES Forbes The Bittersweet Ending Of 'Sinners,' Explained By Dani Di Placido Forbes The AI-Altered 'Wizard Of Oz' Controversy, Explained By Dani Di Placido Forbes Hirokazu Kore-eda Talks The Meaning Of 'Monster' By Dani Di Placido Forbes What Is 'Squid Game' Season 3 Really About? By Dani Di Placido

Hypebeast
4 hours ago
- Hypebeast
Zach Cregger's ‘Weapons' Debuts to a Strong $42.5 Million USD for Box Office Opening Weekend
Summary The horror genre continues to prove its box office might, as director Zach Cregger's latest film,Weapons, soared to an impressive $42.5 million USD in its North American debut. The film, a star-studded horror thriller, not only commanded the top spot at the domestic box office but also solidified Cregger's reputation as a genre filmmaker with a unique ability to deliver both critical praise and commercial success. Released byWarner Bros. Pictures,Weaponsstars Oscar nomineeJosh Brolinin the lead role, alongside a strong ensemble cast. Its commanding opening weekend is particularly noteworthy as it follows Cregger's breakout 2022 hit,Barbarian, which became a sleeper success. This repeated performance at the box office suggests that Cregger is a filmmaker with a loyal following, and audiences are eager to see his original take on horror and suspense. Weaponsis described as a multi-story horror epic, a narrative approach that Cregger used to great effect inBarbarian. The film's successful opening underscores that audiences are hungry for original, high-concept horror films, especially when they come from a director with a proven track record. This victory forWeaponssets a strong precedent for the genre and marks an exciting new chapter for Zach Cregger in Hollywood. Cregger's latest film stars Julia Garner, Josh Brolin, Alden Ehrenreich, Austin Abrams, Benedict Wong and Amy Madigan. Its success extends Warner Bros.' hot streak under its New Line label. Disney's body swap comedy sequelFreakier Fridayhit the second top spot on the charts this weekend, premiering to $29 million USD. ahead of Marvel'sThe Fantastic Four: First Steps.


Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
Cinematographer Larkin Seiple Was Ready For A Break — Then ‘Weapons' Came Along
***WARNING! The following contains major spoilers for the film!*** Cinematographer Larkin Seiple had just finished shooting Wolfs for director Jon Watts, and was fully prepared to take a hiatus from the hustle and bustle of Hollywood. Before taking that R&R, however, he received the script for one of the hottest titles making its way around town: Weapons. The sophomore horror effort from writer-director Zach Cregger (Barbarian) sparked a heated bidding war among the major studios, ultimately landing an eight-figure sum at Warner Bros.' New Line Cinema under the auspices of Vertigo Entertainment and BoulderLight Pictures (the latter currently enjoys a first-look deal with New Line). Saying yes to Zach Cregger's Weapons "I was going to take a break from making movies, but I'd heard about Weapons because it was in the trades and was like, 'I'll take a crack at it,'' Larkin remembers over a Zoom call. 'It's a two-hour movie, and I think I probably read it in 80 minutes. I was just transfixed, hypnotized by it. I met Zach for coffee the very next day and we got along great. We saw the movie the same way." Cregger (a founding member of the Whitest Kids U' Know comedy group) offered him the director of photography job on the spot. 'I was kind of shook because I was going to have to move across the country and leave my family for five months,' notes Seiple. "It was a very trippy experience, but I was like, 'I don't think I'm going to be able to shoot something like this ever again.' So I just went with it and said yes.' There was, perhaps, no better choice for the project than Seiple, who served as cinematographer on Everything Everywhere All at Once. Similar to the Daniels' Oscar-winning multiverse saga, Weapons 'was very complicated to make.' What is Weapons about? More ambitious, yet just as mysteriously titled as Barbarian, Weapons takes the form of a contemporary 'Pied Piper' story, in which 17 children from the same class suddenly leave their homes in the middle of the night and never come back. By the time morning arrives in the sleepy hamlet of Maybrook, Pennsylvania only one student, Alexy Lilly (Cary Christopher) remains. The inexplicable mystery launches a multi-perspective narrative centered around the kids' ostracized schoolteacher Justine Gandy (Julia Garner), grieving father Archer Graff (Josh Brolin), school principal Marcus Miller (Benedict Wong), local police officer Paul Morgan (Alden Ehrenreich), heroin addict James (Austin Abrams), and more. 'There's definitely a malicious nature to it,' Seiple says. 'There's a knowingness that floats with the camera and tells the audience that something is [amiss].' As Cregger revealed to Entertainment Weekly this past spring, the overlapping yarns were inspired by Paul Thomas Anderson's 3-hour cinematic tapestry, Magnolia (1999). 'We watched the opening to talk about the energy of it,' the cinematographer confirms. 'It was never directly to lift a specific shot, as much as it was about how he wanted it to feel breakneck with all this information you are seeing. He wanted it to be playful." Seiple wholeheartedly agreed with that sentiment, adding: 'There's so much information that is explained or expressed or seen. I naturally started connecting with, 'How can we simplify these things and make these seem kinetic?'' While Weapons does not contain a downpour of amphibians in the third act, the movie's denouement is no less wildly insane as Magnolia's, effectively cementing Cregger as the audacious new face of horror in the vein of Stephen King (and indeed, his second feature contains notes of IT and Needful Things). Shooting the best horror movie of 2025 "Overall, we really just went from our gut, which is my preferred way of doing it,' admits Seiple. 'The longer I've shot, the less I like to be referential, because I think you're not going to find anything new by doing that … All you can hope for is getting a script that's so compelling, you naturally start to visualize it. It's the movies where the script isn't good and you start having to add visuals to make it better. We were really just getting out of the way and letting the story do its thing.' For about a month or two before principal photography kicked off in Atlanta, Seiple and Cregger began to shot-list the movie via Zoom. 'There's no storyboarding at that point, because it's all conceptual,' explains the former. 'You're just talking about the rhythm. I would pitch an idea, he would love it, and then he would top it. That's the best part about Zach. He's really collaborative, but can also take anything you give him and will find a way to make it better or more interesting." Because they'd be shooting most of the film's nonlinear structure out of sequence, the crew needed to visit every Atlanta-based location and decide on specific frames ahead of time. 'We did a very long and arduous process of photo-boarding the entire film … because we knew we didn't have time to figure it out on the day,' Seiple adds. 'There was no, 'Let's go and see what happens.' It's like, 'No, we need to know exactly' … When you have to relight, rethink, and re-block six to eight times in the 10 to 12 hours you have, it gets a little zany. So we had to go in being bulletproof." The overall challenge was compounded by the fact that underage actors can only work so long on a film set, meaning the introductory sequence of the kids running out their homes (a core tenet of the film and its marketing campaign) became a taxing endeavour. After shooting for 12 hours straight during daylight hours, Seiple and Cregger would take a crew of around 10 people to get the necessary nighttime shots of the children before the youngsters were required by law to stop working at 12:30 in the morning. 'We did that for four or five days, and it kind of burned us out,' shares the director of photography. 'It's the middle of summer and 95 [degrees with] full humidity in Atlanta. It gets dark at nine and you're working until midnight, maybe 12:30. You're desperately trying to get four, maybe five sequences shot before you have to call it.' From a certain point-of-view Thanks to the numerous points-of-views, the visual language of Weapons 'shifts and changes,' with each character getting their own special treatment. 'To me, the camera language is trying to elevate emotion in the scene,' Seiple says. 'There was always the conversation of, 'How do we make this scene feel what the character's feeling?'' Justine, for instance, always feels like she's being stalked because the community suspects her of abducting the children, though they have no concrete proof. 'The camera is constantly moving around her, looking around her," reveals the cinematographer. 'She isn't as centered as often." As a result, 'you're kind of paranoid with her." Meanwhile, Archer Graff is 'kind of like a heat seeking missile' due to his life-consuming obsession to find out what happened to his son, Matthew (Luke Speakman). 'We were a lot more dead on him,' notes Seiple. Officer Morgan, on the other hand, 'is someone who's trying so hard and just makes the worst mistakes' by violating his sobriety, committing adultery, and assaulting an individual in custody. 'A lot of it was cutting off Alden, or trying to make him feel a little bit more awkward or sad,' Seiple says. 'His character is someone who is down on their luck and makes it worse [for themselves]. It was about a lot more profile shots. He's not the hero, you're seeing him from other people's vantages. It's not a visual theme we wanted people to pick up on. It was just something you talk about and hopefully, it makes its way in there. We never necessarily forced scenes to do it, but his chapter was really just bearing witness to his terrible decisions." Lastly, there's James, whose scenes are "more frenetic, because he's someone that's kind of spiraling and going into a frenzy," Seiple continues. 'We wanted the camera to feel more playful and spastic, if you will. We changed lenses for Austin's chapter because his felt so different from everyone else's. He's an outsider from the chaos that's happened. And so, we wanted it to feel slightly ajar, more open if that makes sense. We went spherical for that while the rest of the movie is anamorphic.' Witchy woman The true nature of the story is eventually revealed in the chapter focusing on Principal Marcus Miller, who finds himself the unwitting weapon of Alex's spell-casting Aunt Gladys (Amy Madigan), forced to murder his own husband, Terry (Clayton Farris). 'Originally, Marcus was supposed to strangle his husband to death. We were just playing around and I was like, 'What if he just smashes him with his head?'' Seiple recalls. 'We talked about changing it and at one point, it was a oner where you just see him smash it all the way in — more to create a real sense of terror and understand that that Marcus is a monster. Less to be gory and more to be like, 'Oh, these things do the most blunt version of whatever their mission is. They're not thinking about what they're doing.' And [for] that, our special effects makeup team, brought in three different molds of Terry's head. So we would shoot and swap it out; and our operator would whip pan back and forth. It was a long day in that house.' Marcus then goes after Justine, relentlessly chasing her around a gas station convenience store in a sequence that required Seiple to call on the talents of Los Angeles-based camera operator, Conner O'Brien, who pulled it off through 'a combination of roller skates, Segway, and dolly," explains the DP. 'It was a challenging sequence, but it was pretty fun. Also, everyone was hiding in the aisles, just out of frame, which reminded me of an indie film where everyone is just making it work.' In the final chapter focused on Alex, we learn that the children were magically summoned by Gladys, a decrepit witch desperately trying to stave off death by feeding off the life forces of other people. Seiple credits much of the sinister aura that emanates from the Lilly home to production designer Thomas Hammock. 'We were quickly able to mold it in a house that could start out as warm and loving — and then fall apart. What goes from a warm afternoon starts to feel tobacco-stained and sickly,' says the cinematographer. 'It was really fun to design, because we were able to slowly build up the softness or darkness around the set. Then we were also able to rip the paper off the wall and bring in sunlight. It's really Tom's thing. My job was to find with Zach the angles that made you feel nervous.' And finally, we come to the grand finale, when Alex triumphantly turns Glady's own magic against her by sicking his catatonic classmates to hunt the wicked sorceress down and literally tear her limb from limb. The hilariously surreal visual of 17 children stampeding through suburbia like a pack of angry elephants required some clever cinematic trickery. 'We found stunt people that were roughly the size of the kids. So they would run through, breaking and smashing,' Seiple shares. 'Then we would do another path where we cleaned up all the glass and all the breakable stuff so the kids could run through safely. And using a repeatable camera head, we were able to blend them all in post to make it one shot. So what feels simple becomes very complicated, especially the last shot where we're chasing Gladys through the house; having to go through a screen door, a glass door, and then jump out a window. It was really tricky and narrow. On the first take, our boom operator, Marty — who actually plays the lawnmower man — caught his ankle real bad and fell out the window. It was kind of cumbersome. And also, because we were moving throughout the different spaces, we had signal issues. It got to a point where we had to let the operator, Connor, go and do it [by himself]." Zach Cregger, a natural born filmmaker With the film opening to an impressive debut of $70 million at the global box, it seems Cregger has another horror hit on his hands, which bodes extremely very well for his Resident Evil adaptation and a potential Weapons sequel. 'Zach is a natural born director,' Seiple concludes. 'He's just alive and because of that, everyone else gets more excited to work and you end up working harder. I guess the best way to put it, is he's someone that needs to make movies — and you can feel that.' Rocking a near-perfect score of 95% on Rotten Tomatoes, Weapons is now playing in theaters everywhere. Click here for tickets!