Bill Gates pledges to give away nearly all wealth by 2045, blasts Elon Musk for ‘killing world's poorest'
Bill Gates announced on Thursday (May 8) that he plans to give away almost his entire personal fortune over the next two decades, pledging that his foundation will distribute around $200 billion to aid the world's poorest. The move comes as international aid budgets face severe cuts by major donor governments.
In a sharp criticism of Elon Musk and the current US administration under President Donald Trump, Bill Gates accused Musk of devastating consequences for vulnerable populations.
'The picture of the world's richest man killing the world's poorest children is not a pretty one,' Gates told the Financial Times, referring to drastic reductions in the US aid budget led by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.
Gates highlighted that the cuts have severely weakened the US Agency for International Development (USAID), which has historically provided funding for critical health and humanitarian programs worldwide.
'There are too many urgent problems to solve for me to hold onto resources that could be used to help people,' Gates said in a statement marking the Gates Foundation's 25th anniversary.
Gates confirmed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation will close on December 31, 2045, after spending about 99% of his fortune. 'People will say a lot of things about me when I die, but I am determined that 'he died rich' will not be one of them,' Gates wrote on his website.
The foundation, established in 2000 with his then-wife Melinda French Gates, has so far donated $100 billion, supporting life-saving initiatives such as Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.
Gates emphasised his commitment to addressing key global health challenges despite setbacks from donor nations. 'It's unclear whether the world's richest countries will continue to stand up for its poorest people,' he warned, citing recent aid cuts from Britain, France, and the US.
He stressed the importance of government partnerships, saying, 'Polio will not be eradicated without US funding.'
Gates urged fellow billionaires to consider accelerating their charitable giving. 'I hope other wealthy people consider how much they can accelerate progress for the world's poorest if they increased the pace and scale of their giving, because it is such a profoundly impactful way to give back to society,' he wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Elon Musk denies taking drugs after White House appearance with black eye
Elon Musk on Saturday denied a report that he used ketamine and other drugs extensively last year on the 2024 campaign trail. The New York Times reported Friday that the billionaire adviser to President Donald Trump used so much ketamine, a powerful anesthetic, that he developed bladder problems. The newspaper said the world's richest person also took ecstasy and mushrooms and traveled with a pill box last year, adding that it was not known whether Musk also took drugs while heading the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after Trump took power in January. In a post Saturday on X, Musk said: "To be clear, I am NOT taking drugs! The New York Times was lying their a** off." He added: "I tried 'prescription' ketamine a few years ago and said so on X, so this not even news. It helps for getting out of dark mental holes, but haven't taken it since then." Musk first dodged a question about his drug use at a bizarre farewell appearance Friday with Trump in the Oval Office in which the Tesla and SpaceX boss sported a noticeable black eye as he formally ended his role as Trump's main cost-cutter at DOGE, which fired tens of thousands of civil servants. News of the injury drew substantial attention as it came right after the Times report on his alleged drug use. The daily recalled erratic behavior such as Musk giving an enthusiastic Nazi-style salute last year. Musk said he got the injury while horsing around with his young son, named X, when he told the child to hit him in the face. "And he did. Turns out even a five-year-old punching you in the face actually is..." he added, before tailing off. Later Friday, when a reporter asked Trump if he was aware of Musk's "regular drug use," Trump responded: "I wasn't." "I think Elon is a fantastic guy," he added. Musk has previously admitted to taking ketamine, saying he was prescribed it to treat a "negative frame of mind" and suggesting his use of drugs benefited his work.
India Today
10 hours ago
- India Today
Katie Miller, Elon Musk, and Stephen: What's behind the buzz?
Rumours claiming Katie Miller, wife of senior Trump aide Stephen Miller, left him for billionaire Elon Musk have surfaced online after Musk's White House exit. However, official reports have indicated the claims as pure story spread like wildfire after Elon Musk showed up with a black eye during a press conference announcing he was leaving the Trump administration. Musk said the bruise came from playing with his son, X. But internet users think otherwise. They came up with a wild theory claiming that Trump aide Stephen Miller punched Musk because of a personal issue involving Miller's wife, Katie. Elon Musk appeared with a bruised eye.(Photo: AP) advertisementMore people speculated after news broke that Katie Miller was leaving her White House position to work full-time for Musk. She had been the spokesperson for Musk's federal agency, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). According to reports, she will join his private ventures. Katie Miller is a prominent figure in Washington, having earlier worked as communications director for Vice President Mike SPARKED THE RUMOURSThe timing of several events seems to have added fuel to the speculation. Musk had criticised President Donald Trump's $3.8 trillion "Big Beautiful Bill." It reportedly upset several Trump officials, including Stephen Miller. Musk said the bill went against everything DOGE had worked for and called it a very same day, it was announced that Katie Miller would be joining Musk's team full-time, working on media bookings and other tasks for Tesla and none of these developments prove anything about the personal relationship between Musk and Katie Miller. There are no official reports of a fall-out between Katie and Stephen Miller either. In fact, Stephen Miller appeared on Fox with Lara Trump, speaking about his family and his wife."When I first met her, she was the communications director at the Department of Homeland Security," he said. "So it's on-brand, the relationship, because we were on conference calls every day on border security."NO EVIDENCE OF AFFAIR OR CONFLICTDespite the viral claims on the internet, there's simply no confirmation that Katie Miller "left" her husband for Elon Musk. Musk himself has denied spending too much time on politics and says he's now focusing on his private ventures. "It's not like I left the companies. It was just relative time allocation that probably was a little too high on the government side," Musk InMust Watch
Hans India
17 hours ago
- Hans India
Trump's diplomatic ambitions hit a wall across the globe
Every U.S. president believes they can reshape world affairs—and Donald Trump has always projected an even stronger sense of personal power than most of his recent predecessors. Yet as the 47th president's first four months unfold, he is finding that many of the world's major leaders are simply not intimidated. In his first term, Trump showed he could push American corporations, universities, and courts to fall in line with his agenda. But when it comes to entrenched foreign leaders, his traditional tactics of bluster and threats have backfired. Russian President Vladimir Putin, for example, has openly defied Trump's calls to end Russia's war in Ukraine. Instead of cowering, Russian media portray Trump as a loudmouth who always backs down when pressed for real consequences. Trump's hopes of forcing China to capitulate after their bruising trade war have also fallen flat. Beijing's leadership, confident in their own system, refused to yield. U.S. officials now confess frustration that China has not honored the trade concessions it once agreed to—illustrating that an authoritarian government need not bend to threats of tariffs. Europe, too, has resisted Trump's pressure tactics. When he revived tariffs on European goods, Brussels threatened retaliatory measures. Eventually, the U.S. relented. Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong even coined the mocking acronym 'TACO' (Trump Always Chickens Out) to describe the president's pattern of making big threats and then retreating. Trump likely expected Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to fall in line as he did during Trump's first term, when the American president granted nearly every demand Israel made. But today's distorted dynamics in the Middle East have frustrated Trump's effort to mediate Gaza's conflict. Netanyahu's grip on power relies on a protracted Gaza war, making any premature ceasefire politically dangerous for him. Likewise, Trump's aspirations to negotiate a new Iranian nuclear deal clash with Israel's plans to strike Iran's nuclear facilities while the regime is still weakened—and unwilling to negotiate. Many of these world leaders pursue their own long-term interests on schedules that do not align with America's more transactional approach. Strongmen like Putin, Xi Jinping, and even Netanyahu have little incentive to yield to personal pleas that promise no obvious payoff. Trump's public humiliations of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office—and of South African President Cyril Ramaphosa before that—have only made those leaders wary of granting him leverage. A détente with the world's strongmen simply cannot hinge on the lure of a future White House photo op. During Trump's campaign, he repeatedly touted his 'very good relationship' with Putin and Xi as if it would magically resolve seemingly intractable conflicts. Yet his experience echoes that of his predecessors. President George W. Bush once believed he could 'see into Putin's soul' and use personal chemistry to alter Russia's course. That effort collapsed in 2014 when Putin annexed Crimea. President Barack Obama, meanwhile, dismissed Russia as a 'regional power,' only to watch Moscow reassert itself on the world stage. Both men discovered that authoritarian leaders do not bend to flattery or moral high ground. And even President Joe Biden's claim that 'America is back' after Trump's first term has dwindled into nostalgia for a post–World War II international order. Four years into his administration, Biden's bid for a second term has faltered, leaving many allies uncertain whether U.S. influence will endure. Now Trump has returned, eager to reclaim America's dominance, but his 'America First' populism risks eroding the very alliances and institutions that made the United States so powerful. In his first months back in office, Trump has threatened tariffs, teased territorial expansion into Canada and Greenland, and slashed global aid budgets. Yet so far, China, Russia, Israel, and even Canada appear unmoved—calculating that defying Trump carries little political cost. His ferocious rhetoric may win headlines, but it has done little to bend world leaders to his will. Instead, Trump's brash approach is undermining U.S. soft power—its ability to persuade by example rather than coercion—and revealing the limits of presidential omnipotence on the global stage.
